Set up ‘smoking zones' in hotels, bars or else lose licence: BBMP
The palike has also given one week from the date of notice issued, failing which, the trade licence will be suspended.
According to Chief Health Officer (CHO), BBMP, Sirajuddin Madani, the action is following the Supreme Court direction on June 22, 2022 and section 4 of the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act, 2003 (COTPA), in which any establishment like bars, hotels and restaurants with 30 or more seats must have a separate area for smokers and it should be identified as 'Smoking Zone'.
'The BBMP Special Commissioner for Health held a meeting with police, excise department and education department on Saturday, and a decision was taken that action will have to be taken against restaurants, bars or hotels violating the rules. The BBMP Health Department officials have been instructed to take action under sections 308 and 314 of the BBMP Act 2020 and suspend the license,' Madani said.
The CHO and other officials will revisit the establishments that received notice and if they have not followed the instruction, action will be initiated to to place the trade license under suspension and also impose a penalty. As per the BBMP health officials, the owners of these establishments have been told to comply with the order within seven days' time from the time of notice issued.
The officials who held inspections across eight zones to check if the rules are being followed found the highest violation in the South Zone, with 94 violations. Similarly, 72 violations in Bommannahalli, 63 in East were found, and notices were sent to all of them.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Deccan Herald
an hour ago
- Deccan Herald
BBMP notice to over 400 establishments for no smoking zone
In light of the Karnataka High Court order to protect citizens from passive smoking, Bruhat Bengaluru Mahangara Palike (BBMP) has issued notices to over 400 bars, lodges, restaurants, clubs, and other establishments to install designated smoking zones within their premises, according to News18 in mind the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act (COTPA), and in accordance with the directive, establishments that accommodate more than 30 rooms or 30 seats are required to have an exclusive smoking zone. Smoking will be disallowed in areas outside of the designated space, to safeguard the interests of non-smokers. .Three BBMP staff sacked for ignoring public complaints .The BBMP notice quoting the order of the high court said, "Petitioner shall earmark exclusively a separate area/place(s) with appropriate enclosure in the hotel premises and necessarily after obtaining license for the purpose of smoking and no other area or portion of premises shall be used by the customer of the petitioner for smoking.".They have been given a 7-day time period to set up smoking zones, failure to adhere to this would result in serious legal action, the notice reportedly said. The action may include suspension of their trade license and a penalty imposition, the report June, Cubbon Park police had registered a case against a restaurant and bar co-owned by cricketer Virat Kohli, for reportedly violating smoking zone regulations. The cops conducting the drive had verified that One8 Commune had no designated areas for smoking, and an FIR was registered against the manager and staff. .This was part of a drive conducted by the Bengaluru Police, that began on May 29, to inspect locations and prevent smoking-related violations.
NDTV
5 hours ago
- NDTV
Dog Bites Spike In Noida, Health Department Flags 34 Danger Zones
The health department has flagged 34 hotspots for dog bites across Uttar Pradesh's Noida district. According to official figures, 69,188 dog bite cases were reported between January and May this year. The hotspots were identified based on the number of anti-rabies vaccines administered in the region, as per a report in The Times Of India. A detailed list is expected to be displayed at all primary health centres soon. Dog Bite Hotspots In Noida The areas identified as high-risk include: Noida sectors 130, 110, 45, 5 Khoda, Nangli Vazidpur, Haldoni, Nangala Charandas, Dujana, Achchheja, Palwari Sadarpur, Barola, Harola (Sector 5), JJ Colony in Sector 8 and 9 Thora (Jewar), Patwadi, Chaprola, Mirjapur Omicron sectors 1, 2, 3 Atta Fatehpur, Jalpura, Kherli Hafizpur, Usmanpur, Canarsi Mohalla-Traders, Jahangirpur, Rabupura, Faleda, and Torah Mostly located in Bhangel, Bisrakh, and Dankaur blocks, these areas have seen a sharp rise in stray dog activity. In March alone, 11,599 people were bitten by strays. January and February recorded 9,383 and 10,174 cases, respectively. Dr Tikam Singh, Noida's Deputy Chief Medical Officer, urged residents to stay cautious around strays and seek immediate treatment in case of a bite. This week, the Supreme Court took suo motu cognisance of a TOI report talking about the growing menace of stray dogs in Delhi. The report mentioned the death of a six-year-old girl from rabies, and another severe attack on a four-year-old boy. The court has asked for the report to be treated as a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) and placed before the Chief Justice for further directions. In response, the Municipal Corporation of Delhi has announced a sterilisation and immunisation campaign targeting 70%-80% of stray dogs in 12 assembly constituencies. Plans are underway to set up 20 new dog shelters across the city. The last official count (2022-23) placed Delhi's stray dog population at nearly 10 lakh. At Safdarjung Hospital alone, 91,009 dog bite cases have been registered this year, averaging 249 cases per day. Officials have stressed on the importance of timely rabies vaccination, especially when a dog's saliva contacts broken skin or mucous membranes. In more serious cases, Rabies Immunoglobulin (RIG) is given along with the anti-rabies vaccine. About 44,520 animal bite incidents were reported in the district this year, including 2,193 monkey bites (844 in March alone) and 697 cat bites.
Time of India
8 hours ago
- Time of India
After SC judgment, mental well being no longer charity but constitutional right: Experts
KOLKATA: Mental health activists and experts have welcomed the Supreme Court's explicit recognition of mental health as an integral part of the constitutional Right to Life under Article 21. They say this broadens the interpretation of the right to life to include psychological well-being, not just physical survival. The Supreme Court recognised the right to mental health as an integral component of the right to life under Article 21 while laying down binding guidelines for educational institutions and coaching centres across India. The observation was made in a case related to the death of a 17-year-old student undergoing coaching for the National Eligibility-cum Entrance Test (NEET) examination. The apex court set aside orders of the Andhra Pradesh High Court to allow the transfer of the investigation into the death under suspicious circumstances to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). You Can Also Check: Kolkata AQI | Weather in Kolkata | Bank Holidays in Kolkata | Public Holidays in Kolkata Mental health activist Ratnaboli Ray, who is the founder of Anjali, a rights-based organisation, said the apex court order moves mental health from the realm of welfare or charity into the domain of legal and constitutional rights. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Health: the best shoes to walk and stand all day Ultra-Comfortable Shoes Undo "This means that the state and institutions are no longer simply encouraged but obligated to ensure mental health protections as part of their duty under the Constitution," said Ray, a psychologist by training. Ray also pointed out that by issuing guidelines for students' welfare in the context of mental health, the court has acknowledged the growing mental health crisis in educational spaces—ranging from anxiety and depression to suicide. This makes schools and universities potentially accountable for creating psychologically safe environments. "The court order represents a cultural shift. When the Supreme Court validates mental health as a constitutional concern, it plays a critical role in destigmatising mental illness, legitimising lived experiences, and encouraging both care-seeking and policy action," she said. Advocate Arush Sengupta pointed out that embedding mental health under Article 21 makes it justiciable. "If someone's right to mental well-being is violated—for example, through institutional neglect, discrimination, or lack of access to care—they can now take legal recourse based on constitutional grounds. This also strengthens the implementation of the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017, which already defines access to mental health services as a right, but until now lacked the direct constitutional force to ensure consistent and widespread enforcement," he said. Psychiatrist Aniruddha Deb felt the ruling has the potential to transform institutional accountability, public funding, and societal attitudes in India. "This is a landmark judgment. Till now, mental illness was perceived as a disability, a dysfunction and looked down upon. Treatment and care were neglected as were rights. People with mental illness were relegated to second-class citizens. They were even denied the right to vote. Being of unsound mind precluded them from holding any office. All that will change now. The moment you equate the right to mental health with the right to life, the whole observation changes," said Deb. Ray added that the moment demands bold, rights-affirming governance, not piecemeal or tokenistic gestures. "The judiciary has spoken. It is now the executive's responsibility to institutionalize this vision into everyday governance so that mental health is not only constitutionally protected, but meaningfully lived," she added. What SC judgment does * Broadens the interpretation of the right to life to include psychological well-being, not just physical survival * Moves mental health from the realm of welfare or charity into the domain of legal and constitutional rights. State and institutions are no longer simply encouraged but obligated to ensure mental health protections * Schools and universities potentially accountable for creating psychologically safe environments * Embedding mental health under Article 21 makes it justiciable. If someone's right to mental well-being is violated, they can now take legal recourse based on constitutional grounds * Strengthens the implementation of the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017, * To play a critical role in destigmatizing mental illness, legitimizing lived experiences, and encouraging care-seeking and policy action Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Friendship Day wishes , messages and quotes !
