logo
Norman Tebbit: Thatcher's true believer was a bruiser until the very end

Norman Tebbit: Thatcher's true believer was a bruiser until the very end

Yahoo08-07-2025
Norman Tebbit was one of Margaret Thatcher's true believers and one of her most loyal allies.
In a Conservative party full of old Etonians and toffs, he was also one of very few cabinet ministers from a working-class background.He once told me, when he was party chairman in the mid-1980s and I was working for The Sunday Times, about the snobbery in the party.
"They think I eat peas off my knife," he said. I think he was joking.
He revelled in his reputation as a working-class bruiser. Labour's Michael Foot called him a "semi house-trained pole cat" and he was widely known as "The Chingford Skinhead".
During the riots of 1981, he famously spoke of his father being unemployed in the 1930s. "He didn't riot," he said. "He got on his bike and looked for work."
I've been reporting at Westminster since 1982 and covered the Thatcher era when Norman Tebbit was a giant on the political stage throughout.
When I started as a political journalist he had just been promoted to the cabinet in Mrs Thatcher's momentous reshuffle late in 1981.
That was the reshuffle in which Mrs Thatcher purged the so-called "wets" in her cabinet and appointed true believers like Tebbit, Cecil Parkinson and Nigel Lawson.
Like many incoming governments, hers had struggled in the early days, though perhaps not as badly as Sir Keir Starmer's is at the moment! In the early '80s, though, inflation and unemployment were both rampant.
Even after the 1978-79 "winter of discontent" that brought down James Callaghan's Labour government, strikes were still crippling industry. Mrs Thatcher decided radical action was necessary.
So she handed Tebbit the job of employment secretary: his job was to tame the power of the trade unions.
He succeeded one of the cabinet "wets", the moderate James Prior, who had been branded "Pussyfoot Prior" by Tory-supporting newspapers over his perceived failure to take on the unions.
He was exiled to Northern Ireland in the 1981 reshuffle. Parkinson became a charismatic party chairman and Lawson became energy secretary and later succeeded Sir Geoffrey Howe as chancellor.
Tebbit had always been very anti-trade union, going back to his first job in the printing room of the Financial Times, where he had been forced to join a union, and then his days as a British Airways pilot.
So as employment secretary, he introduced tough anti-trade union legislation, including outlawing the closed shop and making strike ballots compulsory.
And, as Mrs Thatcher turned round the fortunes of her government following the 1982 Falklands War, he became one of the most senior members of the cabinet, and one of her most dependable allies.
After the 1983 Tory landslide, she promoted him to trade and industry secretary, after Parkinson quit in a sex scandal after fathering a love child.
But just as Tebbit was becoming one of the giants of the Thatcher government and being talked about as a potential successor as PM, his political career was cut short by the 1984 IRA attack on the Grand Hotel in Brighton.
It was to be the defining moment of his career. Who can forget the images of him being rescued after he was trapped in the rubble?
He was badly injured, spent three months in hospital and his wife Margaret was paralysed and spent the rest of her life in a wheelchair.
Read more:
Some political observers claimed he was never quite the same after his injuries and the sorrow and anger about his wife's condition.
I don't think he lost any of his edge, however. He was still a great political campaigner and a bruiser.
During the 1987 election, there was tension between Tebbit and Lord Young, another Thatcher favourite, over election strategy, although despite a "wobbly Thursday" during the campaign the Tories won handsomely again.
My other personal memory of Lord Tebbit is breaking the story in the UK about his "cricket test" remarks about Asian supporters, in an interview with the Los Angeles Times in April 1990.
He spoke about a test of how English someone from an ethnic minority background was by asking which cricket team they supported.
"Which side do they cheer for?" he declared. "It's an interesting question."
The headline on my story on the front page of the late - and some would say unlamented - Today newspaper was "Tebbit race bouncer. The ultimate test for being British: Which side do the Asians cheer for at cricket?"
He was strongly criticised for his remarks, not just by political opponents, but also by Conservative MPs.
But Lord Tebbit was controversial right throughout his career. A divisive figure, he was adored by the Tory Right but loathed by the left and trade unions.
But what's not disputed is that he was a massive figure in the Thatcher years.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UK councillor acquitted over 'cut all their throats' speech
UK councillor acquitted over 'cut all their throats' speech

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

UK councillor acquitted over 'cut all their throats' speech

By Sam Tobin LONDON (Reuters) -A British councillor was on Friday acquitted of encouraging violent disorder for saying far-right activists should have their throats cut amid riots last year, drawing claims from right-wing politicians of a hypocritical "two-tier" justice system. Ricky Jones made the comments at a counter-protest in London after three girls were murdered in the north English town of Southport and was suspended by the ruling Labour party. Misinformation on social media said the teenager who committed the murders at a Taylor Swift-themed dance event was an Islamist migrant, fuelling days of violent riots including attacks on mosques and hotels housing asylum seekers. Jones, 58, was cleared by a jury following a trial at Snaresbrook Crown Court. He had made the remarks to a crowd gathered near an immigration advice centre in London after reports that far-right supporters were planning a protest. "They are disgusting Nazi fascists ... We need to cut all their throats and get rid of them all," he said, running a finger across his throat. Jones gave evidence that he did not intend his words to be taken literally and said his comments referred to far-right stickers with hidden razor blades found on a train. Right-wing politicians and activists said his case was an example of how Britain had an unfair police and justice system, with those who voice concerns about immigration treated differently to those who support liberal or left-wing causes. They contrasted Jones' treatment with that of Lucy Connolly, the wife of a Conservative councillor who was jailed for 31 months for inciting racial hatred for a post urging mass deportation of migrants and the burning of their hotels. Unlike Jones, she had pleaded guilty to the offence. Chris Philp, the opposition Conservative Party's home affairs spokesperson, said on X: "The development of two-tier justice is becoming increasingly alarming." Zia Yusuf, from the populist right-wing Reform UK party which is leading in opinion polls, also compared Jones' acquittal to Connolly's sentence. Prime Minister Keir Starmer was labelled "two-tier Keir" by some opponents last summer after claims some ethnic groups were policed more leniently than others, a suggestion that has been rejected by senior ministers, police chiefs and prosecutors.

Ricky Jones case should not be compared to Lucy Connolly
Ricky Jones case should not be compared to Lucy Connolly

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Ricky Jones case should not be compared to Lucy Connolly

A jury's decision to clear a suspended Labour councillor of encouraging violent disorder after he called for far-right activists' throats to be cut cannot be compared to the case of Lucy Connolly, lawyers have claimed. Ricky Jones, 58, faced trial at Snaresbrook Crown Court after he described far-right activists as 'disgusting Nazi fascists' in a speech at an anti-racism rally last year, in the wake of the Southport murders. The now-suspended councillor, surrounded by cheering supporters in Walthamstow, east London, on August 7 2024, was filmed stating: 'They are disgusting Nazi fascists. We need to cut all their throats and get rid of them all.' Jurors deliberated for just over half-an-hour and found him not guilty on Friday. This caused Conservative and Reform politicians to brand the decision 'two-tier justice' – with shadow home secretary Chris Philp comparing the case to that of Mrs Connolly, who was jailed for 31 months after she posted a tweet calling for 'mass deportation' of asylum seekers and to 'set fire to all the f****** hotels' on the day of the Southport attacks. Former home secretary and Tory leadership candidate Sir James Cleverly also called the jury's decision to clear Ricky Jones 'perverse' in an X post, adding: 'Perverse decisions like this are adding to the anger that people feel and amplifying the belief that there isn't a dispassionate criminal justice system.' Lawyers have said the cases should not be conflated as Connolly and Jones faced allegations of a different nature – and Jones faced trial where Connolly, having pleaded guilty, did not. Peter Stringfellow, a solicitor at Brett Wilson, told the PA news agency: 'Both (Jones and Connolly) said pretty unpleasant things. 'However, I'm afraid the conflation of the two after that is a problem. It comes from people who've got some sort of political agenda, in my view. 'They were facing completely different allegations and a massive part of those different allegations is the racial element. 'If you look at the Connolly case … her intention is of a racial nature.' Connolly pleaded guilty last year to a charge of inciting racial hatred by publishing and distributing 'threatening or abusive' written material on X. On July 29 last year, she posted: 'Mass deportation now, set fire to all the f****** hotels full of the bastards for all I care … if that makes me racist so be it.' 'She directs everybody to the fact that this was a racial comment,' Mr Stringfellow said. 'She pleads guilty to that intention … she accepted that she had intended to stir racial hatred. 'The Jones case is different because one, he's facing a completely different allegation: he's facing encouraging violent disorder. 'And the difference with him is he's saying: 'That's not what I was intended to do'.' Mr Stringfellow added that, in the case of Connolly, racially aggravated discourse on social media did translate into real-life violence across the country – whereas Mr Jones' comments at a rally did not cause a violent disorder. 'What she (Connolly) did, what followed her comments about threatening to burn people in hotels, is that that's precisely what then happened – and people were attempting to burn people in hotels.' Ernest Aduwa, partner at Stokoe Partnership Solicitors, said comparisons between Jones' and Connolly's cases were 'misplaced'. 'We need to be honest about what is going on here. The verdict in the Ricky Jones case was not political, it was legal,' he said. 'A jury listened to the evidence, tested it and decided unanimously he was not guilty. 'That is not bias or 'two-tier justice' – it is the justice system doing what it is supposed to do: separating facts from noise. 'Comparisons with the Lucy Connolly case are misplaced. 'Lucy Connolly pleaded guilty. There was no trial, no cross-examination, no jury. She admitted the specific offence: stirring up racial hatred online. 'Ricky Jones faced a different charge … with a high burden of proof. 'The jury decided the Crown had not met it. 'That does not mean the protest was not passionate or loud – it means there was not enough evidence to prove intent to incite violence. That distinction matters. 'I understand why emotions run high. But flattening two different situations into one misleading narrative does no favours to justice. 'The fact that a black man at a protest can receive a fair trial and be acquitted should be seen not as an injustice, but as proof the system can still get it right.' He added: 'The law is not perfect, but it must rest on evidence – not opinion, pressure, or politics.'

Live updates: Trump set for Alaska summit with Putin in push to end the war in Ukraine
Live updates: Trump set for Alaska summit with Putin in push to end the war in Ukraine

NBC News

time3 hours ago

  • NBC News

Live updates: Trump set for Alaska summit with Putin in push to end the war in Ukraine

Russia will come to the Alaska summit as it makes steady but costly gains on the Ukrainian battlefield. Putin believes he has the momentum in this war, throwing tens of thousands of soldiers each month into his 'meat grinder' war machine. Some Ukraine-supporting military analysts were alarmed this week after it appeared advanced Russian units had punched a hole through Ukraine's defenses near the town of Dobropillya. Ukrainian reinforcements rushed to the area, launching a counterattack that was able to stabilize the situation, according to Ukrainian military officials and Russian military bloggers. But the fight there and elsewhere remains desperate for Kyiv's forces. Compounding the situation is an infantry crisis that has seen Ukraine's once superior troop numbers dwindle, now outnumbered by Russia's conscription of prison inmates and hiring of mercenaries and soldiers from North Korea. 'The entire front has turned into a 'hodgepodge,'' Bohdan Krotevych, the former head of Ukraine's Azov Brigade, posted on X last week. 'This chaos has been growing for a long time, worsening with each passing day.' Nevertheless, some Western analysts believe that if Ukraine can hold out into next year, then Russia will begin struggling to resupply its losses of personnel and equipment. Though American aid to Ukraine has stalled under Trump, that gap has been largely plugged by European powers, according to Germany's Kiel Institute think tank.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store