
Noem defends FEMA response to Texas floods amid scrutiny
During an interview on NBC News' "Meet the Press," Noem denied that a memo she issued in June requiring her to approve FEMA expenditures over $100,000 had caused the agency to move more slowly.
"Those claims are absolutely false," Noem said. "Within just an hour or two after the flooding, we had resources from the Department of Homeland Security there."
President Donald Trump suggested after taking office in January that his administration would abolish FEMA, formally called the Federal Emergency Management Agency. The Republican president said the agency had bungled past disasters and that federal aid could go directly to states.
But in the midst of U.S. hurricane season and the aftermath of the Texas floods, Trump and his top officials have taken a softer tone, indicating the agency could be rebranded.
"I think he wants it to be remade," Noem said on Sunday.
Flash floods swept through parts of Texas Hill Country on July 4, killing at least 120 people and leaving another 160 still missing. The disaster put a renewed focus on Trump administration moves to deemphasize FEMA.
As of mid-May, the agency had lost 2,000 full-time employees - a third of its staff - due to terminations and buyouts.
Noem issued a memo on June 11 that called for U.S. Department of Homeland Security agencies, including FEMA, to submit for her review any contract for more than $100,000.
The memo, reviewed by Reuters, said agencies should allow at least five days for her office to review the funding requests.
Reuters spoke with several current and former FEMA officials who worried the spending cap could slow down the agency's response to disasters.
The deployment of national search and rescue teams managed by FEMA did not appear in the agency's daily briefing until July 8 and four current and former officials said the spending cap had slowed it down.
Following the Texas floods, one former FEMA official said Noem needed to approve resources that previously would have been deployed more quickly, including law enforcement officers used for security and crews with saws to clear debris from roads.
'FEMA's never been quick," the former official said. "This is slowing down the speed which they had before."
Noem on Sunday denied a New York Times report, opens new tab that thousands of calls to FEMA from victims of the Texas floods went unanswered because Noem had not renewed the contracts.
"Those contracts were in place, no employees were off of work," Noem said. "Every one of them was answering calls."
An internal FEMA briefing document reviewed by Reuters said Noem had approved contracts for call center support as of July 10, but did not provide further details.
New flash flood warnings were in place on Sunday across central Texas, including in Texas Hill Country, a FEMA bulletin said.
U.S. Representative Tony Gonzales, a Republican whose district included flood-hit areas, warned on CNN's 'State of the Union' that the region could face a lengthy recovery.
"We're not out of the woods yet," he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
30 minutes ago
- The Guardian
I was on New York's rent board. Zohran Mamdani's ideas aren't pie in the sky
During the New York City mayoral primary campaign, Zohran Mamdani's proposal for a citywide rent freeze became a contentious topic. The Democratic nominee says to achieve a cap on annual rent increases for the city's 1m rent-stabilized apartments, he would appoint members to the city's rent guidelines board who support it. Critics decry a rent freeze as a pie-in-the-sky, unrealistic proposal. I served as a rent guidelines board member for nearly four years, appointed by then mayor Bill de Blasio in 2018. And it's clear this controversy isn't just about rent freezes – there's a larger agenda to deregulate rent-stabilized housing, under which rent ceilings prevent landlords from raising the rent too high and tenants must be offered renewal leases (unless the landlord shows legal reason not to). In 2023, a report revealed that half of New Yorkers couldn't afford basic needs such as housing, transportation, food and healthcare. This is the New York that I grew to know intimately before I joined the board. I'd been a tenants' rights attorney for years under the city's right-to-counsel program, representing hundreds of low-income families facing eviction who could not afford their own attorneys. Each week, I entered housing court to find my clients – families with toddlers, seniors with disabilities and food delivery drivers – anxiously awaiting possible eviction. It's not just low-income tenants at the mercy of landlords. Over the last 12 years, I've listened to thousands of stories and the one common thread is how easy it is for a moderate-income person to wind up homeless. Sudden unemployment, unexpected disability coupled with a rent increase, and now you're fighting like hell to survive housing court and not join the 350,000 homeless New Yorkers. For these New Yorkers, a rent freeze isn't some out-of-touch idea; it's a lifeline. The people who make that decision are nine board members, all appointed by the mayor – two tenant members (my former role), two landlord members and five public members whom the tenants and landlord members vie to win over to reach a majority vote. We don't rely on feelings or vibes – we're poring over reports and hours of public testimony, and engaging in spirited policy debates. In 2020, those reports revealed record unemployment spurred by the pandemic and an already high homelessness rate and rent burden (most tenants were paying 30% or more of their income on rent). Weighing that with landlord operating costs, the board voted to approve a rent freeze that year, and a partial rent freeze (for six months) the following year. In fact, the board voted for a rent freeze four times over the last 10 years under the de Blasio administration (the board votes every summer on these rent levels and they take effect in the fall). This is why criticisms of Mamdani's rent freeze ring hollow for me – it's painted as out of touch, yet there's already a precedent, backed by government reports and data. It is essential for the public to understand that there is a broader agenda behind the 'rent freezes are bad' argument. Undermining freezes is part of a larger goal to weaken rent stabilization, which landlords have consistently sought to do – and they were nearly successful recently. While I was on the board, landlords sued the rent guidelines board and all of its members (including me!) in federal court, claiming that rent stabilization amounted to an 'unconstitutional taking': if the government tells me how much I can increase my rent by and when I can terminate a lease, then the government is interfering with my private property without just compensation, the argument goes. For years, there had been whispers that New York landlords were rubbing their hands together, eager to devise ways to get such a case before the US supreme court – and this one came dangerously close. I still remember when I got the call four years after the case traveled its way up the federal appeals court chain: 'The court declined to hear the case!' Supreme court cases aren't selected in a vacuum – the court often grants certiorari , or agrees to hear a case, when there is a broad public interest, leading some parties to drum up support for their cause strategically. When I was on the board, I often heard the dichotomy of the good landlord versus the bad tenant. It's become so popular, you've probably been inundated with these stories too. 'Professional tenants' who sign a lease, then never pay rent. TikToks about tenants leaving an apartment in disarray. Squatters. Rent-stabilized tenants who are secretly wealthy, gaming the system by paying low rent. All designed to lead you to the conclusion that 'rent stabilization shouldn't exist'. You'd never know that the median household income for rent-stabilized tenants is a modest $60,000. Or that eviction rates are so high that the New York City housing court doesn't have enough judges to handle the volume of cases it sees daily. Just last year, in yet another case that landlords asked the supreme court to review, the court declined, but Justice Clarence Thomas signaled the court would be interested in hearing a rent stabilization challenge and even provided a legal roadmap for how to bring it. Landlords don't want to reform rent stabilization – they want it done away with. At the end of the day, when the goal is profit and power is unchecked, it will be profits over people. Mamdani's proposals are a threat to the real estate industry because they signal a mayorship that doesn't ascribe to the tenet that government must sit back and let the market come to its own conclusion – all while millions of New Yorkers are trying to avoid housing court. Leah Goodridge is a former member of the New York City rent guidelines board and an attorney who spent 12 years in legal services representing tenants

Rhyl Journal
31 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
Israeli strikes kill 30 in Gaza, health officials say
The Israeli military meanwhile said it killed a senior Hamas militant last month who had held a hostage in his home. The 21-month war triggered by Hamas' October 7 attack is raging on after two days of talks between US president Donald Trump and Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu ended last week with no sign of a breakthrough in negotiations over a ceasefire and hostage release. Twelve people were killed by strikes in southern Gaza, including three who were waiting at an aid distribution point, according to Nasser Hospital in Khan Younis, which received the bodies. Shifa Hospital in Gaza City also received 12 bodies, including three children and two women, after a series of strikes in the north, according to the hospital's director, Dr Mohammed Abu Selmia. Al-Awda Hospital in central Gaza reported six killed and eight wounded in strikes in the built-up Nuseirat refugee camp. The Israeli military says it only targets militants and tries to avoid harming civilians. It blames civilian deaths on Hamas because the militants operate in densely populated areas. The military said a June 19 strike killed Muhammad Nasr Ali Quneita, who it said had taken part in the October 7 attack and held hostage Emily Damari, a dual Israeli-British citizen, in his home at the start of the war. There was no comment from Hamas nor independent confirmation. Thousands of Hamas-led militants stormed into Israel that day, killing some 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and abducting 251 people, most of whom have since been released in ceasefire agreements or other deals. The militants are still holding 50 hostages, less than half of them believed to be alive. Israel's retaliatory offensive has killed more than 58,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza's Health Ministry, which has said women and children make up more than half of the dead. It does not distinguish between civilians and militants in its tally. The ministry is part of the Hamas-run government and is led by medical professionals. The United Nations and other experts consider its figures to be the most reliable count of war casualties. Israel's air and ground war has destroyed vast areas of Gaza and driven some 90% of the population from their homes. Aid groups say they have struggled to bring in food and other assistance because of Israeli military restrictions and the breakdown of law and order, and experts have warned of famine.


The Independent
35 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump said Alligator Alcatraz was built for the ‘most vicious people on the planet' — but hundreds of detainees have no criminal record
Hundreds of detainees held at Alligator Alcatraz, the immigration detention center in the Florida Everglades, do not have criminal records or charges pending against them in the U.S. -- despite President Donald Trump claiming the facility would hold ' the most vicious people on the planet.' A preliminary review of the more than 700 people being held at the temporary facility found that one-third of detainees had criminal convictions, according to The Miami Herald and Tampa Bay Times. Around 250 people listed in the facility had immigration violations, which are civil offenses. The report contradicts the president's claim that the remote, maximum-security facility would hold the 'most menacing migrants.' Alligator Alcatraz, which was quickly converted from an abandoned airport to a detention center, is holding hundreds of alleged undocumented immigrants behind chain-link fences inside tents. Managed by the Florida Division of Emergency Management, it is meant to alleviate pressure on local jails, and assist Trump in carrying out his mass deportation agenda. The facility is expected to hold a maximum of 3,000 people. Conditions at the facility have sparked outrage from Democratic lawmakers and members of the public, who have described it as an 'internment camp.' Several detainees have spoken out, claiming conditions are bleak with maggot-infested food, no water for bathing, and blinding lights kept on 24/7. 'They are essentially packed into cages, wall-to-wall humans, 32 detainees per cage,' Florida Democratic Representative Debbie Wasserman Schultz told reporters after visiting the facility over the weekend. 'The only thing inside those cages are their bunk beds, and there are three tiny toilets,' Wasserman Schultz said. Public support for Alligator Alcatraz is low. A July poll from YouGov found that 48 percent of people were against the detention facility. But Trump is determined to fulfill his campaign promise of rounding up all undocumented immigrants and deporting them, either back to their country of origin or a third country willing to take displaced people. 'It's amazing the lengths that the Fake News media will go to try and provide cover for criminal illegal aliens,' Abigail Jackson, a White House spokesperson said in a statement. 'The absence of a US criminal record is an irrelevant measure when many criminal illegal aliens have charges for rape, assault, terrorism, and more in their native country, or other countries abroad. 'And every single one of these illegal aliens committed another crime when they entered the country illegally. The Trump Administration will continue carrying out the largest mass deportation operation in history by removing public safety threats from American communities,' Jackson said. Although recent reporting indicates that hundreds of detainees at Alligator Alcatraz do not have criminal convictions or pending charges in the U.S., there are detainees being held for criminal offenses. Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier provided a list of six men being held at the Everglades facility who were convicted of crimes ranging from murder to burglary to Fox News. While the president said his focus would be on convicted criminals, around 70 percent of all detainees in Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody are being held for civil violations, not criminal convictions, according to Trace Reports.