Speaker Berri discusses Lebanon's challenges with UN and SSNP, emphasizing unity and reconstruction
During the meeting, they discussed the developments in the general situation, political updates, and field developments, particularly in light of Israel's continued attacks, occupation of parts of southern Lebanese territory, and violations of U.N. Resolution 1701 and the ceasefire agreement.
Berri also met with former Minister and head of the Syrian Social Nationalist Party, Asaad Hardan, who was accompanied by a delegation. They discussed the current developments in Lebanon and the broader region.
After the meeting, Hardan stated: "We met with Berri in these circumstances to reaffirm our position and reading regarding his stance on both the national and regional situations. On the national front, our party greatly appreciates the Speaker's approach to all the crises Lebanon has faced and continues to face, as well as his wisdom, patriotism, and sense of responsibility in reinforcing national unity and civil peace in Lebanon.''
He added, ''We all agree on the fundamentals of how to face aggression, its impact on the south and Lebanon, and the right to reconstruction, which is the right of all Lebanese citizens and a responsibility of the state and officials."
He emphasized that these positions are consistent with Berri's views, especially concerning the parliamentary elections, electoral law, and the belief that the law should unite the Lebanese rather than divide them.
He criticized the current state of Lebanon, which he described as fostering sectarianism instead of national unity.
Hardan called for a reduction in the confrontational rhetoric in the country, which he said is inciting Israeli aggression and undermining Lebanese unity. "The Lebanese should stand united in the face of aggression and its consequences on Lebanon," he stated.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
LBCI
4 hours ago
- LBCI
Lebanese expatriates voice concern: What's next for the 2026 elections?
Report by Maroun Nassif, English adaptation by Akram Chehayeb A month ago, lawmakers from the Lebanese Forces, Kataeb Party, and several independent MPs attempted to break the quorum of a legislative session in protest over Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri's refusal to include a proposal on the agenda to amend the electoral law and scrap the six parliamentary seats allocated to the Lebanese diaspora. The proposal was also not referred to a parliamentary subcommittee. While the attempt to break quorum during last month's legislative session ultimately failed, it's equally valid that the MPs pushing to amend the electoral law either forgot—or deliberately ignored—the issue of expatriate voting. This omission prompted several Lebanese expatriates to stage a sit-in outside Nejmeh Square during the session, calling on the General Assembly to amend the articles governing diaspora voting. Many expatriates now fear that the political forces holding sway over Parliament may work to derail the 2026 elections altogether—or at the very least, block the participation of overseas voters. These suspicions were only reinforced by an admission from Deputy Speaker Elias Bou Saab. In reality, the parliamentary subcommittee tasked with reviewing electoral law proposals hasn't convened in over a month. This comes with just 112 days left before the November 20 deadline for expatriate voter registration. With the clock ticking, the question remains: which political party is willing to shoulder responsibility for safeguarding the credibility of the upcoming elections?
LBCI
4 hours ago
- LBCI
State over arms: Lebanon seeks unity ahead of crucial Cabinet meeting
Report by Raneem Bou Khzam, English adaptation by Yasmine Jaroudi In a firm address, Lebanese President Joseph Aoun reaffirmed the state's exclusive right to hold arms, emphasizing this principle as a cornerstone of Lebanon's national policy. The statement comes amid mounting internal and international pressure following the Lebanese government's response to a U.S. proposal concerning the escalating situation with Israel. The president outlined eight key points in Lebanon's official response, placing immediate emphasis on halting all Israeli hostilities, including targeted assassinations, securing Israel's withdrawal behind internationally recognized borders, and the release of Lebanese detainees. The response also addressed broader concerns, including the return of Syrian refugees and measures to combat smuggling and drug trafficking. With Hezbollah's position central to the debate, attention now shifts to the upcoming Cabinet session scheduled for Tuesday. According to LBCI sources, the group is currently leaning toward participating in the session. Intense consultations are expected to take place in the meantime to avoid confrontation and secure consensus. Hezbollah remains steadfast in its stance, maintaining that Israel must cease its aggressions and fully withdraw from occupied Lebanese territory before any discussions regarding the party's remaining arsenal can proceed. Whether the Cabinet can agree on this sequence of priorities remains uncertain. The president's decision to bring the issue before the Cabinet is seen by many as a move to regain control over the national security agenda amid increasing domestic and foreign pressure. His remarks reaffirm his constitutional commitment to a national defense strategy, though the U.S. is not giving guarantees. Political actors close to Hezbollah have signaled a preference for dialogue and de-escalation, warning that any rushed concessions, such as prematurely handing over arms, could cost Lebanon valuable negotiating leverage. While there is no official call to boycott the Cabinet session, its delay is aimed at facilitating ongoing talks among the country's top leadership in hopes of finding a peaceful path forward.
LBCI
5 hours ago
- LBCI
Trump says he did not discuss UK plan to recognize Palestinian state with Starmer
U.S. President Donald Trump said on Tuesday that he and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer did not discuss London's plan to recognize a Palestinian state unless Israel takes a number of steps to improve life for Palestinians. Starmer said on Tuesday that Britain was prepared to recognize a Palestinian state in September at the United Nations General Assembly in response to growing public anger over the images of starving children in Gaza. "We never did discuss it," Trump told reporters on board Air Force One while traveling back to the U.S. after meeting Starmer in Scotland. Trump said recognizing a Palestinian state would reward Palestinian militant group Hamas. "You're rewarding Hamas if you do that. I don't think they should be rewarded," he said. Trump said the U.S. had sent money for food aid for Palestinians in Gaza, and that he wanted to make sure it's properly spent. "I want to make sure the money is spent wisely and is spent judiciously, and that food is distributed in a proper manner," he said.
