Fees for Inmate phone calls could be limited by bill
SB50 states that correctional centers should provide offenders with reasonable access to phone services unless such access is restricted as a disciplinary measure.
Additionally, no correctional center would be able to charge more than 12 cents per minute for any domestic phone calls made by inmates.
'It depends on your average daily population as to what you can cap that at,' said Captain Joe Lysaght, a correctional administrator with the Buchanan County Sheriff's Office. 'For our facility, it will cap those phone calls at $0.09 per minute.'
According to Buchanan County officials, these changes to the phone call fee could come as soon as April.
This proposed bill is in favor for many who have loved ones inside correctional centers, however, Lysaght said in contrast, it comes with drawbacks for the operation of jail facilities.
'This is certainly more favorable to the families because it does cost their families less money,' Lysaght said. 'The problem you run into is, it costs money to operate facilities too and that will take money away from operations. So, there's two sides to this story.'
This will impact prices for daily things used inside the facility including, hygiene products, mattresses, blankets, towels and other necessities. Officials say they will have to try and obtain these items other sources if the facility becomes financially strained.
As of Feb. 3, SB50 has been voted 'Do Pass' by local government and election committees for further consideration.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23-06-2025
- Yahoo
Missouri school funding task force turns its attention to property tax inequities
State Sen. Rusty Black, a Republican from Chillicothe, chairs the first meeting of the Missouri School Funding Modernization Task Force earlier this month (Annelise Hanshaw/Missouri Independent). A group tasked by the governor with reworking Missouri's formula for funding public schools narrowed in on property tax revenue Monday, discussing how the 20-year-old formula creates inequities with an outdated assumption of local aid. In the second meeting of the Missouri School Funding Modernization Task Force, education officials led a conversation on property taxes. The problem stems from a figure frozen in time, said Kari Monsees, deputy commissioner of the Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. The formula subtracts assumed local aid based on 2005 property values and applies the same tax rate statewide even though districts vary widely on levies. 'The longer we go on, the further we get from the actual values on our assumptions and the more problematic it is for what we're trying to do here,' Monsees said. Since the creation of the current formula in 2005, property values have fluctuated with variation across districts. 'There's been a lot of changes in property values since 2005,' said David Wood, a former state representative and policy analyst for the Missouri State Tax Commission. 'If you try to jump to current numbers… it's going to be extremely expensive.' But increasing the cost to the state's general revenue is not an option. Gov. Mike Kehoe's executive order, which convened the work group, calls for funding outcomes 'at a level consistent with what is provided for in the State Fiscal Year 2025 budget.' This amount is $300 million under the current budget passed by state lawmakers and awaiting the governor's signature. Missouri governor calls for task force to keep state education funding flat Missouri is seventh in the nation for reliance on property tax revenue for funding public schools, with 47% of funds coming from local taxes, according to the National Center for Education Statistics. Missouri has the lowest portion of state aid in its public-school funding, at 30% of school revenues. The state's reliance on local funding combined with its outdated figures for property taxes has created a system of winners and losers, with communities with growing property values and higher levies accumulating more funds on a per-pupil basis than their counterparts. If the assessments 20 years ago were accurate and change was uniform across districts, there would be 'less of a concern,' Monsees said. 'But that's not the reality,' he said. 'The reality is those reassessment rates and value changes have been significantly different across the state.' The median home value in districts varies wildly, ranging from $44,500 to $613,300, according to a 2019 review Monsees presented. The formula assumes a local levy of $3.43 per $100 of assessed value, dubbed the 'performance levy.' But districts' levies vary from $2.75 to almost $6.50 per $100. He shared examples of districts in the 90th and 10th percentiles, showing some districts have double the operating funds on a per-pupil basis. Worsening the gaps between districts is a 'hold-harmless provision' in the foundation formula, which keeps funding levels stable for districts that would've seen a dip in revenue when the formula was established. There are 200 hold-harmless districts, with districts under 350 students keeping total state aid flat and those over 350 getting the same amount per student. Missouri has had hold-harmless provisions through multiple iterations of the school funding formula, and Monsees said there's a reason for that. The formula has to be approved by the state legislature, and lawmakers whose districts are losing funds are likely to vote against any changes. A study of the formula commissioned by education nonprofit Aligned estimates that hold-harmless provisions cost the state $150 million annually. The study recommends that any new formula institute a 'temporary hold-harmless provision with a five-year phase out.' The study is one of three being reviewed by task force members. All three recommended changes in multiple areas to the formula, such as increasing multipliers used to increase funding for special education and measuring student count by enrollment rather than attendance. The work group is anticipated to meet over the next year and deliver plans to the governor by December 2026.
Yahoo
13-06-2025
- Yahoo
Gov. Stein considers immigration, concealed carry bills
RALEIGH, N.C. () – North Carolina lawmakers approved several heavily debated bills Tuesday and Wednesday, sending them to Governor Josh Stein's desk for approval or veto. The Freedom to Carry NC bill, SB 50, passed the House with a 59-48 vote on Wednesday. The legislation would allow gun owners to carry a concealed firearm without a concealed handgun permit, with exceptions for convicted criminals. Current law requires concealed carry permit applicants to be at least 21 years old, while SB 50 drops the age to 18 years old. If signed into law, North Carolina would be the 30th state to allow for 'constitutional carry.' Young dancers among victims of York city employees' alleged drunken egging spree: Report Lawmakers also passed two contentious bills concerning state immigration regulations, as against Immigration and Customs Enforcement. The measure from the House would require sheriffs to verify the immigration status of detainees in their custody and notify ICE officials if the person is undocumented. Republicans in the Senate created the North Carolina Border Protection Act, requiring state agencies to audit families that receive publicly funded benefits such as housing assistance, Medicaid or unemployment to ensure they are American citizens. Governor Stein has 10 days from when the legislation reaches his desk to sign the bill, veto the measure, or do nothing and allow the legislation to become law. A spokesperson for the governor's office told Queen City News' reporting partner in Raleigh on Wednesday that Stein was still reviewing the bills. They said on the topic of immigration, 'he has made it clear that if someone commits a crime and they are here illegally, they should be deported.' GOP lawmakers are close to a supermajority, but the House would need every Republican and at least one Democrat to vote for a bill to override a veto. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
11-06-2025
- Yahoo
Bill allowing anyone 18 or older to conceal carry passes NC House, headed to governor
RALEIGH, N.C. (WNCN) — Despite two Republican lawmakers siding with Democrats in opposition, a bill allowing people as young as 18 to carry a gun without a permit in the state, is headed to the Governor's office. Republican sponsors of the bill say it only enshrines the right to carry a weapon to law-abiding citizens. Rep. Jay Adams (R-Catawba) said in defense of the bill, ' States have done this…we're close to 50% of the country…this is really not going to affect criminal behavior…this is going to benefit law abiding citizens.' Democrats opposed the bill, saying it'll only lead to more gun violence and put guns into the hands of teenagers who aren't old enough to understand the true dangers of guns. 'Studies have shown that permit-less concealed carry increases violence and death,' Rep. Phil Rubin (D-Wake) said. The final vote came after a second reading in which 54 voted in favor and 48 voted against. The bill now heads to Gov. Josh Stein's desk, where he can sign it into law or veto the bill. If Stein vetoes SB50, House Republicans would need every single Republican and one Democrat to vote to override that veto. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
