
The killing of Al Jazeera's Anas al-Sharif in Gaza is an attack on truth itself
He was born in the same place I was born: Jabalia refugee camp. His family's home stood in the same crowded lanes where I grew up, among the same walls scarred by decades of displacement and war.
Over the past 677 days, I saw him every single day – not in person, but through my screen. When the rest of the world looked away, Anas was still there, reporting from the very heart of my city, from the streets where my family still lives. At a time when no one else dared to enter northern Gaza, he walked through the rubble, speaking into his camera, delivering not just the news, but fragments of home.
When Israel plunged Gaza into darkness, cutting communications and severing people from the outside world, Anas's voice broke through like oxygen. Through his reports, I could see the neighbourhoods I knew, hear the voices I recognised, and feel the pulse of a place I am exiled from but can never leave in my heart.
He was more than a journalist – he was the thread that connected me to my people in their darkest hour. That made him a target.
The Israeli army threatened Anas several times. They warned him to stop reporting from the north. They told him his life was in danger. He knew exactly what they meant – in Gaza, such threats are never empty.
Yet he never stopped. He refused to be silenced. Instead, he doubled down, documenting every bombing, every destroyed home, every lifeless child carried from the ruins. He understood better than anyone that Israel does not just want to erase lives – it wants to erase the record of those lives. And it has made sure of that by banning international journalists from entering Gaza, leaving Palestinian reporters like Anas to bear the entire, deadly weight of telling the world what is happening.
Israel even accused him of being Hamas – an accusation as absurd as it was predictable – despite the fact that Anas spent most of the past 23 months in front of the camera, reporting live, his location always known. I often knew exactly where he was, just by following his social media and Al Jazeera broadcasts.
The question is: why did Israel kill him now? Is it because what is coming to Gaza is even darker, with the latest announcement of invading Gaza City and displacing more than a million people?
Anas even pleaded publicly with the international community to protect journalists in Gaza so they could continue to expose Israeli war crimes. He was not asking for special treatment. He was asking for the basic right to do his job without being killed for it. That plea, like so many others from Gaza, went unanswered.
On 10 August 2025, an Israeli airstrike hit a tent outside al-Shifa Hospital where Anas and his colleagues were covering the famine and starvation gripping Gaza. The strike killed Anas along with four other journalists – Mohammed Qreiqeh, Ibrahim Zaher, Mohammed Noufal, and Moamen Aliwa.
It was not just an attack on individuals; it was an attack on the truth itself.
Anas's killing is part of a relentless pattern. Since the war began in October 2023, over 230 journalists have been killed in Gaza – the deadliest conflict for journalists in modern history. The vast majority were Palestinian reporters, camera operators, and media workers, many of whom were the sole remaining eyes and ears for the outside world.
But journalists are not the only ones targeted. Israel has also killed over 400 aid workers, including UN staff and Palestinian Red Crescent volunteers. It has bombed clearly marked ambulances and convoys. More than 700 doctors, nurses, and paramedics have been killed. Hospitals and clinics have been destroyed or rendered inoperative. These are not 'collateral damage' – these are deliberate strikes on the people and infrastructure meant to protect life.
And still, no one has been held accountable. Not for Anas. Not for the executed medics in Rafah. Not for the aid workers buried in mass graves. The world issues statements of concern, but statements cannot stop bombs. Words without action are just noise – and in Gaza, the noise is already deafening.
For me, this loss is deeply personal. Anas and I shared the same streets growing up, the same camp, the same stubborn will to survive. I have lived in exile for years, but through his reporting, I could still feel close to Gaza. Every time he went live, I knew I was watching someone who was not just doing his job – he was carrying the burden of speaking for an entire people.
He filmed not as an outsider looking in, but as someone living the nightmare alongside those he reported on. He showed the world mothers digging through rubble for their children. Fathers carrying tiny bodies wrapped in white cloth. Children searching for food among the debris. And he showed it without flinching, without sanitising, without letting anyone look away.
That is why they killed him. And that is why we must remember him.
If there is any award, any honour, any recognition worth giving, it belongs to the Palestinian journalists of Gaza. They have risked – and given – their lives so the truth could survive. Their work has been done under constant bombardment, without protective gear, without safe corridors, and often while their own families were being killed.
Anas al-Sharif will never report another story. But his courage remains. His words remain. And his example must remain a rallying cry – not just for press freedom, but for justice.
Because the killing of journalists is not just a crime against the press. It is a crime against history itself. It is an attempt to ensure that what happened in Gaza can one day be denied.
We cannot allow that to happen. For Anas. For every journalist, aid worker, and medic killed. For the people of Gaza still living – and dying – under siege.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Putin praises 'sincere' U.S. as Ukraine braces for Trump-Putin summit
MOSCOW/LONDON/KYIV, Aug 14 (Reuters) - Russian President Vladimir Putin on Thursday praised "sincere efforts" by the U.S. to end the war in Ukraine and floated the prospect of a nuclear arms deal ahead of a summit with President Donald Trump where Europe has urged Trump to stand firm. Putin was speaking to his most senior ministers and security officials as he prepared for the meeting with Trump in Anchorage, Alaska on Friday that could shape the endgame to the largest war in Europe since World War Two. It follows intensified efforts by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy and his European allies to prevent any deal that carves up Ukraine's territory and leaves it vulnerable to future attack. Putin said in televised comments that the U.S. was "making, in my opinion, quite energetic and sincere efforts to stop the hostilities, stop the crisis and reach agreements that are of interest to all parties involved in this conflict". This was happening, Putin said, "in order to create long-term conditions for peace between our countries, and in Europe, and in the world as a whole - if, by the next stages, we reach agreements in the area of control over strategic offensive weapons." His comments signalled that Russia will raise the issue of nuclear arms control as part of a wide-ranging discussion on security when he sits down with Trump for the first Russia-U.S. summit since June 2021. A senior eastern European official, who requested anonymity to discuss sensitive matters, said Putin would try to distract Trump from Ukraine at the talks by offering him possible progress on nuclear arms control or something business-related. "We hope Trump won't be fooled by the Russians, he understands all (these) dangerous things," the official said. "The only strategic goal for the Russians is not to receive new sanctions, and to lift the sanctions that the U.S. and others (imposed) previously. The Russians have no other big goals now. They think they will find a way to take all of Ukraine in one way or another," the source added. Ukraine's allies said Trump was willing to back security guarantees for Kyiv, a potentially significant but as yet vague offer that could give some hope to Ukraine. Trump had shown willingness to join the guarantees at a last-ditch virtual meeting with European leaders and Zelenskiy on Wednesday, leaders said, though he made no public mention of them afterwards. "Yesterday, together with all our partners, and today in a bilateral format, we discussed expectations for the meeting in Alaska and possible prospects," Zelenskiy said after a meeting in London with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. "We also discussed in considerable detail the security guarantees that can make peace truly durable if the United States succeeds in pressing Russia to stop the killings and engage in genuine, substantive diplomacy." Friday's summit comes at one of the toughest moments for Ukraine in a war that has killed tens of thousands and displaced millions since Russia's full-scale invasion in February 2022. Speaking after Wednesday's meeting, French President Emmanuel Macron said Trump insisted that the transatlantic NATO alliance should not be part of security guarantees that would be designed to protect Ukraine from future attacks in a post-war settlement. "President Trump also stated this clearly, saying things that I find important: namely, that NATO should not be part of these security guarantees - and we know this is a key point, particularly for the Russian side - but (also) that the United States and all willing allies should be part of them. That is what we are committed to," Macron said. Expanding on that, a European official told Reuters that Trump said on the call he was willing to provide some security guarantees for Europe, without spelling out what they would be. The official, who did not want to be named, said this was the first time he has been so explicit about providing some guarantees since the Coalition of the Willing talks led by Britain and France began in March. It "felt like a big step forward", the official said. It was not immediately clear what such guarantees could mean in practice. On Wednesday, Trump threatened "severe consequences" if Putin does not agree to peace in Ukraine and while he did not specify what the consequences could be, he has warned of economic sanctions if his meeting on Friday proves fruitless. However, Russia is likely to resist Ukraine and Europe's demands strongly and previously has said its stance had not changed since it was first detailed by Putin in June 2024. A Kremlin aide said Putin and Trump will discuss the "huge untapped potential" for Russia-U.S. economic ties as well as the prospects for ending the war at the meeting. Zelenskiy confirmed this week that Russian forces had advanced by about 9-10 km (6 miles) near the town of Dobropillia in the Donetsk region. Ukraine, suffering manpower challenges, was forced to move in reserves to stabilise the situation. Trump has said a deal could include what he called a land swap. Russia controls around a fifth of Ukraine and a land swap within Ukraine could cement Moscow's gains. Zelenskiy and the Europeans worry that would reward Putin for 11 years of efforts to seize Ukrainian land and embolden him to expand further west in Europe.


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
The Royal Ballet and Opera must reconsider its invitation to Anna Netrebko
For Ukrainians, the UK's unwavering support – from its governments to its people and cultural institutions like the Royal Ballet and Opera – has been a vital source of strength and hope amid Russia's brutal war of aggression. It is, therefore, with great pain that we witness the Royal Opera House inviting Anna Netrebko – a longtime symbol of cultural propaganda for a regime that is responsible for serious war crimes – to return to its stage in title roles. Even more troubling is the statement by the chief executive of the Royal Ballet and Opera suggesting that its earlier support for Ukraine 'was aligned with the global consensus at the time' and that its position has since changed due to 'complex geopolitics'. We must ask: do Russia's recent escalated attacks on peaceful Ukrainian cities and civilians and its intentional and systematic attempts to erase Ukrainian culture fall into this category of complexity, somehow justifying Netrebko's return? Can the Royal Opera credibly claim neutrality and integrity while offering its stage to someone who, in 2014, publicly waved the flag of 'Novorossiya', the Kremlin's separatist project in Ukraine's Donetsk region, parts of which remain under Russian military occupation? The Royal Opera now faces a defining choice: between status and responsibility, between profit and values, between silence and conscience. We urge you to remain, as you consistently have, on the ethical side of art – and of history. Sergiy Kyslytsya First deputy foreign minister of UkraineAndriy Kurkov Author, PEN UkraineHelen Clark Former prime minister of New ZealandAlex Sobel MP Labour (Co-op), Leeds Central and Headingley, and chair, all-party parliamentary group on UkraineJohn Whittingdale MP Vice-chair, all-party parliamentary group on Ukraine; member, foreign affairs committeeRoger Gale MP Conservative, Herne Bay and SandwichScott Arthur MP Labour, Edinburgh South West Chris Law MP SNP, Dundee CentralBlair McDougall MP Labour, East Renfrewshire; member, foreign affairs committeeJohanna Baxter MP Labour, Paisley and Renfrewshire SouthBernard-Henri Lévy Philosopher, journalist, film-maker and public intellectualMstyslav Chernov Producer, film-makerSerhiy Zhadan Author, translatorRoza Tapanova Director, Babyn Yar national historical and memorial reserveKathy Nalywajko President, Ukrainian Institute of AmericaLydia Zaininger Executive director, Ukrainian Institute of AmericaBohdana Pivnenko Violinist, general director and artistic director, National Ensemble of Soloists Kyiv CamerataSvitlana Azarova Composer, The Hague, NetherlandsDr Olesya Khromeychuk Historian, writer, director of the Ukrainian Institute LondonOlia Hercules Chef, award-winning author and activistPetro Rewko Chairman of the board of directors, Association of Ukrainians in Great BritainFedir Kurlak Chief executive and member of the board, Association of Ukrainians in Great BritainIryna Terlecky Chair, Ukrainian Women's Association; board member, Association of Ukrainians in Great BritainInna Hryhorovych Chair, Association of Ukrainian Teachers in Great Britain; director, Ukrainian St Mary's TrustAnna Fedeczko Chair, Ukrainian Youth Association in Great BritainDr Roman Cregg President, Ukrainian Medical Association of the UKViktoriya Shtanko CEO, Ukraine Appeal Natalia Ravlyuk Director, Support Ukraine/London EuroMaidanIryna Rapiy Deputy director of Support Ukraine/board committee member of AUGB LondonDr Tetyana Vovnyanko Trustee, British-Ukrainian AidMarta Mulyak Head, Plast Ukrainian Scouts in Great BritainMick Antoniw MS Senedd4Ukraine groupDanylo Nikiforov Founder, Ukrainian Students Union in the UKProf Dennis Ougrin Vice-president, Ukrainian Medical Association of the United KingdomAlex Lidagovsky SculptorAliona Hlivco Founder and CEO, St James's Foreign Policy GroupKateryna Babkina WriterDasha Nepochatova DPhil student, New College, University of OxfordAlexandra Kutas Disability advocate and humanitarian leaderMaria Springis Director, producer and filmmaker, Dreams Into Reality ProductionOksana Lovochkina CEO, Ukrainian Medical CharityDr Olha Mukha Senior strategist in strategic communications and human rightsAntonina Grebeniuk Founder, Ukraine Aid and Welfare, BristolAlina Luts Founder and director, Ukrainian Social Club CICKseniia Iaremych Legal counselMaria Romanenko Journalist, editor, public speaker and activistVadym Granovskiy United Kingdom Cezve/Ibrik champion and baristaEla Czuruk Group, lead volunteer, 1st Plast London Ukrainian ScoutsTetyana Birch Executive trustee, The Chernobyl Relief Foundation in the UKNataliia Horbenko Director, Ukrainian Art House in LondonOksana Miletska Trustee, Women Fight For Ukraine FoundationViktoriya Kiose Journalist and director, UABeyondKostiantyn Bidnenko Film-maker and producerProf Olga Onuch Professor of comparative and Ukrainian politics, University of ManchesterDr Daria Mattingly Senior lecturer in European history, University of ChichesterIvan Kozlenko Writer, film scholar, University of Cambridge


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Dragged away to Hell: Terrifying new October 7 footage shows kidnapped Israeli led through Gaza by Hamas terrorists as baying mob tries to lynch him... before being starved and tortured for 491 days
This is the terrifying new October 7 footage that shows a kidnapped Israeli hostage being dragged through Gaza by armed Hamas terrorists as a baying mob tries to lynch him. Ohad Ben Ami, a father of three daughters from Kibbutz Be'eri, was held captive for 491 days in a tunnel in Gaza where he was deliberately starved and endured severe physical and psychological torture. It has since been revealed that once he was underground, terrorists subjected Ben Ami to barbaric conditions: they hung him upside down by his feet, throttled him with rope, and held him in a dark tunnel so tiny he had to learn to walk again. The horrifying new video shows the then-55 year old seeing daylight for what would be the last time for over a year, as he is manhandled through narrow streets by Hamas gunmen as crowds of shouting civilian men swarm towards him. In more footage made public by the IDF for the first time, Hamas terrorists are seen returning to Kibbutz Be'eri to capture Ben Ami's wife, Raz, and kidnap her to the Strip. A crowd of plain-clothed terrorists escort the mother, wearing a black and white dress, on foot through the border fence, where she was then forced to spend the next 54 days confined in Hamas captivity in Gaza's tunnel network. The shocking video shows the final moments before Ben Ami was trapped 30 metres (100 feet) underground in a space measuring only six square metres (65 square feet) with six other hostages for almost 500 days. 'We received food twice a day that amounted to 700 calories at best,' the accountant said after his release, describing how Hamas subjected the hostages to deliberate starvation by giving them only a rotten pita every few days. 'Most of our time was spent trying to guess what we would get to eat, when it would happen, whether we would get a whole pita for each person or just half, whether there would also be a cup of rice, [and] whether we got leftovers from our captors,' he told the Jerusalem Post. The hostages were trapped between concrete 'without air to breathe', he recalled, describing the dire conditions of captivity. 'We slept close together on a thin, damp, and wet mattress, with the same blanket that had been used as a sheet for over a year. 'Insects in the tunnel would get into our noses, mouths, ears, and everywhere else possible.' He and his cell mates were only allowed to shower once every few weeks in 'cold, salty water', and they each wore the same set of clothes the entire time. Illness was rampant underground, and spread quickly between the hostages, with diarrhea and an upset stomach being common among them due to a lack of medicine. 'When someone is sick, everyone is sick. Everything was contagious and exhausting because we lost fluids, and there were several cases where we lost consciousness due to high fever.' Ben Ami and fellow Israeli hostages Or Levy and Eli Sharabi were together subjected to extreme physical torture underground. Israel was distraught to discover how the trio were choked, bound, gagged with cloth to the point of suffocation, hung upside down, and burned with a physical object by their captors in Gaza, reported Haaretz. The hostages were also psychologically taunted by Hamas operatives, who would eat food in front of them, force them to pick which hostages ate and who starved, and even demanded they choose who among their fellow captives who should be killed. Quoted in the Times of Israel, Ben Ami described the sadistic games Hamas would play on the hostages: 'A commander, probably a senior one, came to us and cocked his gun, and said: "Choose three people to die and three people who I will shoot in the kneecap." 'They made us decide which three should take a bullet to the head, and which three a bullet to the knee. 'We had to debate this for an entire hour, all while they filmed us. They let each of us speak and explain why we deserved to live, why we deserved to die, or why we deserved to be shot in the knee.' When the men failed to volunteer themselves or select any fellow captives for death, Hamas operatives would give them the chance to be pardoned - by forcing them to speak badly about the Israeli government. The terrorists would show the hostages statements from Israeli politicians and reports of efforts to sabotage the deal, taunting them with phrases like: 'They don't want to free you' or 'This is how they treat you.' After 51 grueling days in captivity, Ben Ami's wife, Raz, was set free in November 2023. It wasn't until February 2025 that Ben-Ami, 56, Levy, 34, and Sharabi, 52, were released, shocking the world with their emaciated bodies. Health officials took to Hebrew media to report how the three men had suffered malnutrition, decreased muscle mass, heart disorders, and prolonged infection. On October 7, armed Hamas terrorists killed 101 civilians and 31 security personnel during the massacre at Kibbutz Be'eri. A further 30 residents and two more civilians were taken hostage. Ben Ami and his wife have three daughters: Yulie, Natalie, and Ella. On seeing her father for the first time in 491 days, Ella said nothing could have prepared her for seeing the gaunt look of his face and body. 'What you all saw yesterday on TV, the difficult sight that makes you want to throw the TV to the ground, that's my father. He endured horrors. We haven't even begun to hear in-depth about the hell he was in,' reported Haaretz 'My father survived as a hero and returned with his head held high,' she said. Hamas-led militants killed around 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and abducted 251 others in an attack on October 7, 2023, attack that ignited the war. They still hold 50 hostages, around 20 of them believed to be alive. Israel's retaliatory military offensive has killed more than 61,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza's Health Ministry.