Kenyan president approves new officials to head elections body
The East African nation's next general election will be held in 2027, but Ruto is already under pressure from street protests led by young Kenyans dissatisfied with high living costs, corruption and police brutality.
The new chairman and six commissioners appointed to the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission will serve for the next four years, according to the notice issued late on Thursday. They were due to be sworn in on Friday.
Ruto suspended four election commissioners in December 2022 after they rejected his victory in elections held earlier that year. The dispute proceeded to the Supreme Court, which upheld Ruto's win and rejected the commissioners' arguments that the vote tallying process had been opaque.
The commission had been operating without a chairperson or commissioners since 2023, when the terms of the former chairman and the two remaining commissioners expired.
The appointment of new election commissioners, who are chosen by an interview panel and then submitted to the president for approval, had been delayed in part due to several legal petitions, which a high court dismissed on Thursday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
6 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Supreme Court hands Trump another major victory in his quest to resume 1,400 mass firings at top agency
The Supreme Court on Monday voted to allow President Donald Trump to continue his effort to fire 1,400 federal employees at the Department of Education. In a 6-3 ruling, the Supreme Court, with three liberal justices dissenting, paused an order from a U.S. District judge who issued a preliminary injunction to reverse the layoffs in the department. Trump's Secretary of Education Linda McMahon hailed the ruling as an 'obvious' decision from the court, citing the president's authority to control cabinet agencies in the executive branch. 'Today, the Supreme Court again confirmed the obvious: the President of the United States, as the head of the Executive Branch, has the ultimate authority to make decisions about staffing levels, administrative organization, and day-to-day operations of federal agencies,' McMahon said in a statement. Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote the dissent, warning that the judiciary had a responsibly to check the executive branch from breaking the law. 'When the Executive publicly announces its intent to break the law, and then executes on that promise, it is the Judiciary's duty to check that lawlessness, not expedite it,' Sotomayor wrote. Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson and Elena Kagan joined her dissent. In March, the Departmnet of Education announced their decision to cut nearly 1,400 employees from the agency, nearly half of the agency's staff, and terminating leases on buildings in several major American cities. McMahon defended her decision to cut the positions from her department, as part of President Donald Trump's overall goal to shut down the federal agency and return federal funding to the states. She described the cuts as the 'first step of eliminating of what I think is bureaucratic bloat' in a recent interview with Fox News host Laura Ingraham. 'When I got there, I said, "Okay we have to identify where the bloat is where the bureaucracy is and start there,"' she recalled. McMahon famously closed federal education buildings, as workers found themselves unable to go to work as they waited to find out the future of their job at the department. McMahon's bold decision was blocked by U.S. District Judge Myong Joun, an appointee of Democratic former President Joe Biden, who ruled in May that the firings would 'cripple the department' and ordered affected workers to be reinstated. Trump appointed McMahon, former CEO of the WWE, as the department secretary as he wanted a tough business person who could cut and reform the agency. 'Linda, I hope you do a great job and put yourself out of a job,' Trump recalled telling her, when he selected her for the position. At one point, the Department of Education employed over 4,000 employees and has a budget of $80 billion. Trump's efforts to slash the agency has earned sharp rebuke from federal teacher's unions, who continue to challenge the decision.
The Guardian
6 hours ago
- The Guardian
US supreme court allows Trump to resume gutting education department
The US supreme court on Monday cleared the way for Donald Trump's administration to resume dismantling the Department of Education as part of his bid to shrink the federal government's role in education in favor of more control by the states. In the latest high court win for the president, the justices lifted a federal judge's order that had reinstated nearly 1,400 workers affected by mass layoffs at the department and blocked the administration from transferring key functions to other federal agencies. A legal challenge is continuing to play out in lower courts. The court's action came in a brief, unsigned order. Its three liberal justices dissented. A group of 21 Democratic attorneys general, school districts and unions behind a pair of legal challenges had warned in court papers that Trump's shutdown efforts threatened to impair the department's ability to perform its core duties. Created by Congress in 1979, the Department of Education's main roles include administering college loans, tracking student achievement and enforcing civil rights in schools. It also provides federal funding for needy districts and to help students with disabilities. Federal law prohibits the department from controlling school operations including curriculum, instruction and staffing. Authority over these decisions belongs to state and local governments, which provide more than 85% of public school funding. The department's Republican critics have portrayed the department as a symbol of bureaucratic waste, underlining the need for smaller federal government in favor of greater state power. In March, Trump sought to deliver on a campaign promise to conservatives by calling for the department's closure. 'We're going to be returning education, very simply, back to the states where it belongs,' Trump said on 20 March before signing an executive order to close the department to the 'maximum extent' allowed by law. Trump said that certain 'core necessities' would be preserved, including Pell grants to students from lower-income families and federal funding for disadvantaged students and children with special needs, though he said those functions would be redistributed to other agencies and departments. Trump in March directed that the department transfer its $1.6tn student loan portfolio to the Small Business Administration and its special education services to the Department of Health and Human Services. Although formally eliminating the department would require an act of Congress, the downsizing announced in March by US education secretary Linda McMahon aimed to slash the department's staff to roughly half the size it was when Trump took office in January. Sign up to This Week in Trumpland A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration after newsletter promotion Boston-based US district judge Myong Joun, an appointee of Democratic former president Joe Biden, concluded in a 22 May ruling that the mass firings would 'likely cripple the department'. He ordered the affected workers to be reinstated and also blocked the administration's plan to hand off department functions to other federal agencies. The plaintiffs, Joun wrote, are 'likely to succeed in showing that defendants are effectively disabling the department from carrying out its statutory duties by firing half of its staff, transferring key programs out of the department, and eliminating entire offices and programs'. The Boston-based first US circuit court of appeals on 4 June rejected the Trump administration's request to pause the injunction issued by the judge. In a court filing asking the supreme court to lift Joun's order, the justice department accused him of judicial overreach. The plaintiffs warned that mass firings at the department could delay the disbursement of federal aid for low-income schools and students with special needs, prompting shortfalls that might require cutting programs or teaching staff. They also argued in court papers that Trump's shutdown effort would undermine efforts to curb discrimination in schools, analyze and disseminate critical data on student performance, and assist college applicants seeking financial aid.
The Independent
6 hours ago
- The Independent
Trump handed boost over major Department of Education plans
The US Supreme Court has permitted the Trump administration to proceed with mass layoffs within the Department of Education. This decision overturns a Massachusetts judge's ruling that had previously blocked the administration from dismissing over 1,300 employees. The court did not provide a reason for its decision, which is typical for emergency docket orders, and it marks another win for the administration in expanding executive authority. Three liberal justices dissented, with Justice Sonia Sotomayor arguing that the layoffs would cause untold harm to educational opportunities and civil rights enforcement. The layoffs are part of President Trump's broader objective to dismantle the Department of Education, an agency primarily responsible for financial aid and enforcing civil rights laws in schools.
