
Bad news for employees of this company as it plans to cut over 5,000 jobs; not Ratan Tata's TCS, Narayana Murthy's Infosys, Microsoft or Google, Wipro, it is…
Based on the California WARN filings, the job cuts in Santa Clara and Folsom have nearly doubled, totalling 1,935 employees. Layoffs began on July 11 in Folsom and July 15 in Santa Clara.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
16 minutes ago
- Indian Express
July marks record 24,500 tech job cuts: TCS, Microsoft, Intel hit hardest
July 2025 has seen the highest number of layoffs in recent years. From Microsoft to Intel, numerous tech giants announced sweeping layoffs. While the growing adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) tools has been partially blamed, organisations attributed their job cuts to ongoing organisational restructuring and efforts to foster 'leaner' teams across the board. This year, so far, July has witnessed the most layoffs, with 26 companies sacking as many as 24,545 employees. The month began with Microsoft announcing that it was laying off nearly four per cent of its global workforce across teams and role types. These job cuts are said to have impacted Microsoft staff across geographies. In less than a fortnight, another tech major, Intel, announced that it was laying off more than 5,000 employees across four states in the US. Closer to home, Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) announced that it was sacking over 12,000 of its staff. While these job cuts in July largely impacted the workforce in the US, on July 27, TCS claimed that it would be axing two per cent of its global workforce, which would spell job loss for over 12,000 employees. The announcement by TCS comes at a time when the company has been battling allegations of forced resignations following its new 'bench policy' that limited an employee's bench duration to 35 days annually. Bench usually refers to the time when an employee is not actively assigned to a client project but stays on a company's payroll. Based on TCS' bench policy, employees were expected to spend four to six hours daily upskilling themselves through internal platforms with strict work from the office. Experts claimed that the policy puts the onus on employees to proactively seek new projects through the Resource Management Group. Reportedly, these long periods without allocation could likely impact their compensation, growth, employment continuity, and other opportunities. In response to the job cuts, TCS claimed that it is on a journey to become a future-ready organisation. Their vision includes strategic initiatives on multiple fronts, investments in new-tech areas, entering new markets, deploying AI at scale, creating next-gen infrastructure, and realigning their workforce model. Microsoft, which announced its layoffs on the second day of its 2026 fiscal year, asserted that it continues to implement organisational changes necessary to best position itself and teams for success in a dynamic marketplace. This was not the first time this year that the Redmond-based tech giant was announcing job cuts. In January, the company announced it was laying off less than one per cent of its staff based on performance; in May, it cut over 6,000 jobs and 300 more in June. This is the biggest layoff by Microsoft since 2023, when it laid off over 10,000 of its staff. Microsoft is reportedly looking towards reducing the layers of middle managers between top executives and individual contributors. Another notable development was Intel's decision to lay off over 5,000 of its workforce across four states in the US. The layoffs by Intel were not just limited to the US; some reports even suggested that the company was sacking staff from its branch in Israel. In the US, most of the layoffs were reported from California and Oregon. Intel said that it was taking steps to become a leaner, faster, and more efficient company. CEO Lip-Bu Tan, after his takeover, has been prioritising Intel's core products for a new era of computing that is being defined by AI. On July 10, Indeed and Glassdoor said that they were cutting about 1,300 jobs to move towards AI. The companies said that these cuts will impact their workforce in the US, in teams such as research development, people, and sustainability. While the company did not give any specific reason for the layoffs, in his memo CEO Hiyasuki Deko Idekoba said that AI is changing the world and that there was a need to adapt by ensuring that the company's products deliver truly great experiences.


Time of India
2 days ago
- Time of India
Republican Guv Ron DeSantis calls H-1B visa a scam, says it's not illegal but...
Florida Guv Ron DeSantis called H-1B visa program a scam. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis called the H-1B visa program a total scam as Americans are getting laid off, making way for foreign workers. H-1B is the visa program that allows US companies to hire foreign workers. It has become a contentious issue as US big techs including Microsoft, Intel announced major layoffs. Republicans want H-1B to end while the Donald Trump administration is planning major changes in the program. 'They're laying off all these American workers and then they're importing H1B visa people to work for cheaper. I think that's a total scam. I don't think that's good. Yes, it is legal the way they're doing it. I acknowledge that. They're using something that's on the books. But is that good policy for us as a country to have Americans put out of work and then to bring in H1B (visas)? And then they do chain migration from the H1B. So the H1B is bringing in other folks,' DeSantis said. DeSantis compared the dynamic to indentured servitude, citing how H‑1B workers are tied to a single employer, which companies exploit to cut costs. Earlier in January 2025, he called out broad issues with the H‑1B system, sharply criticizing practices where Americans train H‑1B workers who then replace them, asking how such a system could even be acceptable. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Indonesia: Unsold Sofas at Bargain Prices (Prices May Surprise You) Sofas | Search Ads Search Now Undo The comment came as recently vice president JD Vance spoke about the H-1B issue and said the displacement of American workers makes him worried. "You see some big tech companies where they'll lay off 9,000 workers, and then they'll apply for a bunch of overseas visas. And I sort of wonder; that doesn't totally make sense to me." "That displacement and that math worries me a bit. And what the president has said, he said very clearly: We want the very best and the brightest to make America their home. We want them to build great companies and so forth. But I don't want companies to fire 9,000 American workers and then to go and say, 'We can't find workers here in America.' That's a bullshit story," he said.

Mint
3 days ago
- Mint
If TCS is truly preparing for the future, introspection must start in the C-suite
Pankaj Mishra TCS's recent layoffs raise critical questions about the relevance of its leadership in a world where algorithms write code. Tata Consultancy Services on Sunday announced it would lay off 12,000 employees. (Aniruddha Chowdhury/Mint) Gift this article When Tata Consultancy Services announced it would lay off 12,000 employees, it hid behind phrases like 'future-ready", 'realignment", and 'strategic initiatives". These aren't explanations; they're camouflage. Beneath the polite language lies an unsettling truth: India's biggest private employer is finally acknowledging that its core business model—legions of employees performing predictable, routine tasks—is obsolete. When Tata Consultancy Services announced it would lay off 12,000 employees, it hid behind phrases like 'future-ready", 'realignment", and 'strategic initiatives". These aren't explanations; they're camouflage. Beneath the polite language lies an unsettling truth: India's biggest private employer is finally acknowledging that its core business model—legions of employees performing predictable, routine tasks—is obsolete. Nearly three decades ago, Intel's legendary CEO Andy Grove recounted a radical act of self-reflection in his book 'Only the Paranoid Survive'. Facing existential disruption, Intel's leadership symbolically fired themselves. They walked out of the building and asked, 'If we were starting fresh today, would we hire ourselves again?" Today, TCS and its Indian IT peers desperately need Grove's dose of brutal introspection. TCS's layoffs aren't just about middle managers and seasoned coders losing jobs; they're about leadership losing relevance. Look closely at TCS's announcement and you'll notice what it doesn't say: accountability stops neatly below the top floor. AI-driven automation is reshaping entire organizations, yet strangely, the people deciding who stays and who goes remain untouched. When an organization built on human capital claims that part of its workforce is obsolete, shouldn't the people who hired and led that workforce come under equal scrutiny? Also Read | Three years on, AI is prompting IT companies to cut workforce When Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella announced layoffs earlier this year amid record profitability, veteran tech commentator Om Malik pierced through Nadella's corporate doublespeak: 'His narrative framework attempts to make the brutal reality of our AI-driven future psychologically tolerable… Satya and other corporate leaders can't really say that, so they resort to verbal obfuscation." — Om Malik,The Satya of Satya's Layoff Memo (26 July 2025). TCS's decision to lay off thousands employs the same rhetoric. It cloaks harsh truths—human redundancy driven by AI, strategic missteps by leadership, and uncomfortable questions about executive relevance—in comforting phrases like 'future-ready" and 'strategic realignment". Over the past few quarters, the company's competitive resilience has weakened, growth has stalled, and investor confidence has wobbled. Yet, the leadership's chosen solution isn't self-examination or accountability at the top but deep cuts among mid-level ranks. If TCS is truly preparing itself for the future, shouldn't introspection start in the C-suite? This is true not only for India's largest IT company, but its peers as well. Ironically, when the future knocked on its door, India's IT leadership chose familiarity over vision. Infosys didn't retain its former CEO Vishal Sikka, who once led the company's collaboration and potential investments in OpenAI, the organization now synonymous with modern AI disruption. We already know TCS considers middle managers and veteran coders disposable. The more uncomfortable question—still unanswered—is whether its senior executives and board members are themselves ready for the era they're guiding the company into. AI's ruthless logic spares no one—neither the programmers whose code is now written by algorithms, nor the executives whose strategies depend on yesterday's assumptions. Grove understood this decades ago: paranoia and brutal honesty are not virtues but survival skills. If TCS, and indeed India's IT sector, hopes to survive this seismic shift, the leadership must confront the same unforgiving standard they apply to their employees. Which brings us to an essential, sharp-edged truth: If generative AI can churn out code faster than a graduate, shouldn't it also disrupt the comfort of those who sit in executive lounges and boardrooms? It's easy to pin obsolescence only on employees. But CEOs shaped by years of predictable revenues, infinite hiring, and incremental growth might be just as redundant as the Java coder they dismissed. It's time to ask the IT sector's top executives the same harsh question they're asking their teams: Exactly how does your experience make you indispensable in the AI era? If the answer isn't clear, perhaps they're part of the redundancy they're trying so hard to erase. India's IT industry must do better. It must move beyond scrutinizing armies of coders now labeled redundant and instead direct its hardest, most critical gaze into the leadership mirror. If today's CEOs can't convincingly answer Grove's piercing question, maybe it's finally time someone else did the hiring. Topics You May Be Interested In