Lanarkshire MSP recognised for dedication to protecting Scotland's environment
A Lanarkshire MSP was recognised by Scottish Environment LINK for her dedication to protecting Scotland's natural environment, as part of a celebration of MSP Nature Champions, held in the Scottish Parliament.
The reception recognised the efforts of MSPs currently signed up as Nature Champions and celebrated the different ways in which they have championed Scotland's iconic and threatened species and habitats over the current Parliament.
Labour's Central Scotland list MSP Monica Lennon's award was 'in recognition of a MSP who has developed a personal connection with a species or habitat through her Nature Champions role'.
In addition to her hands‑on advocacy, Monica has recently championed legislation that could dramatically reshape environmental protection in Scotland - the Ecocide (Scotland) Bill.
Introduced into Parliament in May, this proposed Members' Bill would make 'ecocide' - severe environmental harm that is widespread, long‑term or irreversible - a new criminal offence in Scots law.
Monica said: 'It is a privilege to receive this recognition from Scottish Environment LINK.
'Nature means a lot to me, and I've loved being part of the Nature Champions programme. Whether it's speaking up for Scotland's wildlife or pushing for stronger laws like the Ecocide Bill, I just want to do my bit to protect the places and species we all care about - now and for the future.
'Big thanks to everyone involved in this brilliant initiative. It's great to be part of a team that's so passionate about looking after our natural world.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Anger as SNP backs biggest wind farm on the planet just days after Trump condemned turbines
The 'largest' offshore windfarm in the world could be built in Scotland after the SNP Government granted planning permission. Ministers confirmed that the giant Berwick Bank project off the south east coast of Scotland - which will contain up to 307 turbines - has been given the go-ahead. Developers SSE Renewables, claim that, if it is fully delivered, then it 'would become the world's largest offshore wind farm '. Conservation groups raised concerns about the danger that the development will kill tens of thousands of puffins, kittiewakes and gannets, including globally important colonies at Bass Rock. It comes just days after Donald Trump attacked the spread of 'windmills' during his visit to Scotland, saying they were 'ruining' countries in Europe. Berwick Bank - proposed to be built 23 miles off the coast of St Abbs - aims to deliver 4.1 gigawatts (GW) of capacity, which is believed to be enough to power every home in Scotland twice over and around 17 per cent of the homes in the UK. The development will feature up to 307 turbines and have two connection points to the grid - one in Dunbar, East Lothian, and another in Blyth, Northumberland. But the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds and partner conservation groups condemned the decision to approve the development. Anne McCall, director of RSPB Scotland, said: 'This is a very dark day for seabirds. It is a terrible decision on a really bad development. 'Berwick Bank would be catastrophic for Scotland's globally important seabirds which are already facing alarming declines. In addition, its impacts are so damaging they will make the relative impacts of other windfarms significantly higher. 'This one wind farm is going to make it really challenging to accelerate renewable projects across Scottish seas. We are incredibly concerned that Scottish Government have granted consent for a project which could catapult some of Scotland's most-loved seabird species towards extinction.' The National Trust for Scotland said the news was 'deeply disappointing', fearing there will be 'significant harm' caused to seabird colonies at the nearby St Abb's Head National Nature Reserve. A spokesperson said: 'At the National Trust for Scotland we are supportive of the drive towards renewable energy, but not at the expense of the very nature and habitats this effort is supposed to help save in the face of climate change.' The Scottish Government highlighted that the consent is subject to SSE Renewables producing a detailed sea bird compensation plan outlining how adverse impacts on seabirds will be compensated for. Stephen Wheeler, the managing director of SSE Renewables, said news of the approval is 'hugely welcome'. He added: 'At over 4GW of potential capacity, Berwick Bank can play a pivotal role in meeting the mission of Clean Power 2030 for the UK and achieving Scotland's decarbonisation and climate action goals. 'Berwick Bank has the potential to rapidly scale up Scotland's operational renewable energy capacity and can accelerate the delivery of homegrown, affordable and secure clean energy to UK consumers from Scottish offshore wind, helping meet the UK's clean power ambition by 2030.' The approval comes after the SNP Government unveiled a new target of having up to 40GW of offshore wind capacity by 2040, which is a significant ramping up from the existing target of 8-11GW by 2030. Based on current average operating capacities it would mean an increase from around 1,000 turbines in five years' time to 5,000 within 15 years. Scottish Conservative net zero and energy spokesman Douglas Lumsden said: 'Wind power is an important part of our energy mix, but it is not on its own enough to provide affordable power and energy security. 'Scotland will only prosper with a realistic energy policy that draws on nuclear, oil and gas and renewables - and only the Scottish Conservatives are committed to that. 'The hostility of both the SNP and Labour governments to North Sea oil and gas is costing an estimated 400 jobs a fortnight and increasing our reliance on imported fossil fuels. 'If they care about Scotland's interests, these two left-wing parties should ditch their opposition to our existing energy sector, embrace a mix of solutions and heed Kemi Badenoch's call to ditch the energy price levy.' Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes said: 'Ministers have given the Berwick Bank wind farm application extremely careful consideration. 'The decision to grant consent to Berwick Bank is a major step in Scotland's progress towards achieving net zero and tackling the climate crisis, as well as supporting national energy security and growing our green economy. 'It is also an important decision for Scotland's renewables sector, and this investment will be further built upon through the delivery of Scotland's significant future pipeline of offshore wind projects under the ScotWind and the Innovation and Targeted Oil and Gas (INTOG) leasing rounds. 'We will continue to work closely with the developer and key stakeholders, including those working in fishing and conservation - to minimise the impact of the development on the marine environment and other marine users - and balance the needs of people and nature.' Asked yesterday if the Scottish Government waited until Mr Trump left the country before announcing consent for the scheme, First Minister John Swinney said: 'No. We had to wait for the various considerations to be given to the application at Berwick Bank.'
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
JONATHAN BROCKLEBANK: Trump's assessment resonates not just with me but with much of Scotland. Sturgeon really WAS terrible
The post on former First Minister Nicola Sturgeon 's Instagram account assumed a certain knowledge on the part of the reader. 'Feeling was mutual, Donnie,' it read. 'Forever proud to represent all the things that offend your view of the world.' The first assumption is that we know that 'Donnie' refers to the President of the United States Donald Trump and that the intention behind the use of the diminutive is to demean him. The second assumption is that we are au fait with President Trump's position on Ms Sturgeon. As he flew back to Washington on Air Force One on Tuesday, he let slip to reporters that, while he had 'a lot of respect' for John Swinney he thought 'the woman who preceded him' was 'terrible as First Minister of Scotland'. Mr Swinney was actually preceded by Humza Yousaf but we shouldn't quibble if he is not on the leader of the free world's radar. He is hardly on Scotland's either. There is one more key assumption of understanding in Ms Sturgeon's riposte to the President. To get her meaning, it must be understood that her words flow down to their readers like consecrated crystal streams from the moral uplands in which she dwells. She has always lived there atop the highest peak in the kingdom of the righteous and if we don't know this about her then her Instagram post could not possibly hit its mark. It would read like some bitter has-been sassing back to power. 'When they go low, we go high,' Ms Sturgeon, in her pomp, once told her party. She was quoting Michelle Obama. In the same speech she name-checked Nelson Mandela as she groped ludicrously for common ground between Scotland's struggle for 'freedom' and the oppression of South Africa's black population under apartheid. Virtue must reside in every Sturgeon utterance and that's a given. We cannot see the person without first seeing that. Unless of course it is Ms Sturgeon who cannot see herself. Her autobiography, Frankly, which is due out this month, may shed more light on the extent to which the former First Minister is self-aware. But the evidence of her political lifetime suggests to me the penny has still to drop and, indeed, may never do so: her high moral ground is a land of make believe. I hear what Mr Trump said about Ms Sturgeon and what she said in response and cannot manage to see past two not particularly pleasant people engaging in trash talk. If anything, I'm rather more offended by her remarks and those offered on her behalf. 'Trump's lack of respect for women is hardly news,' a source close to Ms Sturgeon sniped. Really? We're playing the misogyny card? Can it be conceived of that a male politician might find fault with a female one because of what she stands for or must the attack on all womankind come baked in? And to what extent, do you think, is Ms Sturgeon's intemperate response in keeping with the ethos of going high when your opponent goes low? The truth is when they go low, she gets down in the mud with them. Oftentimes she has dragged others down there with her. In her mind she is the polar opposite of Donald Trump – dissimilar in every respect imaginable. In my mind she is fooling herself and, rather less successfully, us. Fake news? The two are co-authors of that book. During their respective times in office, both have used social media to peddle myths. Remember when Scotland was 'dragged out of Europe against her will' and how broken up Brussels was about it? On the day of our parting, the EU Commission building was bathed in a light show featuring the words 'Scotland' and 'Europe' linked with a love heart. 'If you look carefully, you'll see that they do appear to have left a light on for us,' cooed Ms Sturgeon beneath the picture purporting to portray mutual devotion. Those of us who looked even more carefully found her party had paid an Edinburgh firm to project the message on to the building. It was a cheap SNP stunt, an attempt to skew voters' perception of reality through a lie. It is what happens to politicians so confident in the indisputability of their position that they no longer care to be confused by anything as frivolous as the facts. You think Mr Trump surrounds himself with stooges and sycophants drunk on his Kool-Aid? Ms Sturgeon beat him to the punch. And I'm not just talking about her cabinet. More than two years after she left office, you cannot get moving in the public sector for the cult of Nicola – prissy, sanctimonious, overweeningly woke finger-waggers whose starting position in any conversation is the unshakeable conviction that they represent the enlightenment. I've had issues in the past with Mr Trump's inappropriate use of language. Certainly, he calls things as he sees them. So does Ms Sturgeon. As First Minister she was happy to go on record as someone who detests the Tories. That is a whopping great chunk of society to hate. Most of us down here in the glens she overlooks from Mount Righteous seem to muddle through our lives showing civility, even affection, towards those we disagree with on politics. My life would be poorer without the Nationalists I know and love in it. And another thing about the US commander in chief – his unfortunate habit of dismissing awkward questions by attacking the reporter or the news organisation asking them. Ms Sturgeon, surely, can claw back a few points on the moral scoreboard there. You think? During the pandemic I lost count of the number of times Ms Sturgeon ruled on the 'legitimacy' of questions rather than answering them. Was it my imagination or did they become less legitimate as they became more probing? I recall a thoroughly unpleasant response to our own political editor Michael Blackley who wanted to know whether self-isolation requirements for hospitality staff could be reduced to ease pressure on the industry. 'Yeah, that would really help …' snapped the First Minister. 'I don't know if you have listened to a word I have said, Michael.' A barb followed about the intelligence of the newspaper he writes for. It took 19 days before Ms Sturgeon cut the self-isolation requirements our journalist was asking about. I've made no secret of the fact Mr Trump was never my cup of tea. But his frank assessment of our longest serving First Minister resonates not just with me but with much of Scotland. She really was terrible. It is a blessed relief she's on the festival circuit now. And while she may wear his antipathy towards her as a badge of honour, the baleful truth which she will never accept is that she and he are not so very different. He went low and she went low. That is fact, not politics.
Glasgow Times
an hour ago
- Glasgow Times
Objections expected for Kilpatrick Hills wind farm plans
If successful, the development would be made up of 10 turbines of approximately seven megawatts (MW) each alongside the BESS at the proposed Vale of Leven Windfarm. The plans, created by Vale of Leven Wind Farm Limited, were previously considered by the council's planning committee last August where members agreed to issue a consultation response to the Scottish Government. Scottish Ministers have received an application under section 36 of the Electricity Act 1989 for the construction and operation of a wind farm and BESS, as the Scottish Government Energy Consents Unit processes applications like this. In previously considering the proposal, West Dunbartonshire Council highlighted that wind farms have the potential to impact on a wide range of features. Officials now consider that the development would have a significant and adverse impact on the local landscape as well as the visual amenity of the Loch Lomond and the Trossachs National Park, the Loch Lomond National Scenic Area, and the Kilpatrick Hills Local Landscape Area. Despite West Dunbartonshire Council believing that the potential development would not have a significant detrimental effect on the surrounding area, it does maintain there could be a negative impact on the nearby scheduled monument of Dumbarton Castle/Rock which it has deemed unacceptable. There are also concerns that the proposal has the potential to impact biodiversity matters including the designated sites, habitat, peatland, ecology and protected species, with a variety of habitats impacted including blanket bog and wet modified bog. The committee's findings have now been finalised in a report and will be presented to members of the planning committee next week. If agreed, the updated response to the consultation, where the council maintains its objection, will be submitted to Scottish Ministers.
