
Trump says he'll resolve North Korea conflict, cites good ties with Kim Jong-un
US President Donald Trump on Friday said he will "get the conflict solved with North Korea." At an Oval Office event where he highlighted his efforts to resolve global conflicts, Trump was asked whether he had written a letter to North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, as was reported this month.Trump did not directly answer the question, but said: "I've had a good relationship with Kim Jong Un and get along with him, really great. So we'll see what happens.advertisement"Somebody's saying there's a potential conflict, I think we'll work it out," Trump said. "If there is, it wouldn't involve us."
Seoul-based NK News, a website that monitors North Korea, reported this month that North Korea's delegation at the United Nations in New York had repeatedly refused to accept a letter from Trump to Kim.Trump and Kim held three summits during Trump's 2017-2021 first term and exchanged a number of letters that Trump called "beautiful," before the unprecedented diplomatic effort broke down over US demands that Kim give up his nuclear weapons.In his second term Trump has acknowledged that North Korea is a "nuclear power." The White House said on June 11 that Trump would welcome communications again with Kim, while not confirming that any letter was sent.North Korea has shown no interest in returning to talks since the breakdown of Trump's diplomacy in 2019.It has, instead, significantly expanded its nuclear weapons and ballistic missile programs, and developed close ties with Russia through direct support for Moscow's war in Ukraine, to which Pyongyang has provided both troops and weaponry.- EndsTune InMust Watch

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
19 minutes ago
- Time of India
In 24 hours: Trump's 'full barrier' trade pitch to India, pact with China, cold shoulder to Canada - What's next?
With the Iran–Israel war seemingly in his rear-view mirror, US President Donald Trump has swiftly reset his global focus—once again time zeroing in on trade, tariffs and new deals. In the past 24 hours, Trump has dramatically suspended trade talks with Canada over its digital services tax, vaguely confirmed a fresh agreement with China, and teased a 'very big' breakthrough soon with India. Central to this flurry of announcements is his revived strategy of issuing reciprocal tariffs—by letter—to nations wishing to access the US market. Trump's decision to halt negotiations with Canada came after Ottawa unveiled a 3 per cent levy on major US tech firms, which he denounced as 'a direct and blatant attack on our country.' He declared via social media that he would determine and impose appropriate tariffs within a week, citing the US's dominant position in the relationship. Meanwhile, officials in Washington emphasise that Canada holds more to lose, reinforcing Trump's image of maximum leverage. But Trump also struck a softer tone on India, calling a potential trade deal 'very big.' He hinted this could result in sweeping access for US businesses, dismantling barriers that have thus far kept them at bay: 'Right now, it's restricted. You can't walk in there… we agree that going to India and trade…' He added that the China deal was already underway, giving US firms a shot at rare earths and other vital commodities, though details remain under wraps. Trump tariff : What happened in the last 24 hours President Donald Trump's trade agenda took a dramatic turn over the past 24 hours, as he announced a series of sweeping moves on tariffs, suspended trade talks with Canada, signalled a breakthrough with China, and hinted at a 'very big' deal with India. The moves mark a sharp escalation in his second-term strategy to assert US dominance over global trade, even as allies and rivals alike push back. Trump halts Canada trade talks over digital tax Trump stunned officials on both sides of the border by immediately halting trade negotiations with Canada. 'Based on this egregious Tax, we are hereby terminating ALL discussions on Trade with Canada, effective immediately,' Trump posted on his social media network. 'We will let Canada know the Tariff that they will be paying to do business with the United States of America within the next seven day period.' Canada's new digital services tax, due to take effect Monday, imposes a 3% levy on tech giants like Amazon, Google, Meta and Airbnb — applying retroactively and totalling nearly \$2 billion in US company obligations. 'We have all the cards,' says Trump on Canada Speaking from the White House, Trump reinforced his hardline stance. 'They did something with our tech companies today trying to copy Europe. It's not going to work out well for Europe either. And it's not going to work out well for Canada. They were foolish to do it,' he said. When asked if Canada could reverse his decision, Trump responded, 'No… It doesn't matter to me. We have all the cards.' Tariff deadline looms on July 9 The broader context is Trump's push to impose reciprocal tariffs — some as high as 50% — on countries with whom the US runs a trade deficit. The 90-day negotiation window, set to expire on July 9, could usher in a new wave of tariffs. 'We have 200 countries, you could say 200 countries plus. You can't do that,' Trump said. 'So at a certain point over the next week and a half or so, or maybe before we're going to send out a letter.' Canadian PM Carney: 'It's a negotiation' Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney sought to downplay tensions, saying, 'We will continue to conduct these complex negotiations in the best interests of Canadians. It's a negotiation.' But Trump appears unmoved, accusing Canada of levying 'very, very severe' taxes on American companies, including tariffs of up to 400% on dairy products. Digital services tax: The flashpoint The Canadian tax mirrors EU regulations and specifically targets companies with significant online revenues generated from Canadian users. Trump blasted the policy as 'a direct and blatant attack on our country.' Matt Schruers, head of the Computer & Communications Industry Association, praised Trump's swift response: 'We appreciate the Administration's decisive response to Canada's discriminatory tax on US digital exports.' Tariff letters coming soon, says Trump At a White House press conference, Trump confirmed that the US is preparing to send letters to several countries within the next 10 days. 'We're just going to tell them what they have to pay to do business in the United States,' he said. 'We can do whatever we want. We could extend it. We could make it shorter. I'd like to just send letters out to everybody: Congratulations, you're paying 25 per cent.' Trump: 'India trade deal coming soon' Turning to India, Trump expressed optimism that a long-pending deal may soon materialise. 'India, I think we are going to reach a deal where we have the right to go and do trade,' Trump told reporters. 'Right now, it's restricted. You can't walk in there, you can't even think about it. We are looking to get a full trade barrier dropping, which is unthinkable and I am not sure that that is going to happen. But as of this moment, we agree that going to India and trade…' 'A very big one deal' with India In remarks during the 'Big Beautiful Bill' event, Trump said: 'We have one coming up, maybe with India. Very big one. Where we're going to open up India, in the China deal, we're starting to open up China.' Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick echoed that sentiment, saying: 'You should expect a deal between the United States and India in the not-too-distant future because I think we found a place that really works for both countries.' Commerce minister Piyush Goyal confirmed talks were ongoing, stressing that the goal was a 'fair, equitable and balanced agreement.' US-China pact confirmed, details sparse Trump also confirmed that a deal had been signed with China 'the other day,' though details remain limited. China's Commerce Ministry acknowledged the agreement, mentioning a review of rare earth exports, but offered no timeline. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said China had agreed to make it easier for American firms to acquire key minerals. 'What we're seeing here is a de-escalation under President Trump's leadership,' he told Fox Business. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now


Time of India
37 minutes ago
- Time of India
Can babies be stateless in the US? What the Supreme Court's ruling means for birthright citizenship
The Supreme Court has permitted President Trump's order on birthright citizenship to advance in 28 states. A 30-day delay is in place. Legal challenges are ongoing. States like California and New York are exempt for now. Class-action lawsuits are being pursued. Experts warn of potential statelessness for some children. Mixed-status families may face complications. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads What the Supreme Court's Decision Means for Birthright Citizenship Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads In a key decision, the Supreme Court has allowed President Donald Trump's executive order ending birthright citizenship for children of undocumented immigrants and temporary visa holders to proceed in 28 states. While the court did not rule on the constitutionality of the order, it struck down nationwide injunctions that had blocked its enforcement. A 30-day delay has been set before the order takes effect, giving legal challengers time to including California, New York, and Maryland—part of a group of 22 states that had sued the federal government—will not see immediate enforcement due to existing court blocks. Lawyers representing those states are now moving quickly to convert their cases into class-action lawsuits to preserve broader Yale-Loehr, immigration scholar at Cornell Law School, said as told to The New York Times:'The court decision today means that unless a court certifies a class action within the next 30 days, the Trump administration can start to implement its repeal of birthright citizenship.'With the 30-day window now active, immigration lawyers and civil rights groups are racing to block enforcement before it begins. The constitutional question of who qualifies as an American citizen remains unresolved and is likely headed for another round in the The court imposed a 30-day delay. The order may be implemented only in the 28 states that did not file legal challenges. In states that did, earlier court rulings remain in place, pending further have filed for class-action status, which would allow affected individuals across all states to be represented collectively. The Supreme Court left open this legal path. Federal judges will need to certify these classes quickly for them to have legal Mays, legal director at Democracy Defenders Fund, said to The New York Times:'The Constitution guarantees birthright citizenship, and no procedural ruling will stop us from fighting to uphold that promise.'Yes. In enforcement states, babies born to undocumented immigrants may not receive US citizenship. While many will inherit citizenship from their parents' home countries, some may not, depending on each country's nationality say deportation would depend on the parents' immigration status. Cristina Rodriguez, a professor at Yale Law School, told The New York Times:'What will matter is the status of the parents, in which case there is no bar for removing the babies along with parents.'Under the executive order, children born to individuals on temporary visas—such as H-1B workers or student visa holders—would not automatically receive citizenship. These children may inherit temporary status but would lack the rights tied to added:'They just won't get birth certificates.'Children born during enforcement might gain retroactive citizenship if courts eventually invalidate the order. However, this would require a formal process and could delay access to healthcare, education, and legal warned:'Practically, it could be a gigantic hassle, and there could be significant consequences.'If a family has children born before and after the order, citizenship status could differ among siblings. This may lead to complications in accessing benefits or remaining in the told The New York Times:'The practical problems of ending birthright citizenship are both huge and unpredictable.'


NDTV
42 minutes ago
- NDTV
Digital Services Tax: Trump's Latest Beef With Canada
New Delhi: US President Donald Trump is once again going after Canada. He has announced through Truth Social that he is "terminating all discussions on trade" with Canada with immediate effect. The reason for his tirade this time is the Digital Services Tax. The Digital Services Tax was enacted last year, but companies are expected to start paying the tax from June 30. And since it will directly impact the big tech companies and large e-commerce platforms headquartered in the US, President Trump is seeing red. What is the Digital Services Tax The Digital Services Tax requires foreign and domestic large businesses to pay revenue tax that is earned from engaging with online users in Canada. It applies a three per cent tax on revenue earned from some digital services that rely on engagement, data, and content contributions. So, the taxable revenue could be generated through online marketplace services, online advertising services, social media services, and sales of user data. The Digital Services Tax will apply to companies or groups with annual global revenues of €750 million or more and Canadian digital services revenue of more than CAD 20 million. Significantly, the tax is retroactive to January 1, 2022, and companies will start paying the tax on June 30, 2025. Canada's rationale vs US pushback The overarching premise of the Digital Services Tax is that if big companies, that are based abroad, are earning significant revenue from Canadian users, then Canada should be able to tax a portion of that income. The revenue that Canada would make from the Digital Services Tax is expected to be around $875 million per year, said a note from the US Trade Representative last year. Over five years, the Digital Services Tax will increase federal government revenues by CAD 7.2 billion, per the Canadian Parliamentary Budget Office. The Computer and Communications Industry Association (CCIA) in the US claims that companies will end up paying up to $3 billion in taxes to Canada. It is also predicting 3,000 US job losses. What has been US' response in the past The US Trade Representative (USTR) had previously investigated Digital Services Tax in other countries and said that it had found them discriminatory toward US companies. The US had announced plans for retaliatory tariffs against the countries with Digital Services Tax and had said it would use the same yardstick for Canada. In August 2024, USTR Katherine Tai announced that the United States had requested dispute settlement consultations with Canada under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA or CUSMA) regarding Canada's Digital Services Tax. The USTR had alleged that Canada's tax appeared to be inconsistent with its commitments under the Cross-Border Trade in services and investment chapters of the USMCA, not to treat US businesses less favourably than Canadian businesses. The US said that it had raised the concern with Canada in three official comments about its plan to enact a Digital Services Tax in June 2021, February 2022, and in September 2023. The US Chambers of Commerce has called the Digital Services Tax "discriminatory" and said that it is in contravention of prevailing international tax principles. It adds that doing so would not only discriminate against US companies but also directly contravene Canada's obligations under both the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) and the World Trade Organisation. Hence, President Trump's reaction to the Digital Services Tax as the date of payment closes in is hardly a surprise. Why is Canada not flinching yet on Digital Services Tax Earlier this month, Canadian Finance Minister Francois-Philippe Champagne had said the Digital Services Tax was passed by Parliament, and the government would hence go ahead with the tax. The reason why Canada went ahead and implemented its own Digital Services Tax was that the global effort to establish a broader, multinational digital taxation plan had been woefully delayed. Some argue that the Digital Services Tax is a unilateral measure that would undermine the stability of the agreed multilateral framework. However, with the Trump administration imposing unilateral tariffs - from aluminum and steel to automobiles and energy, against Canada - this argument is unlikely to move Canada. At a time when Canada feels betrayed by its largest trading partner, the United States, and is already reeling under the onslaught of the punishing Trump tariffs, it is beginning to assert its economic leverage. And the Digital Services Tax could perhaps serve as a negotiating tool in the process.