logo
Playbook: Riders on the storm

Playbook: Riders on the storm

Politico4 days ago
Presented by
With help from Eli Okun, Bethany Irvine and Ali Bianco
On the Playbook Podcast this morning, Jack and POLITICO's senior Congress editor Mike DeBonis pick through the bones of the 'big, beautiful bill' and where it's headed now
Good Wednesday morning. This is Jack Blanchard, a little stunned to learn that as of this week, we're closer to 2050 than to the year 2000. Good grief.
BREAKING OVERNIGHT: On a bleak morning for fans of fearless journalism, CBS' owner Paramount has formally settled its lawsuit with Donald Trump after he sued over some (pretty standard) edits to a 2024 interview with opponent Kamala Harris. Under the terms of the deal, Paramount has agreed to hand over a whopping $16 million to Trump's presidential library and committed to releasing transcripts of future interviews with presidential candidates. The company has not apologized for its conduct.
As the NYT reports this morning … 'Many lawyers dismissed Mr. Trump's lawsuit as baseless and believed that CBS would ultimately prevail in court, in part because the network did not report anything factually inaccurate, and the First Amendment gives publishers wide leeway to determine how to present information. But Shari Redstone, the chair and controlling shareholder of Paramount, told her board that she favored exploring a settlement with Mr. Trump. Some executives at the company viewed the president's lawsuit as a potential hurdle to completing a multibillion-dollar sale of the company.' Trump must be loving every minute.
In today's Playbook …
— House members scramble back to D.C. for the final megabill showdown.
— Musk keeps his head down after almost going to war with Trump a second time.
— U.S. blocks key weapons exports to Ukraine … as Russia's bombardment continues.
DRIVING THE DAY
SHUT UP AND DRIVE: Members of the House are motoring back to D.C. this morning to vote on the 'big, beautiful bill' after thunderstorms canceled scores of flights into Reagan National. Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-Ill.) was planning a 14-hour overnight drive from Chicago in order to make today's crucial vote, telling constituents: 'We got some gas money, we got some snacks, and away we go.' A pajama-clad Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.) and Buc-ee's busting Rep. Russell Fry (R-S.C.) were both planning eight-hour overnight drives from South Carolina to get here in time. (And people complain our politicians don't work hard.)
Life is beautiful: The matter in hand is the imminent House vote on Trump's flagship legislation — the tax-cutting, Medicaid-slashing, border-boosting megabill that squeaked through the Senate yesterday lunchtime. The bill is expected to hit the floor of the House for a final vote later tonight. (Don't be surprised if we're all up late once again.) If the House agrees to the bill with no further changes, it's headed straight to Trump's desk in time to hit the July 4 deadline.
Mike drop: 'We're having weather delays getting everybody back right now,' Speaker Mike Johnson told Fox News last night. 'But assuming we have a full House, we'll get it through the Rules Committee in the morning, we'll move that forward to the floor and hopefully we're voting on this by [Wednesday] or Thursday at latest, depending on the weather and delays and all the rest — that's the wildfire that we can't control.'
Numbers game: Johnson can only afford a small handful of rebel votes — and there are certainly enough ominous noises coming out of GOP circles to suggest he may have a problem. In particular, deficit hawks are unhappy at the way the price tag for this already-expensive bill ballooned even higher in the Senate. But will there be enough actual GOP holdouts to stop it sailing through?
Yeah nah: Given the way this Congress has behaved since Jan. 20, it seems far-fetched to imagine the Republican Party actually going ahead and blocking Trump's flagship piece of legislation — especially when the president seems relatively uninterested in the actual detailed content of the bill. But if you do fancy whiling away the day playing will-they-won't-they games, then it's the GOP deficit hawks you'll want to be monitoring — people like Reps. Ralph Norman (S.C.), Chip Roy (Texas), Andy Harris (Md.), Marlin Stutzman (Ind.) and Andy Ogles (Tenn.), who have all been mouthing off about the Senate's tweaks.
In theory, there are also plenty of 'Medicaid moderates' — like California Rep. David Valadao — who could take a stand against the deeper cuts pushed through by the Senate, although frankly, I wouldn't hold my breath. SALT caucus holdout Rep. Nick LaLota (R-N.Y.) already sounds like he's coming around.
How the bill changed: 'Senate Republicans took the sprawling Republican megabill the House sent them and sharpened it further, making the heart of Trump's legislative agenda more politically explosive,' my POLITICO colleagues Benjamin Guggenheim and Jordain Carney write in their must-read analysis. 'GOP senators made steeper cuts to Medicaid, hastened cuts to wind and solar energy tax credits and also managed to add hundreds of billions of dollars more to the deficit compared to the House plan.' It's a far cry from the Senate's usual role, they note, which is to temper the excesses of the House.
Daddy time: This is normally the point in the process when the president himself wades in, and it's striking that there's nothing on Trump's official schedule today. That presumably means he'll be spending the day either visiting the Hill, entertaining Republicans from the Hill … or ringing them one-by-one to bully, praise and cajole this legislation over the line. As ever, Truth Social will be your stream-of-conscious guide to what's on the president's mind.
Looking further ahead: As Playbook has been telling you for weeks, the battle that really is going to matter over the BBB is one of messaging — as both parties believe they have a strong story to tell headed into 2026. The Dems think a message of 'they cut your Medicaid to fund tax cuts for the wealthy' is a genuine vote-winner — but Republicans have rival framing which, if people buy it, also proves popular with the general public.
FIRST IN PLAYBOOK: To that end, my Playbook colleague Dasha Burns writes in with a peek at new polling from Tony Fabrizio (Trump's go-to pollster) and co. The survey delves into the messages related to the bill's key provisions that get the most positive response from likely 2026 voters in four critical Senate battlegrounds: Georgia, Maine, Michigan and North Carolina. The poll was commissioned by One Nation, a 501(c)(4) organization aligned with Majority Leader John Thune.
Notably, the poll refers to the legislation as the 'Working Families Tax Cuts (WFTC)' — which is new (if optimistic) branding coming straight from the White House and its outside allies. The poll found respondents came back 62 percent favorable vs. 12 percent unfavorable when the legislation was framed in this way. Measures such as the Child Tax Credit increase, plus no taxes on tips and overtime, were also overwhelmingly popular.
On the most controversial aspect of the bill, Medicaid cuts, the survey found two-thirds of voters (66 percent) do agree there is waste, fraud and abuse in Medicaid that must be addressed. And an even larger majority (72 percent) agree that able-bodied adults should demonstrate they are looking for a job or are employed to receive Medicaid benefits.
All of which gives a pretty good indication of how Republicans are likely to message the bill as we head into 2026. Whether swing voters in battleground districts are prepared to buy it remains to be seen.
And as for 2028 … It was striking to see several of the Dems' potential presidential hopefuls— California Gov. Gavin Newsom, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), Pete Buttigieg — all looking to pin the bill's passage on VP JD Vance, who cast the tie-breaking vote and who many expect to be the GOP presidential contender next time round. POLITICO's Cheyanne Daniels has more on that.
In the meantime: Johnson told Fox there will be more reconciliation bills ahead of the midterms. 'You can do a reconciliation budget for each fiscal year,' he said. 'So, the plan is to do one in the fall for the FY '26 budget year, and then we can also squeeze in a third one for FY '27 before this Congress is up.' Best start stocking up on cans of Celsius now.
ELON'S BACK
MUSK WATCH: After a whirlwind 24 hours railing against the Republican megabill, Elon Musk said he would 'refrain for now' from escalating his rebooted row with Trump. And sure enough, beyond a retweet or two of Chip Roy, Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), some Starlink posts and even some praise for Trump, the world's richest man has been pretty quiet.
It's not hard to see why: The more Musk delves into Washington, the more Tesla suffers for it. The car company's stocks dropped more than 5 percent after Musk and Trump started beefing again this week, WSJ's Jack Pitcher reports. And for all you visual learners, Reuters' Nandita Bose and colleagues have a handy chart showing just how much Tesla's market value has bobbed up and down during Musk's evolution.
The policy behind the posts: The Senate's megabill that passed yesterday whacks a $7,500 tax credit for households buying electric vehicles, and a $4,000 credit for those who buy a used EV, CNBC's Greg Iacurci writes. Trump argued yesterday that's a big problem for Musk — though Musk has repeatedly said his objections to the megabill are not related to the EV credits.
The view from 1600 Penn: 'No one really cares what [Musk] says anymore,' a senior White House official anonymously told CNN's Kristen Holmes. Let's just see if that line holds — and if Musk keeps his powder dry as the megabill moves through the House again.
WAR AND PEACE
PROMISES BROKEN: The Pentagon stopped shipments of air defense missiles and other precision munitions to bolster the war effort in Ukraine, POLITICO's Paul McLeary, Jack Detsch and Joe Gould scooped last night. The decision came down from Elbridge Colby, the Pentagon's policy chief, after a review sparked concerns that the military's weapons stockpiles are running low.
The decision to withhold military aid allocated during the Biden era was finalized in early June, our colleagues write, but it's going into place now as Ukraine fights back against some of Russia's biggest bombings on the country since the war started. It's been just two days since Russia's latest devastating overnight aerial attack.
How it's playing: Ukraine's biggest allies in Congress denounced the decision, calling out the 180-degree change from Trump's comments last week. 'If this reporting is true, then Mr. Colby … is taking action that will surely result in the imminent death of many Ukrainian military and civilians,' said Rep. Marcy Kaptur (D-Ohio). Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.) called Colby and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth 'rogue actors,' Joe reports.
The White House says: 'This decision was made to put America's interests first following a DOD review of our nation's military support and assistance to other countries across the globe,' White House deputy press secretary Anna Kelly said. 'The strength of the United States Armed Forces remains unquestioned — just ask Iran.'
BACK TO THE FORGOTTEN WARS: Israel has agreed to conditions for a potential 60-day ceasefire in Gaza, Trump announced on Truth Social last night, 'during which time we will work with all parties to end the War.' Big grain of salt: Hamas has not accepted these conditions or the proposal yet. But Trump is once again putting the screws on them to come to the negotiating table. 'I hope, for the good of the Middle East, that Hamas takes this Deal, because it will not get better — IT WILL ONLY GET WORSE,' Trump wrote. Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff met with Israeli Minister for Strategic Affairs Ron Dermer yesterday to discuss the proposal, while Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu will visit the White House on Monday.
MEANWHILE IN THE WEST WING: Our colleague and foreign affairs correspondent Nahal Toosi's new column this morning chronicles the chaos at the National Security Council since Secretary of State Marco Rubio took over — with a shrinking staff, less meetings and worries that small conflicts will balloon into bigger problems as top-level officials are iced out. 'It's 'Game of Thrones' politics over there,' one person told Nahal.
BEST OF THE REST
SCHOOL TIES: The University of Pennsylvania is revoking the winning records of its transgender athletes, in an agreement announced yesterday with the Department of Education, WSJ's Sara Randazzo reports. The university — whose federal funding the Trump administration froze earlier this year over alleged Title IX violations — will strip former student athlete Lia Thomas' three school records.
WHAT STENY HOYER IS READING: The FBI is relocating its headquarters to the Ronald Reagan Building complex, specifically into the former offices of USAID, rather than a planned move to Maryland, the agency announced yesterday. The choice is sure to make Trump happy as he's been wanting to keep the FBI in the district, POLITICO's Aaron Pellish writes, even as it angers lawmakers from Maryland, where a now-scrapped plan had the agency set to move.
In related news, get a load of this: 'FBI supervisor hired prostitutes while on assignment, watchdog says,' by WaPo's Derek Hawkins
THE NEW DOJ: Former FBI agent Jared Wise, who was charged 'with encouraging the mob that stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, to kill police officers,' is now an adviser for Ed Martin on Trump's 'Weaponization Working Group' at the Justice Department, NYT's Alan Feuer and Adam Goldman report. 'His selection meant that a man who had urged violence against police officers was now responsible for the department's official effort to exact revenge against those who had tried to hold the rioters accountable.'
POLITICO's Ankush Khardori pens his latest Rule of Law column: ''I Believe His Account 100 Percent': Former Colleagues Vouch for DOJ Whistleblower'
JUDICIARY SQUARE: A federal judge last night blocked the Trump administration's bid to strip the temporary protected status of 500,000 Haitian immigrants, POLITICO's Hassan Ali Kanu reports. … Pro-Palestinian Georgetown researcher Badar Khan Suri can remain free while he challenges his deportation order, an appeals court ruled yesterday per Reuters' Kanishka Singh. … A federal judge ruled mass layoffs at HHS were likely illegal and granted a preliminary injunction halting the firings, AP reports.
T-MINUS ONE WEEK: Trump said he's sticking by his self-imposed July 9 deadline for trade deals with some of the biggest trading partners, even as he's calling out Japan for not taking in more rice exports, Bloomberg's Jennifer Dlouhy and Akayla Gardner write. 'I'm not sure we're going to make a deal. I doubt it with Japan, they're very tough,' Trump said while traveling on Air Force One yesterday. 'You have to understand, they're very spoiled.'
ALL EYES ON THE TAR HEELS: Rep. Richard Hudson (R-N.C.), who chairs the NRCC, is opting out of a bid for the North Carolina Senate seat set to be vacated by Thom Tillis. RNC Chair Michael Whatley also has no (current) plans to run, and Rep. Pat Harrigan (R-N.C.) is throwing his support behind none other than Lara Trump, ABC's Brittany Shepherd and colleagues report. Also encouraging her to run is the president himself, telling reporters on Air Force One that his daughter-in-law 'would really be great.'
IMMIGRATION FILES: Trump reassigned 150 National Guard troops to go back to fighting California's wildfires in the first rolling back of enforcement since the LA riots last month, NYT's Shawn Hubler and Laurel Rosenhall report. It comes a day after the DOJ announced a lawsuit against the city over its sanctuary policies, which Mayor Karen Bass blasted as an 'all-out assault on Los Angeles,' per the LA Times' David Zahniser and colleagues.
Meanwhile, at 'Alligator Alcatraz': The rollout of the facility, preempted by Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, ruffled some feathers at DHS. 'DeSantis did a live tour of the facility Friday on 'Fox and Friends,' which caught the Trump administration off-guard,' NBC's Matt Dixon reports. 'Noem and top adviser Corey Lewandowski supported the facility but wanted the opening Tuesday to be the formal public rollout.' A GOP operative 'said Noem's staff asked DeSantis not to do the Fox News tour.' And Lewandowski reportedly 'lost his s---' when it went ahead.
INSIDE THE OVAL: 'Fox News, MAGA hats and cookies: Inside Trump's West Wing,' by NBC's Peter Nicholas and colleagues: 'Trump affectionately refers to the Oval Office as 'Grand Central Terminal' because of all the comings and goings … Trump likes to see whom he wants and call whom he chooses, and in the new term, he presides over a freewheeling West Wing that mirrors the man, current and former aides say.'
TALK OF THE TOWN
Glenn Youngkin will be the guest speaker at the South Carolina Republican Party's Silver Elephant Gala this August, which is sure to increase 2028 chatter.
Brent Efron, an EPA employee, went on what he thought was a bad date — until a video of him talking about throwing proverbial 'gold bars' ended up recorded on the conservative Project Veritas website. Since then, he has been 'publicly shamed by Elon Musk, obscenely berated by anonymous callers and hauled into an interview with the F.B.I.'
SPOTTED: Kash Patel dining at Oyamel yesterday evening.
IN MEMORIAM — 'Richard A. Boucher, Veteran State Department Spokesman, Dies at 73,' by NYT's Trip Gabriel: 'Mr. Boucher served longer than anyone else as a State Department spokesman, working for six secretaries of state, from George H.W. Bush's administration to George W. Bush's, explaining, distilling and defending the views of Republican and Democratic presidents in a noncombative tone … For nearly two decades after Mr. Boucher stepped away from the State Department podium, his guidelines for public affairs officers, 'Richard Boucher's Words of Wisdom,' remained posted in the office.'
PLAYBOOK METRO SECTION — 'D.C. is hiking Capital Bikeshare prices. Some will pay triple,' by WaPo's Rachel Weiner: 'Starting in August, it will cost for some people three times as much per minute to ride a regular Capital Bikeshare bike and more than twice as much for an electric bike.
FIRST IN PLAYBOOK — Scott Jennings is launching a new daily radio show, 'The Scott Jennings Show,' with Salem Media Group. The show kicks off on July 14 and will air weekdays from 2-3 p.m.
— Theo Wold is joining The Heritage Foundation as a visiting fellow for law and technology in the Center for Technology and the Human Person. He is a senior counselor at Palantir and previously was Idaho's solicitor general and U.S. assistant attorney general.
TRANSITIONS — Sean Savett is now associate director of comms at the Open Society Foundations, leading comms for the U.S. and the Americas. He previously was spokesperson for the NSC in the Biden White House. … Molly Tuttle is now director of workforce development at the American Council of Engineering Companies. She previously was associate VP for strategic comms at AECOM. … Lisa Bercu is joining the National Consumers League as senior director of health policy. She previously was senior adviser to the deputy FDA commissioner for policy, legislation and international affairs.
WELCOME TO THE WORLD — Anna Epstein, a director at FGS Global, and Aaron Steeg, an associate at Barrasso Usdin Kupperman Freeman & Sarver, on June 17 welcomed Alice Madeline Steeg, who is named for two of her late grandmothers. Pic
HAPPY BIRTHDAY: Reps. Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.), Mike Collins (R-Ga.), Doug LaMalfa (R-Calif.) and Randy Weber (R-Texas) … Billy Constangy … NBC's Tom Llamas … Jonathan Capehart … Eric Fanning of the Aerospace Industries Association … Collin Davenport … Brad Todd of On Message … Reed Howard … Scott McGee of Kelley Drye … Sam Nitz … Derek Gianino of Wells Fargo … Matthew Dybwad … Jenny Beth Martin of Tea Party Patriots … Courtney Geduldig … Snap's Gina Woodworth … Arkadi Gerney … former New Hampshire Gov. John H. Sununu … Jessica DeLoach … former Rep. Mike Castle (R-Del.) … Luci Baines Johnson … POLITICO's Jessie Niewold, Natasha Bernard and Zainab Khan … Jeremy Garlington (57) … Abbey Rogers of DDC Public Affairs … Setota Hailemariam … Santiago Rivera of New Heights Communications … Brooke Oberwetter
Send Playbookers tips to playbook@politico.com or text us on Signal here. Playbook couldn't happen without our editor Zack Stanton, deputy editor Garrett Ross and Playbook Podcast producer Callan Tansill-Suddath.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Musk Announces New America Party Is Formed Amid Trump Split
Musk Announces New America Party Is Formed Amid Trump Split

Yahoo

time10 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Musk Announces New America Party Is Formed Amid Trump Split

Elon Musk speaks during an America PAC town hall in Green Bay, Wisconsin, on Sunday, March 30, 2025. Credit - Jamie Kelter Davis—Getty Images Elon Musk says he has 'formed' his new political party titled the "America Party." The former lead of the Department of Governmental Efficiency (DOGE) had promised to do just that if President Donald Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' passed. Musk has been—and continues to be—a vocal critic of the policy bill, arguing that it will 'cause immense strategic harm' to America on account of the trillions of dollars the bill is projected to add to the debt of the country. 'By a factor of two to one, you want a new political party and you shall have it! When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste and graft, we live in a one-party system, not a democracy,' Musk said via his social media platform, X, on Saturday, a day after Trump signed the bill. 'Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom.' The Tesla CEO had opened a poll on July 4, Independence Day, asking his more than 220 million followers if he should create the new political party. Over 65% of the more than 1.2 million respondents voted 'yes.' Read More: Musk Renews Promise to Start New Rival Political Party as Trump Debates Deporting Him Musk went on to share his potential strategy for 'gaining independence from the two-party system,' arguing that he might try to 'laser-focus on just two or three Senate seats and eight to 10 House districts' for his party. 'Given the razor-thin legislative margins, that would be enough to serve as the deciding vote on contentious laws, ensuring that they serve the true will of the people,' Musk elaborated. But as for what exactly Musk plans to do with his rival third party is largely open for discussion. Musk has yet to share any specific proposed policies or explicitly state what the core tenets of his party would what we do—and don't—know about Musk's vision for the America Party and how it came to be. When Musk floated the idea of creating a new political party in early June amid the very public fracturing of his relationship with Trump, his one-time ally, Musk after conducting a poll said: 'The people have spoken. A new political party is needed in America to represent the 80% in the middle!' He appeared to be referring to those who may not feel seen or represented by either the Republican Party or Democratic Party. Musk, the country's biggest Republican donor, is seemingly committed to campaigning against any Republicans who showed support and voted for the Big, Beautiful Bill that he so vehemently opposes. 'Every member of Congress who campaigned on reducing government spending and then immediately voted for the biggest debt increase in history should hang their head in shame!' Musk said on June 30. 'And they will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth.' If he so desired, Musk could target pivotal congressional seats in an effort to turn them and thus potentially have the upper hand during votes on key matters. He seemingly referenced this plan with his July 4 post about establishing a 'laser-focus on just two or three Senate seats and eight to 10 House districts.' Musk did not elaborate or specify which seats would be at the center of his focus. While Musk has yet to share an actual policy platform for his party, he has reposted and responded affirmatively to some of his X followers' posts about what the platform could be. What appears to be on the docket is a platform that prioritizes cuts on debt and excess spending within the government, similar to what Musk pushed for during his time in the White House. One of Musk's followers asked: 'Is this the America Party platform?' They went on to list the following stances: Reduce debt, responsible spending only Modernize military with AI/robotics Pro tech, accelerate to win in AI Less regulation across board, but especially in energy Free speech Pro natalist Centrist policies everywhere else In response, Musk said 'yeah!' and went on to repost the list to his millions of followers, but stopped short of providing his own official policy plan. Read More: Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' Faces Opposition From Musk and Some Republicans as Senate Narrowly Votes to Advance It Though Musk had voted Democrat previously, he played a vital role for the Republican Party when he became the largest donor of the 2024 presidential race, predominantly funding Trump's campaign but also financially backing other Republicans via his super political action committee (PAC) titled America PAC. Musk became a close ally of Trump's and appeared at major campaign rallies with him, addressing large crowds and urging them to vote for Trump. As a sign of their close working relationship, Trump appointed Musk as the lead of DOGE, a role he held until May. During his tenure, Musk became known for actualizing Trump's vision of cutting 'waste' in the government, which amounted to laying off thousands of federal employees. But Musk and Trump's relationship soured, especially after the former took a public stance against the spending bill. 'I think a bill can be big or it could be beautiful,' Musk told CBS News in May, shortly before he announced his DOGE departure. 'But I don't know if it could be both.' Going a step further in early June, Musk said the 'massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination' and told his millions of followers to 'call your Senator, call your Congressman… kill the bill!' Musk and Trump engaged in an all-out war of words, exchanging jabs and lobbying threats—with Trump threatening to take away the government contracts for Musk's companies, including the SpaceX firm that has become a critical player for NASA. Trump has repeatedly claimed that the falling out stemmed from Musk being unhappy over changes to the Electric Vehicle [EV] mandate. Tensions reignited once more when Musk renewed his calls for the policy bill not to be passed. When asked by reporters on July 1 if he was planning to deport Musk, who has U.S. and South African citizenship, Trump replied: 'I don't know, we'll have to take a look.' 'We might have to put DOGE on Elon. The monster that might have to go back and eat Elon. Wouldn't that be terrible?' Trump said, appearing to refer to the contracts and subsidies that Musk's prominent businesses have from the federal government. Read More: Musk Floats Idea of Starting New Rival Political Party—and Even Names It—Amid Trump Feud Though Musk is looking to build a viable, competitive third party, it requires more than an X poll to actualize it in the U.S.. In fact, many have tried before. Two major parties—Democratic and Republican—have dominated U.S. politics and no third party in recent memory has been able to penetrate the two-party system in a meaningful way. Former 2020 Democratic presidential primary candidate Andrew Yang has pushed for representation beyond the two-party system, but has arguably encountered limited success with his Forward Party. In June, Yang expressed a keenness to join forces with Musk, seemingly hoping that the two of them may have a stronger chance of succeeding. 'Elon has built world-class companies from nothing more than an idea multiple times, and in this instance, you have the vast majority of Americans who are hungry for a new approach,' Yang said in an interview with Politico. 'I'm happy to spell it out for Elon, or anyone else who wants to head down this road. A third party can succeed very quickly.' Part of the reason third parties struggle is due to the U.S.' 'winner takes all' system in the Electoral College. 48 out of the 50 States award Electoral votes on a winner-takes-all basis (so does the District of Columbia). This makes voting for third party candidates difficult. For example, support for the Tea Party held strong at 24% according to polls in the 2010s, though they rarely held significant political power, since the Republicans were often fearful of splitting votes in races with narrow margins, which would have risked giving the election to Democratic candidates. Contact us at letters@

'Attack on rural America': Kentucky governor hits Medicaid cuts in Trump's megabill
'Attack on rural America': Kentucky governor hits Medicaid cuts in Trump's megabill

USA Today

time15 minutes ago

  • USA Today

'Attack on rural America': Kentucky governor hits Medicaid cuts in Trump's megabill

Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear argued the Medicaid cuts in President Donald Trump's sweeping tax policy bill will have a 'devastating' impact on rural communities. 'It's the single worst piece of legislation I've seen in my lifetime, and it is a congressional Republican and presidential attack on rural America,' the Democrat told CNN's Dana Bash in a July 6 interview on "State of the Union." He said around 200,000 people in Kentucky are could lose their healthcare under the bill, which implements new work requirements for Medicaid and a raft of other restrictions that healthcare experts argue will trigger hospital closures in rural areas. Lawmakers included a $50 billion fund in the legislation to prop up these hospitals, but experts say it won't be enough to make up for the $155 billion expected decline in federal Medicaid spending in rural areas. Beshear, who is considered a potential presidential candidate for the party in 2028, said up to 35 rural hospitals in Kentucky could be at risk of closing as a result of the bill. 'What that means is our economy takes a huge hit,' he said. 'You lose 200 jobs from doctors and nurses and orderlies and all of a sudden the coffee shop does worse, the bank doesn't have as many folks coming in. This is going to hit rural America right in the face.' Still, Republicans have argued that the biggest expected cut to Medicaid – the implementation of work requirements for able-bodied adults – is popular among voters, and other changes such as more frequent eligibility checks are common sense options. Democrats "unfortunately seem to think that poor people are stupid. I don't think poor people are stupid. I think they have agency, and I think to have them register twice a year for these benefits is not a burden," Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent also said on CNN on July 6. "People who want to infantilize the poor and people who need these Medicaid benefits are alarmist.' Republicans in Congress passed the massive tax-cut and spending package on July 3. Trump signed it into law on July 4. It was the key goal for Trump and Republican leadership in Congress, which captured a trifecta during the 2024 elections and has used that political muscle to force what they've dubbed their "One Big, Beautiful Bill" through both chambers at a rapid-fire pace. The passage came despite deep reservations within their own party and unanimous opposition from Democrats who see it as a ticket to winning back congressional majorities in 2026.

Social Security no taxes message on Trump bill raises eyebrows
Social Security no taxes message on Trump bill raises eyebrows

The Hill

time15 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Social Security no taxes message on Trump bill raises eyebrows

President Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' is sending mixed messages about whether most Americans are required to pay federal income taxes on their Social Security benefits. 'It's a mixed bag for seniors, because some seniors will get some tax relief; the cost of that, though, is borne by the entire Social Security system,' Alex Lawson, executive director of left-leaning advocacy organization Social Security Works, told USA Today. The bill, which Trump signed into law on Saturday, included a $6,000 tax deduction for Americans 65 or older. After Congress passed the bill on Thursday, the Social Security Administration said the legislation 'delivers long-awaited tax relief to millions of older Americans.' 'The new law includes a provision that eliminates federal income taxes on Social Security benefits for most beneficiaries, providing relief to individuals and couples,' the Thursday press release said. 'Additionally, it provides an enhanced deduction for taxpayers aged 65 and older, ensuring that retirees can keep more of what they have earned.' However, policy experts are concerned that the bill does not include a provision to eliminate federal income taxes on Social Security benefits. 'There is no provision in the budget bill that directly 'eliminates' or even reduces taxes on Social Security benefits,' Howard Gleckman, senior fellow at the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center, told the Washington Post. Trump's bill offers a tax deduction of $6,000 to seniors making up to $75,000 individually, or $150,000 on a joint return. The deduction is lowered for incomes above that level and axed for seniors with individual incomes of more than $175,000, or $250,000 jointly. However, the new deduction for seniors is set to expire within a couple of years. The median income for seniors in 2022 was about $30,000. 'The people who benefit by definition have to be richer, and people who benefit the most are the richest people,' Bobby Kogan, senior director of federal budget policy at the Center for American Progress, told CBS News. Before the megabill's passing, 64 percent of seniors receiving Social Security income paid no tax on their Social Security due to exemptions and deductions, according to an estimate by Trump's Council of Economic Advisers. Under Trump's megabill, 88 percent won't be paying. Marc Goldwein, senior vice president of the nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, told the Post that the rise is due to the bill's increase in 'the standard deduction for seniors, which, as a result, reduces the number of seniors who will pay taxes on their Social Security benefits.' Put simply, the new legislation will provide limited benefits for lower-income seniors because they already pay less in taxes. 'Lower-income earners benefit less than middle and upper-middle income households,' Garrett Watson, senior policy analyst at the Tax Foundation, a center-right think tank, told USA Today. 'It's been marketed as tax relief for seniors, but a lot of seniors are going to be surprised when they find out it doesn't apply to them,' he added. 'I'm getting asked all the time by folks what this actually means for their tax situation.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store