logo
A potential new treatment for Parkinson's shows early promise

A potential new treatment for Parkinson's shows early promise

USA Todaya day ago

A potential new treatment for Parkinson's shows early promise | The Excerpt
On a special episode (first released on May 29, 2025) of The Excerpt podcast: Parkinson's is a disease that afflicts an estimated 90,000 Americans every year. Dr. Lorenz Studer and Dr. Viviane Tabar of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, joined USA TODAY The Excerpt to share more about a new stem cell-based therapy that creates nerve cells. The treatment is showing early promise.
Hit play on the player below to hear the podcast and follow along with the transcript beneath it. This transcript was automatically generated, and then edited for clarity in its current form. There may be some differences between the audio and the text.
Podcasts: True crime, in-depth interviews and more USA TODAY podcasts right here
Karen Weintraub:
Hello, and welcome to The Excerpt. I'm USA TODAY Health Reporter Karen Weintraub. Today is Thursday, May 29th, and this is a special episode of The Excerpt.
You've no doubt heard of the chemical dopamine. It's often referenced as part of the brain's reward system when we do something pleasurable. Dopamine, or a lack thereof, also plays a critical role in the onset of Parkinson's, a disease that afflicts an estimated 90,000 Americans every year.
Treatment for Parkinson's focuses on managing its many symptoms, as there is no cure. But a new stem cell therapy developed at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center for advanced Parkinson's is showing early promise.
What's behind this incredible discovery and just how hopeful should patients be? Here to talk about this exciting new treatment and its impact on patients are the two physicians who helped make it a reality. Dr. Viviane Tabar and Dr. Lorenz Studer. Drs. Tabar and Studer, thanks so much for joining The Excerpt.
Dr. Tabar, when someone is diagnosed with Parkinson's disease, what exactly is happening to their brain and their body?
Dr. Viviane Tabar:
Well, we think that at the time an individual is diagnosed with Parkinson's disease, they have already experienced degeneration or loss of a large number of their dopamine neurons. We are all born with a limited number of large, beautiful dopamine neurons that live in our brainstem and that project to multiple areas in the brain.
They're involved in a lot of intricate activities, but an important element of their function is to modulate movement. So the individual very commonly will come to clinical attention because of movement difficulties, albeit there are other symptoms, loss of smell, gastrointestinal symptoms, difficulties with sleep, and it's a complex picture.
But it's important to remember that at the time they receive this diagnosis, which today is still vastly made on a clinical basis, on an examination of the individual and listening to their symptoms, they have already lost probably 50% or more of their dopamine neurons and their projections.
A potential new treatment for Parkinson's shows early promise
A new stem cell-based therapy creates cells that make dopamine, a chemical that's critical to the disease.
Karen Weintraub:
And what are some of the everyday challenges your patients face? You mentioned motor control, cognitive issues also I think?
Dr. Viviane Tabar:
For the majority of patients, and keep in mind that Parkinson's is a disease that spans a variety of symptoms and spectrum of progression and intensity, for most patients it starts with manageable symptoms that they control well, could be a tremor, could be some stiffness in their gait. And for the majority, I would say cognitive change comes late, assuming a proper diagnosis of Parkinson's.
So it becomes paradoxically even more problematic because it starts interfering with activities of daily living, your ability to get to and from your job. You're still high-performing, but you are impaired gradually. And you're fully cognitively there often, and so you're very aware of the slow degeneration that's essentially relentless.
Karen Weintraub:
And you mentioned jobs. Are people affected by Parkinson's primarily older, retiree age, or are there other groups at risk as well?
Dr. Viviane Tabar:
We didn't say necessarily retirees. Parkinson's, the sporadic form of it, which is the most common form, I mean by that the form that's not inherited, that happens commonly in the sixties or later. But nowadays, people in their fifties and sixties are considered at their prime still at work.
Karen Weintraub:
And others who are affected, we think of Michael J. Fox who is certainly younger when he started developing symptoms.
Dr. Viviane Tabar:
There are forms of Parkinson's that occur in a younger individual at a younger average age, and that is commonly related to specific mutations. And so the majority of Parkinson's disease occurs what we call sporadically, so without a hereditary or identified specific mutation that we are aware of. But some is related to a mutation, and those tend to occur at a younger age, but that's not the majority.
Karen Weintraub:
And is it clear what causes Parkinson's? You mentioned the neurons, but is there still some mystery there, and can the causes vary from person to person?
Dr. Viviane Tabar:
There is a lot of mystery. So in simple terms, we do not know the etiology of Parkinson's disease very specifically. Many things have been invoked, the environment, environmental toxins, a genetic predisposition outside of the genetic forms of the disease.
And we can talk a lot about some exciting science trying to dissect what's going on, the role of inflammation, et cetera. But the short answer to your question is we're not able today to tell a patient what caused their Parkinson's, again, outside the relatively uncommon hereditary forms.
Karen Weintraub:
And can you walk us a little bit through how Parkinson's progresses over time? Is there a sort of a path, many paths, what does that look like?
Dr. Viviane Tabar:
So yes, there are many paths, but let's take an average situation. The patient would reach out to a physician, eventually come to the attention of a neurologist, they're examined, their brain scan is obtained. In the case of Parkinson's, often that scan is fine and normal to age and the symptoms are identified often, as we said earlier, motor symptoms.
The common situation is that they get started on a form of dopamine that can reach the brain, and that makes them feel better and that is often referred to as the honeymoon period. And that goes on for a few years where the patient is almost back to normal but dependent on the medicine.
And as time goes by, the disease process is such that they are losing more and more of their dopamine neurons. And at some point we start or the treating neurologist starts escalating the dose of the medication. And there are other medications that can support that. But essentially within a few years or several years depending, they reach a point where they're starting to experience side effects from the medication and a shortening of the periods where they are feeling okay and functioning.
And that is where we start getting stuck in that there are no new medications that, I shouldn't say no new medications, there's always new medications, no formulations that try to extend the ability to help the individual. But you clearly plateau in terms of the effectiveness of pharmacological therapy for a lot of patients, not all.
There are options that are surgical like inserting electrodes that is called deep brain stimulation, which will work for some patients. But we reach a point where the patient has lost most of their dopaminergic neurons and there is not much more that can be offered today to help the individual. Hence, the idea of what if we could replace those degenerated dopamine neurons?
Karen Weintraub:
Which brings us to Dr. Studer. Dr. Studer, when did you first think about using stem cells as a possible way to treat Parkinson's?
Dr. Lorenz Studer:
Well, it's really a very long story. In fact, it's I think nearly three decades when we first had the idea of doing so, which was the question, "Now, can we really replace cells in the brain and what will be the right source?" In fact, that was the goal of my laboratory starting 25 years ago, finding exactly what's the source of dopamine neurons.
The challenge is how do you make this very, very specific nerve cell in the brain? And so that was a long journey, took us at least 10 years of basic research to understand, now what is the code of development? It's a little bit like trying to go through the steps that the cells go in normal development, but give them those signals one by one in a culture dish. And so it's a little bit like a code that we need to decipher and then to apply to the cells.
And by 2011, we could do that finally in a study that showed that we did a good job because when we implant those cells back into a mouse, in a rat or in a monkey model of Parkinson's disease, we see benefit in that model. And that really then opened up the whole next new step, now can we do that not just in a animal model, but maybe eventually in humans? That was what they call the proof of concept. But then obviously it was not a long journey to get to the ultimate clinical patient.
Karen Weintraub:
And how might the stem cell therapies transform the treatment landscape? What opportunities does this offer? And are there specific symptoms that you expect to get better or everything or certain symptoms?
Dr. Lorenz Studer:
The dopamine acts primarily on the movement-related symptoms. That's the area where we think we can make the biggest impact. Whether it's also going to affect all the symptoms, it's more questionable. Now, for example, again, we said the patients can have loss of smell, they can have problems with severe constipation, and at later stage of the disease, cognitive issues.
And at this point we don't have a good reason to believe that this therapy will also help with those symptoms. This has to be tested. It could be indirect effects, but the main effect we expect is that the movement disorder should improve.
Again, we don't want to overstate it, but in a dream scenario, it would be you have still Parkinson's disease, so you cannot cure Parkinson's disease, but maybe if it worked, ideally you could cure the movement disorder component of Parkinson's disease.
And so I think that's really what we are trying to develop with this type of cell therapy. And maybe in the future this will open up the same approach for all the cell types that might affect all the symptoms as well. So it's also kind of opening up the door to many other cell therapies in Parkinson's itself and maybe in other diseases as well, because it's one of the first cases now where really you actually replacing nerve cells in the brain, which sounds like a little bit of a science fiction approach. But I think this is one of the first examples where we really tried to attempt that and hopefully opening the door now for applications in the future.
Karen Weintraub:
And you said we can't call this a cure, obviously it's early days, but what would it take to get to a cure? More cell types?
Dr. Lorenz Studer:
Yeah. I think, because again, Parkinson's has more than just a movement disorder. So all that's not just movement-related, there is late stages cognitive problems, gastrointestinal problems, sleep problems, and those are unlikely to be treated with this cell type.
So what you can envisage is yes, well, maybe you would have additional cell types that can attack that, or ideally, you brought that up now, what causes Parkinson's disease, it'll be a complementary approach where you would give the cells back, because many dopamine cells are already lost by the time you're diagnosed.
So you get that movement-related symptoms hopefully restored, but at the same time, you'll find, like the whole field, many thousands researchers try to do that, find a therapy that can slow down or stop the progression. So you would gain back the function that you've already lost, but you would maybe not get some of those later symptoms. That would be even bigger dream in the future.
Karen Weintraub:
I was going to ask, Dr. Studer, where the research goes from here?
Dr. Lorenz Studer:
We always talk about bench to bedside, but there's also a bedside to bench. So where you kind of try to figure out, so what could you do even better now with regard to the cells that they function maybe more quickly or they are more potent or they have some additional features like we discussed? How could it treat some of the other symptoms in the future? So I think that's a big area for Parkinson's disease itself. How can we get the most benefit out of this kind of an approach?
But then the other part is really there's so many other very severe diseases now. We talk about Alzheimer's disease, we talk about ELS and other disorders. Each of them might need a different approach, quite different. So in some case we don't think we can just replace nerve cells, but we still learn that maybe other approaches could be used in those specific disorders.
And it then gives us a lot of encouragement when we see some progress in one area that this might be not just kind of a one-time go, but we might have opportunities to now give some help to those very difficult to treat neurodegenerative disorders where even today, this has been kind of some of the value of this for many of the drugs.
Now, very, very few new drugs came up in the context of neurodegenerative disorders, and I don't think cell therapy is alone going to solve all of that, but it's yet the new tool that is becoming actually clinically a realistic option to replace cells, and I think that's quite exciting.
There's some examples, for example, for treating eye disorders, so-called people who get blindness, macular degeneration, where data look quite promising. There's some examples maybe in very severe seizures where [inaudible 00:12:35] could be useful. So I think this is one of the very, very first example now where we now go all the way to this phase three study, but in the lab now we are thinking, "What did we learn? Why did it take us 25 years, for example? How can you make it quicker and what would be some of the next targets?"
Because from the stem cell side, we learned a lot. So by now we can pretty much make any cell type of the brain. So that's a language to make this as no longer limiting. What's limiting is now to know what's really needed in each individual patient, which is going to be quite distinct and will take, again, a couple of years, but pretty confident not another 25-year step.
Karen Weintraub:
Well, we will stay tuned for that very exciting work. Thank you both so much for being on The Excerpt.
Dr. Lorenz Studer:
Thanks so much.
Dr. Viviane Tabar:
Thank you for having us.
Karen Weintraub:
Thanks to our senior producers, Shannon Rae Green and Kaely Monahan, for their production assistance. Our executive producer is Laura Beatty.
Let us know what you think of this episode by sending a note to podcasts@usatoday.com. Thanks for listening. I'm USA TODAY Health Reporter Karen Weintraub. Taylor Wilson will be back tomorrow morning with another episode of The Excerpt.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Deep cuts erode the foundations of US public health system, end progress, threaten worse to come
Deep cuts erode the foundations of US public health system, end progress, threaten worse to come

Boston Globe

timean hour ago

  • Boston Globe

Deep cuts erode the foundations of US public health system, end progress, threaten worse to come

Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up But local health officials say they now have no choice but to do a lot less of it. The Trump administration is cutting health spending on an unprecedented scale, experts say, including pulling $11 billion of direct federal support because the pandemic is over and eliminating 20,000 jobs at national health agencies that in part assist and support local public health work. It's proposing billions more be slashed. Advertisement Together, public health leaders said, the cuts are reducing the entire system to a shadow of what it once was, threatening to undermine even routine work at a time when the nation faces Advertisement The moves reflect a shift that Americans may not fully realize, away from the very idea of public health: doing the work that no individual can do alone to safeguard the population as a whole. That's one of the most critical responsibilities of government, notes James Williams, county executive in Santa Clara County, California. And it goes beyond having police and fire departments. 'It means not having babies suffering from diseases that you vanquished. It means making sure that people have access to the most accurate and up-to-date information and decisions that help their longevity,' Williams said. 'It means having a society and communities able to actually prosper, with people living healthy and full lives.' A student received a vaccination inside a mobile health unit visiting Independence High School in Charlotte, N.C., on March 19. Matt Kelley/Associated Press Keeping communities healthy saves lives — and money Just outside a Charlotte, North Carolina, high school in March, nurse Kim Cristino set out five vaccines as a 17-year-old girl in ripped jeans stepped onto a health department van. The patient barely flinched as Cristino gave her three shots in one arm and two in the other to prevent diseases including measles, diphtheria and polio. Like many other teens that morning, the girl was getting some shots years later than recommended. The clinic's appearance at Independence High School gave her a convenient way to get up to date. 'It lessens the barriers for parents who would have to be taking off from work and trying to get their kids to a provider,' Cristino said. The vaccinations also help the community around her. The teen won't come down with a life-threatening disease and the whole community is protected from outbreaks — if enough people are vaccinated. Advertisement The Mecklenburg County department, with 'Protecting and Promoting the Public's Health' emblazoned on its van, is similar to other U.S. health departments. They run programs to reduce suicides and drug overdoses, improve prenatal health and help people stop smoking. They educate people about health and test for and treat diseases such as HIV and tuberculosis. Some, including Mecklenburg, operate medical and dental clinics too. 'You come to work every day and think: What's going to be my challenge today? Sometimes it's a new disease,' said Raynard Washington, Mecklenburg's director. 'That's why having a backbone infrastructure is so important.' What they do is cost-effective, experts have found. For every Disease prevention is unseen — and ignored Critical care can be glamorous — surgeons, cardiologists and cancer doctors can pull off breathtaking medical feats to save lives at the last possible moment. Prevention work is low key. It's impossible to identify who was saved because, if it goes well, the person never knows when they've fended off a mortal threat with the invisible shield of public health. 'People don't appreciate it,' said Dr. Umair Shah, former health director for Washington state. 'Therefore, they don't invest in it.' State health departments are funded by a varying mix of federal and state tax money. Some states deliver services in a centralized way while others provide resources to local departments, which generally also get money from counties, cities or towns. Some large cities get direct federal funding for their health departments. Mecklenburg — a large department with around 1,000 workers serving 1.2 million people — has an annual budget of around $135 million, while some metro hospitals have operating expenses in the billions. About 70% of the department's budget comes from local funds, which helps fill gaps in state and federal money. But Mecklenburg is still strapped for cash and resources. Advertisement At times, employees work 12- to 14-hour days, especially during outbreaks. Nurse Carmel Jenkins recalled responding to mpox exposures at a day care center — arriving before 5:30 a.m. to alert the children's parents and working late into the evening. 'Even though there may be limited resources, we still have a service to provide,' said Jenkins, a director of clinical services for the department. 'We don't mind going above and beyond to be able to do that.' Chaos in Washington puts 'lives at risk' In March, the Trump administration pulled $11 billion from state and local health departments without warning under the leadership of Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a longtime anti-vaccine activist and public health critic. The cuts abruptly ended COVID-era grants, which had also been approved for non-COVID work including vaccination and disease detection, tracking and testing. A week later, thousands of people were laid off at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Many had worked closely with state and local health departments to provide information, grants and other support. The sudden, one-two punch delivered a serious blow to the system, public health leaders said in interviews, court filings and public testimony. Related : A Kennedy spokesman said in an email that America remains unhealthy compared with other developed nations and HHS is reorganizing what he said were 'broken systems' and reprioritizing resources to 'centralize programs and functions that will improve our service to the American people.' Advertisement 'These cuts are not about abandoning public health — they're about reforming it,' spokesman Andrew Nixon said, adding: 'We reject the implication that HHS has turned its back on urgent health threats.' HHS justified the grant cancellations by saying the money was for COVID and the pandemic is over. But most of the cuts were in areas that are especially important given today's health threats. The biggest chunk, more than $8.9 billion, involved epidemiology and laboratory capacity related to infectious diseases, while another $2 billion was related to immunizations. In some places, the cuts are on hold due to a federal judge's order in a lawsuit by states. But elsewhere, cuts are continuing. In Mecklenburg, for example, 11 community health workers lost their jobs, meaning less outreach to groups like the Hispanic community. All eight employees dedicated to the mobile vaccine program were laid off. In Columbus, Ohio — one of several communities in Republican-led states suing over the cuts — the health department had to lay off nine disease intervention specialists. This left it operating at 25% capacity in its disease tracing and investigation work just as it prepared to address a measles outbreak. Kansas City, Missouri, will not be able to do its own testing for infectious diseases because the cut came just as the city was about to buy $500,000 worth of equipment. And Nashville had to end a program offering free flu and COVID tests and cancel plans to buy a van to deliver vaccinations. The cities complained the cuts had created 'severe budget uncertainty' and forced them to redirect their limited resources 'to respond to the resulting chaos.' CDC staff cuts are also having a ripple effect on state and local departments. Children who are deaf or hard of hearing will no longer benefit from an early intervention program run by states after everyone who worked on the program at CDC was laid off. The team in the Office on Smoking and Health, which funds state tobacco hotlines that help people quit, was let go. Advertisement So was the CDC team that worked to reduce drownings, partly through funding low-cost swimming lessons in local communities. Drownings kill 4,000 people a year in the U.S. 'The experts who know the things that can be done to help prevent the No. 1 cause of death from children ages 1 to 4 have been eliminated,' Connecticut state health commissioner Dr. Manisha Juthani told a Democratic congressional hearing in April, referring to drownings. She said the abrupt and disorganized nature of the cuts leaves her department scrambling as officials try to understand what is being cut and to close important programs on the federal government's impractical timelines. 'The current uncertainty puts lives at risk,' she said. Public health funding is going bust — and about to get worse The new cuts are especially damaging because health departments are funded differently than other government agencies meant to protect the public: Funding pours in during emergencies and slows to a relative trickle when they subside. Mecklenburg's Washington notes the contrast with fire departments, which are kept ready at all times, not scrambling to find firefighters and fire trucks when houses are already burning. With health departments, 'there's a long-established pattern of boom-and-bust funding,' said Dr. Steven Stack, Kentucky's public health commissioner and past president of the Association of State and Territorial Health Officials. Related : A temporary surge of money during the pandemic allowed some health departments to expand and strengthen programs. In Alabama, the influx of COVID money allowed the state to reopen a health department in largely rural Coosa County that closed a decade ago due to a lack of money. In California's Santa Clara County, a COVID-era lab grant paved the way for a new science branch with nearly 50 positions. But by early this year, most of that money had disappeared, along with other COVID-era grants across the nation — 'We're facing funding cliff after funding cliff after funding cliff,' said Dr. Sara Cody, Santa Clara County's health director. 'What really worries me is I felt that we had finally built the infrastructure in the public health department. ... We were still pretty trim, but we weren't just, like, bones.' In Chicago, one-time COVID grants made up 51% of the health department budget, and their ending will push staff numbers below the pre-pandemic level of 588 — slowing responses to outbreaks and forcing officials to scale back food safety, violence prevention and other programs. In Mecklenburg, the department lost 180 employees as COVID funds dried up. It also lost a wastewater monitoring partnership with the University of North Carolina at Charlotte that helped the county react quickly to changing COVID variants and could have also been used to detect The cuts are not over. The Trump administration has proposed cutting billions more from CDC's budget, enough to cut the agency's spending in half. CDC sends about 80 percent of its budget to states and local communities. Michael Eby, director of clinical services in Mecklenburg, said the relentless cuts to the system leave departments unable to respond to new pandemics and old diseases returning across the United States. 'Without the appropriate funding, we can't properly address these threats,' he said. 'We're at risk of them getting out of control and really causing a lot of damage and death to individuals that we could have saved, that we could have protected.' Ungar reported from Charlotte and Louisville, Kentucky, and Smith reported from Providence, Rhode Island. Associated Press reporters Mary Conlon in Washington and Kenya Hunter in Atlanta contributed to this report.

Trump pulls nomination for NASA administrator
Trump pulls nomination for NASA administrator

The Hill

time2 hours ago

  • The Hill

Trump pulls nomination for NASA administrator

The White House on Saturday said it will pull the nomination of tech entrepreneur Jared Isaacman as NASA administrator. 'It's essential that the next leader of NASA is in complete alignment with President Trump's America First agenda and a replacement will be announced directly by President Trump soon,' a White House spokesperson told The Hill. The Senate was slated to vote on his nomination in the coming days. Isaacman worked alongside tech billionaire Elon Musk at SpaceX to fund the company's first private spacewalk, and he was one of four astronauts aboard the Polaris Dawn flight this fall. He is also the founder and CEO of Shift4, a payment processing company. President Trump announced Isaacman as his pick to lead the space administration in December, describing him as 'ideally suited to lead NASA into a bold new Era.' Isaacman testified before the Senate in April as a part of the confirmation process. He advanced out of committee in a 19-9 vote. Senate Majority Leader John Thune filed for cloture to vote on Isaacman's nomination on May 22. It is not immediately clear why the president pulled his nomination on Saturday. The move was first reported by Semafor. In early April, Isaacman contradicted Musk about space travel priorities. The commercial astronaut told senators he would focus on returning people to the moon, rather than Mars, which has been a priority of Musk's for some time. 'I'd like nothing more than to see … Americans walking on the moon,' he said during the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation hearing. This is the latest of a number of nominations Trump has pulled since returning to the White House. He pulled his original nominee for surgeon general earlier this month. Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.), who was nominated to serve as U.N. ambassador, was withdrawn from consideration in April amid tight margins in the GOP-controlled House. Trump eventually tapped Mike Waltz to be the country's U.N. ambassador after taking him out of the national security advisor role, now filled by Secretary of State Marco Rubio. At least one Republican lawmaker has already opposed pulling Isaacman's nomination. 'Astronaut and successful businessman @RookIsaacman was a strong choice by President Trump to lead NASA. I was proud to introduce Jared at his hearing and strongly oppose efforts to derail his nomination,' first-term Sen. Tim Sheehy (R-Mont.) wrote in a Saturday post on social media platform X. Earlier on Saturday, far-right influencer Laura Loomer had reported that 'deep state operatives' were attempting to prevent Isaacman from serving at the helm of NASA.

Still vexed — an overview of anxiety and depression
Still vexed — an overview of anxiety and depression

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Still vexed — an overview of anxiety and depression

In 2018, the Deseret News published a series called Generation Vexed, exploring and detailing the then-growing scope of teenage anxiety in the United States. It was already well on the rise even before the pandemic, the land wars that broke out in the Middle East and Europe, and the political schism of the 2020 election. Approximately 1 million teenagers struggled with anxiety, and experts at the time estimated that nearly 1 in 4 had some form of an anxiety disorder, with that ratio going up to nearly 1 in 3 when just girls were considered. Census data from 2015 'estimated more than 17 million (children) had already experienced a diagnosable mental disorder,' the Deseret News reported. That number was 'the equivalent of the entire populations of Utah, Idaho, Arizona and Colorado' combined. That was just teenagers, and just the disorder of anxiety — and that was seven years ago. Anxiety is still rising. From 2018 through the first two years of the pandemic in 2022, anxiety rates for all Americans went up by over 16%, and depression rates by over 15%. In 2023, the American Psychiatric Association said that more than a third of all adults felt more anxious than they did the year before. Then, when it did the same study last year, the number of adults reporting that they felt more anxiety jumped to 43%. For perhaps a brief moment, 2023's number seemed small by comparison. Today, the National Institute of Mental Health reports that some 40 million Americans have anxiety disorders — nearly one-fifth of the total U.S. population — and more than 14 million suffer from depression. That is another mental health disorder that has steadily been rising, with 29% of all Americans experiencing depression, according to Gallup, up from 19% eight years earlier. Now, the NIH research suggests that 21 million people in the U.S. will experience a depressive episode in their lifetimes. Mental Health America, a nonprofit dedicated to mental health and prevention, published a report that says 46% of Americans will at some point confront a mental-health-related disorder. Those numbers, while shocking, are not as surprising to encounter in 2025 as they may have been even a few years ago. That's because, while there are more people experiencing disorders such as anxiety and depression, general awareness of broader mental health issues has risen, too. According to Michele Nealon, a psychologist and president of the Chicago School of Professional Psychology, writing for the United Nations in 2021, the pandemic 'accelerated positive momentum in our communities to raise awareness about these issues and increased accessibility to crucial support and services for those affected.' Talking about mental health — interpersonally, on the news, social media or via the numerous celebrities who often show support (including Michelle Obama, Demi Lovato, Simone Biles, Prince Harry and Dwayne Johnson) — has become so common that the cause and effect of anxiety and depression are beginning to look like the chicken and the egg question to some, too. The BBC reported earlier this year that experts in England are now openly debating if the proliferation of awareness has actually caused more young people to self-diagnose, which results in 'over-pathologising distress.' The argument is that, rather than learning resilience, some are diagnosing what might be the normal discomfort of growing up as anxiety or depression. Regardless of the possible pitfalls, the pandemic had one recognizable silver lining, Nealon wrote: it 'resulted in more open dialogue on, and greater knowledge of, mental health than ever before.' This is not to say that stigma no longer exists; it does. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has a webpage that was updated in January of 2025, explaining and contextualizing the ways people with mental health disorders are made to feel stigma — the negative sentiment, shame or disgrace leveled onto an action or behavior. It included structural stigma, where institutions are not prepared to support those with them; public stigma that comes from individuals and groups judgmental toward mental health issues; and even self-stigma, where someone with a mental health issue 'may believe they are flawed or blame themselves for having the condition.' All of which is why experts say it's so important to keep talking about the resources that exist for people who are experiencing anxiety and depression. Not just in order to combat the stigma that individuals, communities, cultures and organizations may have, but also the sheer volume of those who are already experiencing anxiety and depression and need to know how and where to find help for a legitimate and pressing health concern. There are resources that exist, and — as always — much more to learn. It's a topic that's been investigated, it turns out, since the days of ancient Greece and Rome. The first known medical reference to mental health disorders like anxiety or depression is within the texts attributed to Hippocrates from ancient Greece. They describe a subject named Nicanor who's stricken with an irrational fear — a phobia — of the woman who plays the flute at the symposium. Hearing the music played at night, Nicanor would have panic attacks, yet he was unaffected when he encountered the same flutist during the day. Its inclusion by one of modern medicine's founders made clear that mental disorders had long been considered health issues. Ancient Roman thinkers investigated the variations of mental disorders more specifically. It was Cicero, the Roman statesman and stoic philosopher, who carved out the notion of anxiety and depression — separately — and sought to solve them. 'In some there is a continual anxiety, owing to which they are anxious … for all are not anxious who are sometimes vexed, nor are they who are anxious always uneasy in that manner,' he wrote in 45 B.C. According to Marc-Antoine Crocq, a psychiatrist, who wrote 'A history of anxiety: from Hippocrates to DSM' in the scientific journal Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, Cicero's arguments come from a book written after his daughter's untimely death and was 'a plea for Stoicism, a branch of philosophy that is one of the pillars of today's cognitive therapy.' Kathleen Evans, of Griffin University in Australia, suggested that Cicero's whole book was indicative of a 'major depressive episode' for the great ancient philosopher. His work may have been a means for him to navigate the struggles of his own life. Another stoic called Seneca, wrote Crocq, 'taught his contemporaries how to achieve freedom from anxiety in his book 'Of Peace of Mind.'' Later, Seneca suggested in another of his treatises that people should stay present in their day-to-day lives, previewing thousands of years ago what is now commonly referred to as 'living in the moment.' Depression was long called by the other name of 'melancholia,' especially so during the period between the late 1700s and the late 1800s. It was defined as 'a disorder of intellect or judgment, a 'partial insanity' often, but not always, associated with sadness,' wrote Kenneth S. Kendler, of Virginia Commonwealth University. He wrote that it was a 'mood disorder.' That name, itself, helps to understand why there is some lasting stigma felt today by folks whose lives and work are disrupted by their depression as if it is a matter of mood, rather than a debilitating health disorder. Not until the German psychiatrist Emil Kraepelin began using the word 'depressive' to describe elements of 'melancholia' in the late 1900s did its name change to what we know today. That definition and symptoms have changed, too. While it is common for people to feel sad or low in the course of their days, depression manifests itself with more pronounced symptoms, some of which include feeling down, empty, pessimistic or hopeless. Those experiencing depression report feeling tired, lacking in pleasure or interest in the things they care about, difficulty concentrating and trouble sleeping, among many others. Though not always, some also report suicidal thoughts. Understandably, these feelings often implicate behaviors and moods — the poor descriptor from the Victorian period raising its ugly head — like anger, restlessness, a tendency to isolate or a struggle to manage responsibilities. The list of symptoms is long, and not everyone who has depression exhibits all of those that are published by the National Institutes of Health, the Mayo Clinic, or any of other national and local agencies. Additionally, age plays a role in which symptoms are more or less pronounced, as does gender. There are a kaleidoscope of different possible symptoms — many of which everyone feels at some point or other in the course of their lives — and it makes it difficult to determine when one is momentary and another a disorder. If someone is feeling any of these symptoms for prolonged periods, they should speak to their regular medical care provider about it or call one of the local or national hotlines published with this article to discuss their specific circumstances. Taking advantage of available resources and learning more is the first step to care. To help someone who may not have recognized these symptoms for themselves, Harvard Health suggests encouraging that person to use the resources or seek help, or a softer touch might be to offer emotional support. The symptoms of anxiety — just like Cicero suggested a couple millennia ago — are not necessarily unique to those who suffer from an anxiety disorder. Most people will feel some version of what we understand anxiety to be at some point in their lives. It could be before starting a new school, prior to a test, a date or a job interview, or even when rent and other bills are due. To a certain extent, anxiety is a regular part of most lives, which makes its disorder also hard to firmly categorize and understand. The Mayo Clinic explains the disorder as an escalation of the common occurrences of anxiety. 'People with anxiety disorders frequently have intense, excessive and persistent worry and fear about everyday situations,' its website reads. Those symptoms show up as constant worry, elevated heart rates, fear, trouble sleeping, feeling a sense of looming issue or problems. There are also many different permutations of anxiety that also exhibit these symptoms. These issues can lead to other health issues or even depression itself. If someone is uncertain, they should also discuss the matter with their regular health care provider or one of the national hotlines. The treatment for both begins with asking questions and seeking help, no matter how certain or uncertain someone might be. Part of that seeking of help, too, can be speaking with your friends, family, clergy or teachers. The ancient Greek and Roman philosophers asked each other these bigger questions about their minds and health at the lyceum in order to reach reasonable conclusions, and it turns out that many of them are still in place. Today, we have doctors, phone and text hotlines, and our respective loved ones to seek out more and better information about anxiety and depression. The more we know, too, the less likely we are to judge or to suffer needlessly from anxiety or depression. Seneca wrote that 'there are more things … likely to frighten us than there are to crush us; we suffer more often in imagination than in reality.' If you need help, please refer to this document for contacts that can speak over the phone or text in either moments of crisis or those who need support. You can always call or text the national Disaster Distress Hotline at 1-800-985-5990 (para Español: Llama o envía un mensaje de texto 1-800-985-5990 presiona '2.'). If you're in Utah, Huntsman Mental Health Institute lists several ways to get help for a mental health crisis: University of Utah community crisis intervention and support services: 801-587-3000. Text or call Suicide & Crisis Lifeline: 988. Utah Crisis Line: 1-800-273-TALK (8255). Walk-in crisis center for adults: 955 W. 3300 South, South Salt Lake. Utah Warm Line: 8 a.m. to 11 p.m. 1-833-773-2588 (SPEAKUT) or 801-587-1055. For parents, teachers and educators: SAFEUT Crisis Chat & Tip Line, download the app or call 833-372-3388. For active National Guard members, their family and civilian personnel: download SafeUTNG app or call 833-372-3364 (SAFENG).

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store