Family of Nottingham attack victims complain about ‘offensive' watchdog meeting
Valdo Calocane killed students Barnaby Webber and Grace O'Malley-Kumar, both 19, and caretaker Ian Coates, 65, before attempting to kill three other people in the city in June 2023.
It was announced in February that prosecutors, police and medical professionals would be scrutinised in the two-year inquiry, including the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC).
Grace's father, Dr Sanjoy Kumar, said that an IOPC regional director had behaved inappropriately when the bereaved families met the watchdog nine months after the attacks in March 2024, including by starting the meeting with a prayer.
Dr Kumar told The Sunday Times: 'I found it patronising and offensive.
'I didn't want a prayer, I wanted answers. I've lost my daughter and it was his job to give me the truth, not a prayer.
'There are plenty of places to pray and the IOPC isn't one of them.'
The regional director at the meeting, Derrick Campbell, is now the watchdog's director of engagement, the newspaper reported.
An IOPC spokesperson said: 'We can confirm we've received a complaint about one of our directors and we are dealing with it in line with our complaints and feedback procedure.'
The IOPC previously prepared a report which concluded that police failed to properly investigate an assault on warehouse workers by Calocane, which could have stopped his murder spree a month later, leading to the watchdog reopening its investigation into the incidents in March.
In a statement at that time, Mr Campbell said: 'Those who are closely impacted by our decision, including the bereaved families and the officers involved, have been notified and we will complete this work as quickly as possible.'
Calocane was sentenced to an indefinite hospital order in January 2024 after admitting manslaughter by diminished responsibility and attempted murder, something which has been widely criticised by the victims' families.
Barnaby's mother Emma Webber said in February last year that the families had a lot of concerns 'that were in the most part wholly ignored' by the Crown Prosecution Service.
Senior retired judge Deborah Taylor will chair the inquiry, which aims to report back within two years, with recommendations to prevent similar incidents.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
AI cameras catch thousands not wearing seat belts
Around 50% more people have been caught not wearing seat belts as those fined for driving while using mobile phones, police have said. Devon & Cornwall Police said 10,000 images collected by Artificial Intelligence (AI) cameras over the last 12 months had captured 6,000 people breaking seat belt laws and 4,000 drivers using phones. It added a large proportion of those killed in road accidents in Devon and Cornwall who were not wearing seat belts were young people, aged 16 to 24. A spokesman for the Department for Transport said road safety was under scrutiny: "Measures have not been reviewed for over a decade and we will set out the next steps for our strategy for road safety in due course." Adrian Leisk, head of road safety for Devon & Cornwall Police, said the force was dismayed at the number of people, including children, found travelling in cars without belting up. "Surely your child is the most precious cargo you can carry and it defies belief that people treat the safety of their children in such a casual manner," he said. Government figures show that in autumn 2023, 97.6% of all vehicle drivers and 95.2% of front seat passengers in England were observed using a seat belt. However, Acusensus, the company which operates the AI cameras intended to spot people using phones, said it was evident many more people were breaching the seat belt laws. Geoff Collins, UK general manager, said he believed there was no longer a "generational knowledge transfer between people" about the dangers of breaching the seat belt rules and tougher penalties were needed. "You think you've addressed the problem and that problem is gone but it has actually crept back in again. "What we've learned is that there are some people who will just habitually not wear the seat belt." Three penalty points According to the RAC, if you are caught driving or travelling in a vehicle without wearing a seat belt, and do not qualify for an exemption, you could be given an on-the-spot fine of £100 which will not carry any penalty points. The driver is responsible for children aged up to 14 and could be fined for each child passenger without a seat belt. If the case goes to court, the fine could be as much as £500. However, road safety experts hope upcoming legislation will make seat belt offences endorsable, meaning offending drivers will notch up points and could lose their licence. More news stories for Devon Listen to the latest news for Devon Edmund King, president of the Automobile Association, said tougher penalties were needed. "We do believe that they [the government] will be looking at making the non-wearing of seat belts an endorsable offence, probably three penalty points. "I certainly think that would be a step in the right direction." From the mid 1960s all vehicles were fitted with seat belts but it was not until 1983 that it became a legal requirement for drivers and front seat passengers to wear them. Eight years later the law was extended to include rear seat passengers. The legislation was accompanied by a TV advertising campaign using the slogan "clunk click every trip". Follow BBC Devon on X, Facebook and Instagram. Send your story ideas to spotlight@ More on this story What are the rules for wearing seat belts? Why are people still not wearing seat belts? Police in seat belt plea amid 'worrying' trend Related internet links Devon & Cornwall Police seat belt advice
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Woman-beater jailed for strangling his girlfriend as her kids were sleeping
Thug Clint Jackson has been jailed after he strangled and beat up his girlfriend in her own home. The 42-year-old struck his then-partner while her children were sleeping upstairs. Stoke-on-Trent Crown Court heard heard he also called her 'fat' and 'ugly'. Now the defendant, of Russell Street, Leek, has been locked up for 14 months and handed a three-year restraining order. Prosecutor Brian Williams said Jackson and the complainant had been arguing on the evening of April 10 which continued into the morning of April 11. After calling her names, she went to bed and he remained on the sofa downstairs. READ MORE: Live updates as police flood popular Stoke-on-Trent pub READ MORE: The 10 Midlands towns and cities named 'most dangerous' Mr Williams added: 'The defendant and the complainant had known each other for some time and started a relationship in January 2025. They were argumentative if the defendant had been drinking. "On the night in question after an argument ensued, she went to bed, and the next morning he rang her from his phone downstairs, and she spoke about seeing other people. 'The defendant started to shout and she tried to quieten him because her two children were asleep upstairs. He was shouting and swearing and aggressive. She said 'Get out' and he put his right arm around her neck and applied pressure, then let go of her but punched her in the face. She called the police and the defendant was arrested.' Jackson pleaded guilty to intentional strangulation and assault occasioning actual bodily harm. Robert Holt, mitigating, said: 'The defendant offers genuine remorse to his former partner. He turns 43 next month, he's a plasterer and was employed until his recent incarceration. 'There were no permanent injuries and there was no need for hospital treatment. There is no evidence that the children witnessed any of this and were said to be upstairs during this incident. He accepts this has crossed the custody threshold.' Jailing Jackson, Judge Graeme Smith told him: "We've heard the circumstances and the distress she felt at that time. It was relatively short lived although frightening for her nonetheless. I accept that the children were not awake or in that part of the house where this occurred, so it is not an aggravating feature. 'However, you were on licence when you committed these offences, and that expires in January 2027. I accept you have shown remorse.' Get all the latest news from court here
Bloomberg
3 hours ago
- Bloomberg
After Disposable Vape Ban, Britons Throw Away Reusables Instead
A UK ban on disposable vapes is failing to stop users treating refillable devices as if they are still throwaway products, new research shows. Environmental legislation has made it illegal since June 1 to sell disposable vapes in the UK, a bid to crack down on youth usage and to tackle ballooning amounts of toxic and flammable waste.
