Trump confirms Iranian attack on U.S. military base in Qatar, no casualties reported
New York, June 24 (UNI) U.S. President Donald Trump on Monday confirmed that Iran had launched a missile attack on a U.S. military base in Qatar in response to recent American airstrikes on its nuclear facilities, describing it as a "very weak response" that caused no casualties and "hardly any damage".
In a series of posts on Truth Social, Trump said 14 missiles were fired by Iran, with 13 intercepted and one allowed to proceed as it posed no threat. He credited Iran for providing "early notice", which he said enabled the United States to avoid any loss of life.
He urged Iran and Israel to pursue "peace and harmony" in the region.
Trump also thanked the Emir of Qatar for his role in promoting regional stability, noting that no Qataris were harmed in the incident.
Majed Al-Ansari, spokesperson for Qatar's foreign ministry, confirmed the interception of multiple Iranian missiles over its capital, Doha, on Monday, an attack Tehran claimed was aimed at U.S. forces at the Al Udeid Air Base. He said the base had been evacuated ahead of the strike, and no casualties were reported.
Iran's Islamic Revolution Guard Corps (IRGC) claimed responsibility for the operation, dubbed Annunciation of Victory, saying it had targeted U.S. military installations in both Qatar and Iraq. The IRGC described Al Udeid as "the headquarters of the U.S. Air Force and the largest strategic asset" of American forces in the region and said it fired six missiles at the site.
Despite the attack, Iran's Supreme National Security Council said Tehran was committed to its "brotherly and friendly relations" with Qatar, noting the targeted base was far from urban centres and the operation posed no danger to the country.
UNI XINHUA ARN
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
40 minutes ago
- Mint
Is a ‘regime change' in Iran possible? What happens if Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei is killed?
US President Donald Trump hinted at a "regime change" in Iran just hours after Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said on Sunday, 'This mission [US attacking Iran's nuclear sites] was not and has not been about regime change.' The idea of killing Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei also surfaced during the Iran-Israel conflict. It was said that Trump had vetoed an Israeli plan to kill the Iranian Supreme Leader, but the US President later claimed Khamenei was an "easy target" but would not be killed, "at least for now". This left the door open for a discussion of what exactly President Trump meant by "regime change." Meanwhile, Israel, which is in conflict with Iran, has not ruled out killing Khamenei. Last week, Israel Defense Minister Israel Katz said of Khamenei: 'This man absolutely should not continue to exist.' Cambridge dictionary defines a 'regime change' as a complete change of government, especially one brought about by force. Meanwhile, Britannica says a regime change refers to the overthrow of a government considered illegitimate by an external force and its replacement with a new government according to the ideas or interests promoted by that force. Simply put, a change of regime means forming a new government. In case of Iran, a regime change would require Israel or the US having a figure in mind to replace Khamenei and send troops to the country, Trita Parsi, executive vice president of the Quincy Institute in Washington, DC, told CNN. A delay in choosing the new Supreme Leader could fuel another possibility for a regime change in Iran. Iran's government is a unique hybrid system which has elements of a theocracy and a republic. The Supreme Leader is at the top of Iran's power structure. He is "the guardian jurist who is effectively Iran's leader for life," the CRF explained. The president is the second-highest-ranking official in Iran. Particularly, Khamenei, the 86-year-old cleric, has ruled Iran for more than 35 years as its highest authority, rising to power a decade after the 1979 Islamic Revolution overthrew a US-backed monarch. So, what will happen if Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei dies? Will his death lead to a regime change? Khamenei can be replaced by a new leader, but changing the regime itself is likely to trigger unrest in the Islamic Republic. Choosing a leader on time may not necessarily lead to a "regime change" in Iran. After US strikes in Iran, The New York Times, citing sources, reported that Khamenei has chosen three successors as his replacement in case military commanders die in Israeli strikes. However, the US reportedly fears that Iran could get "somebody worse than Khamenei," a source told the New York Post. Experts reportedly said that if the Supreme Leader is killed and the Guardian Council delays naming a successor, the risk of instability could grow. Parsi from Quincy Institute in Washington also warned that "a possible outcome of Khamenei's potential killing is total regime collapse." One possible scenario is Iran's various ethnic groups vying for power after Khamenei's death. Experts say that any attempt at regime change in Iran risks collapsing the state altogether – "a scenario that could splinter Iran and send shockwaves across the Middle East," CNN reported. Earlier, The Telegraph reported that Khamenei's death could create a vacuum at the heart of the government that might trigger internal strife and civil unrest. This is because Khamenei's death is likely to create opportunities for Iran's ethnic minority groups to rise up. Reports suggest that separatist groups who have long opposed the Islamic Republic may seek to take advantage of what they may see as an opportunity. This could "potentially ignite local conflicts that could spiral into a broader civil war." If Iran's regime falls, 'there would be support for ethnic separatist groups by the Israelis, and perhaps the US,' Parsi said. This would lead to a situation where remnants of the state are going to be consumed with fighting separatists. Another possibility is "military intervention", which "rarely leads to democratisation," Hamed Mousavi, associate professor of International Relations at the University of Tehran, told CNN. "Military factions that could take over are 'not going to be the type of regime that the US may have had in mind,' Parsi said. "They are unlikely to seek diplomatic routes with Israel or the US, but could take a more hawkish approach that sees possession of a nuclear bomb as the only deterrent to more attacks," Parsi said.
Time of India
40 minutes ago
- Time of India
'No CEASEFIRE, But...': Iran's Big Message To Trump As Israel Accepts Truce Deal
/ Jun 24, 2025, 01:27PM IST Iran and Israel have finally agreed for ceasefire implementation hours after US President Donald Trump announced a ceasefire on Truth Social. Iran's top diplomat Abbas Araghchi praised armed forces for relentless strikes against Israel until the ceasefire deadline. He denied any ceasefire agreement exists, warning Israel to halt aggression by 4 a.m. Tehran time to avoid further retaliation. Iran launched six waves of ballistic missiles targeting central and southern Israel, killing four civilians in Beersheba when a missile hit an apartment building. Israeli forces intercepted most missiles but one made impact. The intense missile barrage occurred minutes before the proposed ceasefire phase began, reflecting high regional tensions. Araghchi stressed the final decision on ending military operations is pending, signaling uncertainty in the fragile conflict's future.#IsraelIranCeasefire #MiddleEastTensions #TrumpNews #TehranStrikes #BreakingNews #QatarMediation #IDFUpdates #IranCrisis #Geopolitics #Ceasefire2025 #WorldAtWar #PeaceOrWar #GlobalAlert #USForeignPolicy #MideastConflict
Mint
40 minutes ago
- Mint
Iran denies ceasefire violation as Israel warns of ‘forceful' response
News about a missile attack by Iran on Israel after the ceasefire between the two countries took effect is "denied", Iranian media reported, quoting state TV. "Victory has forced Israel to unilaterally accept defeat and stop its aggression" said Iran, as quoted by Fars News. Israeli military said earlier it detected missile launches from Iran to which Israeli defence minister Israel Katz said Israel would respond 'forcefully'. Katz said the military had now been instructed to carry out high-intensity operations against targets in Tehran. The Israeli military reported two missiles fired from Iran mid-morning on Tuesday, leading sirens to blare in the north several hours after US president Trump announced a ceasefire plan, Agence France-Presse (AFP) reports. The army initially said it had identified missiles launched from Iran 2.5 hours after the start of the ceasefire. 'Two missiles were launched from Iran and they were intercepted,' a military official told AFP on condition of anonymity, with the army saying people could leave shelters about 15 minuutes after the first alert. Israeli defence minister Israel Katz said on Tuesday he has ordered the country's military to respond forcefully to what he said was Iran's violation of a ceasefire with Israel, Reuters reports. The directive followed an announcement by the military that it had detected missile launches from Iran towards Israel. The Israeli military said it was working to shoot down Iranian missiles after detecting the launch. Earlier, US president Donald Trump had said that the ceasefire was now in effect. Katz said the military had now been instructed to carry out high-intensity operations against targets in Tehran. He said, "In light of Iran's blatant violation of the ceasefire declared by the President of the United States – through the launch of missiles toward Israel – and in accordance with the Israeli government's policy to respond forcefully to any breach, I have instructed the IDF (Israel Defence Forces) … to continue high-intensity operations targeting regime assets and terror infrastructure in Tehran.
