Right to disconnect laws lifts staff engagement, productivity: Australian HR Institute report
More than half of employers say new laws cracking down on workplace communications after business hours have led to an increase in productivity and lower employee stress, according to a new report.
Under contentious right to disconnect laws, which came into effect for most workers last August, employers are allowed to reasonably refuse to respond during out-of-work hours. This includes not having to take calls or answer to emails.
Many employer groups hit out against the laws, flagging concerns about vexatious claims going to the Fair Work Commission.
But in its new outlook report for the upcoming June quarter, the Australian HR Institute found nearly 60 per cent of employers said the right to disconnect had improved staff engagement and productivity, while 37 per cent observed a reduction in employee stress.
The survey of over 600 senior business decision-makers — including HR officers — found 39 per cent reported improved work-life balance among staff since legislation came into effect, with just 3 per cent observing a negative change.
AHRI chief executive Sarah McCann-Bartlett said overall, employers saw positive outcomes from recent workplace legislation.
'It's not necessarily surprising that actually if they've been implemented well in the organisation through their HR teams and their managers, that employees have actually seen a positive outcome for themselves and then that has positively led to higher employee engagement,' she said.
'What we were slightly surprised about was the extent of how positive employers have seen these changes.'
Other key findings from the report show 64 per cent of employers plan to hire staff in the June quarter, with recruitment intentions higher in the public sector at 77 per cent compared with the 61 per cent in the private sector.
Employers also expect wages to grow 3.3 per cent over the next 12 months, up from 3 per cent in the March quarter.
'Although conditions in the Australian labour market have eased slightly compared with a year ago, the market remains tight,' Ms McCann-Bartlett said.
'Many organisations continue to contend with rising wage pressures and persistent challenges in both attracting new employees and retaining existing ones.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Age
27 minutes ago
- The Age
Trump's war on innovation is a golden opportunity for Australia, if we're smart enough to take it
Our productivity growth, the only reliable way to raise living standards, is sclerotic. We now rank 27 out of 31 OECD countries, with the UK and US achieving three times and eight times our growth rate respectively. And with the future of our resource exports growing cloudy, the 'lucky country' might be starting to run out of luck. Jump-starting Australian innovation would give us a chance to break out of this uninspiring position and provide a path to a more prosperous future. Frustratingly, we're on track to squander this opportunity. While competing destinations have launched ambitious programs like the Choose Europe for Science Initiative, backed by €500 million ($881 million), Australia has dragged its feet. A recent proposal to tax unrealised capital gains has spooked start-ups and their investors, and Labor's ongoing desire to cap foreign student numbers actively harms our chances. Loading To reverse course and win the war for global talent, we require a bold, coordinated, 'big push' strategy to ensure that Australia offers the most compelling alternative to the US as a place to discover scientific breakthroughs, develop technologies and build companies. Our big push strategy should target the four key types of individuals that define the best innovation ecosystems: world-class researchers; risk-taking entrepreneurs; high-skilled technical workers and promising young students. We can target each talent category with two types of policy levers. First, make it as easy as possible to choose Australia. For top talent and their families, getting an Australian visa should be a fast and seamless experience. Labor's National Innovation Visa is a good start but is too restrictive; it could be significantly expanded, for example by removing the 'invitation only' requirement and introducing a fast track for affected Harvard scholars. Supply-side housing action to address the ongoing crisis, such as zoning reform, is long overdue to make Australia welcoming to new migrants. Select new arrivals could merit limited financial support to smooth the transition, and for top professors who bring research affiliates in tow – think of the benefits we have seen from international researchers like Professor Michelle Simmons basing their careers in Australia – tailored incentive packages would provide excellent bang for the public buck. Second, invest in the success of Australian-based innovators. For scientists, that means aggressively reversing the decline in R&D funding that Robyn Denholm, chair of the ongoing National R&D Review, has called a 'national emergency'. Opportunities to fund 'shovel-ready' research projects cut by the US are plentiful. For entrepreneurs and high-skilled workers, selective support for companies in high-potential or strategic sectors such as public offtake agreements, can support the growth of new products and businesses. These policies can be targeted at places where Aussie innovators have already proved their strength. Hubs such as Melbourne's biotech district, Sydney's SaaS (Software as a Service) scene, or the Gold Coast's growing space industry provide natural focal points for new talent to coalesce and amplify. Labor's historic election victory has given them a rare licence to invest in a better, more exciting future. For Albanese and Chalmers, who have publicly committed to solve our productivity crisis, this opportunity to boost innovation in Australia couldn't have come at a better time. They should seize the chance to do so.
Sydney Morning Herald
27 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Trump's war on innovation is a golden opportunity for Australia, if we're smart enough to take it
Our productivity growth, the only reliable way to raise living standards, is sclerotic. We now rank 27 out of 31 OECD countries, with the UK and US achieving three times and eight times our growth rate respectively. And with the future of our resource exports growing cloudy, the 'lucky country' might be starting to run out of luck. Jump-starting Australian innovation would give us a chance to break out of this uninspiring position and provide a path to a more prosperous future. Frustratingly, we're on track to squander this opportunity. While competing destinations have launched ambitious programs like the Choose Europe for Science Initiative, backed by €500 million ($881 million), Australia has dragged its feet. A recent proposal to tax unrealised capital gains has spooked start-ups and their investors, and Labor's ongoing desire to cap foreign student numbers actively harms our chances. Loading To reverse course and win the war for global talent, we require a bold, coordinated, 'big push' strategy to ensure that Australia offers the most compelling alternative to the US as a place to discover scientific breakthroughs, develop technologies and build companies. Our big push strategy should target the four key types of individuals that define the best innovation ecosystems: world-class researchers; risk-taking entrepreneurs; high-skilled technical workers and promising young students. We can target each talent category with two types of policy levers. First, make it as easy as possible to choose Australia. For top talent and their families, getting an Australian visa should be a fast and seamless experience. Labor's National Innovation Visa is a good start but is too restrictive; it could be significantly expanded, for example by removing the 'invitation only' requirement and introducing a fast track for affected Harvard scholars. Supply-side housing action to address the ongoing crisis, such as zoning reform, is long overdue to make Australia welcoming to new migrants. Select new arrivals could merit limited financial support to smooth the transition, and for top professors who bring research affiliates in tow – think of the benefits we have seen from international researchers like Professor Michelle Simmons basing their careers in Australia – tailored incentive packages would provide excellent bang for the public buck. Second, invest in the success of Australian-based innovators. For scientists, that means aggressively reversing the decline in R&D funding that Robyn Denholm, chair of the ongoing National R&D Review, has called a 'national emergency'. Opportunities to fund 'shovel-ready' research projects cut by the US are plentiful. For entrepreneurs and high-skilled workers, selective support for companies in high-potential or strategic sectors such as public offtake agreements, can support the growth of new products and businesses. These policies can be targeted at places where Aussie innovators have already proved their strength. Hubs such as Melbourne's biotech district, Sydney's SaaS (Software as a Service) scene, or the Gold Coast's growing space industry provide natural focal points for new talent to coalesce and amplify. Labor's historic election victory has given them a rare licence to invest in a better, more exciting future. For Albanese and Chalmers, who have publicly committed to solve our productivity crisis, this opportunity to boost innovation in Australia couldn't have come at a better time. They should seize the chance to do so.
Perth Now
43 minutes ago
- Perth Now
What 1-in-5 Aussies are buying
One-in-five Australians are expected to have a ticket in Oz Lotto's mouth-watering $70m jackpot draw. It will be the second biggest lottery prize on offer in Australia this year and the fourth biggest Oz Lotto jackpot in its 31-year history. Ticket sales are expected to peak about 6.55pm on Tuesday – about 35 minutes before the draw closes – when more than 4100 tickets will be sold in a single minute, The Lott spokesman Matt Hart said there had been three Oz Lotto division one winning entries totalling $185m so far in 2025, and they were eagerly awaiting their fourth winner. Oz Lotto's $70m jackpot is the second biggest lottery prize on offer in Australia this year. NewsWire/Ian Currie Credit: News Corp Australia 'We'll be standing by ready to reach out to any registered division one winner immediately after the draw on Tuesday night, so make sure you register your ticket to The Lott Members Club for the chance to receive that winning phone call,' he said. 'If one person takes home the entire $70m prize, they'll be crowned the second-biggest Australian lottery winner so far in 2025 and Oz Lotto's second-biggest individual lottery winner ever.' Mr Hart said previous winners greeted news of their multimillion-dollar prize with stunned silence, hysterical laughter and tears of joy. 'Who knows how someone might react on Tuesday night if they win the entire $70m jackpot,' he said. 'The last time we had a $70m Oz Lotto draw was in April, and on that occasion it was won by a 15-share Queensland syndicate, each receiving more than $4.7m. 'Will history repeat itself on Tuesday night or will the Oz Lotto jackpot remain unclaimed and soar higher for next week's draw?' If one person takes home the entire $70m prize, they'll be crowned the second-biggest Australian lottery winner so far in 2025 and Oz Lotto's second-biggest individual lottery winner ever. NewsWire/Ian Currie Credit: News Corp Australia The most frequently drawn Oz Lotto winning numbers are 47, 21, 28 and 33, while the least frequently drawn include 34, 26, 45 and 43. More than three-quarters of the Oz Lotto division one winning entries in 2024 were QuickPick entries – where the lottery terminal randomly selects the numbers. Almost a third of Oz Lotto division one winning entries in 2024 were System entries – which allows you to play more numbers in a single game. Tickets in Tuesday's draw can be purchased at licensed lottery outlets, online from or via The Lott mobile app.
