Nurses' action over trans colleague using changing rooms to be heard in autumn
A group of nurses who are challenging their health trust's policy over allowing a trans colleague to use the female changing rooms at work are to have their case heard at an employment tribunal in the autumn.
The eight nurses are taking action against County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust after a colleague, Rose Henderson, who was born male but who identifies as a woman, was allowed to use the women's changing facilities at Darlington Memorial Hospital.
They have filed the claim on the grounds of sexual harassment, discrimination, victimisation and breaches of the right to a private life, under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Seven of the nurses were at a preliminary hearing at Newcastle Tribunal Centre on Wednesday, where a judge considered an application by the trust to delay the hearing from its trial date of June.
Tribunal Judge Stuart Robinson said: 'These are important proceedings.
'The issues are complex.'
The trust claimed a postponement was necessary to allow more time for an internal investigation to be completed.
Judge Robinson said the hearings will take four weeks, not the original estimate of three, given around 30 witnesses are expected to give evidence.
He scheduled the case to be heard from October 20.
Ahead of the hearing, nurse Bethany Hutchison said outside court: 'We are nurses who love our jobs and our patients and only want to be afforded the dignity of getting dressed and undressed for work without a man present.
'I would like to remind everyone that we are doing this for the safety and dignity of every woman and girl across society and that we will continue to fight these unlawful policies.
'Thank you again to our many supporters.
'We see you and hear you and are delighted to stand with you.'
The nurses are being supported by the Christian Legal Centre.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
15-05-2025
- Telegraph
NHS trust breaking law over trans row, says Royal College of Nursing
An NHS trust at the centre of a trans changing room row has been accused of breaking the law by not providing single-sex facilities. The Royal College of Nursing (RCN) accused the County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust of breaching workplace health and safety law by not prohibiting a trans nurse from using female changing rooms. The union intervened amid a legal battle between the trust and eight of its nurses, who are opposing its decision to allow Rose Henderson, who was born male, to use women-only facilities. In a letter seen by The Telegraph, the RCN in March pointed to the Workplace (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1992, which require all changing rooms to be male or female-only except when they are 'single lockable rooms'. 'The RCN expects the trust to comply with these statutory provisions and provide single-sex changing rooms without delay,' the letter reads. The nurses are suing the NHS trust for sexual discrimination and sexual harassment after Henderson was permitted to use a female changing room. The nurse, who was born male, lives as a woman but does not have a gender recognition certificate (GRC) and therefore has not legally changed sex. Changing in converted office The eight nurses, who have formed the Darlington Nurses Union (DNU), have been forced to change in a converted office since they first raised concerns about the situation in 2023. The nurses, who are being supported by the Christian Legal Centre, were initially told by hospital bosses they needed to be 're-educated, broaden their mindset and become more inclusive'. In the RCN's letter, Sarah Dodsworth, the union's northern regional director, told the NHS trust to change the gender-critical nurses' changing room into a third 'gender-neutral changing space'. That would then allow the nurses to return to the female-only changing room. 'It would seem reasonable that the alternative changing room provision that some women are currently using, would be the obvious choice for a gender neutral changing space,' Ms Dodsworth wrote. 'It is our understanding that the above provisions outweigh any local or national guidance regarding the issue,' the letter said. The following week, the trust republished its 'transitioning in the workplace policy' without any changes to policies allowing transgender women to change in female changing rooms. Bethany Hutchison, president of the DNU, said the trust had not complied with the RCN's letter. 'The law is the law' 'We appreciate the letter from the Royal College of Nursing, but it has been a month now and there has been no sign of any action, quite the opposite in fact,' she said. 'We recognise how captured the NHS has been by extreme Stonewall policies, but unfortunately the law is the law. There can be no excuses for any further dragging of feet.' The RCN's intervention in the Darlington case was made before the Supreme Court ruled that transgender women were not legally women. Andrea Williams, chief executive of the Christian Legal Centre, added: 'NHS Trusts must now revise policies that have prioritised gender identity over biological reality often at the expense of female staff and patients.' The tribunal is due to be heard in Newcastle-upon-Tyne in October.
Daily Mail
12-05-2025
- Daily Mail
Charlie Gard's grieving mother launches legal fight to lift life-long gagging order to keep identities of the doctors in his case secret
Almost eight years after baby Charlie Gard 's death, his mother has launched a legal fight to lift a life-long gagging order keeping the identities of the doctors involved in his case secret. Connie Yates, 39, hopes to overturn the injunction, which threatens prison for anyone who dares to 'publish or reveal' the names of the Great Ormond Street Hospital clinicians. Charlie, who suffered from mitochondrial depletion syndrome, died after they blocked his transfer to a US hospital for a pioneering treatment. 'The injunction is so restrictive that it prevents me from making a complaint to the General Medical Council about the clinicians as I would be revealing their identities,' Ms Yates told the Mail. 'I would have to wait for the Supreme Court to finally discharge it before I could do anything.' The boy's mother, who is supported by the Christian Legal Centre, says the order imposed in 2017 has 'silenced' her for years. She spoke of feeling guilt at having not reported those involved in Charlie's case, who she feels may have breached GMC standards while giving evidence on behalf of the NHS in the high-profile case. Its rules state that medical professionals must 'give an objective, unbiased opinion' and that evidence must not be 'misleading'. Ms Yates and Charlie's father, Chris Gard, had wanted their son to have a pioneering treatment called nucleoside bypass therapy and had raised £1.3million to transfer him to a US hospital that had agreed to take him. However, doctors said that Charlie's degenerative condition was irreversible, and that his life support should be switched off to allow him to die with dignity. His parents took their fight to the European Court of Human Rights but made the decision to end the case after an MRI scan revealed he had deteriorated and lost 90 per cent of his muscle mass. Charlie was taken off life-support and died on July 28, 2017, days before his first birthday. 'Clinicians were able to hide behind anonymity and say that it was in Charlie's 'best interests' to die rather than to pursue specialist treatment which we as parents wanted,' Ms Yates said. 'It is difficult to put into words what it is like... to be silenced and threatened with being criminalised if you speak about the people condemning your child to die.' Her legal bid follows a Supreme Court ruling last month in the case of two other families - the Abbasis and Haastrups - saying life-long orders in such cases may only be granted in exceptional circumstances to protect an individual based on 'compelling evidence' of 'a real and continuing threat of a serious nature'. Ms Yates's legal team has written to Great Ormond Street, saying this shows the injunction must be 'discharged immediately'.
Telegraph
11-05-2025
- Telegraph
Sharing changing room with trans colleague brought back child abuse memories, nurse says
Following the encounter, Ms Danson was forced to take time off work and when she did return, she began getting changed in a lavatory. Her trauma was compounded when she was admitted to Darlington Memorial Hospital for a minor gynaecological operation, only to discover Rose was scheduled to be involved. She said: 'It is difficult to put into words how I felt. I immediately knew this was ethically wrong and that my condition would be made worse and more painful with the stress it would cause.' But when she raised the matter with the theatre manager and suggested it was inappropriate, she claims she was told: 'But Rose is a woman.' She was initially given the choice of cancelling her surgery, trying to get it done at another hospital, or allowing Rose to be part of the operation. But after raising the matter with the Patient Advisory and Liaison Service (PALS), Rose was eventually removed from the operation. She said: 'I believed this was purely vindictive and demonstrated how low they were prepared to go. Gender identity was placed above patient and staff care. 'They tried to punish me for the legal case I was part of and for opposing gender identity policy within the hospital.' Decision to go public Ms Danson said she had decided to go public about her ordeal in order to 'reclaim her voice' and reiterate why she and her colleagues believe the policy is wrong. The nurses, who are being supported by the Christian Legal Centre, were initially told by hospital bosses they needed to be 're-educated, broaden their mindset and become more inclusive'. She went on: 'I love my job on the day care unit and making people feel better. I am there to be an emotional support to patients and to help take the pain away. 'I am telling my story now because it feels right. I am aghast at how the Trust has ignored what I have been through and placed gender identity ideology above a woman who has experienced child abuse at the hands of a man. 'Institutions pushing this ideology need to understand what many women are carrying around with them. We cannot 'compromise' or 'be more inclusive.' We shouldn't have to be brave and go through the courts and have our livelihoods threatened. 'I found my voice. It was taken away from me as a child. We are survivors, not victims, and our voices need to be heard to help and inspire other people. 'I would encourage other women, whether you are working in the NHS, the police, or wherever: don't suffer in silence. Don't allow this dangerous ideology to make you believe you have done something wrong. Raise your voice and don't be afraid.' Bethany Hutchison, a Darlington nurse and president of the Darlington Nursing Union, said: 'How Karen has been treated has been appalling and totally unacceptable. Sadly, however, we are no longer surprised. 'The Trust is prepared to defend a policy that allows men to access female changing rooms, at all costs. Women's dignity and safety has been completely trampled over.' Andrea Williams, chief executive of the Christian Legal Centre, said: 'Karen's trauma—rooted in childhood abuse—was cruelly reawakened in a place where she should have felt safe: the nurses' changing room. 'The Trust showed not a shred of compassion for her. Instead, they clung to a harmful ideological policy—one that elevated transgender identity over a woman's lived trauma and need for dignity and protection.'
