Cyberbullying On The Rise Among Children, Teens
bout four years ago, Malaysian netizens made headlines around the world for their bold stance against Israel, most notably through the hashtag #IsraelKoyak.
Nicknamed the 'Bawang Army' or 'Bawang Rangers' they not only circulated posters condemning the Zionist regime following bombings in Palestine but also flooded the social media pages of the Israeli Defence Forces, earning praise from the global community.
But behind this display of bravery and unity lies a darker side of Malaysian Internet users – those who use social media platforms to bully others, a trend that is becoming increasingly concerning.
Their targets are not just ordinary individuals or local celebrities, but international athletes as well. Among them is Japanese cyclist Shinji Nakano, who was bombarded with abusive comments after being accused of deliberately causing Malaysian cyclist Muhammad Shah Firdaus Sarom to miss out on a medal at the 2024 Paris Olympics.
What's alarming is that this toxic behaviour appears to be 'infecting' children and adolescents in the country. This group of young and inexperienced social media users are not only targeting their peers but also brazenly bullying older persons.
NO COMPASSION
Often under the guise of joking, these taunts are hurled without compassion or empathy for the feelings of those on the receiving end. These youths rarely consider the consequences their actions may have on others or themselves.
'My friends made fun of my photo on TikTok. They commented on my skin, saying I looked as dark as charcoal. I felt so ashamed,' Saffiya (not her real name), a 12-year-old pupil, told Bernama.
She said the incident, which happened last year, shattered her self-confidence. It left her feeling depressed, unwilling to go to school, distancing herself from friends, fearful of using her phone and frequently crying when alone.
Thankfully, she had parents and teachers who were attentive to the changes in her behaviour. She was taken to see a counsellor, while the bullies were given a stern warning.
'Even though we're just kids, we can still get hurt. Don't think body shaming is a joke,' she said.
MALAYSIA RANKS SECOND IN ASIA
According to a report by the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF), Malaysia ranks second in Asia for cyberbullying among youths, behind China. On a global scale, the country is ranked fifth after Peru, Argentina, Mexico and Brazil, reflecting the seriousness of the issue in Malaysia.
A study conducted last year by global market research and consulting firm Ipsos revealed that nearly 47 percent of parents knew at least one child in their community who had been a victim of cyberbullying. And, one in four parents believed their own child had experienced online bullying.
Cyberbullying is more dangerous because the use of digital technology allows embarrassing information or images to be widely disseminated and remain online indefinitely.
The Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC) reported receiving 8,339 complaints related to cyberbullying – an average of 27 cases per day – between January and Nov 1 last year.
These statistics underscore the urgent need for a safer online ecosystem for social media users.
Acknowledging this need, the Malaysian government announced in November last year that it was studying the feasibility of introducing an Anti-Cyberbullying Act to curb such activities.
DEEP IMPACT
Commenting on the issue, Dr Mohd Nazir Mohd Nazori, a senior lecturer at the Kulliyyah of Allied Health Sciences, International Islamic University Malaysia, said bullying is an act that is done repeatedly with the intention of instilling fear, anger or sadness in the victim.
'Cyberbullying is more dangerous because the use of digital technology allows embarrassing information or images to spread widely and remain online indefinitely,' he said.
Dr Mohd Nazir Mohd Nazori
He added that among the factors that lead teenagers to become bullies are peer pressure and a desire to fit in with like-minded groups.
'Many of their (bullies') actions are driven by group conformity… they just follow what the group is doing and rarely use their own judgment to assess whether what they're doing is right or wrong,' he told Bernama.
According to the health education expert, bullies often present a different persona in front of their parents compared to when they are engaging in cyberbullying.
SIGNS OF VICTIMISATION
Mohd Nazir said signs a child may be experiencing cyberbullying include a loss of interest in activities they used to enjoy, a tendency to keep to themselves, looking gloomy and showing fear whenever they hear the sound of phone notifications.
He also warned that without intervention from parents or guardians, victims of bullying are at risk of developing mental health issues.
He believes that to combat cyberbullying, merely limiting children's Internet access is not enough.
'We've to educate them first,' he said, adding, 'We need to teach our children what their (smart) devices are for. For example, if a child enjoys drawing, parents should help them choose appropriate apps and review their work weekly.'
He is also of the view that children should not have social media accounts as they lack the maturity to give informed consent and are vulnerable to digital dangers such as privacy breaches and interaction with strangers.
Dr Zulfikar Ahmad
Sharing the same view, Dr Zulfikar Ahmad, senior psychology officer at the Psychological and Counselling Services Centre, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, believes that smartphones should only be given to a child based on his or her maturity level.
He said parents should not justify giving smartphones to their children solely for safety or educational purposes.
'If we don't even know what our children are doing with these devices, who they are interacting with... we are actually exposing them to all kinds of risks, not just cyberbullying,' he said, advising parents to be more alert to behavioural changes in their children who are using smartphones.
STRICTER PENALTIES
On July 11, the government enforced amendments to the Penal Code (Amendment) 2025 and the Criminal Procedure Code (Amendment) 2025 aimed at strengthening efforts to combat cyberbullying. The amendments also introduce new sections, namely Sections 507B to 507G, which allow for faster and stricter action against those who break the law.
Section 507D(2), for example, provides for penalties of up to 10 years' imprisonment or a fine for offences involving threatening, insulting or abusive communication that leads to suicide attempts due to provocation.
Commenting on these amendments, Dr Mohd Nazir said enforcement should also come in the form of advocacy and education so that people understand why such behaviour is wrong and are made aware of the consequences of their actions on the victims.
Zulfikar, meanwhile, suggested that if the cyberbully is a minor or still in school, punishment should take the form of community service, such as cleaning houses of worship or participating in community activities under the supervision of the local people.
'They need to be taught the meaning of responsibility... not punished to the point where they see themselves as bad people. The punishment should educate them so that they think twice before repeating the behaviour,' he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New Straits Times
5 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Singapore court reserves judgement on Pannir Selvam's post-appeal application
SINGAPORE: Malaysian death-row inmate Pannir Selvam Pranthaman gained reprieve when the Singapore Court of Appeal reserved its judgment, following the second hearing on his post-appeal application held on Wednesday. The Singapore Ministry of Home Affairs' (MHA) policy on the scheduling of executions came under scrutiny during the proceedings, as Pannir Selvam's counsel and the Attorney-General's Chambers addressed the content of affidavits they submitted after the first hearing on May 7. At the initial hearing, the court observed that Pannir Selvam's request for a stay of execution, pending the conclusion of disciplinary proceedings arising from his complaint to the Law Society, rested fundamentally on the principle that the MHA's policy on execution scheduling must be applied equally to all. His lawyers argued that the MHA policy applied to him differs from an earlier policy, thereby violating his right to equal treatment under Article 12 of the Constitution. On this, Chief Justice Sundaresh Menon, who led the five-man bench, stated that Article 12 does not prohibit a state agency from changing its policy. "Article 12 applies by looking at the current legislation, the current statute, or the current policy, and asking yourself whether that policy is being applied in a way that is unfairly discriminatory," he said. Pannir Selvam's counsel further argued that the MHA had not provided an explanation for the differing application of its policy between state and non-state proceedings. In their submission, his counsel team argued that the MHA's approach to preserving a prisoner's life had changed. Previously, executions could be delayed if a prisoner's testimony was needed in any legal case. Now, the MHA says delays are only considered if the testimony is needed in a state-led case. "There have been no reasons provided by the MHA as to why this differential treatment between a state and a non-state proceeding is reasonable," said counsel Ng Yuan Siang. In response, Deputy Senior State Counsel Terrence Chua said the distinction exists because state-brought proceedings are, by definition, in the public interest. "It goes beyond the interest of an individual PACP (prisoner awaiting capital punishment), whereas the PACP cannot claim to represent public interest in their private applications. "But even then, I pointed out in my affidavit that state-brought applications are still assessed on a case-by-case basis," he said. The court responded by saying that if the applicant can show that the policy can give rise to an unfair distinction between two categories of persons between whom there is no rational difference, he may be entitled to a finding that the policy offends Article 12. The proceedings, which lasted over an hour, ended with Chief Justice Menon stating that the Court would reserve its judgment. Seated in the dock wearing a purple-coloured prison uniform, Pannir Selvam appeared calm throughout the proceedings in a packed courtroom, which was also attended by his siblings who had arrived from Malaysia earlier in the day. The hearing marks the latest chapter in Pannir Selvam's ongoing legal battle against his death sentence. He was convicted by the High Court on May 2, 2017, for importing not less than 51.84g of diamorphine into Singapore and was sentenced to the mandatory death penalty. Pannir Selvam filed an appeal, but it was dismissed by the Court of Appeal on Feb 9, 2018. Together with his family and legal team, he submitted petitions for clemency to the President of Singapore, who subsequently declined to commute the sentence. Pannir Selvam and his family were informed that he would be executed on May 24, 2019. He then filed another application to the Court of Appeal, seeking a stay of execution on the grounds that he intended to challenge both the rejection of his clemency petition and the Public Prosecutor's decision not to issue a Certificate of Substantial Assistance (CSA). The court granted this application on May 23, 2019. Following this, he filed several other judicial review applications. Pannir Selvam received another notice of execution on Feb 16, 2025, for a scheduled execution on Feb 20. He then filed for permission to make a Post-Appeal Application in a Capital Case (PACC), seeking a stay of execution, which was granted on Feb 19. Judge of the Appellate Division Woo Bih Li, in his written judgment, stated that the stay was granted pending the determination of his PACC application. Singapore's PACC Act, which came into effect on June 28, 2024, allows prisoners awaiting capital punishment to make post-appeal applications, which can only be heard by the Court of Appeal. – Bernama


New Straits Times
7 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Family rejoices as dikir barat singer Eda Ezrin walks out a free woman
NARATHIWAT: The family of modern dikir barat singer Eda Ezrin described her release from Narathiwat Prison today as a miracle and the answer to months of relentless prayers. Eda Ezrin, whose real name is Wan Norshaheeda Azlin Wan Ismail, had been detained at the provincial prison in southern Thailand with five others, including her husband, since November last year for possessing methamphetamine pills. She was released after a Thai court allowed an appeal to drop her drug charges. Speaking to Malaysian reporters gathered at the prison, her mother Zaharah Mamat said they never stopped believing in her innocence and had prayed day and night for her safe return. "Since she was detained, not a single day passed without us praying for her. "We knew she was innocent and had been wrongly accused. Today, our prayers were answered," said the 48-year-old mother of four. Zaharah also expressed the family's gratitude to the Thai prison authorities as well as her relatives for their assistance and support. "We are thankful to everyone who helped and supported us throughout this painful journey. "Eda is now safely back with us, and we hope her life will be back to normal soon," she said. Eda's youngest sister, Wan Nur Faqeehah, said the family planned to hold special prayers for her release. "We are happy with her return. Soon after receiving the call from the prison staff about 4.30pm, we immediately rushed here," said the 18-year-old.


Borneo Post
9 hours ago
- Borneo Post
Sarawak waters remain free from piracy, says deputy transport minister
Henry (centre) receives a memento from Kwon, as others look on. SIBU (Aug 6): Sarawak's coastal and riverine waters remain free from piracy and sea robberies, assured State Deputy Minister of Transport (Riverine and Marine) Dato Henry Harry Jinep. Speaking to reporters after launching the Anti-Piracy Forum, jointly organised by the Sarawak and Sabah Shipowners Association (SSSA) and the Regional Cooperation Agreement on Combating Piracy (ReCAAP) here today, he said no incidents of piracy have been reported in Sarawak waters, including along major shipping routes to local ports. Henry explained that sea robberies generally occur in international waters, where no single enforcement agency has jurisdiction. 'As far as Sarawak is concerned, it is safe. In our rivers, there are no pirates, no robberies,' he said. Henry noted that piracy and robbery incidents usually happen in open waters beyond national boundaries, such as the route between Kuching and Singapore, where slow-moving barges are more vulnerable. 'After leaving Malaysian waters near Kuching, ships enter other territories before reaching Singapore. 'In between, there is a stretch with no enforcement agency, and that is where robberies sometimes happen,' he said, adding that such incidents rarely escalate to hostage-taking. Citing statistics from ReCAAP, he said more than 100 sea robbery cases were reported in Asian international waters last year – most of them outside Malaysian jurisdiction. Henry emphasised that the forum aimed to raise awareness among local shipping operators about safety measures and to strengthen cross-border cooperation in monitoring high-risk zones. 'The safety of our local shipowners is important. We work closely with federal maritime and naval authorities to ensure Sarawak waters remain secure,' he added. Also present at the forum were SSSA chairman Yong Ing Huong, ReCAAP ISC assistant director Kwon Soon Tee, and Malaysia Shipowners' Association (MASA) chairman Haji Mohamed Safwan Othman. Henry Harry Jinep piracy Sarawak waters