logo
The Supreme Court's trans ruling is the new Brexit. Its opponents won't accept that they've lost

The Supreme Court's trans ruling is the new Brexit. Its opponents won't accept that they've lost

Telegraph30-06-2025
More than two months ago, the Supreme Court ruled that sex-based rights are exactly that. Sex-based, the five judges declared, means based on biological sex.
This was the court's interpretation of the 2010 Equality Act. As such, legal protections afforded to women under the act are restricted to those born female. In short – trans women are not legally women.
The justices' clear ruling – which promises to have wide-ranging implications for single-sex spaces and services – is proof that biology matters. And it was a relief to many who have argued for the dignity, privacy and safety of women.
It means lesbians, who have found their dating apps and events inundated with men claiming to be women, will be able to meet up without biological males being present. It also means that in prisons and hospitals and refuges, vulnerable women will not have to share their spaces with such men.
And it restores some sanity to a discussion that has been propelled by militant activists who insist that their fetishes and delusions are radical, doing no favours to those trans people who do just want to get on with their lives.
Open up social media and you still find hordes of men insisting they are biological women. These people are beyond rational argument, and will carry on shrieking and punching down. This was to be expected.
What is shocking, though, are the number of public bodies that are refusing to act on the court's ruling. The law is not optional. The provision of single-sex spaces is something that most organisations are able to facilitate – be that toilets or changing rooms. If they are concerned that their provision for trans people would be insufficient, they can simply provide gender-neutral spaces, too.
The reduction of the principle of this legislation to endless discussion about loos, is part of the institutional denial that's at play.
The BMA, the Fire Brigades Union, Equity, the UCU (University and College Lecturers), teachers, NHS unions and civil servants are just some of those refusing to accept that however much you chant 'trans women are women', the law has said this is not the case.
Among those losing patience with those refusing to accept the ruling is the Prime Minister, who said he had 'accepted' and 'welcomed the ruling'.
'Everything else flows from that as far as I'm concerned… All guidance of whatever kind needs to be consistent with the ruling and we need to get to that position as soon as possible,' Sir Keir Starmer told reporters on Sunday.
In other words, get on with it. But that is not what is happening, as the trans rights lobbyists continue to mislead people about what equality law is. This is the result of often well-meaning or bewildered folk having gone along with whatever groups like Stonewall fed them about trans ideology. (And it must also be said that Starmer's current position is a long way from where he and his Labour party were a few years ago).
Now, we find ourselves in a situation reminiscent of Brexit, when there was a refusal by swaths of the pro-EU camp to accept the result of the referendum.
Valuable resources were wasted by those who felt they could overturn the result by having a second vote. Even as someone who backed Remain, this always seemed to me a complete waste of time.
Looking back, Brexit disrupted a complacent, liberal consensus. Neighbours told me at the time that they knew of nobody who would vote Leave, which of course was precisely the problem.
Similarly, the arguments around women asserting their rights have also come as news to those who only get their information via The Guardian /BBC axis where the crimes of men – even rape – are attributed to women.
Those pushing for trans rights have benefited from the public NOT being properly informed about what is going on. Middle-aged men arguing for children to be sterilised, medicalised and denied puberty through drugs, is not only creepy but, as the evidence examined by Dr Hilary Cass has shown us, actually harmful. Even some of America's 'progressive' media outlets – such as The New York Times – are having to gently reveal facts documenting how 'gender-affirming care' is hurting children.
Nonetheless, a completely unthinking trans activist hegemony has been so deeply embedded in our major institutions that nurses demanding to get changed in private is some sort of insurgency. Madness.
The Supreme Court ruling restores some balance. But other parts of society must catch up and get over their befuddlement. Ofcom – an unelected quango which, we ought to remember, refused to censure the BBC for referring to Scarlet Blake, a biological man who murdered a stranger and had livestreamed the killing of a cat, as a woman – has this week come under fire for saying broadcasters must give airtime to claims that biological men are women when covering trans issues.
We don't do this with climate change denial any more. Why do it with biology?
The reality is that some went so far down this particular rabbit hole that they now have no idea how to climb back out. To state that men are not women, an obvious truth, is not to discriminate against a 'uniquely marginalised' group. It is a return to reality that protects women's rights. The trans rights grift is over – the sooner everybody realises as much, the better.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Police warn of mass arrests if Palestine Action protest goes ahead
Police warn of mass arrests if Palestine Action protest goes ahead

Sky News

time2 hours ago

  • Sky News

Police warn of mass arrests if Palestine Action protest goes ahead

Police are warning of mass arrests if a protest in support of the banned group Palestine Action goes ahead on Saturday. Hundreds of people are expected to turn out for the demonstration, which is understood to be planned for London. However, the Metropolitan Police said "anyone showing support for the group can expect to be arrested." "We are aware that the organisers of Saturday's planned protest are encouraging hundreds of people to turn out with the intention of placing a strain on the police and the wider criminal justice system," said a spokesperson. The organisers, a pressure group called Defend Our Juries, denied their protest will try to overwhelm the police and justice system. "If we are allowed to protest peacefully and freely, then that is no bother to anyone," said the group in a statement. 1:29 Palestine Action was banned under terrorism laws after two aircraft were damaged at RAF Brize Norton on 20 June. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said the vandalism of the planes was "disgraceful" and accused the group of a "long history of unacceptable criminal damage". The ban means membership of, or support for, Palestine Action is a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison. More than 200 people supporting the group were arrested at Defend Our Juries protests across the UK last month, many of whom held placards with the message: "I oppose genocide, I support Palestine Action." Downing Street has urged people not to attend this weekend's protest. It comes after around 40 people gathered outside Labour HQ on Monday to protest the party's stance on Gaza. They were watched by a small group of police officers as they chanted phrases including: "Shame on Keir Starmer, shame on the Labour Party, shame on David Lammy." Separately, the Board of Deputies of British Jews has also confirmed it will protest this weekend, with community organisations marching through central London to Downing Street on Sunday. They are calling for the government not to recognise the state of Palestine without all hostages taken by Hamas being released. Last week, Sir Keir Starmer said he planned to recognise Palestine by the UN General Assembly meeting in September, unless Israel met certain conditions including agreeing a ceasefire and improving the humanitarian situation in Gaza.

'Government needs to get a grip': Southport residents say they STILL fear anti-migrant riots one year on from violence... and they aren't alone
'Government needs to get a grip': Southport residents say they STILL fear anti-migrant riots one year on from violence... and they aren't alone

Daily Mail​

time2 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

'Government needs to get a grip': Southport residents say they STILL fear anti-migrant riots one year on from violence... and they aren't alone

Tearful Southport locals are living in fear there could be a repeat of the anti-migrant riots and have told Labour to get a grip on immigration. Violent scenes that shamed Britain last year were sparked by misinformation on social media following the triple stabbing murders of Bebe King, 6, Elsie Dot Stancombe, 7, and Alice Dasilva Aguiar, 9. Now, more than 12 months later, terrified residents are pointing the finger at Sir Keir Starmer for being too weak and have told the Daily Mail the PM has not done enough to prevent further disorder. One elderly lady, standing just yards from the mosque on Sussex Road where most of the violence occurred, broke down when asked what she remembers. 'I'm sorry,' she says, 'I'm sorry. It's just too painful.' She is not the only one still feeling the effects of the July 30 disorder last year which left many local people fearing for their lives as a large crowd gathered on the street. Janet McCormick, 62, remembers the riot well, living just doors away from the centre of it. Like many people interviewed, her eyes glaze over as she recalls the events of that night. 'It was a terrible time,' she says. 'The rioters were right outside my home, lighting fires and throwing bricks. 'It was terrifying for people living around here. No-one was sure what was going to happen and the police appeared to be outnumbered. 'It was a horrible thing to witness. I was angry last year at people for being so stupid that they believed every rumour they heard. 'I kept telling them they were being racist, that they should think for themselves but you could see what was driving them on. 'Sadly I do not think the Government has done enough to prevent another riot, not here but I can see it happening in other parts of the country. 'I think people think we should have someone waiting on the shore for the boats to arrive and have the power to send them straight back. 'People can't understand why that is not happening. It's no use telling us about human rights because this is affecting everyone. 'Illegal immigration is killing this country. It is putting a vast strain on the NHS and welfare and schools because too many people are coming into the country and we can't cope. 'I keep reading about how much money we are paying the French to stop asylum seekers crossing the Channel but the boats are still coming. 'Somebody has to address the problem. I don't want to see or read about another riot like we had in Southport but the Government must get a grip.' Businesswoman Kimberley Parker, 37, runs pet groomers Glad Wags just down from the mosque. Liberal in her views, she blamed the riot on 'bigotry and ignorance' and was particularly upset that the rioters targeted a hard-working Asian family who run a local shop doors away from her own. 'The thugs who raided their shop went for the alcohol and cigarettes and got away with more than £10,000,' she says. 'I was just very disappointed in my fellow human beings. The only good thing is that the riot brought his all closer together in Southport, especially around here. 'That was the one big positive to come out of it all. 'But the hard truth is that people will read and accept lies as the truth and I suppose that is because they want to. 'And we have to accept that people are now angry for all sorts of reasons and one of them I think is because they don't see the Government as very strong. It bends too easily. 'On the one hand we are getting misinformation from social media about the dangers of illegal immigration and on the other we are not getting enough information from the Government over how many immigrants are arriving here and what they intend to do about it. 'I don't think Starmer is being proactive enough. 'We need to sort out what is going on. For example, a lot of the people coming across on boats are losing their passports so they cannot be deported because no-one knows where they came from. 'That should be sorted immediately. If you don't have a passport you should be unable to claim asylum and that should be the hard and fast rule. 'The Government need to work with us to calm our fears. Of course people here are frightened of those from different cultures with backgrounds they don't know about. 'Starmer has to understand that and he has got to have a policy that we understand. 'I do hold liberal views but I do realise you cannot have uncontrolled immigration without it having a knock on effect on every part of out lives. 'I do fear there could be further riots in the country but I hope that there isn't. 'I think that since the riot last year we have become closer in Southport but I think what is going on in the rest of the country is a shambles. 'It appears to me that the Government is spending all its time papering over the cracks instead of facing up to problems and doing something about them.' Roofer Craig Johnson, 37, witnessed the riot at first hand with most of it happening outside his front door. 'I was speechless at first,' he says. 'It was horrific to watch. 'The rioters were pulling down the garden walls and using the bricks to throw at the mosque and at police. 'I was one of those who came out the next day and help re-build the walls around here. 'But I don't think the Government is doing enough to stop another riot happening somewhere else. They are not facing up to the immigration problem. 'If you ask me, the sooner Farage gets in the better. 'What do I think Starmer should do? I think the best thing he could do is resign.' Meanwhile, in Tamworth a year ago a rioting mob descended on the old historic town where they tried to set fire to a Holiday Inn which was housing migrants. Hundreds of people gathered as a group of masked thugs threw a burning bush inside the side entrance, while onlookers filmed, cheered and clinked their beer bottles Adam Goodfellow, 39, a surveyor who stood in Tamworth at last year's General Election for the Workers Party, said: 'I came down here when I heard there was a protest being planned, just to say that these people don't speak for all of Tamworth. 'There were a gang of people shouting at the police and it had been going for a good hour when they started throwing fireworks and it got scary. 'Personally I believe uncontrolled immigration is damaging to working peoples' interests. I also believe that when things aren't going so well, people look for scapegoats and there is a lot of hearsay on social media. 'If there is lawlessness then you need more police whoever is committing the crime. 'A year on and nothing has changed under Labour, people are still massively concerned which is why Reform won every seat at the recent elections. 'The only change at the hotel seems to be permanent security guards on reception which shows there is still a high level of threat and concern.' Claire Mitchell, 51, a Tamworth local and a regular gym-goer, said: 'What happened a year ago was horrific to see. I was ashamed and surprised. I did not think Tamworth was that sort of place. 'I don't believe everything I read on social media. There are people with agendas seeking to sew division. 'I have seen people from the hotel sitting around the lake and passing the time of day like anyone else might. It is not something I get concerned about. 'Fake news is a terrible thing and the riots we saw last year were prompted by that. 'Tamworth is a great place. I was brought up here and it has so much more to offer than the terrible behaviour of a minority. I find it sad that its reputation has been tarnished in this way. 'A year on, I do not think it matters which political party is in power. 'For me, anyone who risks their life getting on a dinghy to cross the sea has got something to run from. 'There will always be some who take advantage of a humanitarian situation but we must not let that blind us.' Retired IT guy and gym-goer Alex Freeman, 72, said: 'Whatever your opinion of the immigration situation, there is no excuse for threatening people's welfare and damaging property and that's what happened last year. 'I don't mind peaceful protest but that was threatening harm to other human beings and that is just wrong. 'I am anti the boats, I think immigration should be controlled and if you do something illegal then you shouldn't end up being given free stuff in a hotel. 'It's difficult. These are obviously desperate people but this country is not so big. 'It annoys me when I see homeless people in this country and then I think these people in the hotels have travelled across multiple countries to get to the UK. 'Why are they doing this? I know France and Germany take a lot in but I don't think they are treated as nicely as we treat them. 'We have limited resources – we have a broken NHS, potholes everywhere and we're constantly being told there is not enough money, so of course people are going to be angry. 'This is a terrible situation. 'I don't have any reason to think the people in the hotel are any different or worse than anyone else. 'I see them doing things we all do – going to the lake, looking at the ducks. If some do naughty stuff then that is rare just as it is rare when one of us commits a crime. 'And I know they are a tiny fraction of overall immigration. They get a lot of attention but they are not the ones breaking our system.' A 36-year-old mother of three, and regular gym goer, said: 'I do feel a little bit unsafe in the dark evenings. I park a bit closer to the entrance because the hotel is full of males and they hang around with nothing to do and it does make you feel on edge. 'I did not agree with the protests. Violence is never the answer but people don't feel listened to so it is difficult. 'Yes, you feel unsafe but I also feel a bit sorry for them. Where are they meant to go? 'I saw more police around now than I did before last year's trouble but I don't know whether that is to keep everyone safe or because something has happened. 'There is a lot of hearsay, a lot of rumours. I hear about women being cat-called but I have never have anything like that happen to me personally so it is a difficult one to judge.'

Class warfare is back under this spiteful government – and we will ALL end up paying a ruinous price: LEO MCKINSTRY
Class warfare is back under this spiteful government – and we will ALL end up paying a ruinous price: LEO MCKINSTRY

Daily Mail​

time2 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Class warfare is back under this spiteful government – and we will ALL end up paying a ruinous price: LEO MCKINSTRY

The current government is increasingly running not on a desire to improve the country, or out of any kind of political mission - but on sheer spite. Having failed to achieve the elusive economic 'growth' he and his inept Chancellor Rachel Reeves promised before the election, Sir Keir Starmer is now trying to revive his fortunes by stoking class envy.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store