US foreign policy driven by resource competition – former South African envoy
Former South African ambassador to the United States Ebrahim Rasool, expelled from Washington in March after accusing Donald Trump of promoting white supremacy, has warned that a new global conflict is underway, not over oil, but over critical minerals.
Speaking at a Jumu'ah lecture at Masjidul Quds Institute in Cape Town recently, Rasool said: 'Let me give you an example, some statistics, the United States has identified 50 critical minerals for its immediate future if it is going to remain the leader and not cede leadership to China in the tech revolution.
'Of the 50, they are 100% dependent on other countries for 12 of those 50,' he continued.
'They are more than 50% dependent on 29 of those 50 minerals. And they are dependent on China for 13 of those. And China has captured 90% of the processing market for all of that.'
Rasool tied the US response to this dependency to what he described as a militarised, resource-driven foreign policy.
'It's not that Donald Trump is suddenly waking up and saying, I hate Chinese because of this, that, and the other. It is because the tech robber barons have told him - You've got to go to war.'
He pointed to South Africa's military involvement in the Democratic Republic of Congo as proof of its role in defending the continent's mineral wealth.
'South Africa showed when it lost 18 soldiers in the Eastern DRC, defending the critical minerals of the DRC, it showed its willingness to protect Africa, because Africa has 30% of the critical minerals of the world.'
'South Africa itself has 70% of the platinum critical minerals,' he added.
'No new car can be driven without platinum, because platinum is the core ingredient of catalytic converters.'
He said that the world is entering a dangerous new phase, a 'scramble for critical minerals' that is driving global tensions and US foreign policy.
'This is not the scramble for oil,' Rasool said. 'This is the scramble for critical minerals.'
He suggested that US interest in Arctic access, Greenland, and control of global trade routes was all part of this strategy.
'The whole issue of Canada - Canada has 30% of the world's critical minerals,' he said.
'It's not a joke about the 51st state. It's to beat them into submission.'
He also criticised US actions around global shipping routes.
'The Panama Canal, bombing the Houthis to make sure the Suez Canal always stays open so that it flows, the critical minerals flow through.'
Rasool claimed that the US wants to ensure the Panama Canal 'never gets into hostile hands because the critical minerals have to flow.'
'My respected brothers and sisters, if we want to understand this changing, ominous global landscape, then be amused by the apparent madness, but look for the method in the madness.'
Rasool was expelled from the US in March 2025 after accusing President Donald Trump of promoting white supremacy both at home and abroad, and drew attention to Vice President JD Vance's and Elon Musk's connections to far-right movements.
This led to US Secretary of State Marco Rubio declaring Rasool persona non grata, calling him a 'race-baiting politician who hates America.'
His diplomatic privileges were revoked, and he was given 72 hours to leave the country.
The incident further strained already tense US and South Africa relations, which had been deteriorating over disagreements around South Africa's land reform program and its genocide case against Israel at the International Court of Justice.
After arriving back in Cape Town, Western Cape, Rasool said he stood by his words.
'I have no regrets,' he said. 'This is a badge of dignity.'
Meanwhile, President Cyril Ramaphosa has appointed Mcebisi Jonas as South Africa's new Special Envoy to the United States, amid diplomatic tensions between the two countries.
Jonas, who 'is entrusted with the responsibility to advance South Africa's diplomatic, trade and bilateral priorities' is a former Deputy Finance Minister, a statement issued by the Presidency said.
His appointment comes as South Africa has been given a three-month breather to endeavour to negotiate better trade terms with the US than the initial 30% tariffs imposed by US Donald Trump as well as Ebrahim Rasool's expulsion last month.
'This appointment underscores his distinguished career and continued commitment to advancing South Africa's national and economic interests,' said the Presidency's statement.First published by IOL
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
2 hours ago
- Russia Today
Iran hails Russian rebuff of US bombing threat
Senior Iranian lawmaker Abolfazl Zohrevand has expressed gratitude to Russia for condemning American threats against the Islamic Republic over its nuclear program. Speaking exclusively to RT, he also suggested that Washington was attempting to lure Tehran into a 'propaganda trap.' The two countries began negotiations in Oman in April. US President Donald Trump has warned that if Iran does not 'make a deal, there will be bombing.' In an interview with RT on Friday, Zohrevand, who is a member of the Security and Foreign Policy Committee of the Iranian parliament, praised Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova for clearly articulating Moscow's opposition to the threats. The lawmaker also warned that Iran should be cautious not to fall into the 'trap' set by the US. 'The atmosphere that is being created by the Americans cannot be deemed credible,' Zohrevand stated, stressing that this was his personal opinion. Speaking during a press briefing on Wednesday, Zakharova described threats to target Iranian nuclear facilities as 'irresponsible,' emphasizing that such a strike would lead to 'catastrophic consequences' for the whole world. 'It should be obvious to everyone that the path toward the resolution of [issues] surrounding Iran's nuclear program is through diplomacy only,' she added. Following a phone conversation with Russian President Vladimir Putin that same day, President Trump wrote in a post on his Truth Social platform that 'President Putin suggested that he will participate in the discussions with Iran and that he could, perhaps, be helpful in getting this brought to a rapid conclusion.' Speaking to reporters on Thursday, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov confirmed that 'President Putin said that we are ready to use [our close relations with Tehran]… to help contribute positively to the ongoing talks.' On Monday, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi stated that his country was prepared to 'give assurances to all sides about the peaceful nature of our nuclear program.' Responding last month to Washington's demand that Tehran stop all uranium enrichment, the diplomat dismissed it as 'completely detached from the reality of negotiations.' Iran currently enriches uranium to 60% purity, far above the 3.67% cap set under the now-defunct 2015 nuclear deal. The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action was rendered null and void after President Trump unilaterally withdrew the US from it during his first term, claiming that it was toothless.
Russia Today
6 hours ago
- Russia Today
Trump-Musk Big Bro bust-up: Ignore the noise, focus on the signal
Two very rich and very powerful and very big American egos have had a very public and very loud cat fight. US President Donald Trump, arguably the single most powerful politician in the world, and his now former 'buddy-in-chief' Elon Musk, certifiably the single richest oligarch on (for now) this planet, have 'torched' (Wall Street Journal) their occasionally exuberant bromance of almost a year in a 'stunning' (Bloomberg) and 'spectacular' (New York Times) finale of fiery mutual recrimination. Say what you will about oligarchic techno-capitalism, but it can be entertaining. Using their own social media platforms, Musk and Trump have gone after each other with brutal reputational attacks, griping of the 'You owe me!' – 'No, you me!' variant, and high-value threats to do each other economic and political damage. The key trigger for the blow-up was what Trump calls his 'Big Beautiful Bill,' which is currently making its way through Congress. For, Musk – despite his lucrative government contracts a deficit hawk, whose own DOGE cost-cutting effort has just frustratingly failed – the same tax bill is a 'disgusting abomination.' Musk claims that he is greatly concerned over America's exploding and unsustainable national debt. Since Trump's Republican majority in the Senate is small, Musk's open support for the bill's vocal opponents there is a real political embarrassment for the White House at least, if not even a serious threat. US sovereign debt, moreover, is a real and very serious problem with dire economic and geopolitical implications; and estimates put the costs of Trump's bill at 3.3 trillion additional debt over the next ten years: Musk has a factual point. Yet there also is the fact that Trump's Big Beautiful Bill foresees cutting subsidies for buying Musk's Tesla cars (among other EVs), amounting to an estimated loss of $1.2 billion for Tesla. It can be complicated in that place between conservative ideology, pure and simple, and the unrelenting will to milk the public for yourself and your shareholders. Musk also 'revealed' – if that is the word – that Donald Trump features on the client list of the sinister financier, pedophile, mass sex criminal, and most likely intelligence-connected elite blackmailer Jeffrey Epstein, who conveniently committed suicide in a Manhattan jail in 2019. To make it count, Musk, as if returning to his former Centrist political self, suggested impeaching Trump and founding a new party to contest the great blusterer's grip on 'the 80% in the middle.' Liberal Tesla drivers: Maybe you can love your car again. Even if the share prices of its manufacturer are tanking. Trump shot back by warning Musk that his 'billions' in government contracts could melt away like the snows of yesteryear, which made Musk threaten to stop carrying US astronauts into orbit, that is, in effect – since the volatile oligarch is America's de facto monopolist – shut down space for the US. That, according to the Washington Post, constituted a 'serious threat to NASA and Pentagon programs.' Slow claps, Washington, for letting 'the Market' handle national security. All in all, quite a reality show: noisy, no holds barred, and pretty indecorous. A dignified display of manly self-control and mature gravity at the empire's top this was not. But, then again, it's the US late-imperial 'elite,' so the bar of the truly sensational is really high – or low, depending on how you look at it. The whole battle-not-so-royal may or may not blow over. Both Trump and Musk clearly have much to lose from a prolonged war against each other, financially and politically, and both are not only card-carrying egomaniacs but also ruthless, selfish pragmatists. There are already signals that Musk, for one, may want to wind down the confrontation again: he has relented regarding the astronauts and made some semi-conciliatory noises. Between the president's growing reputation for 'TACO' (Trump always chickens out) and Musk's proven ability to knuckle under when the price is right (in Brazil and toward Israel-while-committing-genocide, for instance), the two would-be alpha males might still find a way to share. Yet things will never be as before. For one thing, by losing their cool, Musk and Trump have ended up showing each other three things that neither of them will forget: Just how volatile they both are (I know: surprise, surprise…); that Elon is no sacrosanct exception for Donald and Donald isn't one for Elon either: everyone can always end up on the menu; and, finally, that both can think quickly – really as if they had been doing so for quite a while already – of the nastiest way to hurt the other. If Musk and Trump do make up, think of it as a movie star marriage sticking together after both spouses have badly, publicly cheated and also tried to ruin each other, financially, career-wise, and reputationally. And now let's take a step back. For, ultimately, the Big Bro Bust-Up is most interesting if we look at it as if we were historians a few hundred years from now in the future: What does this quarrel tell us more generally about America at this stage? First of all, it simply confirms what we all know already: The US is not a democracy by any stretch of the (reasonable) imagination but an oligarchy and plutocracy. Votes count much less than money because money produces the votes. Musk has been commendably explicit about his belief that it was his massive financial support that made Trump win; and one of Trump's worries in the whole rumble is that Musk might not only withdraw future funds from his camp – already promised but not yet paid out – but also invest them elsewhere. Second, as of now at least, the American oligarchy/plutocracy is not under pressure 'from below.' Objectively – to use a term long beloved by Marxists – Americans have every reason to rebel and shake off both Trump and Musk and then some. But, sadly, tension and conflict are generated inside the elite, not by 'the masses.' And third, the US elite is and remains absolutely, ruthlessly amoral and immoral, indeed quite evil: Here is a major falling out between the biggest oligarch and the president, and it's about taxes, the deficit, profits, ego, and personal advantages. Not about, for instance, the fact that the US has, according to Israel, by now delivered 90,000 tons of arms and ammunitions to the Israeli apartheid state while the latter has been committing the Gaza genocide. Indeed, Musk has never withdrawn his support for Israel, while Trump has reached the same level of complicit depravity as his predecessor Joe Biden. America: The world sees your priorities. And it won't forget.
Russia Today
8 hours ago
- Russia Today
Trump and Musk go from hugs to insults
US President Donald Trump and billionaire Elon Musk, who just months ago celebrated the Republican candidate's election victory together, have exchanged insults, accusations and threats. Their relationship has followed a familiar trajectory: over the years, many of Trump's associates have gone from working closely with him to a public falling out. This is how the tech entrepreneur threw his wealth and clout behind Trump's re-election campaign, took a proverbial chainsaw to perceived excesses in government spending, and later turned against the president and his signature spending bill. Musk first unequivocally endorsed Trump for a second term in July 2024, after a shooter almost killed the GOP contender during a campaign rally in Pennsylvania. In the months leading up to the election, he spent an estimated $200 million securing the candidate's victory through a political action committee he created for the purpose. But their relationship stretches back years. During Trump's first term in office, which began in January 2017, Musk sat on a White House business advisory group, but quit later that year after the administration decided to withdraw from the Paris climate accord. In 2022, Musk said it was time for Trump 'to hang up his hat & sail into the sunset' and blamed the Democrats for targeting him, arguing they had pushed him to seek office in order to insulate himself from legal problems. The remark reflected the tech entrepreneur's broader dissatisfaction with what he called 'the party of division & hate.' That same year, Musk purchased Twitter, a social media platform that at the time was the de facto public square for US national politics, whose management he accused of stifling conservative voices. The new owner reinstated Trump's account, which had been suspended in January 2021 for allegedly posing a risk of incitement of violence in the wake of the Capitol Hill riot, and otherwise changed moderation rules. Critics claim Musk saturated the platform with 'misinformation' and hate speech. Musk also blasted then-President Joe Biden's immigration policy, which he said amounted to keeping the southern border 'open' and decried failing to repatriate illegals as a ploy to increase the Democratic Party electoral base. Trump made the promise of mass deportation of such immigrants a key part of his campaign. In January 2025, Musk was appointed to lead the newly-created Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) in the Trump administration, with a mandate to review federal spending and cut exuberant or suspicious projects. Critics called Musk's approach reckless and damaging, while Trump declared DOGE a 'very big success' and an example of his administration's no-nonsense treatment of red tape. In February, Musk gladly brandished a chainsaw at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC), which had been given to him by Argentina's President Javier Milei, a similarly-minded politician, as a symbol of the efforts. Musk got embroiled in several controversies while working for the government. Claims that he threw a Nazi salute during an inauguration event were largely written off by the president's supporters as partisan attacks. Musk's criticisms of senior officials in countries which were traditional US allies, including UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Germany's now-former Chancellor Olaf Scholz, were downplayed by officials. Behind closed doors, however, he reportedly clashed with senior cabinet members. In March, the New York Times claimed that the DOGE chief had criticized US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy for not firing enough staff members in their departments. Trump dismissed the report as 'fake news.' Nevertheless, signs of the growing rift mounted. Days before his seemingly amicable departure from DOGE, Musk told CBS News he was 'disappointed' with the 'big, beautiful bill' – the centerpiece of Trump's second term agenda currently pending approval by the Senate. This week, Musk derided the spending proposal as a 'massive, outrageous, pork-filled … disgusting abomination.' The Trump-Musk 'bromance' seemingly imploded over several hours on Thursday, after the president accused the Tesla CEO of going after the legislation out of personal spite. 'He only developed the problem when he found out we're gonna have to cut the EV mandate,' Trump told journalists in the Oval Office. The billionaire pushed back on X, accusing Trump of lying about the bill and lacking gratitude for his backing on the campaign trail, which Musk asserted secured the victory. Trump doubled down on his Truth Social platform, declaring that Musk 'just went CRAZY' and threatening to withdraw government contracts from his businesses. In response, Musk accused Trump in an X post on Thursday of covering up his alleged complicity in the sex offences of late financier and convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, suggesting the president could be impeached for it. He also threatened to jeopardize NASA's manned space program by decommissioning the Dracon family of spacecraft operated by his company SpaceX. Musk has since indicated that he would be taking a couple of days to cool off, while White House insiders reportedly suggested a possible truce was being arranged. Some Democratic officials have suggested that Musk could switch sides, while others expressed a sense of satisfaction at his downfall. Congresswoman Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez claimed 'these two huge egos were not longed for being together in this world as friends,' and the breakup was long overdue.
