logo
In 24 hours: Trump's 'full barrier' trade pitch to India, pact with China, cold shoulder to Canada - What's next?

In 24 hours: Trump's 'full barrier' trade pitch to India, pact with China, cold shoulder to Canada - What's next?

Time of India5 hours ago

With the Iran–Israel war seemingly in his rear-view mirror, US President Donald Trump has swiftly reset his global focus—once again time zeroing in on trade, tariffs and new deals.
In the past 24 hours, Trump has dramatically suspended trade talks with Canada over its digital services tax, vaguely confirmed a fresh agreement with China, and teased a 'very big' breakthrough soon with India. Central to this flurry of announcements is his revived strategy of issuing reciprocal tariffs—by letter—to nations wishing to access the US market.
Trump's decision to halt negotiations with Canada came after Ottawa unveiled a 3 per cent levy on major US tech firms, which he denounced as 'a direct and blatant attack on our country.'
He declared via social media that he would determine and impose appropriate tariffs within a week, citing the US's dominant position in the relationship. Meanwhile, officials in Washington emphasise that Canada holds more to lose, reinforcing Trump's image of maximum leverage.
But Trump also struck a softer tone on India, calling a potential trade deal 'very big.' He hinted this could result in sweeping access for US businesses, dismantling barriers that have thus far kept them at bay: 'Right now, it's restricted.
You can't walk in there… we agree that going to India and trade…' He added that the China deal was already underway, giving US firms a shot at rare earths and other vital commodities, though details remain under wraps.
Trump
tariff
: What happened in the last 24 hours
President Donald Trump's trade agenda took a dramatic turn over the past 24 hours, as he announced a series of sweeping moves on tariffs, suspended trade talks with Canada, signalled a breakthrough with China, and hinted at a 'very big' deal with India.
The moves mark a sharp escalation in his second-term strategy to assert US dominance over global trade, even as allies and rivals alike push back.
Trump halts Canada trade talks over digital tax
Trump stunned officials on both sides of the border by immediately halting trade negotiations with Canada.
'Based on this egregious Tax, we are hereby terminating ALL discussions on Trade with Canada, effective immediately,' Trump posted on his social media network. 'We will let Canada know the Tariff that they will be paying to do business with the United States of America within the next seven day period.'
Canada's new digital services tax, due to take effect Monday, imposes a 3% levy on tech giants like Amazon, Google, Meta and Airbnb — applying retroactively and totalling nearly \$2 billion in US company obligations.
'We have all the cards,' says Trump on Canada
Speaking from the White House, Trump reinforced his hardline stance. 'They did something with our tech companies today trying to copy Europe. It's not going to work out well for Europe either. And it's not going to work out well for Canada.
They were foolish to do it,' he said.
When asked if Canada could reverse his decision, Trump responded, 'No… It doesn't matter to me. We have all the cards.'
Tariff deadline looms on July 9
The broader context is Trump's push to impose reciprocal tariffs — some as high as 50% — on countries with whom the US runs a trade deficit. The 90-day negotiation window, set to expire on July 9, could usher in a new wave of tariffs.
'We have 200 countries, you could say 200 countries plus.
You can't do that,' Trump said. 'So at a certain point over the next week and a half or so, or maybe before we're going to send out a letter.'
Canadian PM Carney: 'It's a negotiation'
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney sought to downplay tensions, saying, 'We will continue to conduct these complex negotiations in the best interests of Canadians. It's a negotiation.'
But Trump appears unmoved, accusing Canada of levying 'very, very severe' taxes on American companies, including tariffs of up to 400% on dairy products.
Digital services tax: The flashpoint
The Canadian tax mirrors EU regulations and specifically targets companies with significant online revenues generated from Canadian users. Trump blasted the policy as 'a direct and blatant attack on our country.'
Matt Schruers, head of the Computer & Communications Industry Association, praised Trump's swift response: 'We appreciate the Administration's decisive response to Canada's discriminatory tax on US digital exports.'
Tariff letters coming soon, says Trump
At a White House press conference, Trump confirmed that the US is preparing to send letters to several countries within the next 10 days.
'We're just going to tell them what they have to pay to do business in the United States,' he said. 'We can do whatever we want. We could extend it. We could make it shorter. I'd like to just send letters out to everybody: Congratulations, you're paying 25 per cent.'
Trump: 'India trade deal coming soon'
Turning to India, Trump expressed optimism that a long-pending deal may soon materialise.
'India, I think we are going to reach a deal where we have the right to go and do trade,' Trump told reporters. 'Right now, it's restricted. You can't walk in there, you can't even think about it. We are looking to get a full trade barrier dropping, which is unthinkable and I am not sure that that is going to happen. But as of this moment, we agree that going to India and trade…'
'A very big one deal' with India
In remarks during the 'Big Beautiful Bill' event, Trump said: 'We have one coming up, maybe with India.
Very big one. Where we're going to open up India, in the China deal, we're starting to open up China.'
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick echoed that sentiment, saying: 'You should expect a deal between the United States and India in the not-too-distant future because I think we found a place that really works for both countries.'
Commerce minister Piyush Goyal confirmed talks were ongoing, stressing that the goal was a 'fair, equitable and balanced agreement.'
US-China pact confirmed, details sparse
Trump also confirmed that a deal had been signed with China 'the other day,' though details remain limited. China's Commerce Ministry acknowledged the agreement, mentioning a review of rare earth exports, but offered no timeline.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said China had agreed to make it easier for American firms to acquire key minerals. 'What we're seeing here is a de-escalation under President Trump's leadership,' he told Fox Business.
Stay informed with the latest
business
news, updates on
bank holidays
and
public holidays
.
AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Singapore International Arbitration Centre rules in favour of Amazon in Future Group case
Singapore International Arbitration Centre rules in favour of Amazon in Future Group case

Economic Times

time16 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

Singapore International Arbitration Centre rules in favour of Amazon in Future Group case

Amazon claim trimmed Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel The Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) has ruled in favour of Amazon in its long-standing legal battle with Kishore Biyani-led Future Group , holding that Reliance Retail- Future merger deal breached its pre-existing contract. However, Amazon has managed to get minuscule damages of Rs 23.7 crore against claimed amount of Rs 1436 a final award issued late Thursday night, the three-member tribunal said the 2020 board resolution by Future Retail Ltd (FRL) approving the sale of its retail, wholesale, and logistics assets to Reliance was in breach of contractual obligations under the Shareholders' Agreement (SHA) and Share Subscription Agreement (SSA) signed between Amazon and Future Coupons Pvt Ltd (FCPL).While Amazon had sought damages of Rs 1,436 crore, the tribunal awarded a significantly smaller sum of Rs 23.7 crore. It directed 11 promoters and parties, including Kishore Biyani , to jointly and severally pay the amount, along with interest at 10.3% annually (compounded) from March 9, 2022, until full payment. The parties are also liable to bear Amazon's arbitration and litigation tribunal noted that 835 of FRL's 1,534 retail stores were transferred in a manner that breached Amazon's contractual rights stemming from its 2019 acquisition of 49% in FCPL for Rs 1,400 crore. FCPL held a 10% stake in Tribunal held that Amazon was entitled to damages due to the promoters' repudiatory breaches of the Future Coupons Pvt Ltd (FCPL) Shareholders' Agreement (SHA), but it rejected the quantum of Rs 1,436 crore claimed by the had based its claim on "reliance loss," arguing that it should be compensated for the full value of its 2019 investment in FCPL including Rs 1,430 crore paid under the Share Subscription Agreement and Rs 5 crore in associated the Tribunal found that even if all contractual agreements had been fully performed, Amazon would not have recovered its entire investment due to the declining financial condition of Future Retail Ltd (FRL) the ultimate beneficiary of Amazon's stake in the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and FRL's deteriorating business value, the Tribunal observed that awarding full damages would unfairly shield Amazon from a commercial loss it was likely to incur regardless.'Such an award would essentially allow Amazon to escape a bad bargain,' the final award the Tribunal awarded Amazon total legal and related costs of Rs 77.3 crore and SGD 68, Amazon-Future legal dispute began in October 2020, when SIAC's emergency arbitrator restrained Future Retail from proceeding with the Reliance deal. The Future Group had challenged the arbitration, citing the Competition Commission of India's 2022 suspension of the Amazon-FCPL deal.

Harvard & Toronto Universities join hands to host international students amid Trump's visa blockade
Harvard & Toronto Universities join hands to host international students amid Trump's visa blockade

First Post

time27 minutes ago

  • First Post

Harvard & Toronto Universities join hands to host international students amid Trump's visa blockade

Harvard University and the University of Toronto came out with a plan that would see some of the Harvard students complete their studies in Canada if visa restrictions prevent them from entering the United States read more A Harvard sign is seen at the Harvard University campus in Boston, Massachusetts, on May 27. Image used for representation. (Source: AFP) Harvard University and the University of Toronto are collaborating to host international students who are facing visa restrictions imposed by US President Donald Trump. Both institutions came out with a plan that would see some of the Harvard students complete their studies in Canada if visa restrictions prevent them from entering the United States. The pact between the two institutions reflects how schools are willing to collaborate to ensure that students are not affected by the tumultuous policies introduced by the current Trump administration. The deal was struck between the Harvard John F Kennedy School of Government and the University of Toronto's Munk School of Global Affairs and Public Policy. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In a letter to the students, Jeremy Weinstein, the Harvard Kennedy School Dean, noted that the plans were meant to ease concerns. He maintained that a formal program would only be unveiled if there is 'sufficient demand' from students who are unable to come to the United States. 'We are deeply grateful for the support of the Munk School and other partners, who are helping to ensure that we can continue to provide all HKS students with the excellent education they deserve,' he said in his letter. Harvard's struggle with the Trump administration The American university is locked in an acrimonious legal battle with the Trump administration after it claims the Department of Homeland Security improperly revoked its ability to enrol international students. It is pertinent to note that nearly a quarter of Harvard's students come from outside the US, and their students are a key source of funding for the school. So far, Harvard has won two preliminary injunctions against the DHS, probably clearing a path for international students to obtain entry visas. 'These are exceptional times,' Janice Stein, the founding director of the Munk School of Global Affairs and Public Policy, said in a statement. 'If Harvard Kennedy School international students are not able to complete their studies in Cambridge, Mass., the Munk School of Global Affairs and Public Policy looks forward to providing shared academic and co-curricular experiences for students from both our schools.' In addition to the HKS at Munk School program, institutes are also announcing HKS Global, which will have both an online and in-person component. The University of Toronto made it clear that Harvard students attending their college will still have to apply for Canadian study permits and will be enrolled as full-time, non-degree students at the Munk School. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The program is only open to students who have already completed a year of study in the United States. Interestingly, Canada has put its cap on international students and curtailed the number of visas it will allow. The University of Toronto said the plan with Harvard 'would not reduce the number of spaces available for U of T students in any academic programs or university housing'.

US Senate rejects bid to curb Trump's Iran war powers
US Senate rejects bid to curb Trump's Iran war powers

Indian Express

time35 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

US Senate rejects bid to curb Trump's Iran war powers

The Republican-led US Senate rejected a Democratic-led bid on Friday to block President Donald Trump from using further military force against Iran, hours after the president said he would consider more bombing. The Senate vote was 53 to 47 against a war powers resolution that would have required congressional approval for more hostilities against Iran. The vote was along party lines, except Pennsylvania Democrat John Fetterman voted no, with Republicans, and Kentucky Republican Rand Paul voted yes, with Democrats. Senator Tim Kaine, chief sponsor of the resolution, has tried for years to wrest back Congress' authority to declare war from both Republican and Democratic presidents. Kaine said his latest effort underscored that the US Constitution gives Congress, not the president, the sole power to declare war and requires that any hostility with Iran be explicitly authorized by a declaration of war or specific authorization for the use of military force. 'If you think the president should have to come to Congress, whether you are for or against a war in Iran, you'll support Senate Joint Resolution 59, you'll support the Constitution that has stood the test of time,' Kaine said in a speech before the vote. Lawmakers have been pushing for more information about weekend U.S. strikes on Iran, and the fate of Iran's stockpiles of highly enriched uranium. Earlier on Friday, Trump sharply criticized Iran's Supreme Leader, Ali Khamenei, dropped plans to lift sanctions on Iran, and said he would consider bombing Iran again if Tehran is enriching uranium to worrisome levels. He was reacting to Khamenei's first remarks after a 12-day conflict with Israel that ended when the United States launched bombing raids against Iranian nuclear sites. Members of Trump's national security team held classified briefings on the strikes for the Senate and House of Representatives on Thursday and Friday. Many Democratic lawmakers left the briefings saying they had not been convinced that Iran's nuclear facilities had been 'obliterated,' as Trump announced shortly after the raid. Opponents of the resolution said the strike on Iran was a single, limited operation within Trump's rights as commander-in-chief, not the start of sustained hostilities. Senator Bill Hagerty, a Tennessee Republican who served as ambassador to Japan during Trump's first term, said the measure could prevent any president from acting quickly against a country that has been a long-term adversary. 'We must not shackle our president in the middle of a crisis when lives are on the line,' Hagerty said before the vote. Trump has rejected any suggestion that damage to Iran's nuclear program was not as profound as he has said. Iran says its nuclear research is for civilian energy production. Under US law, Senate war powers resolutions are privileged, meaning that the chamber had to promptly consider and vote on the measure, which Kaine introduced this month. But to be enacted, the resolution would have had to pass the Senate as well as the House of Representatives, where Speaker Mike Johnson, a close Trump ally, said this week he did not think it was the right time for such an effort. During Trump's first term, in 2020, Kaine introduced a similar resolution to rein in the Republican president's ability to wage war against Iran. That measure passed both the Senate and House of Representatives, with some Republican support, but did not garner enough votes to survive the president's veto.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store