US senator demands answers after report claims X enables terrorist-linked financial transactions
Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren, a heavy critic of the tech tycoon Elon Musk, is demanding an investigation into X, following claims the social media platform has enabled terrorist groups to carry out financial transactions.
The claims were made in a report titled "US-Sanctioned Terrorists Enjoy Premium Boost on X", released in May by the Tech Transparency Project (TTP), a non-profit and non-partisan research organisation covering technology companies.
'I write with deep concern about recent investigative reporting that X is helping US-sanctioned terrorists engage in financial transactions and facilitating their ability to raise funds, including through the use of cryptocurrencies,' she said in a letter to US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and National Security Adviser Marco Rubio.
If the reports are true, Ms Warren said that X and Mr Musk are potentially endangering the safety of US citizens. She also warned that, if not corrected, the risks could grow if extremist groups 'create their own stablecoins, as proposed by the Genius Act', she said, referring to a specific type of cryptocurrency that is pegged to a fiat currency.
In her letter, Ms Warren alleges that the Genius Act – a keenly awaited bill that seeks to create a regulatory apparatus for stablecoins – contains a loophole that would allow companies like X to issue their own cryptocurrency.
'If tech platforms are not abiding by Office of Foreign Asset Control restrictions and the Treasury Department is not enforcing them, the Genius Act as drafted will turbocharge sanctions evasion and other illicit activity,' she warned.
Even though policies listed by X claim that premium services such as verification are not available to entities under US sanctions, an Al Qaeda adviser, a Hezbollah founder, the head of an Iraqi militia group and a top Houthi official who recently lashed out at the 'criminal Trump' were all granted premium, verified status, according to TTP. 'Several made use of revenue-generating features offered by X, including a button for tips,' the organisation's report said.
The group levelled similar accusations against Mr Musk's platform last year. According to the organisation, X quickly removed the verification checkmarks from various terrorist accounts following the original report, yet little enforcement has taken place in the months since.
'X's clean-up effort appears to have been short-lived,' the report read. 'TTP's new investigation found an array of blue checkmark accounts for US-sanctioned individuals and organisations, including several that appeared to simply re-subscribe to premium service or create new accounts after their old ones were restricted or removed by X.'
Despite increasing enthusiasm over the last decade, criticism and scepticism still abounds over crypto, which, unlike fiat currencies, lacks an overall regulatory apparatus and is mostly decentralised, making it appealing to groups with malign intentions.
In May, a US federal court sentenced a man to more than 30 years in prison after finding him guilty of converting $185,000 to cryptocurrency and transferring it to ISIS.
Earlier in the year, an investigation originating from the FBI's field office in New Mexico led to the seizure of $201,400 in cryptocurrency assets that was intended to finance Hamas, according to unsealed court documents.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Khaleej Times
an hour ago
- Khaleej Times
Trump-Musk feud: From "bromance" to a social media brawl; when did it all begin?
US President Donald Trump and X owner Elon Musk have long been close allies, with their bond or "bromance" serving as amusement to many social media users. Their affection for each other has now taken a sharp turn into an all-out clash, both using social media as their tools in a tit-for-tat exchange. So, when did it all begin? Trump's "big, beautiful" bill apparently wasn't just so beautiful to Musk. He criticised it, calling it a "disgusting abomination" on the basis that the tax-cut and spending would add even more to the nation's debt, which already reaches a staggering $36.2 trillion. In response, Trump told reporters in the Oval Office he was "very disappointed" in Musk. "Look, Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore," Trump said. Trump has also said that Musk's opposition to the bill was because of the elimination of consumer tax credits for electric vehicles. However, Musk has maintained that he does not mind cuts to the EV credits as long as Republicans rid the bill of wasteful spending. The X owner and the US President have harnessed their usual platforms to snub each other. Trump has claimed that he asked Musk to leave as the Tesla owner was "wearing thin". "I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy electric cars that nobody else wanted, and he just went crazy!", Trump posted on Truth Social. Meanwhile, Musk hit back, posting on X that the "real reason the Epstein files have not been made public" are because Trump is in them. "Have a nice day, DJT!", Elon quipped. Musk has also responded "Yes" to a post on X that said Trump should be impeached and called out the US President's "ingratitude". "Without me, Trump would have lost the election," wrote Musk, who spent nearly $300 million backing Trump and other Republicans in last year's election. Trump meanwhile, took a dig at Elon's space businesses, suggesting that "the easiest way to save money in the budget — billions and billions of dollars — is to terminate Elon's governmental subsidies and contracts." "I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!", Trump added. Musk, who owns SpaceX, said the company would "begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately" in light of Trump's statement, which would be a big blow to US space aspirations. Dragon is the only US spacecraft capable of sending astronauts to the International Space Station. The world is watching closely as these two men, both with loud opinions, clash. As the feud unfolds, conveniently written out on social media, it is yet to see how this will impact the White House, and US politics.
Gulf Business
4 hours ago
- Gulf Business
Trump and Musk battle it out over contracts, impeachment
Credit: Getty Images Donald Trump threatened on Thursday to cut off government contracts to Elon Musk 's companies and the world's richest man suggested the US president should be impeached, marking a stark end to an unlikely alliance and leaving onlookers wondering what was next. The hostilities between the former allies intensified when the president criticised Tesla CEO Musk in the Oval Office and the pair then lobbed verbal barbs at each other on their social media platforms: Trump 's Truth Social and Musk 's X. 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts,' Trump posted. Tesla shares closed down over 14 per cent on Thursday, losing about $150bn in market value in the largest single-day decline in value in its history. Minutes after the closing bell, Musk replied, 'Yes,' to a post on X saying Trump should be impeached, an unthinkable move in Congress where Trump 's Republicans hold majorities in both chambers. The trouble between the two started brewing days ago, when Musk denounced Trump 's sweeping tax-cut and spending bill. The president initially held his tongue while Musk campaigned to torpedo the bill, saying it would add too much to the nation's $36.2tn in debt. Trump broke his silence on Thursday, telling reporters he was 'very disappointed' in Musk . 'Look, Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore,' Trump said. As Trump spoke, Musk responded in real time on X. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election,' wrote Musk , who spent nearly $300m backing Trump and other Republicans in last year's election. In another post, Musk asserted that Trump 's signature tariffs would push the US into a recession later this year. Musk 's businesses also include rocket company and government contractor SpaceX and its satellite unit Starlink. Musk , whose space business plays a critical role in the U.S. government's space programme, said that as a result of Trump 's threats he would begin decommissioning SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft. Dragon is the only US spacecraft capable of sending astronauts to the International Space Station. Late on Thursday, Musk backed off the threat. And in a sign of a possible detente to come, Musk subsequently wrote: 'You're not wrong,' in response to billionaire investor Bill Ackman saying Trump and Musk should make peace.
The National
4 hours ago
- The National
Bond market is sending out distress signals, but investors don't need to panic
Investors tend to fixate on the stock market, but there are times when the bond market cries out for our attention, too. That's definitely the case today, because it's sending out distress signals. The global bond market is actually the bigger of the two, worth about $140 trillion, compared with $115 trillion for equities. And when bond yields surge, the ripple effects can shape everything from mortgage rates to stock valuations and government solvency. In recent weeks, yields on long-dated US government bonds, or Treasuries, have jumped to their highest levels since the global financial crisis. Investors are demanding more interest to lend to governments awash with debt, at a time when sticky inflation deters central bankers from slashing interest rates. Tom Stevenson, investment director at Fidelity International, said the US 30-year Treasury yield climbed above 5 per cent in May as markets recoiled at US President Donald Trump's new tax cut proposals, known as the 'Big, Beautiful Bill'. That package alone could add more than $3 trillion to US debt, which already stands at a mountainous $36 trillion. It could lift the country's debt-to-GDP ratio from about 100 per cent today to 125 per cent within a decade. 'The prospect of higher borrowing and unsustainable debt servicing costs led Moody's to downgrade the US prized triple-A credit rating. Debt interest payments, already at $880 billion a year, will rise further as a result,' Mr Stevenson says. He sees trouble ahead. 'The US has lived beyond its means thanks to strong global demand for its debt. But confidence is beginning to wane, with investors seeking to diversify elsewhere.' Vijay Valecha, chief investment officer at Century Financial in Dubai, says a similar story is unfolding elsewhere. In Japan, 30-year yields have climbed towards 3 per cent following the weakest demand in a decade. In the UK, 30-year gilt yields briefly touched 5.55 per cent as government borrowing soared. Yet at the same time, stock markets have rallied after Mr Trump paused his 'liberation day' trade tariffs on April 9, Mr Valecha says. 'US markets enjoyed a V-shaped recovery with the S&P 500 up almost 20 per cent, while the tech-focused Nasdaq rose 27 per cent.' The UK's FTSE 100 and Japan's Nikkei 225 are both trading above key technical levels, he adds. But investors shouldn't assume this will continue. 'Global government debt is rising fast, pushing 95 per cent of GDP," he says. "If this continues, debt could reach 100 per cent of GDP by the end of the decade.' Global inflation is also proving sticky, driving up interest rates and yields. That's a warning shot for stock markets. Mr Valecha flags up something called the 'equity risk premium', which measures the difference between what investors can expect from shares and the yield from lower-risk bonds. 'As bond yields rise that gap gets smaller, it becomes harder to justify paying high prices for shares, especially when valuations are already stretched.' The equity rally may continue but it will be bumpier, and careful stock picking is required, Mr Valecha says. Near-zero interest rates Near-zero interest rates allowed governments to borrow freely in the past decade, but that era is now over, says Charu Chanana, chief investment strategist at Saxo Bank. 'Rising sovereign debt is arguably one of the most underappreciated long-term risks to global financial stability.' If interest rates remain elevated, this could crowd out public investment, put pressure on social spending and, ultimately, reduce economic dynamism, she says. High debt levels also suppress growth, which fuels more borrowing in a vicious cycle. 'The fiscal space to respond to future crises is being eroded,' Ms Chanana says. The risk is amplified in emerging markets, many of which have borrowed heavily in US dollars, making debt harder to service if their currencies weaken. Corporate earnings remain resilient but the equity rally may have run its course, she says. 'Further equity upside may require either stronger earnings growth or a clearer path towards monetary easing.' While cash and bonds offer short-term comfort, don't overdo the flight to safety. Ms Chanana warns that higher inflation will chip away at the real return. 'Increased exposure to cash or bonds may not be sufficient to preserve or grow wealth over the long term.' Instead, she favours a diversified approach. 'Equities, particularly those tied to structural themes like AI and digital infrastructure, continue to offer compelling growth opportunities.' While gold has stood bright as a hedge against inflation and economic and political volatility, it also has one big drawback as yields rise – it doesn't pay interest or dividends. Higher yields increase the opportunity cost of holding gold, but that hasn't deterred investors yet, with the price up 26 per cent this year. 'Gold still plays a strategic role as a hedge against systemic risk, currency debasement and geopolitical uncertainty,' Ms Chanana says. Should investors turn back to bonds? Tony Hallside, chief executive of Dubai-based brokers STP Partners, agrees that gold still has a role to play in a diversified portfolio but suggests rebalancing towards high-quality fixed income. 'Investment-grade bonds, especially with shorter durations, provide attractive yields while preserving capital. They offer stability and liquidity when markets turn turbulent." 'That doesn't mean abandon stocks entirely, but it does mean being more selective." Amol Shitole, head of fixed income at Mashreq Capital, sees an opportunity in emerging market bonds, particularly in the Middle East and North Africa. Mena bonds continue to enjoy haven status due to their superior credit quality, he says. 'We favour the UAE, Qatar, Oman and Morocco for their strong fundamentals and ongoing structural reforms.' He says Mashreq remains underweight on Saudi Arabia and Bahrain, citing fiscal risks and tight valuations. He doesn't expect US yields to spiral uncontrollably. 'We believe US Treasuries will continue to benefit from flight-to-safety demand during slowdowns or uncertainty.' In equities, he sees opportunities in small caps and value stocks, particularly as higher interest rates pressure growth sectors. 'A well-diversified multi-asset portfolio including equities, fixed income, gold and alternatives can yield attractive returns of 7 per cent to 7.5 per cent a year.' There is little prospect of a return to ultra-low interest rates, but at least this means bond investors are being rewarded gain. Equity investors must be more careful, but strong companies still offer solid long-term value. Gold remains a valid hedge. As ever, diversification is the best defence.
