4 years and 3 court cases later, City of Prince George wins case to shut down homeless camp
The ruling was handed down this week by B.C. Supreme Court Justice Bruce Elwood and distributed to the media by the city.
It found that the city has significantly increased the number of available shelter spaces and affordable housing units in the north-central B.C. city, which serves a population of approximately 90,000.
It agreed that the city had demonstrated plans were in place to further increase the available housing units in order to accommodate the remaining residents in the camp, who, it was agreed in court, number approximately 20.
However, Elwood also ruled that the city must be prepared to allow for overnight sheltering for residents who are unable to find available supports elsewhere.
"Today's decision doesn't solve homelessness," said Eric Depenau, the city's manager of administrative services, at a Friday afternoon news conference at city hall.
"We have done good work... but we know that more needs to be done."
The city said that moving forward, those who were living in the camp as of July will be allowed to remain until they receive an offer of housing, at which point they will have seven days to vacate.
Any newcomers seeking outdoor shelter will be allowed to stay at 498 Ottawa Street, a smaller lot in the current encampment, between 7 p.m. and 9 a.m.
The city says it will now be using a "phased approach" to close and remediate the encampment site.
The ruling marks what may be the final chapter in an issue that has highlighted the growing visibility of homelessness in communities outside of Canada's major metro areas over the past decade.
Previous shutdown attempts failed
The encampment on Lower Patricia Boulevard, known as Moccasin Flats, was first established in the spring of 2021 on city-owned land, on an empty dirt lot between an industrial yard and a steep hill leading to a residential neighbourhood.
Over the years, its population has fluctuated from fewer than a dozen to close to 100.
Though homelessness had previously been an issue in the city, it was the first time in recent memory that a permanent encampment housing such a large population had been seen in Prince George, which bills itself as B.C.'s northern capital, and has sparked a multi-year debate about how best to handle its presence.
WATCH | City back in court over homeless camp:
While expressing sympathy for the plight of those who lived there, many nearby residents raised concerns about public safety and disorder stemming from the presence of the camp, which have included shootings and multiple fires consistent with arson attempts.
At the same time, camp residents and outreach groups pointed out the greatest danger was to those who had nowhere else to go, and argued the camp was necessary as long as there weren't enough viable options for indoor sleeping available.
It was also pointed out by groups, including the B.C. Assembly of First Nations, that a majority of encampment residents were Indigenous, many with direct family ties to residential schools, and could not be treated as a simple public safety issue.
WATCH | BCAFN Chief Terry Teegee protests homeless camp eviction in Prince George:
That argument first made its way to the B.C. Supreme Court in August 2021, when the city applied for an injunction to shut the camp down. But in October, Chief Justice Christopher E. Hinkson ruled the city had failed to prove there were viable alternatives to the camp, and ordered it to be allowed to stand.
The ruling was upheld in a 2022 decision, after the city partially demolished a portion of the camp, which a separate justice said was in violation of the Hinkson ruling. The city later apologized.
During this time, the encampment caught the attention of then-B.C. housing minister David Eby, who said he didn't believe permanent homeless camps were a safe or viable option and offered to collaborate with the city on finding a more permanent solution.
After becoming premier, Eby announced Prince George as one of the first cities to pilot his new HEART and HEARTH programs, which were billed as a way to "rapidly respond to encampments to better support people sheltering outdoors to move inside."
New units built during this time include the new transitional housing facility in Atco trailers on Third Avenue near the encampment and complex care spaces available a few blocks away.
Phased shutdown
In his ruling released Friday, Justice Elwood noted the change in the city's approach to homelessness over the past four years.
"Much has changed since the city failed to persuade [the courts] that there was sufficient available housing in 2021," he wrote. "The HEART & HEARTH initiative, the memorandum of understanding between the province and the city and the construction of the Third Avenue Site all reflect tangible progress and concerted efforts by government to address the needs of the occupants of the encampment."
However, he noted he was still unable to be certain that the new shelter spaces would be accessible to everyone currently living in the encampment.
For one, he found that the units currently available are fewer than the number of people — between 10 and 20 — living in the encampment.
Lawyer Claire Kanigan and co-counsel Casey St. Germain, representing residents of Moccasin Flats, said they found there to be at least 18 residents remaining at the encampment and said there are only three rooms currently ready to be occupied at the Thrd Avenue site.
Kanigan said there's no timeline as to when more beds will be made available and that the city should be able to prove they have enough beds before they're permitted to close the site.
"The basic calculation of number of beds to number of people is foundational," she said. "It is not an overly onerous burden to meet."
But Elwood found the proposed solution from the city and B.C. Housing was reasonable — in which the camp would be allowed to stay open until its residents had been offered housing — and was enough to move forward.
Outdoor sheltering must still be allowed: judge
Another issue raised in the ruling, though, was city bylaws that have been passed barring overnight outdoor sheltering elsewhere in the city, as well as limiting daytime camping.
With the closure of Moccasin Flats, Elwood wrote, the impact would be that "there will be nowhere in Prince George where a homeless person can lawfully erect shelter from the elements, store their possessions or even rest during the day," he wrote.
"The potential lack of basic shelter during the day is an important consideration year-round. Extreme daytime heat during the summer is also dangerous for people experiencing homelessness. Those who have no other accessible option must be allowed to rest and shelter themselves."
As a result, he said, the terms of his ruling "cannot be absolute" and exceptions must be made, however rare, for residents who cannot access other shelter.
Mayor Simon Yu, who was elected in 2022 in part on a promise to build housing for people living in the encampment, said he remains committed to the goal of resolving homelessness in the city for good.
"It has been a long road and there is much more work to be done to address homelessness in our community," he said in a written statement.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Draft of Trump's Health Blueprint Avoids Industry Crackdown
(Bloomberg) -- A draft of the Trump administration's highly anticipated blueprint on health policy takes a softer approach to regulating companies than many had feared, a relief for industry and setback for environmental activists. The US-Canadian Road Safety Gap Is Getting Wider Festivals and Parades Are Canceled Amid US Immigration Anxiety A Photographer's Pipe Dream: Capturing New York's Vast Water System To Head Off Severe Storm Surges, Nova Scotia Invests in 'Living Shorelines' Five Years After Black Lives Matter, Brussels' Colonial Statues Remain The draft report, which has been reviewed by Bloomberg News, has parts that go beyond previous announcements. They are mostly about boosting research in areas such as the risks of microplastics and how antidepressants are prescribed for children. It also refers to plans to boost fertility rates and getting whole milk into public schools. The draft was dated Aug. 11, but could still see changes before it's finalized, according to people familiar with the discussions who weren't authorized to speak publicly on the matter. In particular, the report's tone around pesticides is far less critical than Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and his allies have been in the past. That raised concerns earlier this week from some of his supporters in the so-called Make America Healthy Again movement, according to the people. The policy agenda is the second installment in a two-part process to carry out an executive order that President Donald Trump signed in February. The first report detailed research about what the administration viewed as the root cause of chronic disease among children, and the second was intended to lay out policies to address those root causes. The strategy was due to be submitted to the president on Aug. 12, but hasn't been publicly released. The White House declined to confirm the draft's authenticity, but industry officials said it was largely in line with what they had been briefed on by the administration. Still, the report appeared in flux before its public release, with the debate centered on the wording of the pesticide provisions. 'Until officially released by the White House and MAHA Commission, any documents purporting to be the second MAHA Report should be disregarded as speculative literature,' said White House spokesman Kush Desai. The document aligns with the administration's strategy to create change by pressuring industries, rather than through new regulations or laws. Officials have employed the strategy with food companies, health insurers and pharmaceutical producers so far. Pesticides Approach The draft takes a lighter touch on pesticides, after a backlash from the agricultural community before the first report's release prompted an internal debate over the issue. The document calls for continually evaluating the current framework to 'ensure that chemicals and other exposures do not interact together to pose a threat to the health of our children.' It references measuring the 'cumulative exposure' to chemicals. That could rankle farmers and agriculture firms, which say that pesticides are safe to use and disputes language that suggests they could be harmful to Americans. Kennedy has been skeptical of some vaccines, and the document calls for more research on vaccine injuries. The draft has vague pronouncements such as 'ensuring scientific and medical freedom' and making sure Americans have the 'best' vaccination schedule. The agency will launch a 'MAHA education campaign' to promote the early adoption of lifestyle changes that may increase fertility rates among men and women, including through new partnerships with federally funded family planning facilities, according to the draft, which didn't provide specific examples of what would be taught. Kennedy has repeatedly raised concerns over declining sperm counts and testosterone rates, especially among teenage boys, to explain declining US birth rates. Processed Foods The draft report criticizes 'highly processed foods,' listing poor diet among the top drivers of children's chronic diseases, but didn't propose any significant new restrictions on the industry. The administration has already begun the process of defining 'ultra processed foods,' which it said will be used to develop future research funding and policies. The report refers to highly processed foods more often than ultra-processed foods and doesn't distinguish between the terms. Ultra-processed foods typically involve some industrial steps or ingredients, unlike whole foods such as fruits and vegetables. Many packaged foods are generally considered ultra-processed. The report also pointed to forthcoming revised dietary guidelines, which Trump officials have estimated will be released in the fall. Kennedy has said those guidelines will encourage people to eat 'whole foods,' and will be simple and easy to understand. The draft report previews several public health awareness campaigns it plans to launch, including a 'Real Food First' push to 'prioritize whole, minimally processed foods over packaged and highly processed alternatives.' Whole Milk Food and Drug Administration Commissioner Marty Makary has indicated the dietary guidelines will take a new approach toward saturated fat. The draft report included one hint of what could be coming, by specifically calling to remove the restrictions around serving whole milk in schools. Because the current dietary guidelines recommend limiting consumption of foods high in saturated fat to less than 10% of calories daily, schools serve only skim and 1% milk. The draft calls for increased oversight and enforcement of advertisements for direct-to-consumer drugs. The report suggests that social media influencers and telehealth companies – categories that have historically fallen into a regulatory gray area – should be subject to greater oversight when promoting drugs. Lawmakers have been pressuring the federal government to take action on the influx of advertisements from telehealth companies that offer copycat weight-loss medications. That includes allegations that Hims & Hers Health Inc. omitted safety information in advertising. --With assistance from Ilena Peng, Charles Gorrivan and Madison Muller. What Declining Cardboard Box Sales Tell Us About the US Economy Americans Are Getting Priced Out of Homeownership at Record Rates Bessent on Tariffs, Deficits and Embracing Trump's Economic Plan Twitter's Ex-CEO Is Moving Past His Elon Musk Drama and Starting an AI Company How Syrian Immigrants Are Boosting Germany's Economy ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Grants Pass to provide 150 camping spaces, $60k in services after disability rights suit
The city of Grants Pass, which gained national attention for its practice of punishing homeless people for camping outside, has agreed to provide at least 150 spaces for individuals to do so. (Ben Botkin/Oregon Capital Chronicle) A southern Oregon city that gained national attention for its practice of punishing homeless people for camping outside has agreed to provide at least 150 spaces for individuals to do so after a lawsuit alleged its practices discriminated against disabled individuals. The city of Grants Pass won a major U.S. Supreme Court case in June 2024, reversing an earlier appeals court ruling that a city ordinance barring homeless people from using blankets, pillows or cardboard while sleeping outside violated the U.S. Constitution's protections against cruel and unusual punishment. That Supreme Court ruling cleared the way for more stringent restrictions on homeless individuals in the West, but in Oregon, a state law only allows cities to regulate sleeping outside if those regulations are 'objectively reasonable' to time, place and manner. Grants Pass responded by passing ordinances that allow people to stay in designated areas only between 5 p.m. and 7 a.m. and to remove tents or other supplies each morning or face a $75 citation. Disability rights advocates and five homeless individuals sued, and the city reached a settlement this month. The settlement says the city will offer at least 150 units of camping spaces for homeless individuals. The city must also provide drinking water at any approved camping sites, and the property must be in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act for the next year. 'Oregon can't arrest its way out of homelessness, and we are pleased the city has committed to developing more humane and legally compliant approaches to this public health crisis,' said Jake Cornett, executive director and CEO of the Portland-based Disability Rights Oregon, in a statement. 'This settlement represents a significant step forward in ensuring people with disabilities experiencing homelessness have places to rest, basic necessities like drinking water and real opportunity to stabilize their lives.' The city had limited homeless people to stay and sleep in just one site with about 30 tents at any given time, prompting concerns about overcrowding and a lack of drinking water. In January, local officials closed another site with space for about 120 tents. Disability Rights Oregon and the Oregon Law Center cited Oregon's anti-discrimination law for disabled individuals in their January lawsuit. They won a two-week temporary restraining order in February prohibiting the city from enforcing penalties and restricting camping to the city's one site for tents. Since then, Circuit Court Judge Sarah E. McGlaughlin has ordered the city to halt enforcement of its ordinances against homeless encampments until the city restored capacity for 150 tents, exempting several parks from her mandate. The city and plaintiffs have agreed that the additional capacity for campaign will be on property owned by the city or operated by a third-party city contractor, according to the settlement. The city will also install shade at drinking facilities and award a $60,000 grant to a local nonprofit to provide services for homeless residents. The facility receiving the money must have bathrooms. The lawsuit launched by disability rights advocates was driven by stories of homeless people with chronic pain and health conditions being forced to constantly move their belongings and lives every day in the city. One such case involves 57-year-old Janine Harris, who suffers from arthritis, vertigo and chronic headaches. She previously told the Capital Chronicle that her health problems made her give up a job as a caregiver and she has been homeless for four years. She has to collect her belongings in a wagon she carries around. 'Being homeless is really hard on a person's body, especially if you have physical disabilities,'Harris wrote in a court declaration. 'I just want everyone to know that a lot of people who are living outside are people, just like them, who are doing their best to get by.' In a statement following the settlement, Allison Nasson, a staff attorney at the Oregon Law Center, cautioned against policies mandating homeless residents continuously relocate. 'Requiring people to 'move along' everyday doesn't get people into housing, it just makes life harder and more dangerous,' she wrote. 'When you have been forced to live outside, you still need water, a bathroom, and a place to rest.' Grants Pass City Manager Aaron Cubic did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Under the agreement, the city will also pay $85,000 to Disability Rights Oregon, allowing it to forgo any further obligation to pay legal fees. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Canada labor minister presses Air Canada, union to intensify talks to resolve dispute
(Reuters) -Canadian Labor Minister Patty Hajdu said on Friday that she met jointly with Air Canada and the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE), urging both sides to work harder and remain at the negotiating table to reach a deal and avert a potential strike. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data