logo
China quietly exempts some US-made products from tariffs

China quietly exempts some US-made products from tariffs

Mint26-04-2025

BEIJING—China's government has exempted some U.S. imports that the country would struggle to immediately source from elsewhere from its retaliatory tariffs, people familiar with the matter said.
Chinese authorities have told some importers of American goods that they would waive the most recent 125% increases in tariff rates for certain U.S. imports. Those products include certain semiconductors and chipmaking equipment, medical products and aviation parts, the people said.
The carve-outs highlight points of vulnerability for China's economy. Many Chinese industries, particularly in advanced technology, aerospace and pharmaceuticals, remain reliant on American-made inputs.
The Trump administration, similarly, announced exemptions on its 'reciprocal tariffs" for China-made smartphones, laptops and other electronics earlier this month, a recognition of the U.S.'s reliance on China for such goods.
When Trump leveled a cumulative 20% in additional levies on all Chinese imports early on in his second term, Beijing responded with targeted tariffs on some U.S. imports, including energy products and certain vehicles. It didn't slap across-the-board tariffs on U.S. goods until Trump's 'Liberation Day" tariffs on April 2, which applied an additional 34% on all Chinese goods. After that, Beijing matched each of Trump's subsequent tariff increases, bringing its current tariff level to 125% on all U.S. goods.
Two semiconductor traders said Chinese customs had lifted tariffs on eight categories of U.S.-made chips, including central-processing units, starting on April 24. Chinese authorities haven't removed tariffs on U.S. memory chips, they said.
Many chip products developed by Intel and Texas Instruments are exempt from the tariffs, while some U.S.-made products of memory-chip maker Micron Technology will continue to be subject to the duties, they said.
Beijing has prepared a list of U.S. imports from which it plans to remove the tariffs, some of the people said. The goods being considered also include some industrial chemicals such as quartz and ethane, as well as lithography machines, helicopters and vaccines, they said. They cautioned that the list could change as discussions proceed.
As the tariff war between Washington and Beijing has escalated, Chinese officials have been surveying companies and industry groups to understand what U.S. goods should be exempted from tariffs to protect China's own interests, the people said. Still, Beijing has refrained from publicly announcing its tariff exemptions so as not to reveal its structural vulnerabilities while also leaving space for future adjustment and negotiation, one of the people said.
The Chinese effort has involved several government bodies, with coordination overseen by the Customs Tariff Commission of the State Council, the country's cabinet.
'They want to make sure the Chinese tariffs don't harm their economy," said Michael Hart, president of the American Chamber of Commerce in China, whose members include Boeing, Honeywell and Qualcomm. Hart said Beijing had been asking U.S. firms doing business in China what components they import from America that they can't get elsewhere.
Hart said that pharmaceutical companies were reporting anecdotally that some of their shipments to China were also exempted from the 125% levies on all U.S. goods.
'China still has the 125% tariffs in place, but appears to be making specific exemptions for products that are critical for them and their economy," Hart said. 'Assuming we have understood this correctly, it tells us China is clearly mapping and managing their supply chain to keep out U.S. products that have other substitutes, but allowing in those they need and can't replace at present."
China's aviation regulator has instructed some airlines to halt receiving aircraft and components from the U.S. The exemption on aircraft parts, such as engines, will allow the country to continue with aircraft maintenance and manufacturing. China has a homegrown plane maker, Comac, that remains reliant on foreign supply chains.
In recent weeks, at least three Boeing aircraft set to be delivered to China's Xiamen Airlines and Air China have flown back to the U.S. Chinese officials are also weighing whether to waive tariffs for Chinese carriers that lease jets from the U.S., one of the people said.
Olivier Andries, chief executive of Safran, a French aerospace-industry supplier, told analysts on an earnings call Friday that China was exempting tariffs on deliveries of engines, landing gear and other parts.
Write to Jonathan Cheng at Jonathan.Cheng@wsj.com

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump travel ban: Will Iran travel for 2026 FIFA World Cup?
Trump travel ban: Will Iran travel for 2026 FIFA World Cup?

Hindustan Times

time4 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Trump travel ban: Will Iran travel for 2026 FIFA World Cup?

USA, Canada, and Mexico are all set to host the 2026 FIFA World Cup together. However, President Donald Trump's latest travel ban has posed questions about whether certain qualified countries will now be allowed to travel to the US and take part. Starting Monday (June 9), citizens of 12 countries will no longer be allowed to get a US visa, according to a recent decision by Trump. Citizens of Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen have been banned by Trump and tighter restrictions have been applied to seven other nations (Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela). Trump explained his move by stating in a video, 'The recent terror attack in Boulder, Colorado, has underscored the extreme dangers posed to our country, by the entry of foreign nationals who are not properly vetted, as well as those who come here as temporary visitors and overstay their visas. We don't want them.' As of now, Iran is the only country from the list to have already qualified to compete in the FIFA World Cup next year. Cuba, Sudan, and Haiti are currently in contention to contest. Venezuela is five points off the threshold for automatic qualification but a playoff might just cut the deal. Sierra Leone can still be involved through multiple playoff games while Burundi, Equatorial Guinea, and Libya have very slim chances. Under the current policy, sports teams of qualifying countries should still be able to contest since such a provision have been provided for 'any athlete or member of an athletic team, including coaches, persons performing a necessary support role, and immediate relatives, traveling for the World Cup, Olympics, or other major sporting event as determined by the secretary of state.' However, this exception will only continue as long as there is no change to the current ban policy adopted by the US. Iranian fans hoping to catch their national team in the spotlight won't be so lucky however since the policy provides no such exceptions for fans of sporting teams. Getting an American visa had already been tough for Iranians even before the ban was implemented due to tougher vetting procedures. However, considering how those indulging in international travel for sporting events are usually from a higher wealth bracket, such individuals could still try to circumvent the process by using different passport options. The move has stirred a debate about the intersection of politics with global sport. Back in 2017, FIFA President Gianni Infantino had said, "Any team, including the supporters and officials of that team, who qualify for a World Cup need to have access to the country, otherwise there is no World Cup." Infantino has since developed close ties with Trump and has re-emphasized that sporting teams of all countries will face no barriers in coming to the US for participation next year. The event is expected to raise a majority of the soccer body's revenue in the 2023-2026 period. Questions have also been raised about the US' legitimacy to hold the upcoming 2028 Olympic Games with such strict travel policies against certain participating countries.

Tech analyst and Tesla bull warns investors on Elon Musk-Donald Trump 'fight': 'I don't think...'
Tech analyst and Tesla bull warns investors on Elon Musk-Donald Trump 'fight': 'I don't think...'

Time of India

time10 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Tech analyst and Tesla bull warns investors on Elon Musk-Donald Trump 'fight': 'I don't think...'

A day after Elon Musk and US President Donald Trump engaged in a 'fight' online, Wedbush Securities tech analyst and Tesla bull, Dan Ives, has advised investors to brace for further developments in the ongoing public dispute between the Tesla CEO and Trump, a conflict many experts had anticipated, a report has said. "Get the popcorn out," Ives told CNBC, suggesting the dispute is far from over. 'I don't think we're done here,' he added. Ives says the online feud between Musk and Trump is 'bad news' for market Ives expressed concern that Musk's strong reactions to Trump could jeopardise prospects for favourable regulatory outcomes for Tesla. In a research note on Thursday, Ives said the spat will be "jaw-dropping and a shock to the market." 'The quickly deteriorating friendship and now 'major beef' between Musk and Trump is jaw-dropping and a shock to the market,' Ives warned in a research note on Thursday, adding it is 'putting major fear for Tesla investors on what is ahead,' he said. However, Ives later moderated his stance following reports from Politico indicating that White House aides had contacted Musk in an attempt to de-escalate the situation. On Friday (June 6), Ives adjusted his assessment, writing that "Musk needs Trump and Trump needs Musk for many reasons, and these two becoming friends again will be a huge relief for Tesla shares," subsequently labeling the stock as oversold. How Musk-Trump spat started The feud started soon after the introduction of the Trump administration's " One Big, Beautiful Bill ", which Musk publicly branded a "disgusting abomination." Trump later fired back saying he did not need Musk to win in Pennsylvania. Musk replied by saying that if he would have not been involved, Trump would have lost the elections.

'Trump wouldn't have been US President had…': Hakeem Jeffries rips GOP agenda, Trump-Musk feud - The Economic Times Video
'Trump wouldn't have been US President had…': Hakeem Jeffries rips GOP agenda, Trump-Musk feud - The Economic Times Video

Time of India

time17 minutes ago

  • Time of India

'Trump wouldn't have been US President had…': Hakeem Jeffries rips GOP agenda, Trump-Musk feud - The Economic Times Video

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries delivered remarks on Friday morning as Democrats rallied against President Trump's 'big, beautiful bill,' which is encountering substantial obstacles in the Senate. His comments came in the wake of tensions between Trump and tech billionaire Elon Musk, who recently left the administration. Musk's criticism of the GOP megabill frustrated the president, sparking a public dispute between them and providing Democrats with additional material to critique the extensive spending package.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store