
State lawmakers considering policy changes after L.A. wildfires
SACRAMENTO — Nearly six months after a firestorm ravaged communities across Los Angeles, California lawmakers are crafting legislation to try to protect the state insurance program for high-risk homes from financial collapse.
A bill, AB 226, sponsored by Assemblymembers Lisa Calderon (D-Whittier) and David A. Alvarez (D-San Diego), would make the state's insurer of last resort, the FAIR Plan, eligible for loans and bonds from the state-backed California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank to avoid running out of money after a disaster.
Alvarez proposed the measure last year but it failed to pass. Despite receiving unanimous support in the Assembly, the bill never reached the Senate floor for a vote before the end of the 2024 legislative session.
If the measure had passed last year and been signed into law by the governor, the FAIR Plan would have had more flexibility to weather the massive number of claims filed after the January firestorms, Alvarez said.
Instead, the FAIR plan was forced to imposed an extra $1 billion in total assessments on insurers that provide homeowners policies in California. To recoup those expenses, insurance companies are expected to hike rates on homeowners through monthly surcharges.
'Had they had this option available to them ... they would not be having to hit consumers with price increases on the private market now,' Alvarez said.
AB 226 is one of many wildfire-related bills still winding their way through the slow legislative process. If passed into law, the measures would protect homeowners from price gouging after disasters, streamline the process for filing claims for lost property and offer financial protections for disaster victims.
Lawmakers and Gov. Gavin Newsom in January approved $2.5 billion in wildfire aid after the Palisades and Eaton fires killed more than two dozen people and became the second and third most destructive fires in state history. Legislative leaders at the time signaled for a swift, bipartisan approach to the disaster.
'Tens of thousands of our neighbors, our families and friends, they need help. This means that we need to be able to move with urgency, put aside our differences, and be laser-focused on delivering the financial resources, delivering the boots on the ground that are needed and the policy relief that is needed to get neighborhoods cleaned up and communities rebuilt,' Senate President Pro Tem Mike McGuire (D-Healdsburg) said after it passed.
California's last-ditch home insurer, the FAIR Plan, is meant as a backup for properties deemed high-risk and uninsurable by private companies. A Times analysis found that within the Eaton and Palisades fire zones, the number of homes on the plan nearly doubled between 2020 and 2024 and the plan has become one of the state's largest insurers.
Amid lawsuits alleging collusion between private insurers and the FAIR Plan and policyholders raising concerns about delays in payments and smoke damage investigations, lawmakers and insurance advocates have repeatedly called for better safety nets — like the one proposed in AB 226 — to keep the insurer solvent in emergencies and viable as a long-term solution to the state's home insurance problem.
This year, Alvarez was joined on the bill by Calderon, chair of the Assembly's insurance committee. It passed through the Assembly at the beginning of March but has not yet seen its first Senate committee.
Alvarez celebrated the bill's swift passage through the Assembly and hopes the Senate will work to do the same, 'God forbid, if it has to be used because of a devastating fire this summer,' he said.
Other major wildfire bills being considered by lawmakers include:
Most of the pending legislation won't directly support survivors of the Palisades and Eaton fires but are still important to the rebuilding process, said Maryam Zar, president emeritus of the Pacific Palisades Community Council and founder of the Palisades Recovery Coalition.
The new laws would help prevent and prepare for future fires, she said, and are a show of goodwill to the communities that are suffering still.
Some other fire relief measures focus on easing the permit process for rebuilding, while others extend provisions set by Newsom during the state of emergency — easing tenancy rights for people staying in temporary housing for longer than 30 days, shortening the permit approval timeline and securing mortgage forbearance for destroyed properties for up to a year after the disaster. Others look to address staffing issues for the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection as fire season turns into a year-round threat.
'Wildfire survivors continue to face housing insecurity, financial strain, and emotional trauma long after the immediate danger has passed,' Los Angeles County Supervisor Lindsey Horvath said in a statement. 'These State bills represent a commitment to meeting people where they are — actively in recovery, rebuilding their lives, and in need of our long-term support.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Lemonade Inc (LMND) Q1 2025 Earnings Call Highlights: Strong Revenue Growth Amidst Challenges
Revenue: Increased 27% year-on-year to $151 million in Q1 2025. In Force Premium (IFP): Grew 27% to just above $1 billion. Customer Count: Increased by 21% to 2.5 million. Premium per Customer: Increased 4% to $396. Annual Retention Rate (ADR): Decreased to 84% from 86% in the prior quarter. Gross Earned Premium: Increased 24% to $234 million. Gross Loss Ratio: 78% for Q1, compared to 79% in Q1 2024. Adjusted Gross Profit: Improved 25% year-on-year. Net Loss: $62 million, or a loss of $0.86 per share. Adjusted EBITDA Loss: $47 million in Q1. Total Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Investments: Approximately $996 million. Growth Spend: $38 million in Q1, nearly double the prior year quarter. Technology Development Expense: Increased 5% to $22 million. General and Administrative (G&A) Expense: Increased 20% to $36 million. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 3 Warning Signs with LMND. Release Date: May 06, 2025 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. Lemonade Inc (NYSE:LMND) reported a 27% year-on-year growth in Q1 2025, marking the sixth consecutive quarter of accelerating top-line growth. The company achieved a 25% year-on-year improvement in adjusted gross profit, despite the impact of California wildfires. Lemonade Car's quarter-over-quarter in-force premium (IFP) growth outpaced the rest of the business for the first time, signaling strong momentum. The company is on track to achieve EBITDA breakeven by the end of 2026, with expectations of generating positive adjusted free cash flow in 2025. Lemonade Inc (NYSE:LMND) has successfully leveraged AI to maintain or reduce fixed costs while significantly increasing its book size, demonstrating strong operational efficiency. The California wildfires had a notable impact on Q1 results, contributing 16 percentage points to the gross loss ratio. Annual dollar retention (ADR) decreased to 84%, down from 86% in the prior quarter, partly due to efforts to improve profitability in the home insurance book. The gross loss ratio for Q1 was 78%, slightly higher than the previous year's 79%, indicating ongoing challenges in managing claims costs. Operating expenses, excluding loss and loss adjustment expense, increased by 29% year-on-year, driven by growth spend and the impact of the FAIR plan assessment. Net loss for Q1 was $62 million, or $0.86 per share, compared to a net loss of $47 million or $0.67 per share in the prior year, reflecting ongoing financial challenges. Q: Can you elaborate on the timeline for reaching EBITDA profitability and what levers will drive this? A: Daniel Schreiber, CEO, explained that Lemonade aims to achieve adjusted EBITDA breakeven by the end of 2026, with 2027 being the first full year of positive adjusted EBITDA. The company expects gross profit to grow faster than fixed costs, driven by AI efficiencies, bringing them closer to profitability. Q: What impact did the California wildfires have on gross profit, and how are tariffs affecting your full-year guidance? A: Tim Bixby, CFO, noted that the California wildfires had a $44 million gross impact, aligning with prior estimates. The tariff impact is expected to be modest, with single-digit percentage effects on claims. Lemonade is comfortable with its full-year guidance, assuming a modest headwind from tariffs. Q: How is Lemonade's Car business performing, and what are the plans for geographic expansion? A: Daniel Schreiber, CEO, highlighted that Lemonade Car is growing faster than the rest of the business, with a focus on refining the product before expanding geographically. The company is currently available to 40% of the U.S. market and plans to expand further once the product is optimized. Q: How is AI impacting Lemonade's competitive position in the insurance industry? A: Daniel Schreiber, CEO, emphasized that Lemonade's AI capabilities allow for better data utilization and risk assessment compared to traditional insurers. The company's digital infrastructure enables it to connect data points effectively, providing a competitive advantage in pricing and customer acquisition. Q: What percentage of new car sales are cross-sales from existing Lemonade customers? A: Tim Bixby, CFO, stated that about half of new car sales are cross-sales from existing customers, up from a third previously. This trend is expected to continue, leveraging Lemonade's existing customer base for more efficient growth. For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. This article first appeared on GuruFocus.

2 hours ago
Bolivia reinstates a leftist challenger but keeps former leader Morales off the ballot
LA PAZ, Bolivia -- Bolivia's electoral tribunal on Friday included leftist Senate leader Andrónico Rodríguez on the list of presidential candidates approved for the ballot but excluded the powerful former socialist leader Evo Morales — the other major thorn in the president's side. As tensions escalate in the run-up to Bolivia's Aug. 17 elections, the Supreme Electoral Tribunal reinstated Rodríguez, a 36-year-old political upstart with close ties to Morales and roots in the ex-president's rural coca-growing stronghold, weeks after suspending his candidacy on technical grounds in a decision that shocked many Bolivians. 'We are the candidate of the people,' Rodríguez said in a speech welcoming the revival of his campaign. 'Our primary concern has been to wage the legal battle, and in the end, the power of the people had to prevail.' With the ruling Movement Toward Socialism party, or MAS, riven by dysfunction and division over President Luis Arce's power struggle with his former mentor, Morales, supporters of the senate leader see him as the only chance for MAS to beat the right-wing opposition and salvage its decades-long political dominance. President Arce, widely blamed for accelerating Bolivia's worst economic crisis in 40 years, dropped out of the race last month. Opinion polls show that his pick for the presidency, senior minister Eduardo del Castillo, has inherited the president's unpopularity. Arce's government insists that its main rival, Morales, is constitutionally barred from running. Morales accuses Arce of waging a 'judicial war' against him. In leaving out Morales, the tribunal opened the potential for further turmoil: Morales has called on his supporters to take to the streets to demand his eligibility. Over the last week his followers have blockaded some of the main roads around the country, adding to a sense of crisis as merchants and truckers rise up in outrage over surging food prices and severe fuel shortages. Morales, who governed Bolivia from 2006 to 2019, has been holed up in the country's tropics for months, surrounded by fiercely loyal coca-farmers, as Arce's government seeks his arrest on charges relating to his sexual relationship with a 15-year-old girl. A constitutional court filled with judges beholden to Arce has disputed the legality of Morales' fourth candidacy and barred him from the contest. 'The constitutional court acts like a sniper ... restricting and enabling electoral participation upon request,' he said in response to his disqualification. 'The order is clear: Hand over the government to the right and legitimize the election with negotiated candidates who will protect their backs.' Morales, whose own loyalists packed the same court when he was president, points to an earlier court ruling that paved the way for his 2019 presidential campaign, that said it would violate his human rights to stop him running. Morales' bid that year for an unprecedented fourth term ultimately sparked mass protests and led to his resignation and brief self-exile. The conservative opposition to MAS is also fractured, with at least three right-of-center candidates vying for the presidency and no clear frontrunner. All of them are little-known abroad but well-known within Bolivia, where they have run for president or served in government in the past: Jorge 'Tuto' Quiroga, former president from 2001-2002, Samuel Doria Medina, a former cement tycoon and planning minister, and Manfred Reyes Villa, the mayor of Bolivia's major central city of Cochabamba.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Musk floats ‘The American Party' after Trump tiff
Elon Musk floated a new political party on Friday after falling out with President Trump over the big, beautiful bill. He launched a Thursday poll on the social platform X, which he owns, asking about whether or not the country needed a new faction for political nominees. 'The people have spoken. A new political party is needed in America to represent the 80% in the middle! And exactly 80% of people agree. This is fate,' Musk wrote, citing numbers from his survey. He followed up with a potential name for the group, 'The America Party.' In recent days, Musk has railed against Trump for suggesting the United States increase its national debt by $4 trillion as proposed in the bill. The tech giant said it 'undermines' all the work he did at the Department of Government Efficiency, geared towards reducing government spending. However, Trump said the Tesla CEO was mad over slashes to electric vehicle incentives instead of other clauses in the legislation. 'Elon knew the inner workings of this bill better than almost anybody sitting here. … He had no problem with it,' Trump told reporters in the Oval Office. 'All of a sudden he had a problem, and he only developed the problem when he found out that we're going to have to cut the EV mandate, because that's billions and billions of dollars,' he added. Still, Musk, who served as a White House adviser for over 100 days in the Trump administration, backed a call for Trump to be impeached and replaced by his own vice president. The president has publicly questioned Musk's motives for slamming his leadership right after leaving his role in the administration. 'I don't mind Elon turning against me, but he should have done so months ago. This is one of the Greatest Bills ever presented to Congress. It's a Record Cut in Expenses, $1.6 Trillion Dollars, and the Biggest Tax Cut ever given. If this Bill doesn't pass, there will be a 68% Tax Increase, and things far worse than that. I didn't create this mess, I'm just here to FIX IT. This puts our Country on a Path of Greatness. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!' Musk also credited himself for Republicans' successful trifecta in November capturing the White House, in addition to majorities in the House and Senate. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate,' Musk said in a post on his social platform X. 'Such ingratitude,' he added. Florida Republican Rep. Jimmy Patronis cast doubt on Musk's claim of creating 'The America Party' in Friday comments, suggesting the two will be 'hanging around again' shortly. 'Elon Musk is not gonna create a new political party,' Patronis told NewsNation's Blake Burman during an appearance on 'The Hill.' 'Trump knows that sometimes you're going to have falling out with those that you trust, you like, that you're friends with. It happens with us in DC all the time. So again. Mark my words. About a month from now, these guys will be hanging around again. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.