logo
What's stopping Keir Starmer from recognising Palestine as a state?

What's stopping Keir Starmer from recognising Palestine as a state?

Metro27-07-2025
Sir Keir Starmer is coming under a lot of pressure to recognise Palestinian statehood.
He's under pressure from 221 MPs – more than a third of all the people who sit in the House of Commons – who collectively signed a letter urging recognition.
He's under pressure from Jeremy Corbyn's newly announced left-wing party, which placed alleged UK complicity in the Gaza horror at the centre of its launch, and the significant number of supporters it has attracted.
And he's under pressure from top Labour figures, ranging from London Mayor Sadiq Khan to members of his own cabinet, who are pushing him on the matter both publicly and privately.
Those calls have grown in the past few days, as images of starving children have been beamed around the world and French President Emmanuel Macron has announced France will formally recognise Palestine as a state.
But the Prime Minister has remained firm, insisting he will only press forward at the moment when the move would have the maximum impact.
Craig Munro breaks down Westminster chaos into easy to follow insight, walking you through what the latest policies mean to you. Sent every Wednesday. Sign up here.
In a statement released on Thursday night, Starmer said: 'We are clear that statehood is the inalienable right of the Palestinian people.
'A ceasefire will put us on a path to the recognition of a Palestinian state and a two-state solution which guarantees peace and security for Palestinians and Israelis.'
The UK is deeply entwined in the history of the region currently occupied by Israel and Palestine.
In 1916, the British claimed control of the region called Palestine amid the collapse of the Ottoman Empire, and the following year, Foreign Secretary Arthur Balfour said the UK would back a 'national home' for the Jewish people in the area.
A little over three decades later, in 1948, David Ben-Gurion declared the independence of Israel. The UN admitted Israel as a member in 1949, but not Palestine.
It was not until 1988 that Palestinian statehood was recognised by any UN member states, after the Palestinian National Council formally declared independence.
Today, 147 of the UN's 193 member states recognise Palestine, including the vast majority of the countries in Asia, Africa and South America.
The UK, US, Canada, Germany, Japan, Australia and New Zealand are among the nations that do not.
In 2014, MPs in the House of Commons voted to 274 to 12 in favour of recognising Palestine as a state.
But David Cameron's government responded with a line that remains familiar today – that recognition would wait until it was deemed most appropriate for the peace process.
On the face of it, the British government appears to be closer than ever to announcing formal recognition of a Palestinian state.
Among the high-profile cabinet members reportedly arguing in favour are Deputy PM Angela Rayner, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper, Health Secretary Wes Streeting and Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood.
The UK has also been closely aligning with France on the issue, as part of the E3 group of nations alongside Germany.
However, both Starmer and Foreign Secretary David Lammy have insisted publicly that the move is only worth making when it would be most effective in the pursuit of peace.
On Tuesday, Lammy told the BBC: 'We don't just want to recognise symbolically, we want to recognise as a way of getting to the two states that sadly many are trying to thwart at this point in time.'
Labour's election manifesto last year said the party is 'committed to recognising a Palestinian state as a contribution to a renewed peace process which results in a two-state solution with a safe and secure Israel alongside a viable and sovereign Palestinian state.' More Trending
The letter signed by 221 MPs, organised by Labour's Sarah Champion, said the announcement of recognition should come at a UN conference co-chaired by France and Saudi Arabia on Monday and Tuesday.
It said: 'British recognition of Palestine would be particularly powerful given its role as the author of the Balfour Declaration and the former Mandatory Power in Palestine. Since 1980 we have backed a two-state solution.
'Such a recognition would give that position substance as well as living up to a historic responsibility we have to the people under that Mandate.'
Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.
For more stories like this, check our news page.
MORE: Will there be a bank holiday and trophy parade if England win Women's Euro 2025?
MORE: Empty shops to be turned into clubs and bars under new government plans
MORE: Trump warns 'there'll be no Europe left' before immediately hitting golf course
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How will the UK-France migrants return deal work as it comes into force?
How will the UK-France migrants return deal work as it comes into force?

Leader Live

time19 minutes ago

  • Leader Live

How will the UK-France migrants return deal work as it comes into force?

The treaty was laid in Parliament on Tuesday, and will take effect from Wednesday with detentions expected in the coming days. The UK-France deal, which will also bring approved asylum seekers under a safe route to Britain, was agreed last month on the last day of French President Emmanuel Macron's state visit to the UK. Here is a closer look at the plan and what the issue is. – What is the concern over the Channel crossings? Some 25,436 migrants have arrived in the UK after crossing the English Channel this year – a record for this point in the year since data began being collected in 2018. This is up 48% on this point last year (17,170) and 70% higher than at this stage in 2023 (14,994), according to PA news agency analysis of Home Office data. At least 10 people have died while attempting the journey this year, according to reports by French and UK authorities, but there is no official record of fatalities in the Channel. Ministers want to end the crossings because they 'threaten lives and undermine our border security'. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper has said smuggling gangs have been allowed to take hold along the UK's borders over the last six years, making millions out of the dangerous journeys. On Tuesday, Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch claimed the failure to stop migrants crossing the Channel is putting community cohesion at risk. Data on the crossings of migrants in 'small boats' like inflatable dinghies has been collected since 2018. In the first year of data, just 299 people were recorded to have arrived in the UK this way. Since 2018, 94% of migrants who arrived by small boat crossing have claimed asylum in the UK, or 145,834 out of 154,354 people. – What has the Labour Government's approach been to the issue? Since Labour came to power last July, the party has vowed to 'smash the gangs'. Ministers are seeking to ramp up enforcement action against smugglers with new legislation to hand counter terror-style powers to police, and new criminal offences aiming to crack down on the illegal trade. This is my message to the people smuggling gangs: we will end your vile trade. For the very first time, migrants arriving via small boat will be detained and returned to France. My government has led the way in taking our countries' co-operation to a new level. — Keir Starmer (@Keir_Starmer) July 10, 2025 The Government is also seeking to reset the UK's relationship with Europe over the crossings, and France has agreed to change its rules to allow police to intervene when boats are in shallow water, rather than requiring them to still be on land. Meanwhile ministers are hoping to deter new arrivals promised jobs when they come to the UK by cracking down on illegal working and deportations of ineligible asylum seekers. – What is the new deal and how will it work? Last month, the Prime Minister and French president agreed a plan to send back small boats migrants, with an asylum seeker being sent to the UK in exchange in equal numbers. Under the pilot scheme, adults arriving on a small boat can be detained and returned to France for the first time. The trial is set to run until June 11 2026, pending a longer-term agreement or cancellation by either the UK or France with one months' notice. Asylum seekers accepted to come to the UK under the deal would travel via a safe, legal route, 'subject to strict security checks'. Those in France could express an interest to apply for asylum to the UK through an online platform developed by the Home Office, and would then carry out the standard visa application process and checks. Priority will be given to people from countries where they are most likely to be granted asylum as genuine refugees, who are most likely to be exploited by smuggling gangs, and also asylum seekers who have connections to the UK. Borders are being breached by criminal gangs worldwide. Life-threatening Channel crossings have occurred for years – it is time to act. Border Security Command is how we fight back. — Home Office (@ukhomeoffice) March 4, 2025 If accepted, they would be given three months in the UK to claim asylum or apply for a visa, and would be subject to the same rules for all asylum seekers not allowed to work, study or have access to benefits. Their claim could still be rejected during their time in the UK, and they could then be removed from the country. It is not clear what the criteria will be for deciding which migrants who arrive in the UK by small boat will be sent back to France, other than being aged over 18. New arrivals will be screened at Manston processing centre, in Kent, which is current procedure, before individuals determined to be suitable for the pilot and for detention, will be picked and held in an immigration removal centre. Their removal is expected to be made on the grounds of inadmissibility, that they have arrived from the UK from a safe country where their case can be heard instead, because an agreement is in place with France. The treaty confirms the migrants would be returned back to France by plane, and commits for a return to be completed within three months in all cases. It also agrees for a joint committee to be set up to monitor the agreement and arrange logistics. Migrants will be able to appeal against the decision based on exceptional circumstances. The Home Office said it had learned from the 'lengthy legal challenges' over the previous government's Rwanda scheme and would 'robustly defend' any attempts to block removal through the courts. – How many people will be part of the pilot and much will it cost? No official number of migrants has been confirmed to take part in the pilot, but it is understood numbers will grow over the pilot period and depend on operational factors. The Home Secretary has said the Government does not want to put a number on the amount as she believes it could aid criminal gangs. It has been reported that about 50 a week could be sent to France. This would be a stark contrast to the more than 800 people every week who on average have arrived in the UK via small boat this year. There is no funding to France associated with this agreement, and operations around the returns and arrivals will be paid for from the existing Home Office budget. – What has the reaction been to the deal? Opposition politicians were scathing about the Prime Minister's deal with Mr Macron, with shadow home secretary Chris Philp claiming the small percentage of arrivals to be removed would 'make no difference whatsoever'. On Tuesday, he added: 'This deal is unworkable and wide open to abuse.' Reform UK leader Nigel Farage also branded it a 'humiliation'. Meanwhile refugee charities have also criticised the plan and have urged the Government to provide more safe, legal routes for asylum seekers instead. Reacting to the plan coming into force, Amnesty International UK's refugee rights director, Steve Valdez-Symonds, said: 'Once again, refugees are treated like parcels, not people, while the public is left to pay the price for, yet another cruel, costly failure dressed up as policy.'

Hezbollah threatens to resume firing at Israel if it intensifies Lebanon action
Hezbollah threatens to resume firing at Israel if it intensifies Lebanon action

Leader Live

time19 minutes ago

  • Leader Live

Hezbollah threatens to resume firing at Israel if it intensifies Lebanon action

Naim Kassem's comments came as Lebanon's Cabinet was meeting to discuss Hezbollah's disarmament. Beirut is under US pressure to disarm the group that recently fought a 14-month war with Israel and was left gravely weakened, with many of its political and military leaders dead. Since the war ended in November with a US-brokered ceasefire, Hezbollah officials have said the group will not discuss its disarmament until Israel withdraws from five hills it controls inside Lebanon and stops almost daily airstrikes that have killed or wounded hundreds of people, most of them Hezbollah members. Israel has accused Hezbollah of trying to rebuild its military capabilities. Israel's military has said the five locations in Lebanon provide vantage points or are located across from communities in northern Israel, where about 60,000 Israelis were displaced during the war. Since the ceasefire, Hezbollah has claimed responsibility for one attack on a disputed area along the border. In a televised speech on Tuesday, Kassem said Hezbollah rejects any timetable to hand over its weapons. 'Israel's interest is not to widen the aggression because if they expand, the resistance will defend, the army will defend and the people will defend,' he said. 'This defence will lead to the fall of missiles inside Israel.' Since the war ended, Hezbollah has withdrawn most of its fighters and weapons from the area along the border with Israel south of the Litani river. Last week, Lebanese President Joseph Aoun reiterated calls for Hezbollah to give up its weapons, angering the group's leadership. The ceasefire agreement left vague how Hezbollah's weapons and military facilities north of the Litani river should be treated, saying Lebanese authorities should dismantle unauthorised facilities starting with the area south of the river. Hezbollah maintains the deal covers only the area south of the Litani, while Israel and the US say it mandates disarmament of the group throughout Lebanon. Kassem said Hezbollah rejects a government vote over its weapons, saying such a decision should be unanimously backed by all Lebanese. 'No one can deprive Lebanon of its force to protect its sovereignty,' Kassem said. Hezbollah's weapons are a divisive issue among Lebanese, with some groups calling for its disarmament. The Israel-Hezbollah war started a day after the October 7 2023 Hamas-led attack against Israel from Gaza. It left more than 4,000 people dead and caused 11 billion dollars (£8.3 billion) of damage.

Corbyn vs Starmer, modern manners, and a crumbling NHS
Corbyn vs Starmer, modern manners, and a crumbling NHS

Metro

time19 minutes ago

  • Metro

Corbyn vs Starmer, modern manners, and a crumbling NHS

Do you agree with our readers? Have your say on these MetroTalk topics and more in the comments. Robert Hughes (MetroTalk, Mon) says that 'Labour has little to fear by losing the niche hard left and should let Corbyn and his disciples get on with it'. It is worth remembering that in 2017, the Labour Party under Corbyn received 3 million more votes than it did in 2024 under Starmer. Even in 2019, a catastrophic election insofar as the number of parliamentary seats was concerned, it received half a million more actual votes than in 2024. This represents quite a large niche. Political parties striving to attract more supporters should understand that it is even more important to keep those they already have. I am not sure that Starmer and his colleagues have really grasped this point. Rory O'Kelly, Beckenham So Robert Johnson takes issue with Chris Sheperd (MetroTalk, Tue) over the government's record. Under Labour: Unemployment is up; small businesses are closing at their biggest rate in more than ten years; government borrowing is going through the roof; crime in general is up; inflation is up. Also, waiting lists are not down –appointments have been met due to lack of strikes, so that's a sleight of hand with the figures. Labour gave in to the doctors once on pay and look what has happened – more strikes. As for Labour councils going bankrupt all over the country, is that the Conservatives' fault? I would argue there's more illegal immigration than ever before, too. So yes, let's judge the country in five years. I can wait. Gary, Essex I know this has been mentioned by other readers before but why are people so self-centred and lacking in simple manners or consideration for others? Behaviour that we thought was just kids being obnoxious is now being exhibited by grown men and women, adults who should know better. My rant is about the very disgusting trend of listening or playing videos etc without a headset on public transport. It's annoying that one is constantly put in a position of having to say something, and risk abuse or worse. With the demise of any kind of onboard supervision empowered to tackle this anti-social behaviour, ordinary citizens are taking the risk of challenging it themselves. It angers me that I am forced to say something and it's just awful by those who do it, daring anyone to comment or say anything. Shame on you all. I know your mothers taught you better than that! Agatha, Surrey One thing I would like to bring back from yonder years is queuing at bus stops. However, this would only work if the buses stopped right at the bus stop. If it stops 20 yards after or 20 yards before, as seems the case often nowadays, it wouldn't work. Richard Farrar, London Whilst I don't wish to make light of this lady's horrible experience of having 'rodent droppings found in her drawers' (Metro, Mon), I do think you would have been wise to substitute 'drawers' for 'bedside cabinet' to avoid any ambiguity. William Buckley, Reading The front page headline of Monday's Metro ('Rat horror for hospital gran') will come as little surprise to people who've worked in our hospitals for any length of time. A theatre nurse friend of mine told me stories of a large hospital in London which had all manner of pests – rats, mice, cockroaches – cropping up throughout the building, including in operating theatres and kitchens. This was 20 years ago, mind, but I'm sure there are still many hospitals around the country with similar infestations. Nowadays, my friend works in a smaller hospital, which was built from RAAC concrete, so they have to watch out for bits of the roof falling on them during surgery. I'm not even joking. I'm afraid this is what happens when we don't fund our health service properly. These are the things I think of whenever anyone claims that taxes are too high. And you can't pin this on immigration either, because our hospitals rely on immigrants – they are a large and established part of the workforce. Sharon, Manchester Why are hundreds of Gaza children being brought into destitute Britain for treatment – this will only lead to the underfunded NHS's waiting lists becoming even longer. The children should be sent to oil-rich countries such as Saudi Appley, Kent The cost of items in my local charity shops has rocketed. I was shocked to see a T-shirt priced at £5.99, while it is currently on sale in Primark for £6. Mrs AH East, Leeds Mark Hardinge (MetroTalk, Mon) is mistaken when talking about the 'futile net zero programme'. Net zero is the only way we will have good quality jobs and sustainable industries for future generations. It is the most patriotic action we can take. Nigel Farage is backed by oil and gas companies – surely the only reason he champions backward-looking and catastrophic policies. Christina, Sheffield Thank you Michael D Baker (MetroTalk, July 29) for your anecdote about Ozzy Osbourne meeting Leicester band Spring at Rockfield studios in Monmouth. More Trending Spring were a little-known band, who made an almost forgotten, long-lost great British album in my view – although drummer Pick Withers did subsequently find some fame with Dire Straits. Coincidentally, another band, Indian Summer from Coventry, shared both management and a residency at Henry's Blueshouse in Birmingham with Black Sabbath and also made a great, long-lost British album on the same label, Neon. Collectors have always recognised the quality in these albums and both originals are now fetching large sums of money. But for me the enormity of Sabbath and the anonymity of Spring and Indian Summer is impossible to comprehend. It never ceases to amaze me. Lots of things fascinate me about music, this surely one I am destined personally never to understand. Lionel Hutt, Keynsham MORE: The Metro daily cartoon by Guy Venables MORE: I'm a fashion expert – here's what I'm buying in Aligne's unmissable sale MORE: Titan sub pilot Stockton Rush could have faced criminal charges if he survived, report finds

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store