logo
Trump's deals don't help the US, but you can profit anyway

Trump's deals don't help the US, but you can profit anyway

The National2 days ago

Since my previous column detailing US President Donald Trump's tariff illogic, two US trade 'deals' plus talks have materialised. Many pundits point to these as 'proof' that Mr Trump's tariff chaos is solely leverage for deal making and freer trade ahead.
Slow down. While no one can read Mr Trump's mind, don't overstate his talk or actions' positive impacts. Endless tariff flip-flopping chiefly fans rising uncertainty, which stocks always hate – hurting America worst. Let me show you – and where to uncover opportunities.
First, you may not believe it, but stocks are intermediate and longer-term truthtellers, particularly big moves and spreads. Through May 23, non-US stocks returned 13.7 per cent this year in USD. China's gained 16.3 per cent, Europe 19.6 per cent and Mexico 29.1 per cent! Booming! And the US's S&P 500? Down 1 per cent. Striking lag!
Seen differently: Of the 47 MSCI All-Country World Index (ACWI) countries, America's return fell from first over 2023-2024 to 43rd this year. A stunning shift.
What happened? Mr Trump's on, off, back and forth whipsawing vacillations made funds flee America. Tariffs always hammer the imposing country most.
Stocks know attempts to reduce trade deficits are senseless. A trade deficit means a capital account surplus by definition – that capital is foreign investment into America. Why is reversing that desirable? Why is the government intervening on prior successes – versus letting free markets sort out the most efficient use of capital – positive? How is policy that changes on a whim good?
Stocks know it is bad. Stocks' truth-telling shows you exactly that. Markets weigh reality, not efforts aimed at discerning Mr Trump's 'true' goals.
What 'deals' have emerged since April 9? Looking past Mr Trump's boastful bluster, only two materialised – Britain and China. Both are fluff. Britain's is a one-year, non-binding, cancellable agreement to mitigate a few tariffs until a full trade deal can happen – maybe. A deal to make a deal! It affects only a handful of industries. Crucially, Mr Trump's 10 per cent tariff remains on most UK goods.
The China deal impresses, but only because expectations were incredibly low. Yes, it cuts 145 per cent tariffs on Chinese goods to 30 per cent, while China dropped retaliatory levies from 125 per cent to 10 per cent. Yet it lasts only 90 days – buying time – another deal to make a deal! Plus, tariffs on China remain 30 percentage points higher than in January. Both countries remain impaired, especially the US.
Then, on May 16, Mr Trump boasted 150 nations now sought 'deals'. Flip-flopping again, he says there isn't time to negotiate them. His 'solution?' Simply telling nations 'soon' what rates they must pay – and perhaps offering chances to appeal.
Didn't he already do just that on April 2's 'Liberation Day?' How did that work? Badly! How will this work? Will rates be higher or lower than after April 2? He hasn't said, further fanning uncertainty.
Days later, he threatened the EU with new 50 per cent tariffs – and 25 per cent on Apple products – only to flip again days later, postponing EU tariffs through July 9 after plans to fast-track trade talks emerged.
Does this show Mr Trump's talk and actions are somehow clever? That he plays 4D chess while we all play checkers? No! No one wins from crazy vacillations or the higher tariff 'deals' so far delivered.
Meanwhile, legal challenges to Mr Trump's tariffs progress maybe killing some of this. And maybe real deals come, actually lowering trade barriers and uncertainty – a huge potential upside. Maybe not.
But as my last column said, even if all tariffs return, the pain will be less than feared – bullish.
Importers can readily skirt America's understaffed, overwhelmed tariff-collecting Customs and Border Protection staff through illegal and legal means.
The latter include 'tariff splitting' – stripping out services-related costs like marketing to reduce goods' values – or storing imports in bonded warehouses. Or shipping in values under $800, skipping tariffs. And myriad illegal ways like misclassifying and undervaluing goods.
Exporters can 'tranship' or re-export through lower tariff nations. Hence, China's April exports grew despite shipments to America tumbling 21 per cent. South-east Asia absorbed the difference – shipping them on. This drove surges in April re-exports to America – like Singapore's 113 per cent year-on-year spike! Vietnam and Taiwan enjoy similar surges.
Manufacturers can even reship through Canada or Mexico, gaming the United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement tariff exemption. Chinese middlemen advertise such services on TikTok!
Hence, while Uncle Sam's April total tariff collections rose, they missed administration forecasts by 75 per cent. That will persist.
The good news? Tariff fear exceeds reality, especially outside America. That is bull market fuel – helping non-US stocks maintain their leadership, particularly in Canadian, Chinese and Mexican markets – and in Europe, as I predicted on February 3.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US vetoes UN Security Council resolution demanding full humanitarian access to Gaza
US vetoes UN Security Council resolution demanding full humanitarian access to Gaza

The National

timean hour ago

  • The National

US vetoes UN Security Council resolution demanding full humanitarian access to Gaza

The US vetoed a UN Security Council resolution on Wednesday demanding an 'immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire' in Gaza and full humanitarian access, as aid groups warn of famine-like conditions in the enclave after months of war. The resolution received 14 votes in favour, with only the US opposing it. The draft resolution, proposed by the 10 non-permanent council members, also urged the 'immediate lifting of all restrictions' on humanitarian aid into Gaza, ensuring safe and large-scale distribution throughout the besieged enclave. Washington's veto blocked the measure, which required at least nine "yes" votes and no vetoes from the five permanent members – the US, Russia, China, Britain or France – to pass. The veto is the first by Washington since US President Donald Trump took office in January. And it's the fifth draft resolution on the Gaza war vetoed by the US since the conflict started in October 2023. The Security Council has struggled to act on the conflict, with previous ceasefire attempts also failing. 'US opposition to this resolution should come as no surprise,' acting US Charge D'Affaires Dorothy Shea told Council members. 'It is unacceptable for what it does say. it is unacceptable for what it does not say, and it is unacceptable for the manner in which it has been advanced." She stressed that the United States has been clear that it would not support 'any measure that fails to condemn Hamas and does not call for Hamas to disarm and leave Gaza." "We cannot allow the Security Council to reward Hamas is intransigence,' she added. The text, drafted by Slovenia alongside Algeria and Guyana, repeated the council's demand for the 'immediate, dignified and unconditional release of all hostages held by Hamas and other groups". 'It was never our intention to provoke a veto,' Slovenia's ambassador to the UN, Samuel Zbogar, told council members. 'We were aware of different positions inside the council. This is why the draft resolution had only one focus, a humanitarian one." Mr Zbogar called on the council to 'unite around this urgent demand for unimpeded humanitarian access and for food to be delivered to starving civilians'. Starving civilians and inflicting immense suffering is inhumane, he argued, and against international law. 'No war objective can justify such action,' he said. '14 votes in favour however carries a strong message. Enough of suffering of civilians. Enough of food being used as a weapon. Enough is enough is enough.' Israel has come under mounting international pressure to halt its war in Gaza, a conflict sparked by Hamas's October 7, 2023, attack on Israeli soil. Criticism has intensified over the chaotic aid distribution in Gaza, where Israel imposed a complete blockade for over two months before permitting a limited number of UN aid vehicles to enter in mid-May. The amount of aid Israel has authorised to enter Gaza amounts to 'a teaspoon', when a flood of humanitarian assistance is needed, UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres said last month. Meanwhile, the US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Fund (GHF) has faced backlash for allegedly violating established aid principles by coordinating relief efforts with a military party to the conflict. The war, now in its 20th month, has killed more than 54,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza authorities. The Palestinian militant group Hamas is still holding 58 hostages taken during the October 7 attacks. About a third are believed to still be alive.

UAE-backed GlobalFoundries plans $16bn investment to expand US semiconductor manufacturing
UAE-backed GlobalFoundries plans $16bn investment to expand US semiconductor manufacturing

The National

time3 hours ago

  • The National

UAE-backed GlobalFoundries plans $16bn investment to expand US semiconductor manufacturing

US-based semiconductor manufacturer GlobalFoundries, owned by Abu Dhabi's Mubadala Investment Company, announced plans on Wednesday to invest $16 billion to expand semiconductor manufacturing and advanced packaging in the states of New York and Vermont. According to a news release from the UAE-backed company, it is collaborating with Apple, SpaceX, AMD, Qualcomm, NXP and General Motors on the project. 'These companies partner with GlobalFoundries to support their production of US-made chips, underscoring GF's role as a trusted supplier of essential semiconductors and a key enabler of supply chain security,' the company said. According to GlobalFoundries, the investment announcement is the result of work with President Donald Trump's administration as well as 'support from leading technology companies aiming to onshore critical components of their supply chain'. Apple chief executive Tim Cook, noting that GlobalFoundries has supplied the Cupertino-based technology giant with chips since 2010, welcomed the investment announcement. 'We're excited to see them expand right here in the US and these chips are an essential part of Apple products like iPhone, and they're a powerful example of American manufacturing leadership,' he said. General Motors president Mark Reuss also spoke highly of the investment, reflecting on its potential to safeguard the US supply chain. 'Semiconductors are critical to the future of vehicles, and their importance will only grow,' he said. 'GlobalFoundries' investment supports our work to secure a reliable, US-based chip supply – essential for delivering the safety, infotainment and features our customers expect.' The investment plans come weeks after UAE President Sheikh Mohamed and Mr Trump witnessed the unveiling of plans for a new 5GW UAE-US AI Campus in Abu Dhabi during the US leader's visit to the Emirates in May. The campus will include five gigawatts of capacity for AI data centres in Abu Dhabi, providing a regional platform from which US hyperscalers will be able to offer latency-friendly services to nearly half of the population living within 3,200km of the UAE. The AI campus came after months of consternation from US technology companies and UAE officials concerned about new chip export policies announced during the final days of former president Joe Biden's administration. Critics of the policy feels it put an unfair ceiling on the UAE's peaceful AI aspirations, yet with the announcement of the AI campus, experts have said that the worries over chip access have largely subsided. During a congressional hearing on Wednesday, Senator Christopher Coons told Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick he was concerned that the recently announced deal would put the US at risk of being dependent on the Middle East for computing capacity. Mr Lutnick, who called the GlobalFoundries investment an example of a return to US manufacturing of semiconductors, said he agreed that more than half of compute must be done on US shores. 'The deal with the UAE said if you buy a significant number of chips, you will invest in America to build data centres in America for an equal amount of chips. So that investment must be dual there and here,' Mr Lutnick told politicians during the hearing. As for the GlobalFoundries investment, the company's chief executive Tim Breen hailed what it would mean for the US. 'With all these technologies and more manufactured right here in the US, GlobalFoundries is proud to play its part in accelerating America's semiconductor leadership.'

US senator demands answers after report claims X enables terrorist-linked financial transactions
US senator demands answers after report claims X enables terrorist-linked financial transactions

The National

time3 hours ago

  • The National

US senator demands answers after report claims X enables terrorist-linked financial transactions

Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren, a heavy critic of the tech tycoon Elon Musk, is demanding an investigation into X, following claims the social media platform has enabled terrorist groups to carry out financial transactions. The claims were made in a report titled "US-Sanctioned Terrorists Enjoy Premium Boost on X", released in May by the Tech Transparency Project (TTP), a non-profit and non-partisan research organisation covering technology companies. 'I write with deep concern about recent investigative reporting that X is helping US-sanctioned terrorists engage in financial transactions and facilitating their ability to raise funds, including through the use of cryptocurrencies,' she said in a letter to US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and National Security Adviser Marco Rubio. If the reports are true, Ms Warren said that X and Mr Musk are potentially endangering the safety of US citizens. She also warned that, if not corrected, the risks could grow if extremist groups 'create their own stablecoins, as proposed by the Genius Act', she said, referring to a specific type of cryptocurrency that is pegged to a fiat currency. In her letter, Ms Warren alleges that the Genius Act – a keenly awaited bill that seeks to create a regulatory apparatus for stablecoins – contains a loophole that would allow companies like X to issue their own cryptocurrency. 'If tech platforms are not abiding by Office of Foreign Asset Control restrictions and the Treasury Department is not enforcing them, the Genius Act as drafted will turbocharge sanctions evasion and other illicit activity,' she warned. Even though policies listed by X claim that premium services such as verification are not available to entities under US sanctions, an Al Qaeda adviser, a Hezbollah founder, the head of an Iraqi militia group and a top Houthi official who recently lashed out at the 'criminal Trump' were all granted premium, verified status, according to TTP. 'Several made use of revenue-generating features offered by X, including a button for tips,' the organisation's report said. The group levelled similar accusations against Mr Musk's platform last year. According to the organisation, X quickly removed the verification checkmarks from various terrorist accounts following the original report, yet little enforcement has taken place in the months since. 'X's clean-up effort appears to have been short-lived,' the report read. 'TTP's new investigation found an array of blue checkmark accounts for US-sanctioned individuals and organisations, including several that appeared to simply re-subscribe to premium service or create new accounts after their old ones were restricted or removed by X.' Despite increasing enthusiasm over the last decade, criticism and scepticism still abounds over crypto, which, unlike fiat currencies, lacks an overall regulatory apparatus and is mostly decentralised, making it appealing to groups with malign intentions. In May, a US federal court sentenced a man to more than 30 years in prison after finding him guilty of converting $185,000 to cryptocurrency and transferring it to ISIS. Earlier in the year, an investigation originating from the FBI's field office in New Mexico led to the seizure of $201,400 in cryptocurrency assets that was intended to finance Hamas, according to unsealed court documents.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store