
Firearm arrest No. 10 made at Naperville Topgolf parking lot
Naperville police have yet again made a firearm-related arrest in the Naperville Topgolf parking lot. There have now been 10 such arrests in or near the business' lot this year.
Roberto Chacon, 28, of Alsip, was taken into custody outside the 3211 Odyssey Court facility on a felony charge of aggravated unlawful possession of a weapon as well as one charge each of possession of cannabis and unlawful use of cannabis by a driver. His next court appearance is scheduled for June 26, according to DuPage County Circuit Court records.
Officers were performing a proactive foot patrol of the Naperville Topgolf lot when they observed suspected drugs and a handgun in plain view inside a parked, unoccupied Honda, according to Naperville police spokeswoman Kelley Munch.
Officers watched the vehicle until three occupants returned, Munch said. The cannabis and loaded handgun were recovered.
After a nearly four-month break, gun-related arrests outside the facility started up again in early February. Last month alone, police made five such arrests in the business' lot.
Ahead of this year, Naperville police made 25 arrests on gun-related offenses outside Topgolf between August 2023 and October 2024.Alongside Chacon's arrest, an investigation is also underway after a 33-year-old Chicago man allegedly elbowed an officer in the Topgolf lot, according to Munch.
Danzel Swift was taken into custody late Saturday night and charged with aggravated battery to a police officer, possession of open alcohol by a passenger and unlawful possession of cannabis by a passenger.
Officers were on a proactive patrol of the lot when they observed four subjects drinking out of cups in the Topgolf lot, Munch said. When officers later approached, they observed the cups, a liquor bottle and a firearm case in plain view inside a vehicle.
Officers made contact with the subjects, which resulted in the arrest of Swift. While he was being taken into custody, Swift allegedly elbowed an officer in the face, Munch said. A firearm was also ultimately seized and a follow-up investigation regarding the ownership of the gun is underway, Munch said.
Swift's next court appearance is scheduled for June 16.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
Woman Suing Taylor Swift Asks Her Attorneys to Help Her in the Case
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Kimberly Marasco, the Florida artist suing Taylor Swift for copyright infringement, asked Swift's legal team if they would accept service of the lawsuit on Swift's behalf. Marasco made the request in a motion filed Friday after facing persistent difficulties in locating Swift and being notified that the Florida secretary of state's office was backed up with service requests. Newsweek reached out to Marasco and a representative for Swift for comment. Why It Matters Marasco's inability to serve Swift could result in the lawsuit being dismissed or having Swift dropped from it. In a previous lawsuit, Judge Aileen Cannon agreed to drop Swift as a defendant because Marasco was unable to properly serve her. If Swift is dropped from the suit, Cannon may allow the lawsuit to proceed with the other defendants, which is what she decided in a previous suit. Taylor Swift performs during the Dublin stop of the Eras Tour on June 28, 24. Taylor Swift performs during the Dublin stop of the Eras Tour on June 28, 24. Press Association via AP Images What To Know Marasco reported months of unsuccessful attempts using process servers and sheriffs in multiple states to locate and serve Swift with legal documents. Efforts included visits to properties associated with Swift in California, Tennessee, New York and Rhode Island. Security personnel at a California residence denied access to process servers, while a Tennessee sheriff confirmed property ownership but stated Swift did not reside there. In Rhode Island, authorities told a process server they would face arrest for trespassing if they attempted service again. When conventional means failed, Marasco attempted to serve Swift via the Florida secretary of state. This form of substituted service is permitted for defendants who conduct business in the state of Florida, provided that the procedural requirements are met. However, Marasco indicated to the court that the secretary of state's office was experiencing a substantial backlog, further delaying her efforts. Marasco said in an email submitted into court records that she had sent a request for waiver of service via email and certified mail to one of Swift's attorneys, James Douglas Baldridge, on March 28. Marasco asked Swift's attorneys to confirm whether he received the communications in the May 27 email. Katherine Wright Morrone, an attorney for Swift, responded by saying they were not authorized to accept the subpoena on the singer's behalf and informed Marasco that they would oppose her motion. Marasco's suit alleges Swift, collaborators Jack Antonoff and Aaron Dessner, Universal Music Group, and Republic Records infringed on her poetry in lyrics and visuals from multiple albums, including Lover, Folklore, Midnights, and The Tortured Poets Department. Marasco is seeking $25 million in damages. Swift's attorneys have repeatedly denied the allegations in the current and previous lawsuit, arguing for dismissal and noting that Marasco's claims are unsupported and, in many instances, time-barred under federal copyright law. What People Are Saying Kimberly Marasco, in a motion filed Friday: "Plaintiff diligently attempted to serve Defendant Taylor Swift, a high-profile individual with extensive security measure, but personal service has proven impracticable." James Douglas Baldridge and Katie Wright Morrone, in a memorandum filed May 20: "In what is now Plaintiff's second frivolous lawsuit against Artist, Plaintiff has again failed to perfect service. Instead, Plaintiff asks the court for a range of relief without meeting any of the required burdens to show it is warranted." What Happens Next Cannon has yet to rule on Marasco's latest motion. Cannon set June 15 as the deadline for Marasco to serve Swift. The court has ordered all defendants not to respond until everyone has been properly served. Do you have a story that Newsweek should be covering? Do you have any questions about this story? Contact LiveNews@
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Insider Reveals Update On Taylor Swift And Blake Lively's Friendship After Dropped Subpoena
is putting her legal stress behind her, but not all of the fallout has been so easy to shake. The pop icon reportedly feels 'an immense sense of relief' now that she's no longer entangled in the high-profile legal dispute between longtime friend and actor-director Taylor Swift had been subpoenaed by Justin Baldoni's legal team earlier this month, but it was confirmed on May 22 that the summons was dropped after her team voluntarily provided information. While the Grammy winner is said to be 'not talking about the case' and 'has moved on,' insiders say the same can't be said about her once-close bond with Lively. 'There's been radio silence between Taylor and Blake since the subpoena was dropped,' a source told Us Weekly, adding that their previously tight-knit friendship has 'stalled' under the weight of 'legal tension.' According to the insider, the emotional fallout has created enough distance that 'they won't pick up where they left off.' The legal battle began in December 2024 when Lively filed a lawsuit accusing Baldoni, her "It Ends with Us" co-star and director, of sexual harassment, a hostile work environment, and an alleged smear campaign. Baldoni has denied all allegations and responded with his own $400 million countersuit against Lively and her husband, actor , claiming defamation, civil extortion, and more. Swift became embroiled in the dispute when her song 'My Tears Ricochet' was featured in the film. Although she wasn't involved in any creative or production aspects of the project, Baldoni's legal team alleged that Lively pushed Swift to delete years of text messages, prompting the subpoena. Swift's rep quickly shut down speculation, stating that the singer 'never set foot on the set,' had no input on casting or editing, and didn't even see the movie until after its release. 'The connection Taylor had to this film was permitting the use of one song,' the statement read, calling the subpoena a tactic meant to 'draw public interest' by leveraging Swift's name for 'tabloid clickbait.' Lively, for her part, publicly expressed satisfaction over the dropped subpoenas, calling them 'harassing' and unnecessary. Despite this latest report, Daily Mail previously shared that Swift was left blindsided after being briefly subpoenaed and allegedly mentioned in sensitive messages tied to Lively's explosive lawsuit against Baldoni. The pop icon, who once publicly supported Lively, now reportedly feels 'exploited' by the actress, believing their friendship was used for personal leverage in a case that had nothing to do with her. 'Right now, if Taylor had one wish, it would be that she never met Blake,' one insider told the outlet at the time. 'Although there were good times, the issues around the Baldoni case have outweighed them. When Taylor looks back, she sees all the red flags she missed. It just wasn't worth the stress.' The source went on to reveal that Swift often felt pressured to 'tone Blake down' and maintain harmony within their A-list circle of friends, but that loyalty came at a personal cost. 'She always wanted to be the leader of the pack,' the insider said, adding, 'Taylor's relieved the relationship is over. She put up with Blake's antics for too long because she's loyal, but this drama pushed her too far.' What makes the rift even more complicated is Swift's role as godmother to Lively and Reynolds' three daughters. While neither star has commented publicly on how the tension may affect their children's relationships, fans are left wondering whether the once-close family bond can survive the public fallout. In a major development in the ongoing legal battle between Lively and Baldoni, a federal judge ruled in Lively's favor to strike a controversial claim involving Taylor Swift. On Thursday, May 15, Judge Lewis J. Liman approved a motion to remove allegations that Lively's lawyer, Michael Gottlieb, had threatened to release Swift's private text messages unless the singer publicly supported Lively in her lawsuit against Baldoni. With conflicting reports continuing to swirl, the true status of their friendship remains unclear, and likely won't be known for sure until Swift and Lively speak out themselves.
Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
Drama As A Taylor Swift Ally Joins Justin Baldoni's Team Amid Legal Tussle With Blake Lively
The legal showdown between Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni has taken a dramatic turn. A heavyweight litigator with ties to Taylor Swift has joined Baldoni's camp, sparking new controversy and questions about Swift's silent role in the feud. The recent development comes amid reported tensions between Swift and Lively as their friendship continues to suffer amid the latter's legal battle with Baldoni. Baldoni, 41, has recruited powerhouse attorney Ellyn S. Garofalo to his legal team in his escalating conflict with "It Ends With Us" co-star Lively, 37. Garofalo, who worked at Venable LLP, Swift's former legal representatives, from 2018 to 2021, is now part of Baldoni's Wayfarer counsel. Her entry into the case could prove decisive. A seasoned trial lawyer with over 30 years of courtroom experience, Garofalo has handled high-stakes cases involving stars like Anna Nicole Smith and Alyssa Milano. She specializes in civil, criminal, and regulatory law, including SEC enforcement actions, and is a graduate of Pepperdine Law School. 'Garofalo was compelled to join the case after reviewing its circumstances, feeling strongly that an injustice was unfolding and that her participation could make a meaningful difference,' a source told the Daily Mail. 'Baldoni's team is thrilled because of her track record in the courtroom,' the insider added. 'She not only brings exceptional legal expertise but also fulfils their desire to include a prominent female litigator.' The pop icon was pulled into the chaos in early May when Baldoni's team subpoenaed her as a witness. According to a legal filing, Lively allegedly tried to 'coerce' Swift into releasing a public statement supporting her and 'urged her to delete text messages between them.' Lively's lawyers fought back hard, calling the claims 'baseless, unnecessary, improper and abusive.' The court agreed, granting her motion to dismiss the subpoena letter. Swift's camp later slammed the subpoena as nothing more than 'tabloid clickbait.' Ultimately, Baldoni's team withdrew the subpoena in late May after Venable objected, saying the action amounted to an 'unwarranted fishing expedition.' New twists followed quickly. Days after the subpoena was dropped, an unnamed insider from Swift's inner circle allegedly provided incriminating documentation to Baldoni's lead attorney, Bryan Freedman. This evidence reportedly revealed that Lively's team had 'threatened to leak' private exchanges between the actress and Swift to pressure the singer into siding with her publicly. In a shocking reveal, sources claimed the leaker was none other than Taylor Swift's 73-year-old father, Scott Swift. While Swift has not made any public comment on the matter, the surrounding drama has fueled intense speculation about her loyalties and silence amid the celebrity crossfire. Although Taylor Swift is no longer legally tied to the feud between Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni, sources say her friendship with Lively didn't survive the fallout. The 35-year-old pop superstar reportedly feels 'an immense sense of relief' after the subpoena issued by Baldoni's legal team was dropped on May 22. Still, the emotional damage appears to be lasting. 'There's been radio silence between Taylor and Blake since the subpoena was dropped,' a source told Us Weekly, adding that their previously close friendship has 'stalled' due to 'legal tension.' According to the insider, things are unlikely to return to how they were: 'They won't pick up where they left off.' As her friendship with Lively reportedly dissolves, Taylor Swift is quietly deepening her connection with other longtime friends, most notably Dakota Johnson. The two were spotted dining at Via Carota in New York City, accompanied by their brothers Austin Swift and Jesse Johnson. Fans will recall Johnson once calling Swift 'the most powerful person in America' during her "Saturday Night Live monologue." Their recent outing appears to signal Swift's preference for more low-key, drama-free relationships. The ripple effects are extending through Swift's inner circle. Cara Delevingne, formerly close to both Lively and Swift, has reportedly taken Swift's side. 'Cara does not like to be involved in any drama, and she is very supportive of her friends,' a source said to the Daily Mail. 'She considers Taylor to be one of her closest friends and she does not approve of the way that the events of the past several months have unfolded.' Sophie Turner and Gigi Hadid, two other core members of Swift's squad, have also distanced themselves from Lively. Hadid, once publicly affectionate toward Lively, no longer appears connected to the actress. Sources also believe Swift skipped the 2025 American Music Awards to avoid media questions. 'She avoided the AMAs because she didn't want to deal with 1000s of questions about the Blake Lively saga,' a source revealed. 'It is all anyone wants to talk about, and Taylor is really tired of it.'