logo
Families and staff react to scaled down Pittsburgh Public School closure plan: "It's a generational opportunity to do what's right."

Families and staff react to scaled down Pittsburgh Public School closure plan: "It's a generational opportunity to do what's right."

CBS News22-05-2025

Pittsburgh Public Schools leadership is now looking to close 12 schools instead of 14 as part of a revised proposal for the future of the district. It's giving some families some relief learning they their schools may no longer be on the chopping block.
Last July, Mary Leroy moved with her grandson from Georgia to Carrick. She said he's autistic and that Roosevelt K-5 has a great special needs program.
"He loves it here. He's doing really well," Leroy said.
When she learned the school may close, Leroy was concerned.
"Not knowing where he would go, how I would get him there, not knowing the different programs that the schools have," Leroy said.
The same goes for Will Irvin, whose son and niece go to Roosevelt.
"It would have been a big change for all of us, kids and parents alone," Irvin said.
Now, they may not have to worry.
Pittsburgh Public Schools presents updated plan
On Wednesday night, Pittsburgh Public Schools leaders presented an updated feasibility report on the future of the district. Under the new proposal, Roosevelt and Schiller would remain open, but Schiller would relocate to the Allegheny building.
The Manchester building, which was originally going to be converted for another school, will now close along with the school. Special needs training at the Conroy Education Center would stay open. Also, Allegheny would move, saving the King building.
Overall, the district would close nine facilities instead of 10.
Besides the school and facility changes, Superintendent Dr. Wayne Walters also provided additional information on the financial impact, transportation, and feeder patterns, as requested by the board and the public, postponing a vote in late March.
"It is a generational opportunity to do what is right," Walters said.
In the new report, the district claims the plan would save it more than $100 million in the coming years. The majority of the changes would start after school ends in spring 2026, with the final transitions to take place in 2028.
"These conversations about implementation are not something that we are exclusively waiting for a board decision, but we do need a smoke signal for us to kind of put things in gear," Walters said.
The process goes back more than a year as the district looks to save money and make better use of resources with declining enrollment.
At this point, Walters said they're ready for the green light, as Leroy crosses her fingers for Roosevelt's future.
"They're going to stay open. We're going to send it upstairs and keep it open," Leroy said.
Sources told me that while some board members haven't liked how this process has been handled, they believe they'll have enough votes to move forward with the public comment period. The board will take up that vote next month.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

BarEhud Barak: Israel Must Back Trump's Gaza Deal
BarEhud Barak: Israel Must Back Trump's Gaza Deal

Yahoo

time39 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

BarEhud Barak: Israel Must Back Trump's Gaza Deal

U.S. President Donald Trump greets Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as he arrives at the White House on April 7, 2025, in Washington, D.C. Credit - Alex Wong—Getty Images In the coming few days, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will face a defining choice between a politically motivated "war of deception" in Gaza and a deal to release all hostages while ending the war. He must choose between his extreme-right ministers—Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich—or aligning with Donald Trump. There is no symmetry here. Accepting a hostage deal, ending the war, and working with Trump and free world leaders, won't be effortless. Any choice requires detailed negotiations and compromises. But this path is far superior to any realistic alternative. Based on the achievements of the Israel Defense Forces—including damage to Hamas, weakening Hezbollah, destroying Syria's military arsenal during Assad's collapse, and demonstrating Israel's capability to strike deep into Iran—Israeli leadership could, from a position of strength, pursue releasing all hostages simultaneously, halt this senseless war, end the humanitarian crisis, and uproot Hamas from power. This would enable Israel, though belatedly, to join Trump's vision of a New Middle East, including normalization with Saudi Arabia, regional deployment to tackle the Iranian challenge, and participation in the trade corridor project from India through the Gulf to Europe. Choosing a "war of deception" instead—where misleading propaganda presents political warfare as serving Israel's security—would be a grave mistake. It's highly doubtful that continuing the war could produce results different from previous Gaza rounds over the past 20 months. But it would certainly constitute a death sentence for some or most living hostages and deepen the diplomatic tsunami and International Criminal Court claims Israel already faces. This approach might make sense if it could achieve "total victory" over Hamas, but that won't happen. When this new war inevitably halts—under diplomatic pressure, humanitarian crisis, battlefield events, or domestic political developments—we would find ourselves in precisely the same situation as today. To understand, examine recent history. The October 7th barbaric attack created a compelling imperative for Israel to ensure Hamas could never again reign over Gaza or threaten Israel from there. The question was how to achieve this goal. Since Ben-Gurion, Israel has followed four strategic maxims: wars should be aggressive, fought on enemy territory, ended quickly to translate battlefield results into diplomatic and political realities while maintaining international legitimacy, and—extremely important—never lose the moral high ground. That's how we won in 1967 in six days and 1973 in three weeks. Netanyahu has betrayed almost all these principles. Read More: The Israel-Hamas Ceasefire Was Never Going to Last Another strategic maxim, from Clausewitz to Kissinger, holds that war must have a clearly defined, operationally feasible political purpose. As the Roman saying goes: "If you don't know which port you want to reach, no wind will take you there." This maxim was deliberately ignored. Netanyahu has blocked any discussion of this issue since October 7th, 2023. It was clear to any serious observer that Hamas suffered major military blows daily, losing most weapons systems and leadership figures since October 7th. However, since any Hamas group or individual can easily "disappear" within minutes, hiding among the Strip's 2 million civilians and emerging from tunnels or building windows to attack Israelis, their absolute elimination remains a Sisyphean task. Even after 58 years in the West Bank, we never fully eliminated Hamas' presence in Jenin or Tulkarm. The only way to ensure Hamas cannot reign over Gaza and threaten Israel is by replacing it with another governing entity legitimate to the international community, Arab neighbors like Egypt, UAE, and Saudi Arabia, and Palestinians themselves. Practically, this means a temporary inter-Arab force backed by the Arab League, potentially supported by UN Security Council resolution, funded by Saudi Arabia and UAE, with a technocratic government overseeing Palestinian bureaucracy and a new, non-Hamas security body trained by the inter-Arab force under U.S. supervision. Israel would present only two conditions: no Hamas military branch member could participate in the new entity's organs, and the IDF, initially deployed to the Strip's perimeter, would withdraw to the border only after all pre-agreed security benchmarks are met. This plan, easily implementable a year ago, and appearing to save Gaza and Gazans from further destruction, is harder now, because it could be interpreted as saving Israel from sinking into Gazan mud. But the plan remains viable despite the Israeli government's refusal to consider it. Since this is the only practical "day after" plan, there's no sense sacrificing hostages' lives or endangering Israeli troops in pointless warfare. Who can look into the eyes of future bereaved parents, newly widowed spouses, new orphans, disabled and traumatized soldiers, and claim with clear conscience that everything was done to prevent loss, or that it had justification? As long as Israel rejects hostage release and war's end, the risk increases of international initiatives, including Arab neighbors calling for Israel boycotts and steps toward recognition of a Palestinian state by European countries—many of them stable friends of Israel. Read More: I Am a Former Hamas Hostage. Here's My Message to Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu Permanent occupation of the Gaza Strip, population transfer of 2 million Palestinians, and Israeli resettlement on the that land are base and delusional visions that would backfire and accelerate confrontation with the world. Why is Netanyahu, an intelligent, experienced, savvy politician, failing? The answer isn't simple. Netanyahu has ruled since 2015 through an alliance with ultra-Orthodox parties who don't serve in the army and care only about sectoral needs, and since January 2023 added ultra-right zealots believing Gaza resettlement and Palestinian transfer are heavenly orders. He's caught in a dilemma: 80% of the public sees him as primarily responsible for the country's worst day, 60% believe he should resign. A heavy majority perceives his judicial reform, initiated immediately after January 2023 elections, as a "judicial coup d'état"—an attempt to castrate the legislative branch and demolish Supreme Court independence. Many believe the aim of his blatant attack on democracy is to escape his bribery, fraud, and breach of trust court case. For him, any pause in the war—even 60 days, certainly longer—would immediately bring reckoning and accountability: accelerated court proceedings; demands for national inquiry committee investigating October 7th, and events before, during and after; coalition meltdown; and probable disgraced ejection from public life. I believe Netanyahu genuinely wants all hostages home. But when this clashes with immediate threats to his political survival, he prefers leaving them in Gaza. He has already torpedoed several hostage deal opportunities, and seems to be doing it once again over the weekend, by resisting U.S. guarantee to Hamas for an end to the war in exchange for release of all hostages and entering, together with the Trump Administration, into Trump's New Middle East Order (to include the replacement of Hamas, described above). Netanyahu sticks to his eternal war in order to avoid a pause in fighting, which might lead to the end of his political career. This behavior is unacceptable to Israel and Israelis. We are, as former Supreme Court President Aharon Barak wrote years ago, 'defending democracy' that "should be capable of defending itself against those who try to use the very freedoms and tools it provides to destroy it from within." We're led by someone who lost his strategic and moral compass, dragging the nation into war motivated by personal political interests against our security and common future. Israel urgently needs new, sober leadership with clear realistic vision and self-confidence—leadership capable of reading our people's soul, understanding partners' and rivals' minds, and above all, having courage to make decisions and power to implement them. The world will pass judgment. But the burden of bringing Israel back on track is ours—Israeli citizens. I believe we will overcome. This war will end soon, and Israel's worst ever government will be replaced by a responsible, effective one. A long path of repair must follow. Contact us at letters@

‘Out Of His Mind': Critics Aghast At Trump's ‘Detached From Reality' New Message
‘Out Of His Mind': Critics Aghast At Trump's ‘Detached From Reality' New Message

Yahoo

time39 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

‘Out Of His Mind': Critics Aghast At Trump's ‘Detached From Reality' New Message

President Donald Trump shares a lot of outlandish messages on his social media pages, but critics say a single repost over the weekend might be his most 'unhinged' yet. Trump on Saturday night reposted a message on Truth Social claiming that former President Joe Biden had been executed in 2020 and replaced by 'clones doubles & robotic engineered soulless mindless entities.' Trump frequently posts or reposts conspiracy theories on any number of subjects. Last year, the New York Times found Trump had shared or amplified 330 conspiracy theories in a single six-month period describing 'a false, secretive plot against Mr. Trump or the American people and a specific entity supposedly responsible for it.' Since taking office, Trump has continued to promote conspiracy theories, and has even elevated conspiracy theorists to key positions. But many critics say this latest message is on a whole new level:

Man City pursuing deal to sign Rayan Ait Nouri from Wolves
Man City pursuing deal to sign Rayan Ait Nouri from Wolves

New York Times

time40 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Man City pursuing deal to sign Rayan Ait Nouri from Wolves

Manchester City are pursuing a deal to sign Rayan Ait Nouri from Wolverhampton Wanderers. Agreements still need to be reached between the clubs and with the 23-year-old — however all parties now expect a move to happen. Ait Nouri has emerged as City's top target to strengthen at left-back after four impressive seasons since joining Wolves on a permanent basis, which followed a loan spell, from Angers. Advertisement Pep Guardiola's side are working to secure the Algeria international and further recruits before the Club World Cup in the United States this summer. Premier League clubs voted to approve allowing the window to open on June 1 before closing on June 10, with the tournament kicking off four days later. City face Wydad AC, Al Ain and Juventus in Group G of the newly-expanded competition. Ait Nouri has made 157 appearances for Wolves since joining the Midlands club, initially on loan, in 2020. He made 41 appearances in all competitions this season, scoring five goals and adding seven assists. Central defender Josko Gvardiol was City's most regular left-back before academy graduate midfielder Nico O'Reilly starred in the position over the final months of the campaign. ()

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store