logo
What Trump's Tariffs Mean for Hollywood as New Recession Looms

What Trump's Tariffs Mean for Hollywood as New Recession Looms

Yahoo04-04-2025

The entertainment industry woke up on Thursday to the reality that its turn of the economic corner is more elusive than ever. President Donald Trump's reciprocal tariffs against 180 countries sent global markets reeling, with U.S. stocks seeing their biggest one-day plunge since 2020 and unleashing dire predictions for the economy, including a looming recession.
For Hollywood, which has been trying to right itself since the pandemic, the actors and writers' strikes and more recently the wildfires, it was one more plunge into the unknown.
Intellectual property like films and TV shows will not be directly subjected to tariffs as a 'service,' which instead hit consumer goods including cars, iPhones, clothing, wine, coffee and chocolate. But make no mistake, that doesn't mean the entertainment industry escapes a world of hurt as movie and television production, live entertainment and theater upgrades will likely take a hit.
'These tariffs are just going to underline and highlight the already vulnerable parts of our entertainment industry,' veteran producer Tom Nunan, the former president of NBC Studios and founder of Bull's Eye Entertainment, told TheWrap. 'They're just going to expedite some of the more troubling developments that we've all feared since COVID, since the strikes.'
Trump's moves come as Hollywood faces continued contraction and a lack of work in Los Angeles, as productions continue to shift elsewhere for tax breaks — including Canada and the U.K.
'The question will become whether this is going to [accelerate] these other events that seem to be on the horizon, which is more consolidation and possibly just certain companies just hanging up the towel when it comes to some of the legacy businesses like linear networks and ad-supported cable networks,' Nunan added.
Indeed, look no further than what the tariffs mean for advertisers, a main artery that sustains media and entertainment.
A recent survey conducted by Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB) shows that of 100 advertising decision-makers, 94% of them are concerned about the impact of tariffs on ad spending. Of those, 57% are 'extremely concerned' and 37% are 'somewhat concerned.'
If that's not chilling enough, look at these numbers. The IAB says most advertisers anticipate these declines in 2025 ad budgets due to 'tariff-related pressures':
More than 20% decrease – 4%
0-5% decrease – 14%
6-10% decrease – 60%
11-20% decrease – 22%
Here are the sectors of media where that becomes a reality:
Of course, the tariff hammer comes down as TV networks are preparing for their annual upfronts, where they will pitch to advertisers starting this month.
Brian Wieser, CEO of Madison & Wall, which analyzes advertising, said of the current mood on Madison Avenue: 'There's a proper understanding of the chaos that the current administration intends to bring. So you can kind of play out how everyone will be feeling in a couple months and it won't be good. It will be even worse than it is right now.'
Consumers have not felt much relief from grocery bills and other higher costs of living during these first months of the Trump administration. They also have fears about Social Security, health care and retirement funds, if they have any. These are the folks who buy movie tickets, streaming subscriptions and all the other products the industry sells to them — T-shirts, video games, theme park tickets, etc.
During past cataclysmic downturns, these consumers leaned into movies and TV as 'escapism,' but 2025 is a different world, and Hollywood is more aware how many Americans these days live paycheck to paycheck — many believe the price of eggs helped sway the election.
Earlier this year, consulting giant McKinsey reported that three-quarters of consumers across the board were planning to 'trade down' in the first quarter this year, more so among Gen Z and Gen Xers. Not great news for the studios and TV networks and streamers.
'It's going to impact subscriptions and box office first,' producer Nunan said, 'because that's disposable income and people are going to be hit right away.'
At CinemaCon in Las Vegas on Thursday, the conversation among movie theater executives amid the tariff news was primarily focused on industry issues like ticket pricing, theatrical windowing and updating theaters with infrastructure investments.
It couldn't come at a worse time for the box office — domestic totals for the first quarter are set to finish at approximately $1.4 billion, down around 12% from last year's $1.6 billion and 19% from the $1.72 billion of 2023.
While trade organization Cinema United has proudly touted the $2.2 billion pledged by various theater chains to refurbish their multiplexes, that money is likely to not go as far. Theaters that need to upgrade sound and picture in particular may have to recalibrate their plans, as digital cinema projectors are entirely manufactured outside of the U.S.
Hollywood productions will face new scrutiny. Noted Nunan: 'Suddenly Netflix or Disney will take a second look and say, 'Can we really afford our production plans that we had projected for 2026, 2027 and 2028?' We can all agree we're going into a recession. The question is are we going into a depression? And if that's the case, what are these big studios, what are these big media companies going to do?'
And at a time when moviegoers are far more selective about what films they buy movie tickets for, turnout from audiences may become more infrequent if overall entertainment spending scales back.
'We have as an industry emphasized for years that moviegoing is the most affordable form of a night out,' an industry consultant who asked to remain anonymous told TheWrap. 'We're now going to have to fight even harder to convey that message because so many no longer see it that way.'
Beyond movies, Morningstar senior equity analyst Matthew Dolgin in a Thursday research note said Disney and Live Nation were particularly vulnerable to a pullback on consumer spending in theme parks and live entertainment.
'Disney's parks and experiences generate most of its profit,' Dolgin wrote. 'A recession would likely depress tourism and reduce attendance at Disney's parks. Apart from economic weakness, Disney is at risk of less international tourism to the U.S,. particularly from Canada, due to chilled foreign relations.'
And concert promoter Live Nation is also at risk 'as concert attendance is a luxury that consumers could pull back from if needed,' Dolgin added.
Disney CEO Bob Iger reportedly attended an ABC News editorial meeting on Thursday and outlined how the tariffs could impact the company in indirect ways. According to Oliver Darcy, Iger cited the example that rising steel prices could drive up the costs for two new Disney cruise ships under construction, and warned against a notion that companies could just pick up and move manufacturing overnight. His presence and straight talk was a reminder how deep the worry is penetrating the media C-suite.
The tariff wallop will reach from the broadest impact of theme park tickets to the most specific of products, such as lumber, which is massively used on sets. Production crews use millions of tons of lumber each year to construct sound and production stages. Canada is the number one importer of lumber to the U.S. and faces tariffs of 40% or higher under Trump's plan.
Most common among the materials are so-called Hollywood flats, which are built with a wooden frame, typically using 3'x1′ timber on as the edge, and then covered with a plywood skin. Even before tariffs, the price of a sheet of plywood doubled in a year to $80.
At the top end, a major movie set can cost tens of millions of dollars, and as little as tens of thousands of dollars for commercial sets.
Mike Orth, senior project manager and product designer with North Hollywood's 41 Sets, which does as many as 100 set projects a year, said the company will just have to bake the tariffs into 'the cost of doing business.' He said he estimates the cost for all materials for sets, not just lumber, like plastic and metals, could go higher by 30% under Trump's tariffs. 'What's concerning is if and when [studios] stop projects because of costs.'
Orth isn't kidding himself either about how this will trickle down to his labor costs for his five full-timers and 20 or so workers he hires in addition by project. 'Their costs and their families' costs are going to spike under tariffs across the board. It's going to cost them more just to live.'
For Kevin Klowden, an economist and executive director of the Milken Finance Institute, the tariffs are not the problem for Hollywood but place a heavy thumb down on all its other issues that have been plaguing the industry the last few years.
'As far as I'm concerned, the tariffs' impact for Hollywood are not nearly as significant an issue as several of the others, namely the strong dollar, the overall cost of filming in the U.S., not just California, between labor costs, between the overall production costs, everything [for why] productions have been consistently moving overseas because they're cheaper.
'The combination of the incentive packages in places like the U.K. and Australia and Canada, lower labor and materials costs, and everything else — the tariff will just serve to exacerbate that. The 'tariffs,' if you will, that are most significant in many ways already happened.'
Jeremy Fuster contributed to this report.
The post What Trump's Tariffs Mean for Hollywood as New Recession Looms | Analysis appeared first on TheWrap.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How to Stop Missing Big Gains and Start Beating the Market Now
How to Stop Missing Big Gains and Start Beating the Market Now

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

How to Stop Missing Big Gains and Start Beating the Market Now

Have you ever read a headline that made you want to throw your phone across the room? Not out of anger, but frustration for your own bad investing decisions? You know the headlines I mean. 'NVIDIA up 3,000% since 2019…''Palantir up 65% in 2025…' InvestorPlace - Stock Market News, Stock Advice & Trading Tips And all you can think is: 'I saw that. I that. Louis told me about it. Why didn't I act? I missed it!' We've all been there. You hear about a new megatrend… or maybe a little-known company with a big new technological innovation… or a bold prediction about a company or sector… And you think, 'Interesting. I'll keep an eye on it and see if I find anything I like to buy.' Then life happens. The market goes through its gyrations, and things look more unsteady. And six months later, that 'little idea' has pushed select stocks skyward and made investors rich… and you never acted. I bet many of you had one of those moments last week with quantum computing stocks. Over the past week or so, a slew of headlines like the following one appeared about IonQ Inc. (IONQ). And this one about D-Wave Quantum Inc. (QBTS): In case you missed it, even with Friday's down day, QBTS and IONQ were up 56% and 31%, respectively, last week. Quantum computing and both companies started hitting investors' radars in late 2021 and early 2022. That's when a combination of scientific breakthroughs, increased corporate investment and early commercialization started making it impossible to ignore quantum computing. And that's when IONQ and QBTS went public. Yet most of us did nothing about it. But here's the good news: The market always gives you another shot. I gave my paid members another shot on quantum earlier this year when I released two special reports focused on quantum computing and investments to make – including these two stocks. Since publishing my second report on March 13, IONQ and QBTS are up 115% and 204%, respectively. And while quantum stocks are now overheated – I'm still long on the technology, but not necessarily the stocks at the moment – I believe a different 'next shot' is unfolding right now. Just because the headlines scream about a trend or set of stocks, that shouldn't drive your investing decisions. Think of the recent market sell-off after President Donald Trump's Liberation Day press conference. The market plunged, and many investors sold to get out of the market's downward path. Indeed, investors did what they always do when the headlines become bearish. They chase the safety of the crowd. Selling low. Waiting for permission from the media to feel bullish again. Or worse, they load up on whatever trend or stock had the biggest bounce … yesterday. This is a bias called crowd-seeking. It's been hardcoded into us for tens of thousands of years. Imagine you and your hunter-gatherer tribe are out and about… moving to a place with more freshwater. On your way, you see three dozen terrified members of your neighboring tribe running for their lives in a human stampede. Your instincts will tell you to run as fast as you can. There's a good reason three dozen people are running for their lives, and it doesn't matter if you can't see any danger… you just know it's time to run. This reason – survival – is the core reason why humans seek crowds. To this day, we know having your own crowd – your family, friends, and coworkers – leads to longer, better lives. But this instinct won't help make you rich in the stock market. My Stock Grader quantitative system doesn't read the news. It doesn't care who is president. It doesn't get scared on down days or too excited on up days. It just scans more than 6,000 stocks every week… analyzes fundamentals… tracks price action… investigates big money buying… and seeks out the stocks with the highest probability of explosive, near-term gains. That's how I've been able to identify over 175 stocks that went on to make 1,000%+ gains. Let's go back to a similar down-market moment… In 2022, the S&P 500 was in a bear market. Meanwhile, Stock Grader was weeding through the thousands of options to identify which stocks were going to be the rare winners. And one of the stocks it flagged was Vista Energy (VIST). At the time, VIST was a little-known Latin American oil and gas company. But my Stock Grader gave it an 'A' rating based on strong earnings growth, rising cash flow, and a surge in institutional buying. I did my own deep dive… found the stock to my liking… and recommended it to my Accelerated Profits readers in February 2022. VIST went on to post a 117% gain in under three months while the broader market kept falling. And now… in the middle of what feels like political and economic chaos, my system is doing what it always does – finding winners. Many of these winners are popping up because President Trump's bold new economic agenda – which I call '' – is sending shockwaves through the market. Unfortunately, too many investors are only seeing the fear on the surface. But under the surface, my system and I are tracking: A rare divergence in consumer spending vs. sentiment A sudden uptick in institutional accumulation And massive 'money rotation' into unloved sectors primed to surge under new policies This isn't just a gut feeling or sentiment driven by press conferences or screaming headlines. It's data. And the data is saying: It's time to act. Too many investors will likely miss this moment because they let emotions lead. They're waiting. Waiting for the all-clear or listening to fear-driven headlines. But here is what I see… The stocks with the best fundamentals are already rising—quietly, efficiently, and predictably. These are the stocks that will lead the charge when Trump's full economic plan rolls out over the next 12 months. You just have to know where to look. That's why I walked viewers through everything during my free —including: Why this new economic era is nothing like the past four years The three sectors positioned for a breakout under Trump's three-part Liberation agenda And the name of my #1 stock pick for the next 90 days, completely free Now, a repeat of this special presentation is still available to watch – but only for a little while. What's more, I'll detail how I plan to generate repeatable payouts—$2,500, $4,800, even $45,000 or more in cash—again and again, using one of the most battle-tested tools in the history of American investing. The markets are wild. Your emotions are loud. But profits belong to the calm, the rational, and the system-driven. . Sincerely, Louis Navellier Editor, Market 360 The Editor hereby discloses that as of the date of this email, the Editor, directly or indirectly, owns the following securities that are the subject of the commentary, analysis, opinions, advice, or recommendations in, or which are otherwise mentioned in, the essay set forth below: IonQ Inc. () The post How to Stop Missing Big Gains and Start Beating the Market Now appeared first on InvestorPlace.

Southern Maine communities gear up for school budget, bond and candidate votes
Southern Maine communities gear up for school budget, bond and candidate votes

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Southern Maine communities gear up for school budget, bond and candidate votes

Jun. 7—Residents of communities all across Maine will get the chance Tuesday to approve or reject their school districts' proposed budgets. Most budgeting processes so far have been largely uneventful. But when voters weigh in, which is required by law, things can get complicated, especially in cities or towns with large proposed increases. Last year, five Maine districts rejected their budgets. Experts weren't sure whether the increase in spending, which happened as districts were grappling with the loss of COVID-19 pandemic funds, was a trend or a one-off occurrence. But as voters gear up to decide on budgets, special election races and some bond projects, a few this year could prove controversial. They will also decide whether to extend the budget referendum voting process, something state statute requires districts to reaffirm every three years. Historic data shows turnout during June municipal elections is generally low, usually between 10% and 20%, compared to November elections when that number is closer to 60%. Here's a closer look at what will be on the ballot in some communities in Southern Maine. CAPE ELIZABETH Cape Elizabeth has twice rejected large bond proposals to rebuild the district's aging schools. Voters turned down a $116 million project in November 2022, and a $95 million version of the bond in November 2024. The most recent referendum failed by less than 200 votes. On Tuesday, voters will get a third chance to vote on a bond, this one an $86.5 million project that includes a new middle school and renovations and additions at the elementary school. The project comes with an estimated tax increase of 12.3%, spread across multiple years. Proponents of the project, including Superintendent Chris Record, say the school buildings have reached the end of their useful life and are not well-suited to modern-day learning. "At the middle school, they have very small classrooms that make teaching in a modern way very difficult," Record said. "It's very hard to move students into different groups, have interactive centers and do any sort of collaboration because the rooms are so small." Opponents want the district to focus on renovations rather than rebuilding. They also take issue with the school board continuing to propose building project referenda after voters have rejected them in the past. The election occurs as the district and superintendent are undergoing an ethics investigation prompted by a complaint filed by critics of the bond project. They argue district officials should have registered as an official ballot question committee before paying for newspaper advertisements about last November's bond project. Cape voters also will weigh in on a proposed $36.3 million budget with a 2.9% property tax increase. They also get to share a nonbinding opinion on whether they find the budget too high, acceptable or too low. GORHAM In Gorham, the town's recent history of rejecting budgets, coupled with local advocacy against this year's proposal, could signal a close vote. In 2023, Gorham voters rejected two versions of the school budget before approving a third. Last year, the budget passed on the first try, but by only four votes. This year's budget, a $57.5 million school spending plan that represents a $4 million increase over last year, was approved by the school committee and town council unanimously. Superintendent Heather Perry said this year's budget includes the lowest tax rate increase in more than a decade, just 3.15%. "We believe this budget is fiscally responsible and still provides the high-quality educational program our families have come to expect in Gorham," Perry said. "The proposed budget is now in the hands of our voters on June 10. We will move forward positively regardless of the outcome. We encourage all Gorham residents to please get out and vote." Signs that have popped up around town encourage voters to reject the budget. They include messages like "raise test scores, not taxes" and have QR codes that lead to the website for the organization Gorham Watchdogs, which describes itself as a citizen journalism initiative "dedicated to uncovering the truth about school budgets, town politics and taxpayer accountability." That group is circulating a petition that opposes a budget tax hike, and one of its founding members, Ben Tuttle, exceeded the public comment time limit while reading a statement about rising school budgets and the declining student test scores at a May town council meeting. Tuttle collected signatures last year to force a school budget referendum recount, after which the budget passed by two votes. Other signs around town call on residents to vote yes on the budget, with messages like "adequate funding, quality education." OTHER COMMUNITIES In South Portland, early budget discussions were met with swift community opposition when Superintendent Tim Matheney revealed plans to lay off more than 20 employees to cut $5 million from the budget. The final budget approved by the school board totals $73.1 million, a 5.5% spending increase over last year, and contains cuts to nine full-time equivalent positions. Matheney announced his resignation Wednesday, citing friction with the school board during the budget process. South Portland won't vote on a controversial athletic complex bond Tuesday; the school board decided to put that referendum on a future ballot. The Gray-New Gloucester budget generated attention last month when a group of residents spoke out against a proposed axing of the high school's American Sign Language program. Residents of the two towns ultimately approved a $35.4 million budget with a cut to the ASL teacher position, after district officials said the teacher announced plans to retire and they were unable to find a replacement. Portland, the state's largest school district, will vote to fill an open school board seat in addition to weighing in on the $172 million budget. The two candidates are Cassidy LaCroix, a contractor and parent of a Portland elementary student, and Jayne Sawtelle, a retired Portland music teacher. Westbrook voters get to approve a $54 million school budget; last year a second referendum vote was required after voters rejected the first one. Falmouth will vote on a $52.4 million school budget with a 3.33% increased tax rate, a smaller increase than in recent years. MSAD 51, the district that includes Cumberland and North Yarmouth, will get to vote on a $54 million school budget and two school board seats. Yarmouth will elect two school committee members and vote on a $42.4 million budget. Voters from Kennebunk, Kennebunkport, Arundel, the towns in RSU 21, will decide on a $62.6 million budget that represents a 5.5% increase over the current year's. And residents of Brunswick will vote on a $57.71 million school budget, which will result in an estimated 1.8% tax rate increase, and on an open school board seat. For more information about these upcoming votes, visit: Staff Writer Drew Johnson contributed reporting. Copy the Story Link

Our favorite photos from Bitcoin 2025
Our favorite photos from Bitcoin 2025

Business Insider

time25 minutes ago

  • Business Insider

Our favorite photos from Bitcoin 2025

From May 27 to 29, some 35,000 people gathered at the Venetian Expo Center in Las Vegas for Bitcoin 2025, the world's largest annual gathering of bitcoin industry professionals and enthusiasts. As Jacob Silverman reports in a feature dispatch from the conference for Business Insider, "More than anything, Bitcoin 2025 was a victory celebration for an industry that pushed all its chips in behind Donald Trump and the Republican Party during the 2024 election cycle and won handsomely." This year's speakers included Vice President JD Vance, Eric Trump and Donald Trump Jr., White House crypto and AI czar David Sacks, Sen. Jim Justice (who shared the stage with his bulldog, Babydog), Ohio gubernatorial candidate Vivek Ramaswamy, and the recently pardoned Silk Road drug market founder Ross Ulbricht. BI also sent photographer David Becker to cover the conference, and his photos captured the energy and triumphalism of the sprawling bitcoin community today.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store