logo
House Passes Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill

House Passes Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill

Epoch Times25-05-2025

This text appeared in the 'Top Story' email newsletter sent on May 24, 2025.
Well, they finally did it.
Shortly after sunrise on Thursday, after 30 hours of nonstop debate and negotiation and not one but two meetings with the president, House Republicans passed H.R. 1, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.
This bill is the springboard for Trump's second-term agenda.
Republicans (mostly) love it. Democrats appear to universally hate it. Either way, the Big Beautiful Bill is a monumental piece of legislation that impacts nearly every aspect of American society.
It's actually 11 tax and spending bills rolled into a 1,100-page package that includes many promises President Donald Trump made during his second campaign.
No tax on tips? Check. No tax on overtime? Check. $150 billion in new military spending? Yep. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act made permanent? That too.
Related Story
5/23/2025
Plus rollbacks on the so-called Green New Deal tax subsidies, a few changes to Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, 3,000 new Border Patrol agents, 5,000 new customs officers, 10,000 new Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers, and a $1.5 trillion haircut on federal spending over the next 10 years.
And much, much
.
Republicans presented this bill as a commonsense effort to reform some of the things they think are broken in the country.
That includes the rapid increase in Medicaid spending over the last few years, what they see as the deterioration of military readiness, lack of control over the country's borders, runaway inflation, and high energy prices.
Democrats have a different take. Their clear message—and a dress rehearsal of their 2026 campaign strategy—is that Republicans are cutting life-sustaining benefits for needy families to give giant tax breaks to billionaires.
To a person, they repeated those lines in endless hours of committee hearings and floor debate.
But why all the late-night meetings and the hard push from Trump in the final days?
Because Republican fiscal conservatives and moderates had deep disagreements about some parts of the bill. It was like an X-ray of the GOP rib cage. Every little crack showed up in black and white.
For the fiscal hawks, Medicaid was a key issue. Some saw this as a generational opportunity to overhaul the system, which they said is in danger of bankrupting the country due to rapid spending growth.
Moderates balked at any change in the payment rates made to states by the federal government.
The two sides settled on increasing the work requirements for some able-bodied people starting in 2027, and requiring people to verify their enrollment eligibility every six months instead of once a year.
The bill will also penalize states that enroll people living in the country illegally, of which by one government report, there are about 1.4 million people. And? It bars Medicaid for paying for 'gender affirming care.'
Democrats are vehement in opposing changes to the program. They say it's just a way to use paperwork and regulations to kick millions of people out of the program. Republicans say it will only affect people who didn't qualify to begin with.
A handful of Republicans also pushed for an increase in the state and local tax federal tax deduction. It's capped at $10,000, and an initial version of the bill increased that to $30,000. That was negotiated up to $40,000 for people making less than $500,000 per year.
Moderates said it's only fair because people are being taxed twice on the same money—once by the state and once by the federal government. Others, including Trump, appeared to see it as a giveaway to high-tax states like New York and California.
So here's the thing. Despite all the spending cuts, the Beautiful Bill still increases the federal deficit by $3.8 trillion over 10 years, according to the Congressional Budget Office.
That's why a few Republicans wouldn't vote for it. Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) was one of them; he called it 'a debt bomb.'
So did Warren Davidson (R-Ohio) also voted against the bill. Rep. Andy Harris (R-Md.), chair of the House Freedom Caucus, voted present.
Now it's up to the Senate. They'll consider the bill next and will likely make some changes.
House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) said on Thursday morning that he hopes Senators won't change too much. It took a delicate balance to get the bill passed, Johnson said.
The bill would also raise the national debt ceiling by $4 trillion. The Treasury
the country will exceed the current limit in August, so Senate action is expected by July.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Vance says Musk making a 'huge mistake' in going after Trump but also tries to downplay the attacks
Vance says Musk making a 'huge mistake' in going after Trump but also tries to downplay the attacks

Associated Press

time13 minutes ago

  • Associated Press

Vance says Musk making a 'huge mistake' in going after Trump but also tries to downplay the attacks

BRIDGEWATER, N.J. (AP) — Vice President JD Vance said Elon Musk was making a 'huge mistake' going after President Donald Trump in a storm of bitter and inflammatory social media posts after a falling out between the two men. But the vice president, in an interview released Friday after the very public blow up between the world's richest man and arguably the world's most powerful, also tried to downplay Musk's blistering attacks as an 'emotional guy' who got frustrated. 'I hope that eventually Elon comes back into the fold. Maybe that's not possible now because he's gone so nuclear,' Vance said. Vance's comments come as other Republicans in recent days have urged the two men, who months ago were close allies spending significant time together, to mend fences. Musk's torrent of social media posts attacking Trump came as the president portrayed him as disgruntled and 'CRAZY' and threatened to cut the government contracts held by his businesses. Musk, who runs electric vehicle maker Tesla, internet company Starlink and rocket company SpaceX, lambasted Trump's centerpiece tax cuts and spending bill but also suggested Trump should be impeached and claimed without evidence that the government was concealing information about the president's association with infamous pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. 'Look, it happens to everybody,' Vance said in the interview. 'I've flown off the handle way worse than Elon Musk did in the last 24 hours.' Vance made the comments in an interview with ' manosphere' comedian Theo Von, who last month joked about snorting drugs off a mixed-race baby and the sexuality of men in the U.S. Navy when he opened for Trump at a military base in Qatar. The vice president told Von that as Musk for days was calling on social media for Congress to kill Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill,' the president was 'getting a little frustrated, feeling like some of the criticisms were unfair coming from Elon, but I think has been very restrained because the president doesn't think that he needs to be in a blood feud with Elon Musk.' 'I actually think if Elon chilled out a little bit, everything would be fine,' he added. Musk appeared by Saturday morning to have deleted his posts about Epstein. The interview was taped Thursday as Musk's posts were unfurling on X, the social media network the billionaire owns. During the interview, Von showed the vice president Musk's claim that Trump's administration hasn't released all the records related to sex abuser Jeffrey Epstein because Trump is mentioned in them. Vance responded to that, saying, 'Absolutely not. Donald Trump didn't do anything wrong with Jeffrey Epstein.' 'This stuff is just not helpful,' Vance said in response to another post shared by Musk calling for Trump to be impeached and replaced with Vance. 'It's totally insane. The president is doing a good job.' Vance called Musk an 'incredible entrepreneur,' and said that Musk's Department of Government Efficiency, which sought to cut government spending and laid off or pushed out thousands of workers, was 'really good.' The vice president also defended the bill that has drawn Musk's ire, and said its central goal was not to cut spending but to extend the 2017 tax cuts approved in Trump's first term. The bill would slash spending but also leave some 10.9 million more people without health insurance and spike deficits by $2.4 trillion over the decade, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. Musk has warned that the bill will increase the federal deficit and called it a 'disgusting abomination.' 'It's a good bill,' Vance said. 'It's not a perfect bill.' He also said it was ridiculous for some House Republicans who voted for the bill but later found parts objectional to claim they hadn't had time to read it. Vance said the text had been available for weeks and said, 'the idea that people haven't had an opportunity to actually read it is ridiculous.' Elsewhere in the interview, Vance laughed as Von cracked jokes about famed abolitionist Frederick Douglass' sexuality. 'We're gonna talk to the Smithsonian about putting up an exhibit on that,' Vance joked. 'And Theo Von, you can be the narrator for this new understanding of the history of Frederick Douglass.' The podcaster also asked the vice president if he 'got high' on election night to celebrate Trump's victory. Vance laughed and joked that he wouldn't admit it if he did. 'I did not get high,' he then said. 'I did have a fair amount to drink that night.' The interview was taped in Nashville at a restaurant owned by musician Kid Rock, a Trump ally.

Trump hails court ruling allowing White House to restrict AP access
Trump hails court ruling allowing White House to restrict AP access

The Hill

time17 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Trump hails court ruling allowing White House to restrict AP access

President Trump celebrated a federal appeals court's ruling that allows the White House, for now, to restrict The Associated Press (AP) from the Oval Office and other limited spaces when reporting on the commander-in-chief. 'Big WIN over AP today,' Trump wrote on Truth Social on Friday. 'They refused to state the facts or the Truth on the GULF OF AMERICA. FAKE NEWS!!!' The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia temporarily blocked, in a 2-1 decision on Friday, an early April order from a district court judge that allowed the AP to regain its access to key White House spaces. The ruling blocked an April 8 order by U.S. District Judge Trevor McFadden that found that the news wire's exclusion from the press pool, a small cadre of reporters reporting on the president's whereabouts, was unlawful. 'The White House is likely to succeed on the merits because these restricted presidential spaces are not First Amendment fora opened for private speech and discussion,' Judge Neomi Rao said in the Friday opinion, joined by Judge Gregory Katsas. AP's spokesperson Patrick Maks said the organization is 'disappointed in the court's decision and are reviewing our options.' The White House's decision to exclude the AP originated from the news wire not wanting to use Gulf of America in its industry stylebook. The three-judge panel did not halt the part of McFadden's April order that provides AP access to the East Room. Judge Cornelia Pillard said in her dissent that being able to be in the press pool never relied on the news outlet's viewpoint until this year. 'The panel's stay of the preliminary injunction cannot be squared with longstanding First Amendment precedent, multiple generations of White House practice and tradition, or any sensible understanding of the role of a free press in our constitutional democracy,' Pillard wrote. Days after McFadden ruled in favor of AP in April, the White House removed a spot in the press pool normally occupied by wire services.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store