
Elon Musk's name comes up in debate over school choice bill before it advances to full Texas House
A bill that would spend $1 billion in tax dollars to send students to private schools in Texas is headed to the full House. On Thursday afternoon, the
House Public Education Committee voted out the school choice measure, 9-6 along party lines
. No word yet on how quickly the full House will debate the legislation.
Much of the debate on school choice centers around which students are eligible to receive public money and how much.
Under the House bill voted out of committee many students accepted into the program will receive $10,000 per year to attend an accredited private school. Students with disabilities will receive more than that, perhaps up to $30,000 based on their needs. Home-schooled students would get $2,000.
The program will be capped at $1 billion during the first year, which is the 2026-27 school year.
Forecasts by the Legislative Budget Board (LBB) show by 2030, the cost to taxpayers per year could climb to around $4 billion.
But in response to a question by CBS News Texas during a news conference last week,
Gov. Greg Abbott said that the LBB's estimates are "based on fiction"
and that the legislature will determine the program's budget in future years.
Republicans said, under their bill, low-income students and those with disabilities are prioritized. However, it is a universal program, meaning any student is eligible.
State Rep.James Talarico, D-Austin, said that includes billionaire Elon Musk's children.
"I know Elon Musk is a somewhat humorous example, but wealthy parents, whether the richest man in the world or just a family making over $500,000 a year, they have access to this program," said Talarico. "But it is not limited to the family you just mentioned."
But State Rep. Brad Buckley, R-Salado, who is Chairman of the Public Education Committee, rejected Talarico's argument.
"I don't know the circumstances of every family," said Buckley. "I don't know their tax returns and I don't know the particular challenges a child is having. But what I do know is that when you put choice in the hands of the parents, they'll make the right call and I think the circumstance in which they make that will look different from family to family."
Other Democratic lawmakers criticized the school choice bill saying it would lead to unaccredited private schools.
"This voucher bill will eventually destroy public schools," Rep. Alma Allen, D-Houston said. "I give it 10 years, five sessions from now. Once you open the box, many of these will pop up, and will eventually destroy our public schools."
"The bill requires the schools to be accredited and that's a process and it's in the bill," Buckley responded. "There will not be any pop-up schools."
Rep. James Frank, R-Wichita Falls disagreed with Allen.
"The studies all show public school improvement, academic performance improves," said Frank. "The idea that things are going to completely fall apart, I understand people don't like the bill, but the idea this will destroy public schools is to me fear-mongering."
When the debate on this bill makes it to the House floor, Democrats will try to kill it. Abbott and Speaker Dustin Burrows remain confident they've got more than the 76 votes needed to pass the school choice bill in the House.
The Public Education Committee also passed the school funding bill by a margin of 13-2. It will include nearly $8 billion in new money. It will raise the basic allotment for school districts, which has been $6,160 since 2019 by $395. That is more than the $220 increase proposed in the original bill. Forty percent of that basic allotment will go toward pay raises for teachers and other staff. The bill will automatically raise the basic allotment in future years.
Watching the debate Thursday afternoon became an issue because the House committee chose not to livestream the meeting as is normally the case. CBS News Texas livestreamed the meeting. Watch it in its entirety below:
Watch
Eye On Politics at 7:30 Sunday morning
on CBS News Texas on air and streaming
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Axios
11 minutes ago
- Axios
Black Caucus chair says Trump's actions on L.A. are impeachable
Congressional Black Caucus chair Yvette Clarke (D-N.Y.) said Tuesday she believes President Trump mobilizing the National Guard and deploying Marines to Los Angeles rises to the level of an impeachable offense. Why it matters: It's a break with House Democrats' general aversion towards impeachment from the head of one of their most powerful groups. The comment comes amid growing animosity between Democrats and the Trump administration over the president's use of law enforcement to carry out a campaign of mass deportations. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Driving the news: During a press conference, Clarke was asked if Trump's actions to quell protests in L.A. rise to the level of an impeachable offense "I definitely believe it is," she responded, "But we'll cross that bridge when we get to it." Clarke and other Democrats have argued that Trump has violated the U.S. Constitution by mobilizing the National Guard over Newsom's objections. Reality check: Democrats are highly unlikely to pursue an organized impeachment effort against Trump any time soon. Two rank-and-file members, Reps. Shri Thanedar (D-Mich.) and Al Green (D-Texas), have spearheaded their own rogue impeachment initiatives, but most Democrats have dissociated themselves with those efforts. Most Democrats are clear-eyed that impeachment would be doomed to failure with Republicans in control of Congress — and they often note that Trump won in 2024 despite previously being impeached twice. What they're saying: House Democratic Caucus chair Pete Aguilar (D-Calif.) told reporters at a subsequent press conference, "I've said before that ... House Democrats aren't focused on impeachment today."


Axios
11 minutes ago
- Axios
Impeachment wars
Rep. Jasmine Crockett's mere mention of a possible impeachment inquiry into President Trump has touched off negative reactions from some colleagues. "I think she's going to turn off a lot more people than gain," a House Democrat told us. Why it matters: House Democratic leaders are staying neutral. But many Democrats are allergic to the word after they impeached Trump twice only for him to return to power with full control of the government. Crockett (D-Texas), asked in a local news interview if she would pursue impeachment if Democrats retook the House in 2026 and she became Oversight Committee chair, said she would "absolutely at least do an inquiry." The other three candidates for the ranking member job on Oversight, Reps. Robert Garcia (D-Calif.), Stephen Lynch (D-Mass.) and Kweisi Mfume (D-Md.), told us they wouldn't go that far. 👿 "Turning this ranker race into a proxy for impeachment is unhelpful and unfair to her colleagues," said a House Democrat who predicted Republicans will "try to motivate their base by saying that a Democratic majority will inevitably lead to impeachment." Crockett told us the term "impeachment inquiry" would stress to the public the "next level of gravity" of the subject matter — such as Trump's pardons for big money allies and the Qatari jet scandal. "A lot of times we as Democrats can overthink stuff," Crockett said. "A lot of people ... felt like [Oversight Committee chair] James Comer was an embarrassment. But at the end of the day, who won the House?" The bottom line: House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries deferred to House Judiciary Committee ranking member Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), whose panel, he said, "has jurisdiction over impeachment."


New York Times
13 minutes ago
- New York Times
Adams Team Works Behind Scenes to Try to Sway Rabbis Against Cuomo
Mayor Eric Adams may be running an unusually low-key race for re-election in New York City, opting out of the Democratic primary and mounting an independent general election run without even a campaign manager to steer it. But behind the scenes, he is making an aggressive play to try to shape the field to his liking and hold onto a key voting bloc. A top aide to Mr. Adams has been calling Orthodox Jewish leaders in recent weeks to urge them not to back Andrew M. Cuomo in the June 24 Democratic primary, or to temper their support for him if they do, according to six people familiar with the effort. Mr. Adams's allies have indicated they believe he would have a better chance of winning the general election if Zohran Mamdani, the democratic socialist assemblyman now polling in second place, defeats Mr. Cuomo and becomes the Democratic nominee. At the same time, Mr. Adams has used his mayoral powers to make policy pronouncements that seem designed to resonate with some Orthodox Jews. He signed an executive order recognizing the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance's definition of antisemitism and created the Mayor's Office to Combat Antisemitism to address the spike in antisemitic hate crimes in the city. 'He is going around to people to ask for support for the general election,' said Rabbi Moishe Indig, a leader of one faction of the Satmar Hasidic group in Williamsburg, Brooklyn. 'He would love that everyone just ignore the primary and wait until the fall.' Want all of The Times? Subscribe.