
More employers are sending workers shopping for their own health coverage
A small, growing number of employers are putting health insurance decisions entirely in the hands of their workers.
Instead of offering traditional insurance, they're giving workers money to buy their own coverage in what's known as Individual Coverage Health Reimbursement Arrangements, or ICHRAs .
Advocates say this approach provides small companies that couldn't afford insurance a chance to offer something. It also caps a growing expense for employers and fits conservative political goals of giving people more purchasing power over their coverage.
But ICHRAs place the risk for finding coverage on the employee, and they force them to do something many dislike: Shop for insurance.
'It's maybe not perfect, but it's solving a problem for a lot of people,' said Cynthia Cox, of the nonprofit KFF, which studies health care issues.
Here's a closer look at how this approach to health insurance is evolving.
Normally, U.S. employers offering health coverage will have one or two insurance options for workers through what's known as a group plan. The employers then pick up most of the premium, or cost of coverage.
ICHRAs are different: Employers contribute to health insurance coverage, but the workers then pick their own insurance plans. The employers that use ICHRAs hire outside firms to help people make their coverage decisions.
ICHRAs were created during President Donald Trump's first administration. Enrollment started slowly but has swelled in recent years.
They give business owners a predictable cost, and they save companies from having to make coverage decisions for employees.
'You have so many things you need to focus on as a business owner to just actually grow the business,' said Jeff Yuan, co-founder of the New York-based insurance startup Taro Health.
Small businesses, in particular, can be vulnerable to annual insurance cost spikes, especially if some employees have expensive medical conditions. But the ICHRA approach keeps the employer cost more predictable.
Yuan's company bases its contributions on the employee's age and how many people are covered under the plan. That means it may contribute anywhere from $400 to more than $2,000 monthly to an employee's coverage.
ICHRAs let people pick from among dozens of options in an individual insurance market instead of just taking whatever their company offers.
That may give people a chance to find coverage more tailored to their needs. Some insurers, for instance, offer plans designed for people with diabetes.
And workers can keep the coverage if they leave — potentially for longer periods than they would be able to with traditional employer health insurance plans. They likely will have to pay the full premium, but keeping the coverage also means they won't have to find a new plan that covers their doctors.
Mark Bertolini, CEO of the insurer Oscar Health, noted that most people change jobs several times.
'Insurance works best when it moves with the consumer,' said the executive, whose company is growing enrollment through ICHRAs in several states.
Health insurance plans on the individual market tend to have narrower coverage networks than employer-sponsored coverage.
It may be challenging for patients who see several doctors to find one plan that covers them all.
People shopping for their own insurance can find coverage choices and terms like deductibles or coinsurance overwhelming. That makes it important for employers to provide help with plan selection.
The broker or technology platform setting up a company's ICHRA generally does this by asking about their medical needs or if they have any surgeries planned in the coming year.
There are no good numbers nationally that show how many people have coverage through an ICHRA or a separate program for companies with 50 workers or less.
However, the HRA Council, a trade association that promotes the arrangements, sees big growth. The council works with companies that help employers offer the ICHRAs. It studies growth in a sample of those businesses.
It says about 450,000 people were offered coverage through these arrangements this year. That's up 50% from 2024. Council Executive Director Robin Paoli says the total market may be twice as large.
Still, these arrangements make up a sliver of employer-sponsored health coverage in the United States. About 154 million people were enrolled in coverage through work last year, according to KFF.
Several things could cause more employers to offer ICHRAs. As health care costs continue to climb, more companies may look to limit their exposure to the hit.
Some tax breaks and incentives that encourage the arrangements could wind up in a final version of the Republican tax bill currently under consideration in the Senate.
More people also will be eligible for the arrangements if extra government subsidies that help buy coverage on the Affordable Care Act's individual marketplaces expire this year.
You can't participate in an ICHRA if you are already getting a subsidy from the government, noted Brian Blase, a White House health policy adviser in the first Trump administration.
'The enhanced subsidies, they crowd out private financing,' he said.
___
The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Science and Educational Media Group. The AP is solely responsible for all content.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
23 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Novogratz on the Senate's Landmark Stablecoin Bill
Get a jump start on the US trading day with Matt Miller, Katie Greifeld and Sonali Basak on "Bloomberg Open Interest." Banks will get looser limitations for Treasury trades, but some argue that move could backfire on regulators. President Trump declines to say whether the US plans to join Israel's military offensive on Iran. Wall Street is quiet ahead of the Fed's decision later today. And Mike Novogratz joins Bloomberg Open Interest to talk about the Fed and his thoughts on the new stablecoin bill. (Source: Bloomberg)


CNET
36 minutes ago
- CNET
Fed Rate Cuts Unlikely This Summer. Are Lower Mortgage Rates Still Possible?
The Fed's interest rate decisions impact mortgages, but the relationship isn't straightforward. Tharon Green/CNET There's a wild amount of uncertainty in today's economy, but one thing is clear: The Federal Reserve isn't planning to lower interest rates this summer. Mortgage rates, which have been stuck near 7% for the past several months, are likely to stay higher for longer. On June 18, Fed officials voted to leave borrowing rates unchanged for a fourth consecutive meeting. Holding interest rates where they are allows the central bank to evaluate how President Trump's unpredictable tariff campaign, immigration policies and federal cutbacks affect both inflation and the job market. Often, what the central bank simply says about future plans can cause a stir in the housing market. Mortgage rates are driven by bond investors and a host of other factors, i.e., not directly determined by the Fed. "The mortgage market reacts fast to uncertainty, and we've got no shortage of it this summer," said Nicole Rueth, of the Rueth Team with Movement Mortgage. Why is the Fed not cutting interest rates? The Fed sets and oversees US monetary policy under a dual mandate to maintain price stability and maximum employment. It does this largely by adjusting the federal funds rate, the rate at which banks borrow and lend their money. When economic growth is weak and unemployment is high, the Fed lowers interest rates to encourage spending and propel growth. Reducing interest rates could also allow inflation to surge, which is generally bad for mortgage rates. Keeping rates high, however, increases the risk of a job-loss recession that would cause widespread financial hardship. If unemployment spikes -- a real possibility given rising jobless claims -- the Fed could be forced to implement interest rate cuts earlier than anticipated. "The Federal Reserve is in one of the trickiest spots in recent economic history," said Ali Wolf, Zonda and NewHomeSource chief economist. What is the forecast for interest rate cuts in 2025? On Wednesday, markets eyed the Fed's Summary of Economic Projections, which outlined two 0.25% rate cuts in 2025, unchanged from earlier estimates. But that's far from guaranteed. The updated forecast suggests that tariffs will push prices higher, suggesting that consumers have not yet felt the full effect of these import duties. "Everyone that I know is forecasting a meaningful increase in inflation in the coming months from tariffs, because someone has to pay for the tariffs," Fed Chair Jerome Powell said during a June 18 press conference. Inflation could prompt the central bank to forgo one (or both) of its projected rate cuts, which would keep mortgage rates high. Though Powell remains noncommittal on any specific time frame, financial markets still see a potential interest rate cut coming as early as this fall. Most housing market forecasts, which already factor in at least two 0.25% Fed cuts, call for 30-year mortgage rates to stay above 6.5% throughout 2025. "Average rates are likely to stay in the 6.75% to 7.25% range unless the Fed signals multiple cuts and backs up their policy with data," Rueth said. What factors affect mortgage rates? Mortgage rates move around for many of the same reasons home prices do: supply, demand, inflation and even the employment rate. Personal factors, such as a homebuyer's credit score, down payment and home loan amount, also determine one's individual mortgage rate. Different loan types and terms also have varying interest rates. Policy changes: When the Fed adjusts the federal funds rate, it affects many aspects of the economy, including mortgage rates. The federal funds rate affects how much it costs banks to borrow money, which in turn affects what banks charge consumers to make a profit. Inflation: Generally, when inflation is high, mortgage rates tend to be high. Because inflation chips away at purchasing power, lenders set higher interest rates on loans to make up for that loss and ensure a profit. Supply and demand: When demand for mortgages is high, lenders tend to raise interest rates. This is because they have only so much capital to lend in the form of home loans. Conversely, when demand for mortgages is low, lenders tend to slash interest rates to attract borrowers. Bond market activity: Mortgage lenders peg fixed interest rates, like fixed-rate mortgages, to bond rates. Mortgage bonds, also called mortgage-backed securities, are bundles of mortgages sold to investors and are closely tied to the 10-year Treasury. When bond interest rates are high, the bond has less value on the market where investors buy and sell securities, causing mortgage interest rates to go up. Other key indicators: Employment patterns and other aspects of the economy that affect investor confidence and consumer spending and borrowing also influence mortgage rates. For instance, a strong jobs report and a robust economy could indicate greater demand for housing, which can put upward pressure on mortgage rates. When the economy slows and unemployment is high, mortgage rates tend to be lower. Read more: Fact Check: Trump Doesn't Have the Power to Force Lower Interest Rates Is now a good time to get a mortgage? Even though timing is everything in the mortgage market, you can't control what the Fed does. "Forecasting interest rates is nearly impossible in today's market," said Wolf. Regardless of the economy, the most important thing when shopping for a mortgage is to make sure you can comfortably afford your monthly payments. More homebuying advice


Associated Press
39 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Yes, more and more celebrities are entering the phone business. Here's why
NEW YORK (AP) — More and more celebrities are looking to attach their names to your phone. Or rather, wireless services that could power it. From cosmetics to snacks and signature spirits, brands launched or co-owned by high-profile figures are just about everywhere you look today. But several big names are also venturing into the market for mobile virtual network operators — or MVNOs, an industry term for businesses that provide cell coverage by leasing infrastructure from bigger, more established carriers. U.S. President Donald Trump's family was the most recent to join the list with the launch of Trump Mobile this week. Here's what to know. Which big names have entered the phone business? On Monday, The Trump Organization (currently run by the president's sons Eric and Donald Jr.) unveiled Trump Mobile. The company says this new business will offer cell service, through an apparent licensing deal with 'all three major cellular carriers' in the U.S., and sell gold phones by August. Trump Mobile marks the latest in a string of new Trump-branded offerings — which already span from golden sneakers to 'God Bless the USA' bibles — despite mounting ethical concerns that the president is profiting off his position and could distort public policy for personal gain. 'This raises a real question about a conflict of interest,' said Ben Bentzin, an associate professor of instruction at The University of Texas at Austin's McCombs School of Business. As the sitting president, Trump appoints leadership for the Federal Communications Commission — and the family's new phone venture exists under this regulatory authority. All of this sets Trump Mobile apart from other big names that have recently ventured into the wireless business. Still, its launch arrives as a growing number of celebrities tap into this space. Just last week, actors Jason Bateman, Sean Hayes and Will Arnett launched SmartLess Mobile, a name that mirrors the trio's 'SmartLess' podcast. Now live across the contiguous U.S. and Puerto Rico, SmartLess Mobile runs on T-Mobile's 5G Network. Another wireless provider with ties to fame is Mint Mobile. While not launched by celebrities, Ryan Reynolds purchased an ownership stake in Mint in 2019. Mint's parent, the Ka'ena Corporation, was later acquired by T-Mobile in a deal worth up to $1.35 billion. Beyond names of famous people, well-known brands that weren't traditionally in the phone business have also got in on the action over the years — particuarly outside of the U.S., Forrester Research senior analyst Octavio Garcia Granados notes. He points to Walmart's 'Bait' mobile plan in Mexico, for example, as well as Italian soccer club AC Milan launching its own mobile SIM cards for fans. 'The MVNO market is not new,' said Garcia Granados. 'What's new is the development on how it's consumed and the (ease) for brands to launch such plans.' MVNOs have also emerged outside of high-profile brands or launch teams. Bentzin points to Straight Talk and Cricket — which are now owned by Verizon and AT&T, respectively. Still, traditional celebrity endorsements are common across the board. And in recent years, 'influencer marketing' has been 'the fastest growing area of advertising and promotion,' he notes. What are these cell services offering? Why were they launched? For Trump Mobile, the pitch seems to be all about having an 'all-American service' while also tapping into the fan base of the president. The company noted Monday that it chose to unveil Trump Mobile on the 10th anniversary of Trump launching 'his historic presidential campaign.' The name given to its flagship offer, The 47 Plan, and the $47.45 monthly fee make reference to the president's two terms. And a mock-up of the planned gold phone on the company's website shows Trump's 'Make America Great' slogan on the front screen. According to the company, Trump Mobile's 47 Plan will include unlimited calls, texts and data through partner carriers, as well as free roadside assistance and telehealth services. It also says the new phone, called the 'T1 Phone,' will be available for $499 in August — but notes that this device won't be designed or made by Trump Mobile. Still, the company emphasized that these phones will be built in the U.S. Experts have since shared skepticism about that being possible in two months. And beyond the future T1 Phone, others stress that a monthly cell service fee of just under $50 is pricey compared to other MVNO options today. 'It's not actual lower pricing. It's really trading on the fan base, if you will, of Trump,' said Bentzin. SmartLess Mobile and Mint Mobile, of course, don't carry these same political ties. And the wireless plans offered by both boast less expensive offerings. T-Mobile-owned Mint advertises 'flexible, buy-in-bulk' plans that range from $15 to $30 a month. Each option includes unlimited talk and text nationwide, but vary depending on plan length and data amount. Mint, founded in 2016, says it started 'because we'd had enough of the wireless industry's games' — and promises to help consumers avoid hidden fees. SmartLess Mobile's plans also start at $15 a month. Depending on the data amount purchased, that base fee can rise to $30 — but all of its plans similarly offer unlimited talk and text using T-Mobile's network. When launching last week, SmartLess underlined that its goal is to help people stop paying for the data they don't use, noting that the majority of data used by consumers today happens over Wi-Fi. 'Seriously, if your phone bill knew how often you're on Wi-Fi, it would be embarrassed,' Hayes said in a statement for SmartLess Mobile's June 10 launch. What's the demand? MVNOs have proven to be attractive acquisitions to big wireless carriers over the years. But whether or not the star factor promises significant demand has yet to be seen for the market's most recent entrants. For the more established Mint Mobile, Reynolds' investment is a success story. The 25% stake that the actor reportedly owned in 2023, when the company announced that it would be acquired by T-Mobile, was estimated to give him a personal windfall of over $300 million in cash and stock. And since that deal closed, Reynolds has remained in his creative role for Mint and as the face of many campaigns — helping the brand continue to attract new customers. It's no surprise that the potential of such business returns might attract other celebrities to make similar investments, Bentzin notes. Still, newer ventures are untested. And 'as the market becomes more crowded, it could be harder and harder to pick off individual consumers,' he added. Beyond a high-profile name, quality of service and what consumers can afford is also critical. 'The competition battleground here is brand and price,' Bentzin said. Still, if the marketing is right and product meets consumer needs, experts like Garcia Granados note that MVNOs can be a profitable business, for both the brands that start them and the telecommunications giants — like T-Mobile, Verizon and AT&T — offering this 'wholesale' access to their infrastructure. As a result, he said, such high-profile ventures become 'a catalyst for others to follow.' ______ AP Business Writer Bernard Condon contributed to this report from New York.