logo
Letters to the Editor: Building more affordable housing is key to getting the homeless off downtown streets

Letters to the Editor: Building more affordable housing is key to getting the homeless off downtown streets

Yahoo27-05-2025
To the editor: Columnist LZ Granderson rightfully says that removing encampments and getting people shelter are necessary to bolstering our downtowns ('Pushing more Americans into homelessness is no way to revitalize downtowns,' May 24). However, the current rate of getting people out of shelters and into homes is dismal because there is a lack of affordable housing.
In my role as vice chair of the Buena Park Navigation Center Oversight Commission, I see that less than 15% of clients leave to go to stable housing in spite of extensive housing navigation support. The lucky few who are able to obtain housing are in the center for more than a year, a place designed for short-term stays.
We need more creative strategies to ensure that safe places to call home are available for everyone. We need to build more housing and, while waiting five to 10 years for it to be built, we need creative solutions such as single-room occupancy spaces, tiny homes and shared-housing models. We also need more programs to prevent people from falling into homelessness in the first place, such as rental assistance, utility assistance, legal representation at eviction courts and support when a crisis hits and people are living check to check. Our state, county and city budgets and policies can support these strategies.
Barry Ross, Santa Ana
..
To the editor: It is really disappointing to see a Los Angeles Times opinion writer say that officials shouldn't be focused on "offering tax breaks to would-be developers" for building places for the homeless in downtowns. It shows that people don't have a basic understanding of why others are homeless. We have a skyrocketing homeless population because we don't have enough places for people to live.
Changing the rules to build more homes is the best thing that politicians could do to help the homeless. Sure, the homeless might not move into all those new shiny downtown towers, but having people living in those new towers would free up more housing for the people who need it the most.
Or we can just keep stalling on new housing and the rich will take the housing the poorer population currently has and the number of homeless people in downtowns will increase.
Josh Albrektson, South Pasadena
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

House Democrat: Trump ‘militarization' of cities ‘violates everything that we believe in'
House Democrat: Trump ‘militarization' of cities ‘violates everything that we believe in'

The Hill

time12 minutes ago

  • The Hill

House Democrat: Trump ‘militarization' of cities ‘violates everything that we believe in'

Rep. Dan Goldman (D-N.Y.) on Wednesday denounced President Trump's 'militarization' of cities such as Los Angeles and Washington, claiming it 'violates everything that we believe in.' MSNBC's Alicia Menendez asked Goldman if GOP lawmakers are as 'unanimously in favor' of Trump's federal takeover of the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) as the president seemingly believes. 'I would really, really hope not, because the militarization of our cities and our domestic law enforcement violates the Posse Comitatus law and violates everything that we believe in [as] Americans,' Goldman responded. 'But just as I thought there would be Republicans who would stand up for their constituents and prevent them from losing health care, prevent them from losing food benefits, prevent million — billions of dollars of offshore wind investment in their own districts, I thought they would stand up for their own districts, and they didn't,' the New York Democrat told 'The Weeknight' host, referring to provisions included in the massive spending and tax bill signed into law last month. Trump earlier this week deployed National Guard troops to the nation's capital and declared a crime emergency in the district, giving the administration temporary authority to take control over the local police force under the city's Home Rule Act. The president on Wednesday told reporters that he will seek 'long-term extensions' from Congress to lengthen the initiative. Democrats, from local officials to members of the House and Senate, have decried the move as 'unnecessary' and ' unlawful,' as data shows the crime rate shrinking. He also ordered National Guard troops and some U.S. Marines to go to Los Angeles earlier this year when protests spread throughout the city — and beyond — in opposition to the White House's robust immigration agenda, including an uptick in detainments and deportations by U.S. Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

Raskin: Maxwell prison move ‘speaks to the irregularity of the process'
Raskin: Maxwell prison move ‘speaks to the irregularity of the process'

The Hill

time42 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Raskin: Maxwell prison move ‘speaks to the irregularity of the process'

Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) on Wednesday questioned disgraced socialite Ghislaine Maxwell's recent prison transfer, as lawmakers press the Trump administration to release more files related to its probe of the late Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking case. Maxwell, who was convicted and sentenced to 20 years as Epstein's co-conspirator, was quietly transferred from a Florida prison to a lower-security prison camp in Texas earlier this month, according to the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP). The move comes as she is appealing her case to the administration and Supreme Court. 'It was practically instantaneous. And of course, that then speaks to the irregularity of the process leading up to it,' Raskin said during a Wednesday appearance on MSNBC's 'The Last Word.' 'Remember that this was preceded by the sacking of Maureen Comey, who was one of the senior prosecutors leading that prosecution, and they simply fired her,' he continued. 'And then that's when [Deputy Attorney General] Todd Blanche decided to take matters into his own hands.' Blanche, who formerly defended President Trump during criminal proceedings, met with Maxwell one-on-one in Florida for two days to discuss Epstein. The case resurfaced after the Justice Department (DOJ) and FBI released a joint memo last month finding the disgraced financier did not keep a 'client list.' It also sought to dispel conspiracies around his 2019 death in a New York City jail cell, which has been ruled a suicide. Raskin suggested Blanche helped move Maxwell because he liked what he heard in the closed door meetings. 'So look, I think it seems pretty clear to the vast majority of Americans, as you're pointing out this evening, that Donald Trump's got one major interest in this whole affair at this point, which is burying any information that reveals the connection between him and Jeffrey Epstein,' the Maryland Democrat said. 'We know that they had more than a thousand FBI agents working 24 hour shifts, looking for mentions of Donald Trump's name in the Epstein files and looking for photographs of him, video snippets of him, whatever it might be,' he added. President Trump, following pressure from his base, ordered the DOJ to make transcripts of the five days of Epstein and Maxwell's grand jury testimonies public and to ask the court to unseal exhibits related to the case. A judge days later denied the request. While Republican lawmakers left Washington earlier this summer to avoid the controversy, it is likely to ramp up once again when they return in September.

Report slams Trump's DC homeless policy. Should it be a crime to be homeless?
Report slams Trump's DC homeless policy. Should it be a crime to be homeless?

USA Today

timean hour ago

  • USA Today

Report slams Trump's DC homeless policy. Should it be a crime to be homeless?

As President Donald Trump tries to forcibly remove homeless people from Washington, D.C., one think tank is warning that policies that criminalize or punish people for sleeping outside are not just cruel, they're ineffective. Trump plans to seize control of Washington's Metropolitan Police Department and sweep homeless people off the city's streets, he said at an Aug. 11 press conference. Those steps would go against evidence that anti-homeless laws and actions can exacerbate the problem, according to an Aug. 6 report by Mari Castaldi, director of state housing policy at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP), a nonpartisan Washington-based think tank often described as left-leaning. When people are removed from public spaces where they've been living, the report noted, they may lose personal property, have traumatic encounters with law enforcement and incur criminal records and fines that make it harder to get a job or rental housing. "Communities implementing these practices actively hinder people from exiting homelessness, thus worsening, not solving, the nation's homelessness crisis," Castaldi wrote. Homelessness can lead to jail in many states, cities "Since 2022, at least eight states have passed — and dozens more have considered — legislation to ticket, fine, or jail people simply for having no safe place to sleep," Castaldi wrote. What's more, the report said, more than 320 local ordinances to fine or arrest people for sleeping outside have been introduced since the Supreme Court's Grants Pass v. Johnson decision determined that it may be considered a crime. On July 24, Trump signed an executive order making it easier for cities and states to remove homeless people from the streets. When rental assistance and similar services are well-funded, homelessness declines, the report says, citing such policy experiments in Chattanooga, Tennessee, Los Angeles and among veterans nationally. The CBPP report is among several that critique policies championed by the Cicero Institute, a think tank that describes itself as nonpartisan. Cicero was founded by Joe Lonsdale, a Silicon Valley entrepreneur who backed Trump's campaign for president in 2024. More: America's housing is pulling further out of reach, report finds The policies endorsed by CBPP are "untenable," Cicero argues. "Instead, states should pursue minimally viable shelter options and sanctioned encampments with services. Permanent supportive housing doesn't address homelessness – it creates demand for more homelessness and supports cronyism." The group also believes that such policies trap the homeless where they are, rather than providing a path to self-sufficiency. "That's why, despite increased spending, homelessness has continued to rise over the past two decades," Cicero says. Read next: Why do over 1 million Americans live in 'plumbing poverty,' lacking running water? CBPP and other groups see the increase in homelessness as stemming from a failure to respond to the affordable housing crisis. "Homelessness is solvable," Castaldi says. "The way forward is not through punishing people for struggling under a flawed system, but through prioritizing supports that can end their homelessness or prevent it from occurring in the first place."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store