Schwarzenegger ready to fight Newsom on redistricting
Schwarzenegger is preparing to take a starring role in a 'No' campaign, reuniting many of the forces that came together in 2008 to pass Prop 11 (which created the commission for California legislative maps) and in 2010 for Prop 20 (which extended its authority to congressional maps). Several of the leading outside groups that gave good-government ballast to the earlier efforts — including the League of Women Voters and California Common Cause — are challenging Newsom's proposal.
Philanthropist Charles Munger Jr., the most significant benefactor to the redistricting measures, began last month to commission polls and focus groups as he assembles a team for another ballot campaign, POLITICO reported last week. Munger, the son of Warren Buffett's business partner, emerged as one of the California Republican Party's leading funders during Schwarzenegger's governorship.
Schwarzenegger was first elected upon the 2003 recall of Gov. Gray Davis and went on to win a full term in 2006. After leaving government and returning to acting, he has remained involved in politics on a few issues that advisers say he considers central to his legacy, including climate change and independent redistricting. His Netflix action comedy 'FUBAR' is currently in its second season.
Schwarzenegger has also emerged as a prominent antagonist of President Donald Trump, whom he called 'un-American' while endorsing Kamala Harris in last year's election. A redistricting campaign could find the two former 'Celebrity Apprentice' hosts campaigning alongside one another, as Trump argues a Democratic gerrymander would be a threat to Republican dominance and Schwarzenegger argues for the integrity of a nonpartisan process.
'It's too early right now for him to fully unleash the standard Arnold gerrymandering stump speech,' Ketchell said. 'But it'll come.'
This reporting first appeared in California Playbook PM.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
"Forgive Me Nebraska, I Wasn't Familiar With Y'alls Game": Over 2 Million People Have Watched This Video Of A Republican Lawmaker Being Passionately Booed And Heckled At A Town Hall
Republican lawmaker Mike Flood was recently booed and heckled at a town hall in Nebraska, and the video is GLORIOUS. Over two million people have watched this TikTok that began with Mike asking, "Do you think people who are 28 years old, who can work and refuse to work, should get free healthcare?" As the crowd screamed a resounding "YESSSS," Mike looked like he was thinking, "Oh no." Related: The face of someone who did not receive the answer they expected: "I don't think that the majority of Nebraskans agree with you," he finally said. When he asked for the next slide of the presentation, people began chanting, "Tax the rich!" Related: Visibly frustrated, Mike tried again: "If you choose not to work. You. Do. Not. Get. Free. Healthcare." But the crowd wasn't having it and screamed, "BOOOOOO!" Mike continued, "Money does not fall out of the sky. It does not grow on trees. It comes from all of you. I wish there was a world we could live in where everything came from the government, and it was free. But that will never, ever, ever happen." Notably, he did not offer the obvious solution of, IDK, making the ultra-wealthy pay their fair share??? Throughout the town hall, people also shouted things like "vote him out!" and "liar!" The only time in the video that Mike received applause was when he supported the release of the Epstein files. Naturally, folks in the comments had a lot to say. This person pointed out, "even if you work healthcare isn't free!!!!" Related: Many people said what we're all thinking: "Healthcare should be a basic human right." "i love that you can hear the whole crowd say 'YES' it restored my faith in American society." "'Should people in the richest society in history have access to life saving care' isn't the gotcha he thinks it is." "Forgive me Nebraska, I wasn't familiar with yalls game DAMN." Related: "*the majority screams yes* 'the majority doesn't agree with you.'" And finally, "'it comes from all of you' SIR YOU FORGOT TO TAX THE BILLIONAIRES." What do you think about all this? LMK in the comments below! Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Also in In the News:
Buzz Feed
11 minutes ago
- Buzz Feed
Republican Booed At Nebraska Town Hall Over Healthcare
Republican lawmaker Mike Flood was recently booed and heckled at a town hall in Nebraska, and the video is GLORIOUS. Over two million people have watched this TikTok that began with Mike asking, "Do you think people who are 28 years old, who can work and refuse to work, should get free healthcare?" As the crowd screamed a resounding "YESSSS," Mike looked like he was thinking, "Oh no." The face of someone who did not receive the answer they expected: "I don't think that the majority of Nebraskans agree with you," he finally said. When he asked for the next slide of the presentation, people began chanting, "Tax the rich!" Visibly frustrated, Mike tried again: "If you choose not to work. You. Do. Not. Get. Free. Healthcare." But the crowd wasn't having it and screamed, "BOOOOOO!" Mike continued, "Money does not fall out of the sky. It does not grow on trees. It comes from all of you. I wish there was a world we could live in where everything came from the government, and it was free. But that will never, ever, ever happen." Notably, he did not offer the obvious solution of, IDK, making the ultra-wealthy pay their fair share??? Naturally, folks in the comments had a lot to say. This person pointed out, "even if you work healthcare isn't free!!!!" Many people said what we're all thinking: "Healthcare should be a basic human right." "i love that you can hear the whole crowd say 'YES' it restored my faith in American society." "'Should people in the richest society in history have access to life saving care' isn't the gotcha he thinks it is." "Forgive me Nebraska, I wasn't familiar with yalls game DAMN." "*the majority screams yes* 'the majority doesn't agree with you.'" And finally, "'it comes from all of you' SIR YOU FORGOT TO TAX THE BILLIONAIRES." What do you think about all this? LMK in the comments below!
Boston Globe
11 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Trump claims Democrats are denying Republicans congressional districts in Mass. See the maps for yourself.
But that's not the only way Massachusetts has come into the conversation. Advertisement Amid Texas' ongoing redistricting controversy this week, and plenty of Democratic backlash, Trump Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up 'If you look at what's going on with the redistricting, or whatever you want to call it, the Democrats have done it long before we started,' he said following an executive order signing Tuesday afternoon. 'I got 40 percent [of the presidential vote] in Massachusetts, and yet they have 100 percent of the vote in terms of Congress. So there's no Republican, there's no anything. So I should, we should, have 40 percent. You know why? They redistricted.' Is there any truth to Trump's claims, and would it even be possible to draw a congressional district in Massachusetts with a Republican majority? In short, not really. Advertisement Trump won 36 percent of the Massachusetts presidential vote in 2024 (about 1.2 million votes), not 40 percent or 41 percent as he claimed Tuesday morning in a Trump did not win the majority of votes as of 2023. Massachusetts has not elected a Republican to the House for 31 years. In that time, the state's congressional districts have been redrawn three times, following the 2000, 2010, and 2020 censuses, as is required of states by the Constitution. The most drastic change to the state's congressional districts occurred following the 2010 census, when Massachusetts lost its 10th district (also a Democratic seat) due to low population growth. The state's current congressional districts were signed into law by Republican former governor Charlie Baker Under federal law, districts within a state must have roughly equal populations. Based on the 2020 census, the average population for each House seat is a little over 760,000 people. Districts must also be one, uninterrupted shape. The federal Voting Rights Act also dictates that congressional districts cannot be drawn with the intent of suppressing the voting rights of people of color. Advertisement In Massachusetts, the majority of registered voters — In 2024, five of Massachusetts' nine House members Though there are plenty of Republican-leaning voters in Massachusetts, it would be practically impossible to create a Republican-controlled congressional district because the state's major population hubs tend to vote Democratic. A red congressional district, no matter how wonkily drawn, would likely lack the required population size to qualify. When Democratic Secretary of State Bill Galvin was asked Tuesday if Massachusetts might draw a new Congressional map before the next census as Texas is attempting to do, Galvin said it is unlikely. 'We have no Republicans to give,' he said. Julian E.J. Sorapuru can be reached at
