Arkansas grassroots organizations seek to intervene in lawsuit challenging direct democracy laws
Two Arkansas ballot question committees on Wednesday filed a motion to intervene in a federal lawsuit challenging new direct democracy-related laws.
The American Civil Liberties Union of Arkansas, Elias Law Group LLP and Shults Law Firm LLP filed the motion in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Arkansas on behalf of For AR Kids and Protect AR Rights. The former is a grassroots coalition that's received approval from the attorney general to gather signatures for its proposed education-focused constitutional amendment.
The latter plans to file its own proposed ballot initiative for the 2026 election to protect Arkansans' 'right to propose, sign, petition and campaign for ballot initiatives to improve their communities,' according to a Statement of Organization filed with the Arkansas Ethics Commission Friday.
Protect AR Rights is composed of several groups, including Arkansas Advocates for Children and Families, Arkansas Appleseed, Arkansas Citizens First Congress, Arkansas Public Policy Panel, the Arkansas State Conference of the NAACP and For AR People.
'This case is about protecting core political speech,' ACLU of Arkansas Legal Director John Williams said in a statement. 'Arkansas voters have a constitutional right to speak out, organize, and propose laws through the ballot initiative process. The laws we're challenging are deliberate efforts to suppress that speech and silence the voices of ordinary Arkansans in favor of entrenched political power.'
Arkansas attorney general rejects first ballot measure under new law
The original lawsuit was filed last month by the League of Women Voters of Arkansas who alleges eight recently approved laws governing direct democracy violate the First and 14th amendments to the U.S. Constitution. The case is assigned to Judge Timothy Brooks.
Arkansans can propose new laws or constitutional amendments and put them to a statewide vote through the direct democracy process. Arkansas is one of 24 states that allows citizen-led initiatives, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.
The majority of the laws challenged in the lawsuit regulate the petition-gathering portion of the initiative and referendum process. New requirements include directing signature gatherers, known as canvassers, to sign a 'true affidavit,' to request a photo ID from potential signers and inform them that petition fraud is a criminal offense, among other things.
According to Wednesday's court filings, the intervenors want to challenge additional laws, including a 2023 law that requires petitioners to gather signatures from 50 counties instead of 15 counties and Act 602 of 2025, which prohibits ballot titles from being written above an eighth grade reading level. Attorney General Tim Griffin cited the new law for the first time when he rejected a proposed ballot measure from the League of Women Voters last week.
In Wednesday's filings, the plaintiffs argue that intervening in the League of Women Voters lawsuit is more efficient than filing a separate lawsuit, which they said would likely be consolidated with the League's complaint under federal court rules.
Legislators and supporters of the new laws have said they will bring integrity to the initiative and referendum process, while opponents argue they will make it nearly impossible for citizens' proposals to qualify for the ballot. Protect AR Rights spokesperson Bill Kopsky called the laws 'a blatant power grab by politicians trying to silence voters.'
'Direct democracy has been under attack in the Arkansas Legislature really since 2012,' he said. 'Passing just bill after bill, it's death by 1,000 paper cuts, making the process harder for people.'
For AR Rights formed in 2020 in opposition to Issue 3, a proposed constitutional amendment referred by the Legislature that would have changed the initiative and referendum process by requiring voter petitions to be submitted earlier and increasing the number of counties where signatures must be collected, among other things. Issue 3 failed with 56% voting against it.
Two years later, For AR Rights fought against Issue 2, another lawmaker-referred constitutional amendment that would have increased the percentage of votes required to pass constitutional amendments and citizen-proposed state laws from a majority to 60% of votes cast. Issue 2 failed with 59% of voters voting against it.
Arkansas AG certifies education coalition's 2026 ballot proposal
Kopsky is also part of For AR Kids, which submitted and received approval for its proposed constitutional amendment for the 2026 general election after failing to collect enough signatures for the 2024 election.
After the conclusion of the 2025 legislative session, Kopsky said the group assessed the new laws and volunteers tried collecting some signatures to learn how difficult it would be to comply with the new requirements. The regulations were 'so onerous that it's nearly impossible to collect signatures,' which is why the group decided to seek to join the League of Women Voters' lawsuit, he said.
'We just view ballot measures as a fundamental right in the Constitution, obviously, but we also see it as a way to cut through the partisanship that is caused by our politicians and special interests,' Kopsky said. 'Arkansans tend not to be super political, which I love about us. It's not about what camp you're in, it's what can we do to make our community better.'
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
3 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
On Putin's advice, Trump launches assault on mail-in ballots and voting machines
President Trump said Monday he would renew his assault on mail-in voting after Russia's autocratic leader, Vladimir Putin, told him to do so at their meeting in Alaska last week. The president provided few details, but wrote on social media that he would 'lead a movement to get rid of MAIL-IN BALLOTS, and also, while we're at it, Highly 'Inaccurate,' Very Expensive, and Seriously Controversial VOTING MACHINES.' Already in March, Trump had issued an executive order directing the Justice Department to 'take all necessary action' to prevent mail-in ballots received after election day from being counted. The order also attempted to impose a proof of citizenship requirement for voter registration. Those portions of the executive action has been enjoined by courts over constitutional concerns. But another provision, directing the independent U.S. Election Assistance Commission to shift its guidance on voting machines banning the use of certain bar codes and quick-response codes, has been allowed to proceed. The U.S. Constitution states that the timing, place and manner of elections 'shall be prescribed in each state' by local legislatures, and that Congress has the ability to pass laws altering state election regulations. The president is given no authority to prescribe or govern election procedures. Trump's action comes on the heels of his meeting with Putin in Anchorage, where the Russian leader told him that mail-in ballots led to his electoral defeat in 2020, according to the president. The U.S. intelligence community has assessed that Putin attempted to influence the last three U.S. presidential elections in Trump's favor. 'Vladimir Putin said something — one of the most interesting things. He said, 'Your election was rigged because you have mail-in voting,'' Trump told Fox News in an interview. Trump has criticized mail-in voting since entering politics in 2015. But his presidential campaign embraced the practice leading up to the 2024 election, encouraging his supporters — especially those affected by Hurricane Helene in North Carolina — to take advantage of mail-in voting opportunities. 'Absentee voting, early voting and election day voting are all good options,' Trump said at the time. 'Republicans must make a plan, register and vote!'
CNN
10 hours ago
- CNN
Federal hearing over ‘Alligator Alcatraz' detainees' access to attorneys
Attorneys representing detainees held at the controversial makeshift immigration detention center dubbed 'Alligator Alcatraz' are in federal court Monday seeking to allow detainees to meet with attorneys. The attorneys from groups including the ACLU, the US Immigration Law Counsel and Florida Keys Immigration filed a lawsuit against Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and other officials in July, saying the defendants 'blocked detainees held at the facility from access to legal counsel' and are preventing 'people detained in civil immigration custody at Alligator Alcatraz from communicating with legal counsel and from filing motions with the immigration court that could result in their release from detention.' The lawsuit also aims to ensure there is updated information about the location of the detainees at 'Alligator Alcatraz.' 'The U.S. Constitution does not allow the government to simply lock people away without any ability to communicate with counsel or to petition the court for release from custody. The government may not trample on these most fundamental protections for people held in its custody,' Eunice Cho, senior counsel with the ACLU's National Prison Project and the lead attorney in the case, said in a news release. The Department of Homeland Security has denied the allegations, telling CNN in a statement Sunday the 'facility maintains a physical space for attorneys to meet with their clients,' and that attorneys may also request to speak with detainees they represent via email. At a hearing last month, attorneys for the ACLU urged the judge to move forward with the lawsuit as quickly as possible, alleging that staff at the detention center were pushing the detainees to self-deport without access to counsel. The ACLU also reminded the court that 'removal flights' from the facility had already taken place. 'The government has banned in-person legal visitation, any confidential phone or video communication, and confidential exchange of written documents,' the ACLU said in the news release about the lawsuit, describing several instances of attorneys turned away after attempting to meet with their clients. Monday's hearing in Miami, Florida, is the latest in the case against the federal and state officials whose attorneys have argued the lawsuits were not filed in the correct federal court district. US District Judge Rodolfo Ruiz II, who was nominated by President Donald Trump, appeared skeptical of those arguments. The judge also said there was 'confusion' about who runs the detention camp. 'Alligator Alcatraz' is purportedly run by the state of Florida under a partnership with local agencies and the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement under a federal program known as the 287(g) program. Deep in the marshy wetlands of the Florida Everglades, 'Alligator Alcatraz' has been mired with controversy since the start, with reports of hundreds of migrants confined in cages amid sweltering heat, bug infestations and meager meals. 'What is happening at the facility is anomalous for many reasons, not only the way that it was built and where it's been built, the legal authority and the confusion about who is running the detention facility and whose custody people are in,' Cho told CNN. 'These are all things that have never really been seen at other detention facilities.' The state of Florida has pushed back, saying conditions at the camp are in 'good working order' and that claims to the contrary are false. Cho explained the goal of their case is make sure 'basic constitutional rights' of detainees are being upheld, including the 'basic right to be able to speak to their lawyers and the basic right to be able to petition the government for release from custody.' Other alleged violations of constitutional rights include officers 'pressuring detainees to sign voluntary removal orders without the opportunity to speak to counsel,' said Cho, and a detainee who was deported after their bond hearing was canceled because immigration courts said they don't have jurisdiction over people who are held in 'Alligator Alcatraz.' 'These are fundamental constitutional rights, and the fact that it's been happening for such a long time has had a huge impact on the people who are being held at this facility,' Cho said. 'Alligator Alcatraz cannot end up being a black hole where people disappear.' The hastily built detention center is about an hour's drive west of Miami. The temporary camp is built on an airstrip and made up of repurposed FEMA trailers and tents, surrounded by a fence. This lawsuit against the facility is one of two working its way through the federal court system – the other was filed by environmentalists suing to stop the facility's operations due to its close location to the marshlands that serve as a crucial source of freshwater and drinking water for South Florida. On Thursday, DeSantis announced a new immigrant detention center called 'Deportation Depot' in northern Florida. The facility will likely be ready in about two to three weeks, Florida Division of Emergency Management Director Kevin Guthrie said, and it is expected to house around 1,300 detainees. CNN's Rafael Romo and Maxime Tamsett contributed to this report.
CNN
10 hours ago
- CNN
Federal hearing over ‘Alligator Alcatraz' detainees' access to attorneys
Attorneys representing detainees held at the controversial makeshift immigration detention center dubbed 'Alligator Alcatraz' are in federal court Monday seeking to allow detainees to meet with attorneys. The attorneys from groups including the ACLU, the US Immigration Law Counsel and Florida Keys Immigration filed a lawsuit against Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and other officials in July, saying the defendants 'blocked detainees held at the facility from access to legal counsel' and are preventing 'people detained in civil immigration custody at Alligator Alcatraz from communicating with legal counsel and from filing motions with the immigration court that could result in their release from detention.' The lawsuit also aims to ensure there is updated information about the location of the detainees at 'Alligator Alcatraz.' 'The U.S. Constitution does not allow the government to simply lock people away without any ability to communicate with counsel or to petition the court for release from custody. The government may not trample on these most fundamental protections for people held in its custody,' Eunice Cho, senior counsel with the ACLU's National Prison Project and the lead attorney in the case, said in a news release. The Department of Homeland Security has denied the allegations, telling CNN in a statement Sunday the 'facility maintains a physical space for attorneys to meet with their clients,' and that attorneys may also request to speak with detainees they represent via email. At a hearing last month, attorneys for the ACLU urged the judge to move forward with the lawsuit as quickly as possible, alleging that staff at the detention center were pushing the detainees to self-deport without access to counsel. The ACLU also reminded the court that 'removal flights' from the facility had already taken place. 'The government has banned in-person legal visitation, any confidential phone or video communication, and confidential exchange of written documents,' the ACLU said in the news release about the lawsuit, describing several instances of attorneys turned away after attempting to meet with their clients. Monday's hearing in Miami, Florida, is the latest in the case against the federal and state officials whose attorneys have argued the lawsuits were not filed in the correct federal court district. US District Judge Rodolfo Ruiz II, who was nominated by President Donald Trump, appeared skeptical of those arguments. The judge also said there was 'confusion' about who runs the detention camp. 'Alligator Alcatraz' is purportedly run by the state of Florida under a partnership with local agencies and the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement under a federal program known as the 287(g) program. Deep in the marshy wetlands of the Florida Everglades, 'Alligator Alcatraz' has been mired with controversy since the start, with reports of hundreds of migrants confined in cages amid sweltering heat, bug infestations and meager meals. 'What is happening at the facility is anomalous for many reasons, not only the way that it was built and where it's been built, the legal authority and the confusion about who is running the detention facility and whose custody people are in,' Cho told CNN. 'These are all things that have never really been seen at other detention facilities.' The state of Florida has pushed back, saying conditions at the camp are in 'good working order' and that claims to the contrary are false. Cho explained the goal of their case is make sure 'basic constitutional rights' of detainees are being upheld, including the 'basic right to be able to speak to their lawyers and the basic right to be able to petition the government for release from custody.' Other alleged violations of constitutional rights include officers 'pressuring detainees to sign voluntary removal orders without the opportunity to speak to counsel,' said Cho, and a detainee who was deported after their bond hearing was canceled because immigration courts said they don't have jurisdiction over people who are held in 'Alligator Alcatraz.' 'These are fundamental constitutional rights, and the fact that it's been happening for such a long time has had a huge impact on the people who are being held at this facility,' Cho said. 'Alligator Alcatraz cannot end up being a black hole where people disappear.' The hastily built detention center is about an hour's drive west of Miami. The temporary camp is built on an airstrip and made up of repurposed FEMA trailers and tents, surrounded by a fence. This lawsuit against the facility is one of two working its way through the federal court system – the other was filed by environmentalists suing to stop the facility's operations due to its close location to the marshlands that serve as a crucial source of freshwater and drinking water for South Florida. On Thursday, DeSantis announced a new immigrant detention center called 'Deportation Depot' in northern Florida. The facility will likely be ready in about two to three weeks, Florida Division of Emergency Management Director Kevin Guthrie said, and it is expected to house around 1,300 detainees. CNN's Rafael Romo and Maxime Tamsett contributed to this report.
