logo
The Guardian view on Farage's cynical pitch: Labour must be bolder to see off the threat

The Guardian view on Farage's cynical pitch: Labour must be bolder to see off the threat

The Guardian7 days ago

Last July, concluding his election victory speech after winning in Clacton, Nigel Farage announced that after inflicting grievous damage on the Conservative party that night, Reform UK would now 'be coming for Labour'. Since then, on issues such as the nationalisation of Britain's beleaguered steel industry, Mr Farage has carefully positioned his party as sympathetic to working-class concerns and fears. His heavily-trailed speech on Tuesday, in Westminster, was the most direct attempt yet to present himself as a new spokesperson for Labour's traditional blue-collar voters.
The most talented and cynical political opportunist of his generation, Mr Farage knows where the openings lie. Labour has tied itself in unedifying knots over its deeply unpopular cuts to the winter fuel allowance, and agonised over reversing the Tories' two-child benefit cap. Mr Farage simply marched his party into the vacant political space where a centre-left party should be. Even if the government belatedly U-turns on both issues, Reform will be able to claim to have blazed the trail.
Understandably, Labour figures have ground their teeth at airy promises of largesse to the less well-off, and pointed to the Reform leader's track record. There was no serious effort on Tuesday to make any of the sums add up by addressing the fiscal implications of a huge tax overhaul. There are also, of course, compelling grounds to doubt that Mr Farage's conversion to egalitarian politics is wholly sincere. Since entering politics as a privately educated former stockbroker, he has been a Thatcherite advocate of low tax, low regulation and privatising the NHS. More Jacob Rees-Mogg than Aneurin Bevan, in short.
But cries of cosplay, and allegations of 'unserious' politics, will not suffice. Before partygate, the Eton-educated Boris Johnson did not do too badly by indulging in both. Mr Farage will not expect Sir Keir Starmer to take up his invitation to pay a joint visit to a working men's club. But he does spy a working-class route to power.
As is increasingly clear, Reform's leader views a form of rightwing communitarianism as the means to weld together the kind of shire and town coalition that won the Brexit referendum. This means performatively pivoting to the left on some economic issues, in the hope of attracting less well-off Labour voters into his authoritarian anti-immigrant project. It is the same kind of political realignment that Marine Le Pen has pursued, with some success, in France.
As Reform continues to score significant polling leads, eclipsing the moribund Tories, Labour badly needs a progressive strategy that can adequately respond. At the next election, it will need the support of the blue-collar voters Mr Farage hopes to seduce, as well as public sector professionals and liberal graduates in university towns and cities. Yet for now an unattractive combination of economic timidity, cuts and courting the anti-migrant vote has seen it simultaneously lose support to Mr Farage, the Liberal Democrats and the Greens.
There is another way. Policies such as the public ownership of utilities, and the introduction of wealth taxes in an ever more unequal society, enjoy broad support both among blue-collar voters and in Labour's urban strongholds. That suggests a broader groundswell of support for a more expansive social democratic approach – one that can deliver a more collectivist and equal society without embracing the xenophobia and extreme social conservatism that defines Mr Farage and his movement.
Last week, Sir Keir told his party's MPs to view Reform as their 'main rivals for power'. A different, nastier Britain may await, if Mr Farage's attempt to park his tanks on Labour's working-class lawns is not taken by the party as a final warning.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Truly shocking': Dozens of teens found with knives
‘Truly shocking': Dozens of teens found with knives

The Independent

time21 minutes ago

  • The Independent

‘Truly shocking': Dozens of teens found with knives

In 2024, Scottish police found 91 people aged 18 and under in possession of a bladed weapon, including a 10-year-old. More than a dozen children aged 13 – including two girls – were found to have such items when searched. The statistics, analysed by 1919 magazine, indicate that teenagers accounted for almost a third of positive knife searches across all age groups in Scotland. The Scottish Police Federation's chairman, David Threadgold, expressed concern over an emerging societal trend among younger people, saying the statistics are 'truly shocking'. Scottish Labour 's justice spokesperson, Pauline McNeill, described the figures as a sign of a 'youth violence epidemic' and called for early intervention schemes to address the root causes.

Is Ozempic fueling a new era of body image pressure? Join The Independent Debate
Is Ozempic fueling a new era of body image pressure? Join The Independent Debate

The Independent

time24 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Is Ozempic fueling a new era of body image pressure? Join The Independent Debate

Originally developed for type 2 diabetes, drugs like Ozempic, Wegovy, and Mounjaro are now being widely used for weight loss, with demand skyrocketing. Touted as a game-changer by some and a cause for concern by others, GLP-1 receptor agonists work by suppressing appetite. The UK government is backing a five-year trial in Greater Manchester, offering weight-loss jabs to up to 3,000 unemployed people with obesity, in a bid to improve job prospects and reduce strain on the NHS. Health Secretary Wes Streeting defended the move, insisting it's part of a broader preventative health strategy. 'There's a lot of evidence already that these jabs, combined with changes to diet and exercise, can help people reduce their weight but also prevent cardiovascular disease and diabetes, which is game-changing,' he said. But as demand rises, so do questions. Streeting also cautioned against creating a "dependency culture" and experts have warned of potential side effects, including nausea, fatigue, and digestive issues, while long-term effects remain uncertain. Concerns have also been raised about overuse, off-label prescribing, and people turning to unregulated online sources to get the injections without proper medical guidance. There's also a cultural shift to consider: Are we medicalising body image issues? Are we heading toward a future where weight loss is expected to come in a syringe rather than through lasting lifestyle change? Now we want to hear from you: as Ozempic becomes more mainstream, is it a breakthrough treatment, or are we rushing in too fast without understanding the consequences? Are weight-loss jabs simply fueling a new era of body image pressure? All you have to do is sign up and register your details – then you can take part in the debate. You can also sign up by clicking 'log in' on the top right-hand corner of the screen.

How the hasty planning of Edward VIII and Wallis Simpson's calamitous wedding made it so miserable - marked by the 'sad' looks in the wedding photos
How the hasty planning of Edward VIII and Wallis Simpson's calamitous wedding made it so miserable - marked by the 'sad' looks in the wedding photos

Daily Mail​

time25 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

How the hasty planning of Edward VIII and Wallis Simpson's calamitous wedding made it so miserable - marked by the 'sad' looks in the wedding photos

Throughout British history, royal weddings have been extravagant affairs full of pomp and grandeur, but there has been one major exception to this tradition. Hundreds of miles away from the Royal Family, King Edward VIII and Wallis Simpson were married in a low-key wedding ceremony 88 years ago today. It was highly unusual, taking place in the shadow of Edward's abdication crisis, less than a month after the coronation of King George VI. The wedding was hastily planned, taking place a month and a day after Wallis's divorce from Ernest Simpson was finalised. Straying further from tradition, Wallis opted for a long, finger-hugging white wedding dress in the style of the period while Edward wore a civilian suit instead of a military uniform. Despite the opulent setting of the wedding in the Chateau de Cande in France, the couple looked far from happy in their official pictures. Royal photographer Cecil Beaton, who was behind the camera for the event, remarked that Edward had an 'essentially sad' look in his eyes. Meanwhile, royal author Jane Marguerite Tippett, in The Lost Memoir Of Edward VIII, wrote that Wallis and Edward looked back on the wedding without much fondness. The Duke and Duchess are seen on their wedding day alongside Edward's best man, Edward 'Fruity' Metcalfe (right) and businessman Hermann Rogers, whom Wallis later had an affair with In the memoir it was revealed that Wallis said that preparations for the wedding 'were not very gay'. Which is unsurprising considering the royal wedding was in stark contrast to those before it, taking place in a small ceremony with no one from the Royal Family present. Among the guests were Edward's best man, Major Edward 'Fruity' Metcalfe, along with his chauffeur and equerry. Businessman Hermann Rogers, whom Wallis fell in love with and had hoped to marry, also attended. Reverend J.A. Jardine officiated in defiance of Church of England rules surrounding divorcees with living former spouses. He was later defrocked and would go on to open the tacky 'Windsor Cathedral' in Hollywood. Edward had also been left furious by King George's refusal to grant Wallis the status of Her Royal Highness. He bitterly joked that it was a 'nice wedding present'. When his mother, Queen Mary, did not send him an actual gift, he told her that he was 'bitterly hurt and disappointed that you virtually ignored the most important event in my life.' The royal wedding was in stark contrast to those before it, consisting of a small ceremony with no one from the Royal Family present A Faberge box that was sent as a gift by his younger brother Prince George, the Duke of Kent, was rejected by Edward, on the basis that his sibling had not shown any desire to deviate from the family's official stance towards him. Edward and Wallis's wedding venue was owned by millionaire Charles Bedaux, who was later frowned upon by the British and French intelligence services. The chateau boasted modern comforts that included a pipe organ costing $40,000 and a $15,000 telephone system. On the day itself, Wallis wore a blue wedding gown which she twinned with silk gloves made from the same material and a straw hat. She also wore an impressive diamond and sapphire brooch alongside a glittering sapphire wristband and earrings. Her second divorce - from shipbroker Ernest Aldrich Simpson - had been finalised only a month earlier. The Duke had originally wanted a royal chaplain to officiate at his wedding, but this desire was rapidly torpedoed by his brother, the King. His second choice had been the Reverend Martin Andrews, who presided over a parish in the Duchy of Cornwall. The couple looked less than jolly in the official photos that were taken to mark their wedding In the end he had little choice but to go with Reverend Jardine, who was described as 'turbulent' by Edward's biographer Philip Ziegler and later stripped of his duties. Archbishop of Canterbury Cosmo Lang - who had been instrumental in sealing Edward's abdication - described Jardine as a 'seeker of notoriety'. He questioned how Edward - who had been King of England just months before - could have 'lost his dignity' to the extent that he asked 'a man of this sort to celebrate his marriage'. Jardine officiated in defiance of the Church of England, which until 2002 would not perform weddings of rulers to divorcees who had living former spouses. While Edward believed that in Jardine he had chosen well, this idea was somewhat punctured by the priest's subsequent tour of the United States, where he revealed all about the ceremony. The altar was what Ziegler described as a 'bogus renaissance chest adorned with plum caryatids'. Beaton took official photographs of the couple after they tied the knot. In his diary he described Edward's expression when his photo was taken as 'essentially sad, tragic eyes belied by impertinent tilt of nose.' He added that the former King had 'common hands - like a mechanic - weather-beaten and rather scaly and one thumbnail is disfigured.' Beaton had talked to Wallis at length and decided that she was a 'strong force', and 'intelligent within her vast limitations'. 'She has obviously a tremendous admiration for the Duke and considers him one of the greatest brains… of our times. 'She admires his character, his vitality and is determined to love him, though I feel she is not in love with him.' As well as his best man, chauffeur and equerry, guests also included the Duke's hairdresser Charles Topper and Mrs Buchanan Merryman, Wallis's aunt. The service itself was composed of a French civil ceremony and then an Anglican counterpart conducted by Reverend Jardine was carried out ten minutes later. In both versions, Wallis promised to obey her husband. Incredibly, the Duke failed to kiss his bride in either the civil or religious ceremony, although there were tears in his eyes when he put Wallis's ring on her finger. Despite the controversy that surrounded the wedding at the time, the Duke and Duchess received more than 3,000 telegrams and 30,000 letters of good wishes after their wedding. In a statement, the Duke said: 'The Duchess and I would like to thank all those who have so kindly sent us presents and good wishes on the occasion of our wedding. 'We shall never forget their friendly messages, which mean so much to us on this day.' Following their wedding the couple eventually settled in France in the so-called Villa Windsor on the outskirts of Paris. Here they led the life of the idle rich, attending parties in France and America and going on lavish holidays with close friends. Though she lacked the status of an actual queen, it was the kind of high life that American Duchess had always sought. But when the Duke died aged 77 in 1972, Wallis was left alone, bereft of the man who had worshipped her. The Queen, with whom she had had minimal contact in the decades since her husband's abdication, hosted her at Buckingham Palace when she arrived for his funeral. The two had previously met when Queen Elizabeth and her husband Prince Philip visited the Duke in Paris in his final days. Wallis was buried next to her husband at the Royal Burial Ground, Frogmore. The burial was attended by only the Queen, the Duke of Edinburgh, Prince Charles and Princess Diana and eight of Wallis's aides and friends It was a sign of the Queen's willingness to put differences to one side for the sake of the greater good. When Wallis died over a decade later, her funeral service at Windsor's St George's Chapel was attended by senior royals including the Queen, Prince Philip and the Queen Mother. Her name was not mentioned during the service. The service lasted for less than half an hour and, in scenes strikingly similar to her wedding, it was stripped of nearly all the pomp and ceremony that usually marks a royal death.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store