
South Korea's liberal-led legislature passes bills calling for special probes into Yoon and wife
South Korea's liberal-led legislature on Thursday (June 5, 2025) passed bills to launch special investigations into former President Yoon Suk-yeol's short-lived imposition of martial law in December and criminal allegations against his wife, targeting the ousted conservative a day after his liberal successor took office.
The bills previously were vetoed by Mr. Yoon and South Korea's caretaker government after his December 14 impeachment over the martial law debacle.
They are expected to be signed by new President Lee Jae-myung, a Democrat who won (June 3, 2025) Tuesday's snap election triggered by Mr. Yoon's formal removal from office in April.
Many members of the conservative People Power Party refused to participate in the votes, which took place after one of the party's lawmakers accused the liberals in a speech of being driven by vendetta.
Mr. Lee, who as an Opposition leader drove the legislative efforts to impeach and oust Mr. Yoon, pinned his presidential campaign on unity, promising not to target conservatives and calling for an end to political polarisation.
Yet Mr. Lee has vowed a full investigation into Mr. Yoon's martial law stunt and the allegations surrounding his wife, moves that could overshadow the new government and inflame tensions as Mr. Yoon faces a high-stakes rebellion trial carrying a possible death sentence.
The Seoul Central District Prosecutors' Office indicted Mr. Yoon in January over his December 3 martial law decree, charging him with masterminding a rebellion and describing his power grab as an illegal bid to seize the legislature and election offices and arrest political opponents.
Liberals have insisted that independent investigations into Mr. Yoon are essential, saying probes by prosecutors, police, and an anti-corruption agency were inadequate and hampered by Mr. Yoon's refusal to cooperate. If Mr. Lee approves the launch of independent investigations, special prosecutors could request the transfer of relevant cases for expanded probes, or direct public or military prosecutors to continue handling them under their supervision.
The bills calling for independent investigations into Mr. Yoon's martial law decree and criminal allegations involving his wife both passed by a vote of 194 to 3.
Dozens of retired marines, dressed in red shirts, saluted and cheered from an observation box after lawmakers passed the bill for a special prosecutor investigation into the marine's death, which also passed 194 to 3.
Mr. Yoon's martial law decree lasted only a few hours after a quorum of lawmakers pushed past a blockade of hundreds of heavily armed soldiers and voted to revoke the measure. Mr. Yoon defended the move as a necessary act of governance, accusing the Democrats, whom he labeled 'anti-state forces,' of abusing their majority to obstruct his agenda and paralyse state affairs.
That same majority now gives Mr. Lee a far more favorable path to advance his agenda, though conservatives claim it could grant him virtually unchecked power and allow him to pass laws that shield him from legal trouble.
Mr. Yoon's wife, Kim Keon-hee, also faces multiple corruption allegations, including claims that she received luxury items from a Unification Church official seeking business favors, as well as possible involvement in a stock price manipulation scheme. She also is suspected of interfering with PPP's candidate nominations ahead of legislative elections in April last year.
While in office, Mr. Yoon repeatedly dismissed calls to investigate his wife, denouncing them as baseless political attacks.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
Signal war-chat leak: Pentagon watchdog probes if orders given to Hegseth's aides to delete messages
US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth (File photo) The Pentagon's watchdog is investigating whether any of Secretary Pete Hegseth 's staff were instructed to delete Signal messages that possibly communicated sensitive military details to a journalist, based on documents and information from two sources familiar with the inquiry, quoted by the Associated Press. The investigation centres on the dissemination of information via the messaging platform regarding the March 15 strikes against Houthi positions in Yemen. The timing is significant as Hegseth prepares for his first congressional testimony since confirmation, where he will likely address concerns about his information management practices, recent senior staff departures, and internal leak investigations. Previous scrutiny has focused on Hegseth's installation of an non-secure internet connection bypassing security protocols, and his sharing of military operation details in multiple Signal conversations. The communications included separate chats with his family members and senior national security officials, with The Atlantic's editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg accidentally included in one group. The investigation scope includes identifying who posted information and had access to Hegseth's device, according to AP sources and documents. Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Click Here - This Might Save You From Losing Money Expertinspector Click Here Undo The sources spoke anonymously due to restrictions on discussing the matter. Some lawmakers from both parties have criticised Hegseth's sharing of operational details before mission completion, suggesting such actions could have endangered pilots and would typically result in dismissal for lower-ranking personnel. Whilst Hegseth maintains the shared information was unclassified, multiple defence experts assert that such specific pre-strike details would not normally be permitted on unsecured devices. "I said repeatedly, nobody is texting war plans," Hegseth told Fox News Channel in April after reporting emerged about the chat that included his family members. "I look at war plans every day. What was shared over Signal then and now, however you characterize it, was informal, unclassified coordinations, for media coordinations and other things. That's what I've said from the beginning." President Donald Trump has maintained support for Hegseth, acknowledging his challenges during a Memorial Day address at Arlington National Cemetery. Since the Signal controversy, Hegseth has reduced media interactions, avoiding Pentagon press briefings, with his spokesperson conducting only one such session. The investigation was initiated at the request of Senate Armed Services Committee leadership, including Chairman Senator Roger Wicker and ranking Democrat Senator Jack Reed. While Signal offers encrypted communications, it remains vulnerable to hacking and lacks approval for classified information transmission. The Defence Department highlighted these vulnerabilities on March 14, one day before the Houthi strikes. Trump justified the Houthi operations citing their "unrelenting campaign of piracy, violence and terrorism" and their disruption of vital shipping routes. Between November 2023 and January, Houthi forces attacked over 100 vessels, causing two sinkings and four fatalities. Their leadership linked these actions to opposing Israel's Gaza operations.
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
Eight ways Trump and Musk could turn their feud into mutual political pain
Wield his billions against Mr. Trump, his allies and his agenda. After spending more than $250 million to help elect the president, Mr. Musk could just as easily fund campaigns against Republicans NYT The spectacular blowup on Thursday between President Trump and Elon Musk has ripped apart a shaky alliance between two of the world's most powerful men. Their feud could have far-reaching consequences if it drags on or even escalates. Here are eight ways they could inflict pain on each other. What Musk could do Wield his billions against Mr. Trump, his allies and his agenda. After spending more than $250 million to help elect the president, Mr. Musk could just as easily fund campaigns against Republicans. He has called Mr. Trump's domestic policy bill a 'disgusting abomination,' and on Thursday attacked Republican congressional leaders on X, his social media company. (Mr. Musk could also withhold the final $100 million of his pledge to support Mr. Trump.) Use social media as an irritant. On Thursday afternoon, Mr. Musk posted a poll on X, asking whether it was time 'to create a new political party in America that actually represents the 80 per cent in the middle.' More than 80 percent of the nearly two million respondents so far have voted 'yes.' And responding to a post suggesting that 'Trump should be impeached,' Mr. Musk said: 'Yes.' (It was not entirely clear whether he was agreeing with impeachment or with another part of the post.) Drag Mr. Trump into controversy. After enjoying a close relationship with the president for months, Mr. Musk could now cause trouble for Mr. Trump by claiming to have inside information. On Thursday, without offering evidence, he claimed Mr. Trump's administration had slow-walked the release of files on Jeffrey Epstein because Mr. Trump's name appeared in them. 'Mark this post for the future,' he wrote. 'The truth will come out.' House Democrats quickly jumped on the post. Use his companies to inconvenience the administration. Mr. Musk wrote that he would 'immediately' decommission SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft, which transports NASA astronauts and supplies to and from the International Space Station. The threat prompted Stephen K. Bannon, a Trump ally and one of Mr. Musk's foremost critics, to suggest that Mr. Trump 'seize SpaceX tonight before midnight' via executive order. What Trump could do Cut contracts with Mr. Musk's companies. On his own social media platform, Truth Social, Mr. Trump suggested that ending the government contracts with Mr. Musk's various companies, including SpaceX and Tesla, would be 'the easiest way to save money in our Budget.' Last year, Mr. Musk's companies were promised $3 billion in nearly 100 contracts with 17 government agencies. Investigate Mr. Musk's immigration status and drug use. Mr. Bannon called on Thursday for a 'formal investigation of his immigration status, because I am of the strong belief that he is an illegal alien, and he should be deported from the country immediately.' Mr. Musk is a naturalized US citizen who was born in South Africa. Mr. Bannon also called for an investigation into Mr. Musk's drug use and his efforts to be briefed on classified information about military plans involving China. Revoke Mr. Musk's security clearance. Mr. Bannon suggested that Mr. Musk's top-secret clearance should be suspended during investigations into the tech billionaire. But Mr. Trump could also fully revoke Mr. Musk's clearance, which Mr. Musk has as part of the government contracts involving SpaceX's work with NASA. That would make it very difficult for Mr. Musk to continue to work with the government. Wield the power of the presidency against him. Mr. Trump has a tremendous array of powers at his disposal, with the ability to sign executive orders punishing political adversaries and to direct agencies like the Justice Department to initiate investigations. He could end some of Mr. Musk's pet projects, such as the so-called Department of Government Efficiency, as well as his embrace of white South Africans, a priority of Mr. Musk's.


The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
Watch: How a bill drove a wedge between Trump, Musk
One of the most high-profile political alliances in recent U.S. history is breaking apart — and it's unfolding rapidly, intensely and very publicly. After months of bonhomie, U.S. President Donald Trump and tech billionaire Elon Musk are no longer allies and at the centre of the conflict is a new tax and spending bill. This bill, or the 'One Big Beautiful Bill', seeks to cut taxes, fund the government's deportation operation and increase military spending. It also proposes to cut spending on healthcare subsidies, education and renewable energy incentives. It also includes a proposal that will stop individual states from forming laws to regulate AI. The House passed the bill last month with a razor-thin margin of 215-214, with Democrats and two Republicans opposing it. The Senate will take up this bill, and they have set a deadline to get the legislation to Trump before July 4, 2025. Musk, who headed the Department of Government Efficiency or DOGE, took to X to criticise the bill. He dubbed it the 'Debt Slavery Bill.' In a series of posts, he called it a 'massive mistake' that 'punishes innovation' and 'floods the economy with pork-barrel spending.' He also alleged that the Congress was 'spending America into bankruptcy' and that 'If America goes broke, nothing else matters.' The duo even resorted to posting direct personal attacks, with Trump posting on Truth Social and Musk firing back on X. The consequences of this rift are already showing. Tesla's stock dropped on Thursday. Trump threatened to cut subsidies and contracts given to Musk's companies, and Musk announced he may decommission SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft if this happened. Experts are worried that Musk's companies, including Tesla, SpaceX, Neuralink, would face intense scrutiny from regulators in the coming days. Trump risks losing support among tech donors, younger male voters, and Musk's massive online following as he heads into the midterm elections. During its heyday, the Trump-Musk relationship was unprecedented. Musk spent nearly $300 million backing Trump's campaign and other Republicans last year, and Trump allowed the tech CEO unprecedented access. Now, Musk even reposted a post on X which called for Trump's impeachment.