logo
McArthur ‘confident' ahead of key vote on assisted dying bill at Holyrood

McArthur ‘confident' ahead of key vote on assisted dying bill at Holyrood

Liberal Democrat Liam McArthur has brought forward a member's Bill which, if passed, would allow terminally ill Scots to seek help to end their life.
With the first vote on the Bill – where MSPs decide on whether or not they support the general principles of the legislation – due on Tuesday, Mr McArthur said he is 'confident that the support is there'.
Speaking to the PA news agency, Mr McArthur said: 'I think the general mood is while it will be close, I am confident the support is there to allow us to go through to the next stage.'
It will be the third time Holyrood has voted on the issue, with previous attempts to change the law defeated in both 2010 and 2015.
Scotland's First Minister John Swinney has said that the proposals from Mr McArthur are a 'much better Bill' than those introduced previously – though he stressed that he could not support the legislation.
It will however be a free vote when MSPs decide on the issue on Tuesday evening.
If a majority of MSPs back the Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill on Tuesday evening, more detailed scrutiny will be carried out, with the legislation also opened up to other MSPs to put forward amendments, ahead of a final vote at Holyrood before it could become law.
But arguing that the majority of the public support such a change, Mr McArthur insisted it 'would be pretty difficult to justify' voting down the Bill and not taking it forward for amendments.
He said Westminster MPs had initially passed Kim Leadbeater's Bill on assisted dying to 'enable the detailed committee scrutiny of amendments to take place'.
And he said that at Holyrood 'I think we need to go through that process too', adding that it 'may well be that amendments are brought forward that can help address concerns'.
But the Liberal Democrat, who has been working on the issue since 2021, stated: 'We only get to find that out if we pass the general principles next week.'
Opponents of the legislation argue that if it is passed, it could leave vulnerable people feeling pressurised to prematurely end their life.
CEO of Care Not Killing Gordon Macdonald highlights that some vulnerable people would inevitably die under Liam McArthur MSP's assisted suicide proposals. pic.twitter.com/LjCT1Up1ae
— The Christian Institute (@christianorguk) January 24, 2025
Mr McArthur, however, believes that the 'political mood' at Holyrood is 'very, very different from what it was' when the previous Bills were considered.
He said: 'The conversations I have had over the past four years with colleagues now suggests there is more of a willingness to look for reasons to support rather than excuses to oppose.
'There are many colleagues who come at this issue with their own personal stories of losing a family member or a close friend to a bad death, therefore they view this issue through that prism, they recognise that the current ban on assisted dying is leading to too many instances where people are at the end of life with horrendous choices.'
But he added: 'As we get to Tuesday there is a recognition, even among some who still have reservations, that we can't afford not to engage in the detailed scrutiny of potential changes to this Bill that might address the concerns they have.'
While his legislation originally proposed allowing eligible Scots with a terminal illness to seek an assisted death from the age of 16, Mr McArthur announced recently if the Bill progresses he will change that to 18.
'I think on balance 18 is a more appropriate threshold,' he said.
'On this issue it had become increasingly clear to me setting the age threshold at 18 would give more reassurance to my MSP colleagues, including many who are very supportive of a change in the law.'
However, he insisted that assisted dying could 'provide additional choice to the small but not insignificant number of people for whom that is a desired option'.
The MSP stated: 'I understand there are those who do not want to see a change in the law, I understand people have concerns and questions about how this might work in practice.
'But with growing international evidence I think we can have confidence that we will be able to deliver a law which gives that choice, the compassionate choice to the small number of dying Scots who need it.'
Adding that similar debates have taken place in 'all of the states in Australia and New Zealand, in a number of the states in the US and in other jurisdictions', Mr McArthur argued those areas had 'safely and successfully' introduced assisted dying legislation 'in a way that continues to command strong public support and indeed the confidence of the medical profession'.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Reform UK to send first ‘Doge' team to look at council spending in Kent
Reform UK to send first ‘Doge' team to look at council spending in Kent

ITV News

time5 hours ago

  • ITV News

Reform UK to send first ‘Doge' team to look at council spending in Kent

Reform UK is set to send in its first Elon Musk-style Department of Government Efficiency (Doge) unit to look at 'wasteful spending' in councils. A team of software engineers, data analysts and forensic auditors will 'visit and analyse' local authorities, starting with Kent County Council on Monday, the party said. It follows the US Doge, which was launched during Donald Trump's presidency to cut federal spending. Billionaire Musk was involved but has since left his position spearheading the unit. Reform says its UK version will be led by a yet-unnamed man described as one of the country's 'leading tech entrepreneurs with a specialism in data analytics who has also been a turnaround CEO'. The party said that the unit will use artificial intelligence, advanced data analysis tools and forensic auditing techniques to 'identify wasteful spending and recommend actionable solutions'. A letter sent to Kent County Council, which Reform now controls after the May local elections, read: 'The scope of the review includes but is not limited to: Contractual arrangements with suppliers and consultants, all capital expenditure, use of framework agreements and direct awards, any off-book or contingent liabilities, use of reserves and financial resilience, any audit flags raised by internal or external auditors in the last three years. 'We request that all relevant council officers provide the Doge team with full and prompt access to: Council-held documents, reports and records (electronic and paper), relevant finance, procurement, audit and contract data, meeting minutes and correspondence concerning major procurements, any internal investigations or whistleblowing reports relevant to financial matters, any additional documents that might be of assistance.' It added: 'Should you resist this request, we are ready to pass a council motion to compel the same and will consider any obstruction of our councillors' duties to be gross misconduct. We trust this will not be required.' It is signed by council leader Linden Kemkaran, party chairman Zia Yusuf and party leader Nigel Farage. Mr Yusuf said: "For too long British people have been British taxpayers have watched their money vanish into a black hole. "Their taxes keep going up, their bin collections keep getting less frequent, potholes remain unfixed, their local services keep getting cut. Reform won a historic victory on a mandate to change this. "As promised, we have created a UK Doge to identify and cut wasteful spending of taxpayer money. Our team will use cutting-edge technology and deliver real value for voters." A Kent County Council spokesman declined to comment. The Liberal Democrats, who are the second-biggest party in Kent, say that when so much of the budget is mandatory, Reform have very little room to make savings. Liberal Democrat Cllr Richard Streatfield, Kent County Council, said: "Cuts are not part of the equation. "We have a growing population of over 65s who are using demand-led services and only 0.6% of our budget is on discretionary services. "We are using 99.4% of the county council's taxpayer's money for services that we are legally obliged to provide." Sarah Barwick, Branch Secretary of Unison said: "There's fears of job cuts. KCC's really reduced its number of staff in the number of years I've been employed. "We're right at almost the lowest point of staff that you can get without serious problems that could compromise the services." During a local election campaign launch in March, Mr Farage told supporters: "Frankly folks, what we need in this country to pay for the cuts that people deserve and need, we need a British form of Doge, as Elon Musk has got in America. Let's have a British Doge."

Playgrounds must be saved to stop children being ‘glued to screens', MPs say
Playgrounds must be saved to stop children being ‘glued to screens', MPs say

North Wales Chronicle

time6 hours ago

  • North Wales Chronicle

Playgrounds must be saved to stop children being ‘glued to screens', MPs say

A cross-party group of MPs are backing plans which would ensure town halls keep play parks in good order, while housing developers would be required to provide 'high quality, accessible, inclusive' areas for play on new build sites. The amendment to the Planning and Infrastructure Bill is expected to be considered when the legislation returns to the Commons on Monday. Some 49 MPs from the Labour Party, the Greens, and the Liberal Democrats, as well independents, have so far signalled their support for the amendment to the Bill, which would introduce a 'play sufficiency duty' in England. Similar measures already exist in Scotland and Wales, and require councils to regularly assess whether there are enough playgrounds and other play facilities in their areas. The amendment, introduced by Labour MP Tom Hayes, would also 'require new developments to provide high-quality, accessible, inclusive play opportunities which incorporate natural features and are integrated within broader public spaces', and could see councils withhold planning permission if new estates lead to a net loss of play areas. Mr Hayes, the MP for Bournemouth East, told the PA news agency: 'When playgrounds are left to rot, and we have the power to put things right, what message is that sending to families? 'New Clause 82 is a common-sense, no-cost way to protect the play spaces we have today and ensure developments in the future focus on children. 'England must join Scotland and Wales in providing a play sufficiency duty, and my amendment does just that.' In January, the Labour MP led a Westminster Hall debate on playgrounds, where he emphasised the importance of play to children's development and said the Government need to be on the 'side of playing children', as well as the 'side of working people' . The debate was the first of its kind in seven years, he said, and the longest in 17 years, when a national play strategy was introduced by the previous Labour government. Mr Hayes added: 'Children sitting GCSEs this year weren't even alive the last time a government, a Labour government, produced a national play strategy and funded playgrounds. 'Today children end up indoors, glued to screens because they don't have safe play spaces. For families on tight budgets, paying for indoor play isn't an option. 'They're left with bare patches of tarmac where a climbing frame should be, or rusted swing frames that only remind them of what used to be. 'Children growing up in cramped flats rely on playgrounds. My amendment supports their right to play and provides inclusive play areas for children with special educational needs and disabilities, too.' The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government was contacted for comment.

Edinburgh Council refuses to ban arms testing in city parks
Edinburgh Council refuses to ban arms testing in city parks

Edinburgh Reporter

time7 hours ago

  • Edinburgh Reporter

Edinburgh Council refuses to ban arms testing in city parks

An Edinburgh councillor has spoken out after a city committee voted not to ban arms firms from testing military equipment in city parks. In December 2024, arms manufacturer Leonardo was given permission to test communications equipment in the Braid Hills. Green councillor Ben Parker said he was 'disappointed' that councillors chose to not back his motion, which would have seen the practice banned. He continued: 'Today, Councillors had a chance to stand up for peace and instead chose inaction. 'Despite community objections and a clear moral imperative, the Labour, Liberal Democrat and Conservative parties have voted to continue to allow arms manufacturers to test their equipment in our beautiful, publicly owned, green spaces. 'The Council has previously taken a strong stance on opposing advertising and sponsorship from arms manufacturers, and it is completely hypocritical to then allow these same companies to use our beautiful public space to test their equipment. 'At a time when we are witnessing the ongoing genocide of the Palestinian people, we should not be supporting companies who profit from arms sales to the Israeli Government in any way.' Cllr Parker had originally put the motion forward for discussion at May's full council meeting, but an amendment by the Liberal Democrat group sent it to the Culture and Communities Committee for discussion. In a deputation to the committee, he urged councillors to take a stand on the issue, drawing comparisons to the city's Labour council taking a stand against apartheid during the 1986 Commonwealth Games held in the city. That year's games were protested widely, and boycotted by 26 nations, due to the UK Government's relationship with the then white-minority government in South Africa. Liberal Democrat councillor Fiona Bennett said: 'I have been to Iraq twice, once in 2018 with an NGO I'm very closely involved with and again in 2019 with the UN supporting victims of ISIS. 'I saw first-hand devastation throughout northern Iraq and in particular in Mosul – images that will never leave me, and images that will haunt me, for the rest of my life. 'The events unfolding around the world right now are harrowing. And I know people on the ground in Gaza right now, I can't bear what they're telling me. 'This is incredibly difficult, we're being forced to confront balancing our ethical values and responsibilities with the very real fragility of our national security. 'This is the most fragile and uncertain political, global landscape in my lifetime, and I really worry about the future our daughters have in front of them. 'So when we talk about banning testing, are we saying there should be no such testing anywhere in the UK? 'And if so, are we inadvertently undermining our own ability to defend ourselves at a time when global threats are growing and becoming even more complex?' Councillors narrowly supported an amended version of the motion put forward by the Liberal Democrat group, which did not pursue a ban. Instead, it referenced the city's draft parks management plan, which empowers council officers to ban any activity which will or could 'endanger' any person or property. By Joseph Sullivan Local Democracy Reporter Like this: Like Related

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store