Australia echoes global demand for Russia to pay for MH17
Australia has joined the UN's aviation watchdog in demanding Russia negotiate reparations for the downing of MH17.
More than a decade has passed since the Malaysia Airlines flight was shot down over eastern Ukraine, killing all 298 people on-board.
Despite extensive official and journalist-led investigations putting the blame firmly on the Russian government, the Kremlin has not paid a cent in compensation, including to the families of the 38 Australians killed.
Foreign Minister Penny Wong said overnight that 'Australia stands ready to engage'.
Foreign Minister Penny Wong says Australia 'stands ready' to negotiate with Russia on reparations for MH17. Picture: NewsWire / Martin Ollman / NewsWire
'The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) Council has ordered Russia to negotiate with Australia and the Netherlands on full reparations for the downing of Flight MH17,' she posted on social media.
'We welcome this decision, and Australia stands ready to engage.
'We call on Russia to comply and make reparations for this horrific act.
'We remain unwavering in our commitment to truth, justice and accountability for the 298 victims – including 38 who called Australia home – and their families and loved ones.'
Earlier this year, ICAO declared Russia breached international law by using weapons against civil aircraft in flight.
Australia and the Netherlands, which led the international investigation, launched the case with ICAO in 2022.
Investigators have found MH17 was shot down using a Russian-made missile.
It was fired from a launcher transported from Russia to eastern Ukraine and operated by pro-Russian separatists.
All 298 people on-board flight MH17 were killed. Picture: Dominique Faget / AFP
A Dutch court has convicted in absentia two Russians and a pro-Moscow Ukrainian separatist of murder. Picture: Australian Federal Police
In 2022, a Dutch court convicted in absentia two Russians and a pro-Moscow Ukrainian separatist of murder in 2022.
One of the men, Igor Girkin, was the head of Russia's proxies in the mostly occupied Ukrainian region of Donetsk.
He has since fallen out with Vladimir Putin and been arrested and sentenced to four years in prison for inciting extremism.
Originally published as Australia echoes global demand for Russia to pay for MH17 flight downing
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
24 minutes ago
- ABC News
What's the child safety protocol in Victoria's childcare centres, and who regulates it?
A string of sexual abuse allegations against a childcare worker in Melbourne have brought regulation of the early childhood sector back into the national conversation. Advocates for children's rights and prevention of abuse say oversight of the system is flawed, and that robust federal intervention is needed to ensure the safety of society's youngest while in care. The Victorian government has announced it will fast-track reforms into the childcare sector and has commissioned an urgent review to be turned around in about six weeks. Nationally, the system for regulating early childhood education and care falls to an independent statutory authority, but there is neither a ministry nor a regulator dedicated to it. Here's what we know about the regulatory framework as it currently stands. Victoria's early childhood sector is regulated under a combination of Commonwealth and state-specific laws, as well as the Child Safe Standards (CSS) the state adopted in 2016 to protect children in care from harm and abuse. There are a total of 11 standards which organisations are legally required to comply with through independent policies and procedures. They include child safety and wellbeing and suitable staff and volunteers. Victoria has the highest number of child safety standards in Australia, and is the only state other than NSW to have established legislation following the introduction of the 10 National Principles of Child Safe Organisations federally in 2019. The child safety and wellbeing standard focuses on incorporating risk management at the leadership level, requiring service providers to: The standard applies to long day care, family day care, kindergartens, Outside School Hours Care (OSHC), school holiday programs, limited and occasional care, and early childhood intervention services. As for the suitable staff and volunteers standard, providers are required to clearly relay their child safety requirements in job advertisements, include specific selection criteria aligned with the industry's legal framework, and undertake appropriate vetting of candidates — not limited to the Working with Children Check (WWCC), which is already mandatory for most roles. Joshua Dale Brown, the Melbourne childcare worker charged with 70 child sex crime offences this week, had a valid WWCC. Post recruitment, all staff, volunteers and contractors are required to undergo a child safety induction, receive ongoing training tailored to their roles, and be upskilled in how to look out for colleague behaviours that compromise child safety. Victorian providers are also required to nominate child safety champions at their respective services. The manner of compliance with each of the standards is laid out under state government advice for early childhood services online. An ABC investigation in March uncovered that tens of thousands of Australian children attend childcare centres that fail national standards, with one in 10 facilities never rated by regulators. An analysis of national data by ABC's Four Corners the same month revealed a troubling surge in serious incidents at childcare centres — more than 26,000 cases in 2024, a 27 per cent jump in three years. Legally speaking, yes. Across the country, early childhood services have strict obligations relating to the active supervision of children at all times, including when sleeping, in the presence of visitors, and during transportation or excursions. The Australian Children's Education and Care Quality Authority (ACECQA) also sets out the minimum educator-to-child ratios under the National Quality Framework (NQF). They do not stipulate that more than one caregiver needs to be around a child or group of children at any given time. From birth to 36 months the educator-to-child ratio in Victoria is 1:4, from 36 months up to preschool age (5 years) it is 1:11, and over preschool age it is 1:15. That means a single childcare worker is legally permitted to provide care to four, 11, or 15 children at once, based on their age, without another co-worker needing to be physically present. ACECQA's ratios are calculated across an entire early childhood service, not individual rooms. The ratios vary by state and territory. You can view your the ACECQA table here. Early childhood services in Victoria are governed under the National Quality Framework (federal), the Victorian Children's Services regulatory scheme (state), and the Child Safe Standards. The state's overall regulatory authority for the sector is the Department of Education. Under it also falls the Quality Assessment and Regulation Division (QARD), a sub-regulator created specifically to oversee compliance to the CSS in Victoria. Nationally, the agency tasked with helping improve the quality of early childhood services is the ACECQA, which has responsibilities like setting out guidelines and helping state and territories implement the National Quality Framework. However, it is not the national regulator, and doesn't have powers to sanction other regulatory authorities or individual childcare centres. There is also no federal cabinet ministry dedicated exclusively to children or early childhood services, with the responsibility falling to the Minister for Education, presently Jason Clare. The government has long faced criticism that regulation of the childcare system lacks coherence nationally, despite strong checks and balances being in place on state and territory levels. "We have quite robust oversight measures in Victoria. What we don't see nationally is the connectedness of those systems," Mina Singh, Victoria's acting principal commissioner for children and young people, told ABC News Breakfast. "And so [thinking about] how people are able to move around the country and able to work in different spaces, but also just that very idea of child safety front and centre everywhere you put your child … at the commission we see abuse happen in all sorts of centres wherever children and young people are." The Parenthood, an advocacy group for parents and carers, says over the past decade Australia's early education sector has grown faster than the regulatory and oversight mechanisms have been able to. An overwhelming number of families and advocacy groups have called for stronger curbs in early childcare settings relating to staff misconduct with children, particularly the screening of workers both prior to and during their employment. The adequacy of Working With Children Checks — currently administered under eight separate state and territory systems — have received fresh scrutiny, with criticism of the ease in obtaining them and the lack of revocations for workers who show warning signs. The Australian Childhood Foundation (ACF) on Tuesday urged governments across the country to swiftly embed mandatory child abuse prevention education into the scheme, an issue it has lobbied on for years. The Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse in 2015 made a raft of recommendations aimed at making early childcare services safer for children including through standardising and nationalising the WWCC system. National Children's Commissioner Anne Hollonds said a national focus on the childcare sector and targeted policy-setting was urgently needed. "This will happen again and again, until we fix the regulatory foundations of this industry," she told the ABC. "Child safety and wellbeing isn't a priority in this country. When you look at the National Cabinet … what's on that list, you'll find things like women and women's safety, as it should be. "But when you look at that list, you won't see the word children anywhere and I really think that highlights a lack of accountability for action for evidence-based recommendations. "The childcare sector is a shared responsibility across the federation, so National Cabinet should have its eyes on child safety and wellbeing … it could be done with the stroke of a pen." Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan on Wednesday announced the state would create a register of childcare workers for extra scrutiny, as well as ban personal devices from childcare centres from September.
ABC News
38 minutes ago
- ABC News
Here's what the Qantas cyber attack may mean for your data and what to do to protect yourself
Cybersecurity experts are warning Qantas customers to remain vigilant to scams and hacking attempts in coming days, after as many as 6 million Australians were caught up in a data breach. Qantas has revealed it came under attack by cybercriminals on Monday and is continuing to investigate exactly how many customer records were stolen, of the millions on the platform that was breached. Here's what we know about the data accessed, how it could be used by cybercriminals and what you can do to protect yourself in the wake of the incident. Qantas says a cybercriminal targeted a call centre and then gained access to a third-party customer servicing platform. The airline has outlined the data stolen: it includes some customers' names, email addresses, phone numbers, birth dates and frequent flyer numbers. "Importantly, credit card details, personal financial information and passport details are not held in this system," the airline's statement reads. Qantas said the system that was accessed contains the records of 6 million customers. It said it would contact all of those who were potentially affected. On Wednesday, a message was sent to Qantas Frequent Flyer members, noting: "For those customers whose information has been potentially compromised, you will receive further communication from us shortly." So, essentially, watch this space if you are a Qantas customer. Tony Jarvis, the chief information security officer at cybersecurity firm Darktrace, told The Business that personal data had different values when sold on the dark web, depending on the nature of the data. As of Wednesday evening, Mr Jarvis couldn't detect any data from the Qantas breach for sale on the dark web but said he would continue to monitor the situation. He advises Qantas customers to stay across updates from the airline in case further details of the type of data compromised are released. Qantas has established customer support lines and says it will also maintain a dedicated page on its website to keep customers updated. The biggest risk for people now is that their data is used to attempt fraud, target scams or, in the worst-case scenario, steal their identity. Personal details can be used to add weight to impersonation scams — for example, pretending to be a company or agency someone has an account with. He therefore warns Qantas customers to be vigilant about handing over extra details, like credit card information or bank details, to people claiming to be from government agencies or companies. "Then it becomes a financial loss," he added. Cybercrime specialist Richard Buckland agrees that further scam attempts remain one of the biggest concerns from the Qantas breach. The data could also be used to try and hack into accounts on other services. If you use the same email address across many online profiles, stolen information such as your date of birth, address or phone number could be used to try and gain access to other accounts and even financial records. "The information that's been stolen is used by lots of companies to identify them," Professor Buckland, from UNSW, said. In previous cybersecurity incidents involving major Australian companies including Medibank and Optus, there were also concerns that people's personal information could be sold on the dark web to carry out further identity theft. In Medibank's case, the data hacked was so sensitive in nature — with personal healthcare records accessed — that it also led to grave concerns for people's individual wellbeing and ransom demands against Medibank. Both Professor Buckland and Professor De Silva note that such sensitive information hasn't been reported as accessed in the Qantas hack. If you're a member of the Qantas loyalty program, you might be wondering if your points are at risk. Qantas has listed frequent flyer numbers as among the data compromised, but says "no frequent flyer accounts were compromised". However, Professor Buckland warns those accounts could be targeted in subsequent hacking attempts, given membership numbers are among the data breached. "It's quite possible this could be used to log into the frequent flyer system by claiming you've lost a password and trying to do some sort of password reset," he said. Airline loyalty commentator Adele Eliseo notes that loyalty balances are extremely valuable, describing them as a financial asset. "Frequent flyer numbers are more than membership references. They are the gateway to accessing points with tangible financial value, and when linked with personal information, they expose account holders to significant vulnerability," she said. She encourages people to log in to their accounts often in coming weeks and months and check for any unusual activity, and consider two-factor authentication. The consensus among the cyber experts we spoke to? An oldie but a goodie — change your passwords. "Then just watching it closely. Presumably, if someone does go in and steal those points or it uses them for things, Qantas is able to reimburse that, so I think it's just a matter of noticing that that's happened." Professor De Silva says people should think about resetting passwords and make them as secure as possible, including by using password generation software that encrypts codes. "This is something we should be doing regularly," he said. Darktrace's Mr Jarvis warns people to avoid clicking on links in emails purporting to be from Qantas, as companies that have experienced cyber attacks are often impersonated in their wake. Professor De Silva also says there is a risk that people's credit card details have been stored along with their frequent flyer accounts, and that this information could now be accessed too. In this instance, he thinks people should take the "extreme measure" to cancel their credit card, "to be on the safe side".
The Australian
38 minutes ago
- The Australian
Editorial. Yoorrook justice report will fail for same reason as Voice to parliament
It will fail for the reason the voice to parliament was rejected by the Australian people at the 2023 referendum. A decisive majority demonstrated no appetite for denying, as the national anthem puts it, that 'we are one and free'. As prime minister Kevin Rudd put it in the 2008 apology to the Stolen Generations, 'profound grief, suffering and loss (were inflicted) on these our fellow Australians'. There is also a sleight of hand in the report, making the case that the memory of the destruction of cultures weighs so hard on Indigenous Australians now that a parallel government is needed to lift their burden. The commission presents 100 recommendations, many focused on symbolism that will do nothing to reduce Indigenous imprisonment or improve health and housing, employment and education. Despite this, Rueben Berg, co-chairman of the First Peoples' Assembly of Victoria, said on Tuesday: 'When it comes to issues facing First Peoples, we need a different approach, one that draws on the expertise of First Peoples to design and deliver practical solutions to local challenges. That's what treaty is all about.' It is also exactly what the Coalition of Peaks is doing without a political assembly. The 80 or so grassroots community organisations that make up the Peaks work on the federal government's Closing the Gap program and are 'accountable to our communities, not governments … we know how to best advance our lives'. Ideologues who cannot accept the voice result may not like it, but the Peaks approach is politically practical while the Yoorrook commission's call for 'the transition to genuine nation-to-nation relationships' is not. As for those of its recommendations that call for specific improvements to the lives of Indigenous Australians, they are all matters for government now. Indigenous Australians in Victoria working to build careers and set their children up for long and happy lives are entitled to all the assistance government provides. They have a right to see their cultures respected and their histories acknowledged. And Premier Jacinta Allan knows it, responding with a back-covering 'we share the Yoorrook Justice Commission's goals of truth and justice and will carefully consider the commission's final findings and recommendations'. The history of settler society is far more nuanced than appears in the commission report; British governments were not indifferent to the rights of Indigenous Australians. It is incontestable that the arrival of 19th-century settlers was a calamity for millennia-old Australian economies and cultures. But the Yoorrook Justice Commission's recommendations must be judged on how enacting them would improve the circumstances of disadvantaged Indigenous Australians now and in the future. Awareness, indeed anger, among Indigenous Australians today at what occurred in the past should be recognised – it was the point of Mr Rudd's apology, which is still recognised in Sorry Day. But history cannot be undone; guilt is not hereditary. 'Let the dead Past bury its dead,' as poet Henry Wadsworth Longfellow put it.
