
A potential new treatment for Parkinson's shows early promise
On a special episode (first released on May 29, 2025) of The Excerpt podcast: Parkinson's is a disease that afflicts an estimated 90,000 Americans every year. Dr. Lorenz Studer and Dr. Viviane Tabar of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, joined USA TODAY The Excerpt to share more about a new stem cell-based therapy that creates nerve cells. The treatment is showing early promise.
Hit play on the player below to hear the podcast and follow along with the transcript beneath it. This transcript was automatically generated, and then edited for clarity in its current form. There may be some differences between the audio and the text.
Podcasts: True crime, in-depth interviews and more USA TODAY podcasts right here
Karen Weintraub:
Hello, and welcome to The Excerpt. I'm USA TODAY Health Reporter Karen Weintraub. Today is Thursday, May 29th, and this is a special episode of The Excerpt.
You've no doubt heard of the chemical dopamine. It's often referenced as part of the brain's reward system when we do something pleasurable. Dopamine, or a lack thereof, also plays a critical role in the onset of Parkinson's, a disease that afflicts an estimated 90,000 Americans every year.
Treatment for Parkinson's focuses on managing its many symptoms, as there is no cure. But a new stem cell therapy developed at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center for advanced Parkinson's is showing early promise.
What's behind this incredible discovery and just how hopeful should patients be? Here to talk about this exciting new treatment and its impact on patients are the two physicians who helped make it a reality. Dr. Viviane Tabar and Dr. Lorenz Studer. Drs. Tabar and Studer, thanks so much for joining The Excerpt.
Dr. Tabar, when someone is diagnosed with Parkinson's disease, what exactly is happening to their brain and their body?
Dr. Viviane Tabar:
Well, we think that at the time an individual is diagnosed with Parkinson's disease, they have already experienced degeneration or loss of a large number of their dopamine neurons. We are all born with a limited number of large, beautiful dopamine neurons that live in our brainstem and that project to multiple areas in the brain.
They're involved in a lot of intricate activities, but an important element of their function is to modulate movement. So the individual very commonly will come to clinical attention because of movement difficulties, albeit there are other symptoms, loss of smell, gastrointestinal symptoms, difficulties with sleep, and it's a complex picture.
But it's important to remember that at the time they receive this diagnosis, which today is still vastly made on a clinical basis, on an examination of the individual and listening to their symptoms, they have already lost probably 50% or more of their dopamine neurons and their projections.
A potential new treatment for Parkinson's shows early promise
A new stem cell-based therapy creates cells that make dopamine, a chemical that's critical to the disease.
Karen Weintraub:
And what are some of the everyday challenges your patients face? You mentioned motor control, cognitive issues also I think?
Dr. Viviane Tabar:
For the majority of patients, and keep in mind that Parkinson's is a disease that spans a variety of symptoms and spectrum of progression and intensity, for most patients it starts with manageable symptoms that they control well, could be a tremor, could be some stiffness in their gait. And for the majority, I would say cognitive change comes late, assuming a proper diagnosis of Parkinson's.
So it becomes paradoxically even more problematic because it starts interfering with activities of daily living, your ability to get to and from your job. You're still high-performing, but you are impaired gradually. And you're fully cognitively there often, and so you're very aware of the slow degeneration that's essentially relentless.
Karen Weintraub:
And you mentioned jobs. Are people affected by Parkinson's primarily older, retiree age, or are there other groups at risk as well?
Dr. Viviane Tabar:
We didn't say necessarily retirees. Parkinson's, the sporadic form of it, which is the most common form, I mean by that the form that's not inherited, that happens commonly in the sixties or later. But nowadays, people in their fifties and sixties are considered at their prime still at work.
Karen Weintraub:
And others who are affected, we think of Michael J. Fox who is certainly younger when he started developing symptoms.
Dr. Viviane Tabar:
There are forms of Parkinson's that occur in a younger individual at a younger average age, and that is commonly related to specific mutations. And so the majority of Parkinson's disease occurs what we call sporadically, so without a hereditary or identified specific mutation that we are aware of. But some is related to a mutation, and those tend to occur at a younger age, but that's not the majority.
Karen Weintraub:
And is it clear what causes Parkinson's? You mentioned the neurons, but is there still some mystery there, and can the causes vary from person to person?
Dr. Viviane Tabar:
There is a lot of mystery. So in simple terms, we do not know the etiology of Parkinson's disease very specifically. Many things have been invoked, the environment, environmental toxins, a genetic predisposition outside of the genetic forms of the disease.
And we can talk a lot about some exciting science trying to dissect what's going on, the role of inflammation, et cetera. But the short answer to your question is we're not able today to tell a patient what caused their Parkinson's, again, outside the relatively uncommon hereditary forms.
Karen Weintraub:
And can you walk us a little bit through how Parkinson's progresses over time? Is there a sort of a path, many paths, what does that look like?
Dr. Viviane Tabar:
So yes, there are many paths, but let's take an average situation. The patient would reach out to a physician, eventually come to the attention of a neurologist, they're examined, their brain scan is obtained. In the case of Parkinson's, often that scan is fine and normal to age and the symptoms are identified often, as we said earlier, motor symptoms.
The common situation is that they get started on a form of dopamine that can reach the brain, and that makes them feel better and that is often referred to as the honeymoon period. And that goes on for a few years where the patient is almost back to normal but dependent on the medicine.
And as time goes by, the disease process is such that they are losing more and more of their dopamine neurons. And at some point we start or the treating neurologist starts escalating the dose of the medication. And there are other medications that can support that. But essentially within a few years or several years depending, they reach a point where they're starting to experience side effects from the medication and a shortening of the periods where they are feeling okay and functioning.
And that is where we start getting stuck in that there are no new medications that, I shouldn't say no new medications, there's always new medications, no formulations that try to extend the ability to help the individual. But you clearly plateau in terms of the effectiveness of pharmacological therapy for a lot of patients, not all.
There are options that are surgical like inserting electrodes that is called deep brain stimulation, which will work for some patients. But we reach a point where the patient has lost most of their dopaminergic neurons and there is not much more that can be offered today to help the individual. Hence, the idea of what if we could replace those degenerated dopamine neurons?
Karen Weintraub:
Which brings us to Dr. Studer. Dr. Studer, when did you first think about using stem cells as a possible way to treat Parkinson's?
Dr. Lorenz Studer:
Well, it's really a very long story. In fact, it's I think nearly three decades when we first had the idea of doing so, which was the question, "Now, can we really replace cells in the brain and what will be the right source?" In fact, that was the goal of my laboratory starting 25 years ago, finding exactly what's the source of dopamine neurons.
The challenge is how do you make this very, very specific nerve cell in the brain? And so that was a long journey, took us at least 10 years of basic research to understand, now what is the code of development? It's a little bit like trying to go through the steps that the cells go in normal development, but give them those signals one by one in a culture dish. And so it's a little bit like a code that we need to decipher and then to apply to the cells.
And by 2011, we could do that finally in a study that showed that we did a good job because when we implant those cells back into a mouse, in a rat or in a monkey model of Parkinson's disease, we see benefit in that model. And that really then opened up the whole next new step, now can we do that not just in a animal model, but maybe eventually in humans? That was what they call the proof of concept. But then obviously it was not a long journey to get to the ultimate clinical patient.
Karen Weintraub:
And how might the stem cell therapies transform the treatment landscape? What opportunities does this offer? And are there specific symptoms that you expect to get better or everything or certain symptoms?
Dr. Lorenz Studer:
The dopamine acts primarily on the movement-related symptoms. That's the area where we think we can make the biggest impact. Whether it's also going to affect all the symptoms, it's more questionable. Now, for example, again, we said the patients can have loss of smell, they can have problems with severe constipation, and at later stage of the disease, cognitive issues.
And at this point we don't have a good reason to believe that this therapy will also help with those symptoms. This has to be tested. It could be indirect effects, but the main effect we expect is that the movement disorder should improve.
Again, we don't want to overstate it, but in a dream scenario, it would be you have still Parkinson's disease, so you cannot cure Parkinson's disease, but maybe if it worked, ideally you could cure the movement disorder component of Parkinson's disease.
And so I think that's really what we are trying to develop with this type of cell therapy. And maybe in the future this will open up the same approach for all the cell types that might affect all the symptoms as well. So it's also kind of opening up the door to many other cell therapies in Parkinson's itself and maybe in other diseases as well, because it's one of the first cases now where really you actually replacing nerve cells in the brain, which sounds like a little bit of a science fiction approach. But I think this is one of the first examples where we really tried to attempt that and hopefully opening the door now for applications in the future.
Karen Weintraub:
And you said we can't call this a cure, obviously it's early days, but what would it take to get to a cure? More cell types?
Dr. Lorenz Studer:
Yeah. I think, because again, Parkinson's has more than just a movement disorder. So all that's not just movement-related, there is late stages cognitive problems, gastrointestinal problems, sleep problems, and those are unlikely to be treated with this cell type.
So what you can envisage is yes, well, maybe you would have additional cell types that can attack that, or ideally, you brought that up now, what causes Parkinson's disease, it'll be a complementary approach where you would give the cells back, because many dopamine cells are already lost by the time you're diagnosed.
So you get that movement-related symptoms hopefully restored, but at the same time, you'll find, like the whole field, many thousands researchers try to do that, find a therapy that can slow down or stop the progression. So you would gain back the function that you've already lost, but you would maybe not get some of those later symptoms. That would be even bigger dream in the future.
Karen Weintraub:
I was going to ask, Dr. Studer, where the research goes from here?
Dr. Lorenz Studer:
We always talk about bench to bedside, but there's also a bedside to bench. So where you kind of try to figure out, so what could you do even better now with regard to the cells that they function maybe more quickly or they are more potent or they have some additional features like we discussed? How could it treat some of the other symptoms in the future? So I think that's a big area for Parkinson's disease itself. How can we get the most benefit out of this kind of an approach?
But then the other part is really there's so many other very severe diseases now. We talk about Alzheimer's disease, we talk about ELS and other disorders. Each of them might need a different approach, quite different. So in some case we don't think we can just replace nerve cells, but we still learn that maybe other approaches could be used in those specific disorders.
And it then gives us a lot of encouragement when we see some progress in one area that this might be not just kind of a one-time go, but we might have opportunities to now give some help to those very difficult to treat neurodegenerative disorders where even today, this has been kind of some of the value of this for many of the drugs.
Now, very, very few new drugs came up in the context of neurodegenerative disorders, and I don't think cell therapy is alone going to solve all of that, but it's yet the new tool that is becoming actually clinically a realistic option to replace cells, and I think that's quite exciting.
There's some examples, for example, for treating eye disorders, so-called people who get blindness, macular degeneration, where data look quite promising. There's some examples maybe in very severe seizures where [inaudible 00:12:35] could be useful. So I think this is one of the very, very first example now where we now go all the way to this phase three study, but in the lab now we are thinking, "What did we learn? Why did it take us 25 years, for example? How can you make it quicker and what would be some of the next targets?"
Because from the stem cell side, we learned a lot. So by now we can pretty much make any cell type of the brain. So that's a language to make this as no longer limiting. What's limiting is now to know what's really needed in each individual patient, which is going to be quite distinct and will take, again, a couple of years, but pretty confident not another 25-year step.
Karen Weintraub:
Well, we will stay tuned for that very exciting work. Thank you both so much for being on The Excerpt.
Dr. Lorenz Studer:
Thanks so much.
Dr. Viviane Tabar:
Thank you for having us.
Karen Weintraub:
Thanks to our senior producers, Shannon Rae Green and Kaely Monahan, for their production assistance. Our executive producer is Laura Beatty.
Let us know what you think of this episode by sending a note to podcasts@usatoday.com. Thanks for listening. I'm USA TODAY Health Reporter Karen Weintraub. Taylor Wilson will be back tomorrow morning with another episode of The Excerpt.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
New tool can remove nearly all of a cancer-causing ‘forever chemical' from water — in just 5 minutes
Your tap water's dirty little secret might have just met its match. Scientists have engineered a high-tech filter that strips toxic 'forever chemicals' from drinking water in a matter of minutes. Better yet, the new tool glows on contact with contamination, serving as both a purifier and an real-time monitoring system. 4 Research suggests the majority of Americans have 'forever chemicals' in their drinking water. sebra – Forever chemicals — officially known as per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) — are tiny, man-made compounds that break down very slowly and accumulate in people, animals and the environment over time. They've been used since the 1940s in everything from non-stick cookware and grease-resistant food packaging to waterproof fabrics and personal care products. But concerns are mounting over the potential health effects of PFAS, with some experts likening them to 'slow poison.' One of the most widely used forever chemicals, perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), has been linked to higher risks of certain cancers, liver damage, immune system issues, high cholesterol and even developmental delays in fetuses and children. It has been detected across a range of environments and products — from soil and rainfall to seafood, human blood and drinking water. 4 While PFOA was previously used in the manufacturing of non-stock cookware, it has largely been phased out due to concerns about potential health and environmental risks. Dina – In fact, a 2020 study estimated that more than 200 million Americans are drinking water contaminated with PFOA or PFOS, another notorious forever chemical formally known as perfluorooctane sulfonate. Now, researchers at the University of Utah may have found a way to help reduce that exposure. The scientists recently developed a lab-engineered, crystalline substance known as a metal-organic framework (MOF) that functions like a molecular sieve. When water flows through the material, it snags and traps PFOA molecules, effectively removing the forever chemical. 4 The work builds on past research from the team that created a porous material that fluoresces in the presence of PFAS. THE UNIVERSITY OF UTAH In lab tests, the MOF cleared out more than 99% of the toxic substance in just five minutes. 'This sort of rapid treatment is crucial for real-world applications,' the study authors wrote in their report. The material also worked in the presence of other PFAS compounds, salts, and natural organic matter found in drinking water supplies, suggesting it could perform well in a variety of real-world environmental conditions. Better yet, the MOF can be reused, with researchers finding it retained 93% of its adsorption efficiency after five wash cycles. That's a big deal, since current methods for removing PFAS are often slow, costly, inefficient and don't hold up well after repeated use. 4 PFAS in drinking water are estimated to contribute to more than 6,800 cancer cases each year. WESTOCK – An added bonus: when PFOA molecules bind to the material, it glows fluorescent — providing instant, on-the-spot confirmation of contamination. 'This MOF represents a major leap forward for PFAS remediation,' Rana Dalapati, the study's lead author, said in a statement. 'Its ability to both selectively capture and sensitively detect PFOA in real time makes it a versatile and practical solution for water treatment and environmental monitoring,' she added. Looking ahead, the team believes this material could one day be adapted to capture other PFAS chemicals, not just PFOA. Wondering if you should be concerned about forever chemicals in your drinking water? The Environmental Working Group's Tap Water Database is a good place to start — just enter your ZIP code to see what's in your local supply. While the newly developed MOF may one day offer a powerful solution, it will likely be a while before it's available for public use. In the meantime, if you live in an area with known PFAS contamination, consider getting a water filter. Look for one certified by the National Sanitation Foundation to reduce levels of PFOA and PFOS to help limit your exposure.


CNBC
an hour ago
- CNBC
Are 2 to 3 cups of coffee a day too much? It's complicated, experts say: 'It's different for each person'
Two-thirds of Americans drink coffee every single day, according to data collected by the National Coffee Association in 2022, and the debate about how much is too much and whether or not any amount of caffeine is safe persists. But recent research shows that the answer is more complicated than you'd think. A Harvard study, that followed nearly 50,000 women over the course of 30 years and published in June, found that drinking coffee every day may lead to healthy aging in women. One to three cups a day was also linked to heart health benefits and lower mortality rates. But research also shows that high coffee consumption can increase your likelihood of dementia. And a 2022 paper published in the Journal of the American Heart Association found a link between heavy coffee consumption and an increased risk of dying from cardiovascular disease in people with hypertension. Benefits, drawbacks, and the right amount all depend on your individual lifestyle and overall health. And health experts consistently advise that, like with most things, moderation is key for your daily coffee. Deepak Chopra, author, speaker and proponent of alternative medicine, told CNBC Make It in 2023 that he drinks two to three cups of coffee each day before noon. While that may sound like too much caffeine for the average person, it's actually within a healthy range. "Drinking two to three cups before noon is safe to do," registered dietitian Roxana Ehsani said in an interview with CNBC Make It last year. "As long as they don't greatly surpass 400 milligrams of caffeine." Ehsani's suggestion follows the Food and Drug Administration's recommendation of consuming no more than 400 milligrams of caffeine a day, which can include the caffeine found in teas, energy drinks, sodas and chocolate. Certain people may benefit from consuming much less caffeine than is recommended by the FDA. Caffeine tolerance varies from person to person, with some people feeling anxious or jittery after just one or two cups of coffee. "Within those milligram or cup of coffee recommendations, if you start feeling overly tired and the caffeine is not helping, then you've got to stop [drinking it]," dietitian Jessica Sylvester told NBC News. "If your heart starts beating incredibly fast, you've got to stop. It's different for each person." Pregnant people should consider cutting back on caffeine. And people who have diabetes or cardiovascular disease should be mindful of their sugar intake when having coffee, Nikki Cota, a dietitian at the Mayo Clinic, told NBC News. Expert opinion also varies on if teens should drink coffee, but "avoiding caffeine is the best choice for all kids," according to the American Academy of Pediatrics. But for everyone else, if you're having two to three cups, or more, "be mindful of what you're experiencing," registered dietitian Maddie Pasquariello says. And make sure you're not replacing meals with caffeine. Ehsani recommends drinking water or having a meal before reaching for coffee since caffeine suppresses appetite. And if you notice your sleep is affected when you have a coffee in the afternoon, experts suggest a mornings-only rule for your daily latte or macchiato.


UPI
3 hours ago
- UPI
The difference between palliative care and hospice
If a doctor diagnoses you with a serious illness and suggests palliative care, don't jump to conclusions. It doesn't mean you have mere months to live, NIH News in Health emphasizes. Palliative care, which is focused on comfort care and symptom management, may be recommended at any stage of a chronic or serious illness. But it is often confused with hospice care, which is comfort care for patients in the final months of life and requires that all treatments be discontinued. "Embracing palliative care does not mean that you're giving up on treatment," said Alexis Bakos, an aging expert at the National Institutes of Health. "Ideally, palliative care should be offered at the very beginning of a diagnosis of any serious illness." Diagnoses like chronic heart and lung disease, cancer and neurodegenerative illnesses like dementia and Parkinson's all fall under the definition of "serious." These illnesses lower a patient's quality of life or ability to perform everyday tasks like cooking or bathing. A palliative care team can help patients cope with physical, psychological, emotional or spiritual suffering associated with these diagnoses, according to News in Health. They can not only help patients manage symptoms but also assist providers in coordinating complex care. Dr. Matthew DeCamp, a physician at the University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, describes palliative care as a "holistic approach" to medicine and caregiving. "It places the patient's quality of life and needs and values front and center," he told News in Health. A pallative care provider typically meets with a patient soon after they are diagnosed with a serious disease to explain the many ways they can lend a hand - from help coordinating care to helping patients create an advance directive, which spells out their wishes for care if they become unable to speak for themselves. "They will learn your preferences for care and communication," said Dr. Lori Wiener, a palliative care expert at the NIH. Many patients welcome the assist, because planning for a serious illness is often complicated. "Patients and families often remain unaware of how their serious illness may progress," DeCamp said. "They may not know how long they might be expected to live or how long or what types of symptoms they might have. Physicians, nurses and other members of the care team are also historically not very good at predicting the course of a disease." These days, AI tools can help with that. But not all doctors use them and when they do, patients might misinterpret findings they spot in their medical records, said DeCamp, who is studying ethical issues surrounding use of AI. Weiner's team, which is studying ways to help kids with cancer communicate their wishes to family and health care providers, has created a guide called "Voicing My CHOiCES" that helps teens and young adults consider and spell out their hopes, fears and values. It has also developed an electronic screening tool called "Checking IN," which helps doctors understand what, specifically, distresses their young patients so they can be better prepared for visits. Palliative care specialists can help patients understand their prognosis and their treatment options - and help them be comfortable. So NIH experts urge patients who are diagnosed with serious illnesses to ask their doctor about palliative care if it isn't offered to them right away. "Earlier NIH research was focused on making sure that primary care clinicians were aware of palliative care," Bakos said, adding that NIH is looking now at ways to involve more specialists such as E.R. doctors, neurologists and ICU providers into discussions of palliative care. More information Learn more about palliative care and hospice at the National Institute on Aging. Copyright © 2025 HealthDay. All rights reserved.