New S.F. data is most detailed yet on how long it takes to move through city's notorious permit process
That's according to new data compiled by the Planning Department and the Department of Building Inspection, which is published in a new dashboard tracking the processes as part of Mayor Daniel Lurie's PermitSF initiative. The effort aims to simplify the city's notoriously long and often convoluted permitting process.
The dashboard includes two main components: one tracks the median number of days it takes to get through the entire planning or building process, and the other breaks down how long the planning and building departments each take to complete their steps in the process.
Together, the dashboard and underlying data provide more transparency into San Francisco's permitting process than previously existed.
Using the data, a Chronicle analysis found that the time it takes to approve a project or issue a permit has sped up in recent years. Michelle Reynolds, a spokesperson for PermitSF, noted that the city made 'significant changes' to the planning and building review processes starting in January 2024, in response to state law as well as local changes under former Mayor London Breed.
The time spent in both planning and building dropped after those changes were implemented, the data show. Planning approval plummeted from a median of 222 to 133 days, and building went from a median of 258 to 209. So far this year, the median times are on track to be even faster.
Within the process, each step now has its own target for how long it's supposed to take — a metric dubbed the 'shot clock' in a press release from Lurie's administration. Such goals 'make the process more predictable for homeowners and businesses' and hold departments accountable for any delays, the release said. The target times went into effect this month.
So far, according to the dashboard, the city seems to be faring well: Over the last year, though the targets had not yet been set, the building department completed tasks within the target window most of the time, and the planning department only missed its target for resubmission reviews.
Still, that doesn't mean that all projects and permits are suddenly sailing through: In both the planning and the building departments, nearly 30% of permits took longer than the target 30 days to get through a first review. Missed target times will be incorporated into staff performance plans, according to Lurie's office.
The metrics don't measure any time spent on required pre-application neighborhood outreach, which can add significant delays to projects. Michelle Reynolds, a spokesperson for PermitSF, noted that in July 2023, the city removed the pre-application requirement for most projects, although some bigger projects, like new construction or additions over a certain size still need it.
Additionally, the total time metric for planning approval does not include checking whether the application is complete, a process that can take multiple rounds of submittals to the city. That metric is measured, however, in the planning department's 'shot clock' dashboard, with a target time of 21 days.
The new data also reveal how long permits spend at each 'review station,' or city departments that need to check various permits for safety and code compliance.
While the complexity of what each department must review varies with each project, some hit the city's new targets more often than others. A number of stations fell behind in the first review stage, which is when a plan is first checked for compliance (the city sets a 30-day target for these), but most hit the target for rechecks, or reviews of plans that have been revised, over the last year (a 14-day target).
Of departments that completed at least 200 reviews from May 2024 and through April 2025, only one missed the target on most projects for both first reviews and rechecks: the Bureau of Urban Forestry, which handles permits on street trees and foliage. (Because the targets are new, the Bureau of Urban Forestry was not technically held to these targets over the 12 months ending in April, but has been starting this month.)
In an email, Chris Heredia, a spokesperson for the Bureau, said that slower response times are due to a 'staffing issue,' as inspectors, who are also tasked both with upkeep of existing city trees, can only allocate about 20% of their time to permits.
'San Franciscans want trees with new construction,' he wrote, noting that construction, and the load on inspectors, had seen an uptick. 'We don't have an adequate number of urban forestry inspectors to meet the demand.' Still, he said that review times had improved in recent months.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Asia Morning Briefing: Tokenized Assets Will Eclipse DeFi, Chronicle Founder Niklas Kunkel Says
Good Morning, Asia. Here's what's making news in the markets: Welcome to Asia Morning Briefing, a daily summary of top stories during U.S. hours and an overview of market moves and analysis. For a detailed overview of U.S. markets, see CoinDesk's Crypto Daybook the oracle infrastructure provider powering secure, scalable onchain financial data, has been named the exclusive partner to Grove Protocol, an institutional-grade credit platform with a $1 billion tokenized asset allocation strategy. Grove, part of the Sky ecosystem known as a 'Star', the name Sky uses for units in its network, launched in June with a $1 billion allocation to tokenized collateralized loan obligations such as the Janus Henderson Anemoy AAA CLO Strategy on Centrifuge, aiming to bridge DeFi and traditional credit markets by giving protocols and asset managers access to diversified, institutional-grade yields. Niklas Kunkel, Chronicle's founder, said in an interview with CoinDesk that oracles have evolved beyond their early role as simple price feeds. 'They started as general data distribution mechanisms and got really siloed into just prices for however many years, to the point where if you say Oracle to anyone in crypto, they immediately think of the thing that gives you a price,' he told CoinDesk. 'It wasn't until recently that that mold is finally being shed and people are starting to understand how important data and context can be and how that can be leveraged in a risk management type of way.' Kunkel sees tokenized assets as DeFi's next major growth engine, describing them as a 'multi-trillion dollar liquidity injection opportunity' as the sector looks beyond BTC and ETH. 'RWAs are not crypto native, so the risk management around them needs to be much more scrutinized," he continued. "Everything is not on chain, and so where oracles really fill that gap is to add that context back in, to bring that transparency back.' In Kunkel's view, the regulatory potential of oracles is just beginning to be recognized. 'In the real world, this is usually done through regulation where you need to make quarterly filings,' he said. 'But in DeFi we expect finality in the span of blocks, and once regulators actually start understanding what oracles can do, they're going to essentially become Oracle's biggest adopters, because oracles essentially become like reg tech.' This partnership marks a step in Chronicle's plan to dominate the tokenized asset oracle market, a position Kunkel believes will soon outgrow DeFi itself. Market Movers BTC: BTC is trading at $119K, up 2% in the last 24 hours. A recent JP Morgan note argued that a bullish S&P 500 outlook could lift BTC by boosting risk appetite and capital flows into speculative assets, given their historical positive correlation. ETH: ETH is trading above $4200. Bizantine Capital managing partner March Zheng said in a note to CoinDesk that the forced closure of so many ETH shorts during the past 72 hours as helped further accelerate the digital asset's rally. Gold: Gold is holding near record highs as weaker U.S. economic data, trade tensions, and a dovish Fed outlook boost demand, with upcoming inflation and retail sales data likely to shape its next move. Nikkei 225: Closed for a public holiday. Elsewhere in Crypto El Salvador's new bitcoin law signals shift from retail adoption to institutional investment (The Block) Stablecoin issuers like Circle and Tether are gobbling up more Treasuries than most countries. Here's how that could reshape the U.S. economy (Fortune) Animoca Brands and Standard Chartered Establish Stablecoin Issuer in Hong Kong (CoinDesk)
San Francisco Chronicle
2 days ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Operator of $700-per-month sleeping pods in downtown S.F. faces eviction
In San Francisco, where the average apartment rent is about $3,000 per month and millions of square feet of commercial space sit unused after the pandemic, James Stallworth saw an opportunity. Through his startup, Brownstone Shared Housing, Stallworth leased a small former bank building at 12 Mint Plaza in 2023 and converted it into dormitory-like sleeping pods, which he leased out for just $700 per month. The work to remove the bank's abandoned furniture and install the pods, each large enough to fit a twin mattress, was done without city permits. Like any eager market disruptor, the bright-eyed entrepreneur figured it paid to ask for forgiveness rather than permission. He was right — sort of. Despite emerging victorious from a nearly year-long standoff with city officials over the legality of the conversion and managing to skirt hundreds of thousands of dollars in fees once associated with the project, Brownstone is now on the verge of closing its sleeping pods at Mint Plaza for good, seemingly after failing to reach profitability. Last week, Brownstone's landlord — the Prime Company, a Kansas-based real estate developer— filed an eviction lawsuit accusing the startup of owing more than $150,000 in rent payments. The alleged debt is equal to about a year's worth of unpaid rent, according to court records, which show that Brownstone signed a year-long lease with its landlord in May 2023 and operated on a month-to-month agreement for some time following the contract's expiration. Prime Company could not be reached for comment. Stallworth, on the other hand, said he was blindsided by the news of the lawsuit. 'I wasn't aware of the unlawful detainer lawsuit until I was notified by the Chronicle. Brownstone will respond to the lawsuit, but what is clear is that the landlord wants to move on with the building empty going forward,' he said in an email on Monday. Stallworth confirmed that Brownstone currently offers 26 sleeping pods at 12 Mint Plaza, of which he said a majority are occupied. He declined to comment on whether all of Brownstone's current tenants are actively paying rent. The eviction lawsuit comes months after Stallworth and his landlord switched to a new lease contract that pivoted away from requiring the startup to make monthly rental payments, switching instead to a 'revenue sharing' model. Per the contract, which was viewed by the Chronicle, the landlord would receive 80% of all profits generated from the sleeping pods. It also stated that Brownstone was required to provide a financial report and future revenue projections on April 1 — and that the landlord retained the right to terminate the agreement if 'unsatisfied' with Brownstone's performance. The new lease was signed 'with the understanding that the landlord and Brownstone could mutually decide to end the agreement in the event the city indefinitely impaired our ability to operate again,' Stallworth said. The plan was always to house 30 people at 12 Mint Plaza. But, the city began investigating Brownstone's operations after a tenant of the building made the unconventional sleeping arrangement public on social media. The tenant's post went viral before the company could apply for a formal change of use of the commercial building with the city's Planning Department, Stallworth revealed in a blog post last year. Despite launching what Stallworth described as 'costly code enforcement cases' against his startup, the city never shut down the sleeping pods' operations. But, it did limit Brownstone's ability to rent the pods to 'new people' for some time, capping the building's occupancy at 13 tenants. The Planning Department greenlighted the building's residential conversion in October, only to rescind the approval a month later, after ruling that the project didn't meet the city's affordable housing requirements and accusing Stallworth of misrepresenting certain details of the project. At that point, Stallworth faced over $300,000 affordable housing fees, payment of which the city required from all housing developers with projects of 10 or more units. Stallworth was offered a lifeline when legislation by former Mayor London Breed exempted downtown residential conversion projects like 12 Mint Plaza from paying the onerous fees. Brownstone's sleeping pods were approved to operate again, pending final permits from the Department of Building Inspection. But those permits were never pulled, public records show. Dan Sider, the Planning Department's Chief of Staff, said the lack of permits has caused Brownstone to accrue $69,000 in penalty charges with the department to date. 'They've finally gotten the approval from our office to do the thing that they want to do. But they need evidence that this is safe,' Sider said, referring to the building permit process, which he referred to as 'straightforward and objective.' 'Our priority right now is just to help Mr. Stallworth finish this process. We'd like him to take 'yes' for an answer,' Sider said, adding that Stallworth has the option to petition for a decrease in the fines, should he stop operating at 12 Mint Plaza or address the violation. Stallworth did not comment on the outstanding permit issue, but blamed the situation with the city for putting the company in financial arrear. 'We had a lot to recover from, due to incurred costs and deferred maintenance, during the months where we were barely pulling in enough to keep the place somewhat operational,' he told the Chronicle. 'We were optimistic that we could stabilize the place given a few more months, and communicated that with the landlord, so I was surprised to learn the landlord decided to file an unlawful detainer case.' Brownstone may be preparing to decamp from Mint Plaza, but Stallworth said that he is not done with downtown San Francisco. In fact, Stallworth said that he is currently in the 'final stages' of negotiating a lease for a new, larger location nearby, which could house 100 tenants. If the new lease is signed, Stallworth said the hope is to keep the Mint Plaza pods open long enough to transfer existing residents to the new location. And this time, Stallworth said he plans to work with the city, not against it. 'We learned a lot from doing things the wrong way at Mint Plaza,' he said. 'We are glad we stayed open though, because we have seen the benefits of rapidly creating housing from empty buildings downtown … to stop now just because we may have accrued some rental debt in the process would be a disservice to our residents and the city.'
San Francisco Chronicle
2 days ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Zuckerberg and Chan defend homeschool after Palo Alto zoning probe
Priscilla Chan and Mark Zuckerberg attend the 2025 Breakthrough Prize Ceremony at Barker Hangar on April 5, 2025 in Santa Monica. After a city investigation into a home-based school at their Palo Alto compound, the Meta CEO and his wife say their pandemic-era homeschool was legal. Taylor Hill/FilmMagic via Getty Images Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg and his wife, pediatrician Priscilla Chan, defended their decision Monday to homeschool a small group of children — including their own — inside a residence at their Palo Alto compound, following a New York Times report over the weekend that raised concerns about the legality of the operation. A spokesperson for the couple said in an email to the Chronicle that the homeschooling arrangement began as a pandemic pod during COVID-19 school closures to support childcare and education, and has continued to provide stability for their children. According to the Times, the setup — known as BBS — enrolled approximately 14 children and employed multiple full-time staff members, sparking complaints from neighbors of families dropping off children and 'big vehicles with darkened windows' picking up the children for outings — prompting a city investigation. Advertisement Article continues below this ad Emails obtained by the Times show Palo Alto Planning Director Jonathan Lait concluded the operation violated city zoning laws, which prohibit businesses — including schools — from running in residential areas if employees do not live on-site or if the activity significantly increases traffic. Although state filings listed the site as a private coed day school, the couple's representatives said the designation stems from limitations in the California Department of Education's affidavit system. The same form is used for both traditional private schools and homeschool pods, and contains no field to distinguish between the two. 'Mark, Priscilla and their children have made Palo Alto their home for more than a decade,' the spokesperson said. 'They value being members of the community and have taken a number of steps above and beyond any local requirements to avoid disruption in the neighborhood.' Zuckerberg's team said they were unaware the school was in violation, but they have agreed to relocate the children to a different site. No tuition was charged, and many subjects were taught by parents. City spokesperson Meghan Horrigan-Taylor confirmed the home-based school has since shut down. Advertisement Article continues below this ad Parents pick up their kids outside of The Primary School created by the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative in East Palo Alto on Monday, April 28, 2025. Laure Andrillon/Special to the Chronicle The revelation comes at a sensitive time for Zuckerberg and Chan. In April, the Primary School — a tuition-free private school serving low-income families in East Palo Alto and backed by the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative — announced it would close at the end of the 2025–26 school year. Founded by Chan in 2016, the school aimed to integrate education, health care and family services, and served hundreds of mostly Latino students. While no official reason was given for the closure, the decision followed broader retrenchments from social initiatives linked to Meta and Zuckerberg. The Initiative pledged $50 million over five years to support families during the transition. Advertisement Article continues below this ad As of January, 57 private school affidavits were filed in Palo Alto, more than half for schools with six or fewer students — a common marker of homeschooling, according to the state's education department.
