Gun found in new Madeleine McCann search ‘has not been ruled out as a game-changer' amid race against time to charge prime suspect Christian Bruekner
The gun retrieved from a well drained by firefighters last week during fresh Madeleine McCann searches on the Algarve has not been ruled out as a game changer by investigators.
Further details emerged hours after German prosecutors described the co-operation with Portuguese police as 'excellent and very constructive' as authorities in both countries continue to try to build up a case against suspect Christian Brueckner ahead of his scheduled release from prison in September.
The type of gun discovered during the three-day search operation last week near Brueckner's former ramshackle cottage home close to the Algarve resort where Madeleine vanished on May 3 2007, has not yet been revealed, but well-placed sources said today it was a 6.35 calibre.
Typically these types of guns are small, pocket-sized, semi-automatic pistols used for self-defence or target shooting, but can be airguns.
Portuguese daily Correio da Manha reported yesterday it was unlikely to be a 'lethal weapon' although tests are understood to be ongoing.
It has not yet been ruled out as a potential game-changer in the 'race against time' to charge Brueckner over Madeleine's disappearance before he finishes the seven-year prison sentence he is currently serving for the 2005 rape of an American woman.
Another gun said to have been found during last week's searches has been ruled out.
It is believed to be more than 50 years old and has been described by Portuguese sources as a 'rusting relic.'
The same well-placed sources confirmed yesterday forensic analysis of fragments of bones and adult clothing also unearthed last week would take place at a specialist police lab in Lisbon and not in Germany as initially reported.
No samples of any kind have been sent back to Germany despite reports to the contrary, the insiders said.
German forensic officers have been offered the opportunity of being present at the tests, although it was unclear today if they had accepted the invite.
They were shown some of the bones that were unearthed, thought to be animal bones, in a video-conferencing session but were 'unable to come to any real conclusions about exactly what they were'.
German prosecutors said yesterday in their only official statement so far since wells, ruins and water tanks across a 120-acre area in Atalaia between the Algarve towns of Praia and Luz and Lagos were inspected: 'The search operation conducted in Portugal last week has been completed as planned.
'No information can be provided at this time regarding the results of the investigation.
'Our sincere thanks go to all police officers involved in the search.
'The co-operation between the Portuguese police and the Federal Criminal Police Office was excellent and very constructive.
'We don't want to say anymore at the moment.'
Luis Neves, the National Director of the Policia Judiciaria police force which in Portugal has been the lead police force in the hunt for Madeleine and whose officers worked along German counterparts at last week's search, insisted last Friday it had 'not been in vain' despite the apparent lack of results.
He said: 'Nothing is in vain, not least because doors are being closed'.
At the last Madeleine McCann search in Portugal just over two years ago, when the Arade Dam a 40-minute drive from Praia da Luz was combed, German police who requested the operation did take back home with them samples believed to be mainly soil samples.
The remote dam was described at the time as Brueckner's 'little paradise.'
The May 2023 dam searches were the first major searches in Portugal for Madeleine McCann in nine years following an earlier June 2014 operation when British police were given permission to do digs in Praia da Luz that involved sniffer dogs trained in detecting bodies and ground-penetrating radar.
Those Scotland Yard digs were linked to the leading UK police theory at the time Madeleine died during a break-in while her parents were eating tapas nearby with friends, and burglars dumped her body.
They also failed to produce any evidence pointing to the missing youngster's whereabouts.
In a smaller operation in July 2020 Portuguese police and firefighters searched three wells for Madeleine's body but failed to find any trace of her.
Last Friday Correio da Manha claimed German prosecutors had refused to probe a couple suspected of running over Madeleine McCann in a drink-drive accident.
Portuguese authorities demanded an investigation into a British man and his German wife after his UK-based sister tipped off cops in 2018 she thought he could be covering up a dark secret about Maddie's disappearance, the newspaper reported.
But it said German authorities rejected a Portuguese request to use an undercover police officer with a fake identity to try to befriend the female suspect and firm up their suspicions she was driving a car that hit Madeleine while under the influence of alcohol.
There has so far been no official response from German, Portuguese or UK police to the claims.
Convicted 48-year-old paedophile Brueckner denies any involvement in Madeleine's disappearance.
His earliest possible prison release date is September 17 - though his lawyer said he would have to pay £1,300 in outstanding fines from a series of motor offences to leave then.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Defendants should be allowed to ask for jury-free trials to reduce court backlogs, top judge says
Defendants should be allowed to ask for a jury-free trial to reduce court backlogs, a top judge has said. Sir Brian Leveson, who is heading up a review set up by the government, is to propose a 'once in a generation' reform to tackle record court backlogs that would see the UK follow the likes of Canada, Australia and New Zealand. He is to make the recommendation to tackle delays in the legal system, which has a current backlog of 75,000 cases, forcing victims to wait four to five years for justice in many cases. Sir Brian told a conference: 'I can see the advantage in lots of cases. You will get a reasoned judgment [from a judge]. In front of a jury, you don't get a judgment at all, you get guilty or not guilty. 'The case will be undeniably speedier because the judge doesn't have to explain to the jury all the basic premises of the criminal law.' Other reforms could include sparing the public from sitting as jurors in any case scheduled to last more than 12 months due to the disruption to their lives and careers, the Telegraph reports. This could also apply to factually or legally complex cases, where jurors may struggle to understand the full details. The right to a jury trial could also be restricted for lower level offences including assaulting a police officer while resisting arrest, dangerous driving and possession of drugs. Instead, these crimes could be tried by a court comprising of a judge and two magistrates or by extending magistrates' powers to sentence offenders to up to two years in prison, double their current limit. This would mean more cases could be dealt with at a magistrates' court, freeing up more space in the crown courts for more serious offences. Speaking at the conference, Sir Brian warned that the backlog of cases could reach 100,000 if no radical action is taken. He added he believes judges should have the right to overrule a defendant's request for a judge only trial if it is in the public interest. 'There are some cases, which I would not consider appropriate for a judge to try alone, and I would give the judge a discretion,' Sir Brian said. 'So a defendant may say, 'I would like to be tried by a judge alone', and the judge would be perfectly entitled to say, 'I think not'.' Sir Brian is due to deliver his report next week to Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood, with publication expected next month.
Telegraph
3 hours ago
- Telegraph
Defendants should have right to choose judge-only trial, says Leveson
Defendants are to get the right to ask for a judge-only trial without a jury. Under plans for 'once-in-a-generation' reform to reduce court backlogs, an independent review set up by the Government will recommend ministers should follow the example of Canada, Australia and New Zealand and allow defendants in the crown court to opt for a judge-only trial. Sir Brian Leveson, the senior judge heading the review, will recommend the move as a way to speed up trials to tackle the record backlog of more than 75,000 cases which is forcing some victims to wait up to four or five years for justice. He told a conference on modernising justice: 'I can see the advantage in lots of cases. You will get a reasoned judgment [from a judge]. In front of a jury, you don't get a judgment at all, you get guilty or not guilty. 'The case will be undeniably speedier because the judge doesn't have to explain to the jury all the basic premises of the criminal law.' Sir Brian is also expected to recommend that the public should be spared jury service if a case is going to last more than 12 months because of the 'unfairness' of it taking a year out of their lives and livelihoods. Instead, such cases would be heard by a judge without a jury. Other proposals will further scale back people's right to a jury trial for some lower level offences such as assault of a police officer while resisting arrest, racially aggravated criminal damage, dangerous driving and possessing a class B drug like cannabis. These are likely to be tried either by an intermediate court comprising a judge and two magistrates or by extending the powers of magistrates to try cases carrying sentences of up to two years, rather than only those with maximum jail terms of one year, as at present. Sir Brian was appointed by Shabana Mahmood, the Justice Secretary, who said that 'once-in-a-generation reform' of the courts was the only way to tackle justice delays for victims. Internal Ministry of Justice forecasts suggested the backlogs could rise to 100,000 without radical action. Sir Brian said there was a 'real risk that the system will collapse' as defendants take advantage of cases being delayed as long as 2029 and 'threw the dice' in the hope their victims or witnesses disengaged and prosecutions were abandoned. He also said it would be up to the Government to decide which types of cases it felt were appropriate for defendants to have the right to spurn a jury but he said the judges would have the discretion to overrule any request if it was in the public interest to do so. 'There are some cases, which I would not consider appropriate for a judge to try alone, and I would give the judge a discretion,' Sir Brian said. 'So a defendant may say, 'I would like to be tried by a judge alone', and the judge would be perfectly entitled to say, 'I think not'.' Public opprobrium He suggested one type of case judge-only trials could be where there was significant 'public opprobrium' over the case such as sexual or sadistic violence and could sway the jury. 'I can see defendants, perhaps charged with cases that attract public opprobrium being concerned about a jury coming in from their daily lives to face that trial,' he said. 'Equally, I can see if it's that much public opprobrium, why a judge may say, 'I'm not sure about that.' So there is a balance to be done, but judges make judicial decisions all the time.' He said it could also apply to factually or legally extremely complex cases where a jury may struggle to fully understand the case. A third type could where there had been alleged confession or identification, where judges tended to be more rigorous in scrutinising its validity than necessarily a jury. Sir Brian said there had been a limited number of cases where judges had heard cases alone such as where a jury had to be discharged due to evidence of jury tampering. He is expected to deliver his report to Ms Mahmood next week with publication expected in early July. It follows a similar review of sentencing by David Gauke, the former Tory justice secretary, which recommended freeing some prisoners as little as a third of the way through sentence to tackle prison overcrowding.
The Guardian
4 hours ago
- The Guardian
Man dies two weeks after arrest in Adelaide as police investigate incident as death in custody
A 42-year-old man has died in an Adelaide hospital in what is being treated as a death in police custody. Guarav Kundi was arrested in the Adelaide suburb of Royston Park in the early hours of 29 May, according to South Australian police. Police said he died on Friday at Royal Adelaide hospital, two weeks after the incident. In a statement, SA police said Kundi's death would be investigated as a death in police custody. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email The major crime investigation branch will investigate the cause and circumstances of his death and prepare a report for the coroner, while the office of public integrity has independent oversight of the investigation into the conduct of police officers involved in the incident. A commissioner's inquiry into the incident was announced on 3 June, the statement said. The senior investigating officer conducting the inquiry has reviewed body worn vision. 'It has been confirmed that at no time was a knee applied to Mr Kundi's neck. His head was not forced into the car or roadway at any point,' the statement said. 'However, the use of restraints during this incident will be closely examined during the Commissioner's Inquiry.' SA police have briefed the Indian consulate on the incident and investigation and will continue to update the consulate on developments. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion The foreign minister, Penny Wong, was asked whether the incident would damage India-Australia relations at a press conference on Friday. 'I would say to the Indian community here in Australia and the broader Indian community, this is an investigation that will be done properly,' Wong said. 'Be assured of our friendship certainly with India, but also the importance of the Indian diaspora here in Australia.' Anne Aly, the minister for multicultural affairs, said 'trust between people of migrant background and the institutions that govern them, including the police' is 'something that contributes to social cohesion'.
