‘Utter disaster': Critics slam Starmer's use of Palestinian statehood as bargaining tool
Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced on Tuesday that the government would recognise a Palestinian state by September unless Israel 'takes substantive steps' to end the genocide unfolding in Gaza and agrees to a ceasefire.
The statement has drawn fire from political commentators and aid groups who denounced the conditioning of recognition on Israel ending its siege on Gaza and agreeing to a ceasefire.
'Recognition should be because you as Britain recognise the rights of Palestinians to nationhood, to self-determination,' Chris Doyle, the director of Council for Arab-British Understanding (CAABU), told Middle East Eye.
Doyle pointed out that the conditions outlined in the statement - that Israel should take 'substantive steps' and 'end the appalling situation Gaza' - are unclear and more vaguely worded than previous government statements.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
'So actually, amazingly, in some areas, it's weaker than previous government statements, where they have called for the UN to have unimpeded access. So it's an utter disaster.
'Nothing that the government announced yesterday, nothing will stop or slow down the genocide in Gaza,' Doyle emphasised.
'We are going to see additional horrors in Gaza'.
Emily Thornberry: Starmer has 'a golden opportunity' to sway Trump on Gaza Read More »
Ahead of the announcement, Starmer was facing mounting public outcry and pressure from MPs over Israel's war on Gaza, which he initially supported.
More than 60,000 Palestinians have been killed by Israeli forces since 7 October 2023, and increasing numbers have been dying of Israeli-imposed starvation in recent weeks.
A week before Starmer's announcement, French President Emmanuel Macron said his country would officially recognise a Palestinian state in September - becoming the first of the G7 group of the world's richest countries to do so, and intensifying pressure on Starmer to follow suit.
Doyle argued that Starmer could have announced a joint recognition with France, without conditionalities attached.
'There's enough in there to allow him to wiggle out of a recognition in September," said Doyle.
"There's also just about enough, if Israel behaves even worse, that he can go forward. So he keeps his options open."
'A very weak card'
British-Israeli analyst and former Israeli government adviser Daniel Levy noted that, as pressure is mounting on states to act, state recognition has become 'the go-to place', allowing political leaders to look as if they are doing something significant to address the situation.
'It is something that doesn't require an actual reconfiguration in important elements in the bilateral relationship with Israel,' Levy told MEE.
'Arms and trade sanctions, or joining the South African case at the ICJ [International Criminal Court] on genocide, or looking at Israeli assets that are being held within your banking jurisdiction that you could freeze - those would be meaningful steps. This is something that's eminently dismissible, especially by Israel,' he said.
'We're also talking about surveillance fights over Gaza from RAF bases in Cyprus'
- Sara Husseini, British Palestinian Committee
Levy also questioned what the recognition would entail given Palestine is under permanent and illegal Israeli occupation.
'What actions are you going to take against the country that is occupying the state that you recognise to face a consequence for doing so. And the answer is: nothing at all.'
Many have also pointed to the incoherence of the UK government's position on Israel, given it continues to supply it with arms.
'We're talking not just arms sales and the selling of crucial F-35 parts to maintain Israel's fighter jets. We're also talking about surveillance fights over Gaza from RAF bases in Cyprus. We're talking extensive allyship and support for a state that is in the dock for genocide,' Sara Husseini, director of the British Palestinian Committee, told MEE.
'Starmer is now playing this very weak card which he thinks will relieve his government from actually doing what needs to be done,' she added.
'Dangerous and inefficient'
Earlier on Tuesday, a UN-backed global food security body said famine was unfolding across Gaza, with one in three children in Gaza City acutely malnourished.
"Latest data indicates that famine thresholds have been reached for food consumption in most of the Gaza Strip and for acute malnutrition in Gaza City,' the UN-backed Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) said in a new report.
"Amid relentless conflict, mass displacement, severely restricted humanitarian access, and the collapse of essential services, including healthcare, the crisis has reached an alarming and deadly turning point."
The warning comes as nearly 150 Palestinian children and adults in Gaza have died from starvation since Israel's onslaught on Gaza in October 2023.
UK to recognise Palestinian state by September if no Gaza ceasefire reached Read More »
Sangeetha Navaratnam-Blair, Senior Humanitarian Advocacy Manager at ActionAid UK, said the UK's move would do very little to alleviate the spiralling humanitarian crisis in Gaza.
'It's clear at this point that words or condemnation from the UK haven't compelled the Israeli government to change course, and this threat does not appear to be something that would also encourage them to change their actions and to enable any legal supplies and humanitarian support to get into Gaza,' Navaratnam-Blair told MEE.
Since Israel announced last Friday it would allow countries to airdrop aid into Gaza, the UK signalled it was considering the idea, despite warnings from aid groups that the move will do little to alleviate the dire humanitarian situation in the enclave.
Navaratnam-Blair said the airdropping of humanitarian supplies 'is not going to come close to addressing the sheer volume of food, medicine and other supplies that is required by the people of Gaza'.
'It actually can be really dangerous and inefficient when it comes to people who have been starving for such a long period of time. They may experience refeeding syndrome and other negative impacts, if not supported by professional medical support,' she said.
Since 2 March, Israel has prevented all food and aid from reaching starving Palestinians.
Last week, more than 100 international human rights and humanitarian organisations called for an end to the siege, citing widespread starvation affecting their staff.
Unrwa communications director Juliette Touma also told MEE last week that several of the organisation's staff fainted on duty due to malnutrition.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
16 minutes ago
- Middle East Eye
Finland's president says he will recognise Palestinian state as Israel and Palestine have 'suffered'
Finland's president Alexander Stubb says he is ready to approve recognition of a Palestinian state if the Finnish government decides to make such a proposal in a post on X on Thursday. Stubb claimed that both Israel and Palestine were suffereing: "In Israel, there is a real threat of violence. Hamas, many other terrorist organizations, and several states still do not recognize Israel's existence. At the same time, the situation in Gaza is inhumane. Children are dying of hunger as food aid does not reach them. Civilians who have gone to collect food have been shot", he said. He said that it was important for Arab countries to recognise Israel, saying: "It is important that the Arab countries that have not yet recognized Israel do so. The Palestinian Authority has already recognized Israel. Hamas does not represent Palestine".
Middle East Eye
3 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Does Trump care about the issue of Palestinian statehood?
The US president's sentiments on Palestinian statehood have shifted significantly over the past week, as three of his G7 allies proclaimed they would recognise the State of Palestine at the United Nations General Assembly meeting in September. French President Emmanuel Macron's somewhat sudden announcement on X came first, to which Donald Trump - prompted by a reporter - said nonchalantly, "That's fine if he does that. It's up to him. I'm with the United States, I'm not with France". On Monday, just hours after a sit-down with Trump in Scotland, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced that he too would recognise a Palestinian state in September. "I'm not in that camp... if you do that, you really are rewarding Hamas," Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One. By Wednesday, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney had joined the UK and France, as all three parties argued that this was the only pathway to ending the 77-year-old Israel-Palestine conflict and the war on Gaza. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters "Wow! Canada has just announced that it is backing statehood for Palestine. That will make it very hard for us to make a Trade Deal with them. Oh' [sic] Canada!" Trump wrote on his TruthSocial account. He then raised tariffs on Canadian products from 25 percent to 35 percent. Is Trump just feeling the isolation of now having nearly 150 countries - many of them US allies - recognise that Palestinians are entitled to a state, or are others in his close circle driving his policy for him? Why Trump has little interest in delivering a ceasefire in Gaza Read More » "I think that Trump was caught flat-footed initially, and so he was just dismissive, and anything that's not an initiative that he would take, or any action or comment that doesn't turn the attention to him and give him the impression that he is the master of whatever issue is under discussion, he will viscerally reject or oppose," Glenn Carle, a national security expert who spent 25 years in the CIA's clandestine services, told Middle East Eye. "Once matters had evolved a little, he started to think, well, this could create some headaches for me," he added. "The bureaucracies weighed in to the extent they remain capable and relevant. That would be the State Department largely saying, 'Well, this is fraught'." Indeed, US Secretary of State and national security adviser Marco Rubio has been leading the administration's official messaging on the matter. Rubio had been a staunch pro-Israel voice during his years in the Senate. "Irrelevant. It's irrelevant," he said of the recognition of Palestinian statehood on Fox Radio on Thursday. "The UK is like, well, if Israel doesn't agree to a ceasefire by September, we're going to recognise a Palestinian state. So if I'm Hamas, I say, you know what, let's not allow there to be a ceasefire. If Hamas refuses to agree to a ceasefire, it guarantees a Palestinian state will be recognised by all these countries in September," Rubio said in the radio appearance. 'Trump's not in control' A ceasefire that was in effect for six weeks in January - brokered by the Biden administration and enforced by the Trump administration - was broken by Israel on 1 March. Since then, Hamas has insisted that a full restoration of UN aid distribution and a permanent end to the war are the only two conditions it would accept for another deal with Israel. 'Trump's not in control. I think we need to take a look at the first three months of Trump's presidency, and then we need to compare that to the last four or five months,' Abdelhalim Abdelrahman, a political analyst and host of the podcast Uncharted Territory, told MEE. Abdelrahman says that in the first three months, Trump managed to negotiate a successful ceasefire with the Houthi rebels, diplomacy with the Iranians, and his envoy Steve Witkoff managed to twist Netanyahu's arm into accepting a ceasefire. 'If you look at who Trump has surrounded himself with, there's no doubt who's guiding his Middle East policy' - Abdelhalim Abdelrahman, host of Uncharted Territory "I know that Senator Lindsey Graham has been in the president's ear, pushing back against this. Mark Levin, who's a host at Fox [News], who was really pushing Trump to bomb Iran, has also been pushing back on this." There's also the Heritage Foundation, a highly influential right-wing, Evangelical Christian think tank in Washington that was key to formulating Trump's playbook for both his terms in office. The organisation celebrated this achievement back in 2018, and has undoubtedly seen more of its recommendations go into action now with the doxxing, firing, and deportation of students and faculty who took part in pro-Palestine protests last year. At a Thursday event in the US capital hosted by Heritage, speakers included the US ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee and the chairman of the scandal-plagued Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, Johnnie Moore. Organisers pledged to help Israel annex Judea and Samaria, otherwise known as the occupied West Bank, and never once mentioned the word Palestine or Palestinians during the 90-minute discussion. Moore in particular referred to them as the "Arabs of Gaza". "The Heritage Foundation has very much been peddling this idea that A, Palestinians are not indigenous to the land, and B, that the Trump administration should take just about every pro-Israel avenue that they possibly can," Abdelrahman said. "There is no such thing as a Palestinian people," to the Evangelical Christian community to which officials like Huckabee and groups like Heritage belong, Carle said. Is the two-state policy dead in the US? Washington adopted the policy of two states, Israel and Palestine, at the signing of the 1978 Camp David Accords between Egypt and Israel. It became official at the signing of the 1993 Oslo Accords in the White House Rose Garden. No administration has officially, on paper, overturned that policy since, but now more than ever, no government action even remotely suggests that it remains in effect. "The two-state policy is undoubtedly dead," Abdelrahman said. Carle said that US policy now effectively only serves the objectives of the Israeli right-wing, its current government run by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's Likud Party. US calls Saudi and French-led conference on two-state solution a 'publicity stunt' Read More » "It used to be a pretty clear majority of Israelis who favoured a two-state solution and opposed the colonisation of the West Bank," Carle said, but the numbers have dwindled. Just one week ago, the Knesset voted 71-13 on a non-binding motion to annex the occupied West Bank. "The Trump administration has never taken any steps towards a two-state solution. The Biden administration was quite a classic American one, in that it did want a two-state solution, but was feeling caught between the contradiction of supporting Israel's existential existence, which then meant that the US never pushed Israel," Carle said. In a move that the State Department insisted is unrelated to the momentum building around Palestinian statehood, the Trump administration on Thursday placed sanctions on officials in the Palestinian Authority (PA) and Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO) over their work taking Israel to international courts. The unnamed officials were "not complying with their commitments and undermining the prospects for peace", the State Department said. "Ironically enough, the PLO de-armed about 40 years ago, and has recognised Israel's right to exist, has abided by the Oslo security apparatus, and has just done about everything to appease the United States," Abdelrahman noted. Efforts by US lawmakers Also on Thursday, Jewish Insider revealed that California Congressman Ro Khanna, a progressive Democrat, had begun circulating a draft letter among colleagues, calling on Trump to recognise Palestinian statehood. The US must " recognise the need to meaningfully address the decades-long conflict and injustice underlying these 22 months of horrific war", the letter read. "With such an outcome opposed by the current Israeli government and actively undermined by its accelerating annexation campaign in the West Bank - as well as open calls by Israeli ministers to annex much if not all of Gaza - meaningful action is necessary to bolster the legitimacy of Palestinian statehood," the letter concluded. At the time when it was obtained, there were no signatures added to the letter yet. Khanna quickly shared the article on his X account and insisted that its revelation hampers discussions with the White House. "Someone leaked our effort to try to sabotage it. Sad. It won't work," he wrote. "Recognising a Palestinian state is an idea whose time has come. The response of my colleagues has been overwhelming. We will build support and release prior to the UN convening," he added. Abdelrahman told MEE it's likely "going to be nipped in the bud", at least until Republicans gauge where public sentiment is after the 2026 midterm elections for lawmakers. More and more young America Firsters have questioned US loyalty to Israel's objectives over the past several weeks, highlighting a split among Trump's most ardent supporters. And even if all the other G7 countries recognise Palestinian statehood, there won't be much of an effect anyway, Carle argues. "I think the reality is that there are only two countries that can really affect Israel's foreign policy. One is Israel, and the other is the United States".
Sharjah 24
4 hours ago
- Sharjah 24
Over 1,370 Palestinians killed while seeking food: UN
Despite Israel's 27 July announcement of daily military pauses in western Gaza 'to improve humanitarian responses,' Israeli forces continued attacks along food convoy routes and near GHF aid sites, the OHCHR said in a press release issued on Friday. '[The office] has no information that these Palestinians were directly participating in hostilities or posed any threat to Israeli security forces or other individuals. Each person killed or injured had been desperately struggling for survival, not only for themselves, but also for their families and dependents,' it said.
