logo
How to remove heart attack causing microplastics from drinking water at home

How to remove heart attack causing microplastics from drinking water at home

Time of Indiaa day ago

Tap water is one of the most common way of hydration.
The human body is made up of 62 to 70% water. No living organism can survive without water. Water helps in digestion, the respiratory process, and blood circulation. It is the primary element for survival for all.
The most common way of consuming water is tap water. But it cannot always be a healthy option for people in many countries. Tap water comes directly from rivers or other sources. It is not filtered and may have contaminants and toxic particles in it. One of the most common concerns these days is the presence of microplastics in water.
According to a study conducted by Orb Media titled "Invisibles: The Plastic Inside Us," it was found that tap water samples from 14 countries were found to contain microplastics.
What came as a shock was that almost 83% of the samples contained microplastics.
micro plastic are small particle size of 1m to 5m.
What exactly is microplastic?
Microplastic is a plastic particle sized between 1 nanometer to 5 millimeters, which makes it smaller than a grain of sand. Microplastic was usually found in oceans but has now made its way into daily life.
A WWF report revealed that drinking water sources—groundwater, tap water, and surface water—are the biggest contributors of microplastic in daily life.
On average, a person consumes 1,769 microparticles on a weekly basis.
Another report from
POLS One
provided deeper insight into how microparticles vary with regional differences in water. In that report, it was found that 94% of US tap water contains microparticles, whereas 72% of European borders have microplastic particles, and India has over 82.4% microplastic in its tap water. The report also stated that an average person consumes 5,800 particles on a daily basis, 88% of which come from tap water.
A New England Journal study has found that drinking microplastic water can increase risk by 4.5 times.
Effect of microplastic on the human body
Microplastic can cause significant damage to the human body. It can irritate the digestive tract, causing inflammation.
A recent study published in
The New England Journal of Medicine
has found a link between microplastics in carotid arteries and an increased risk of heart attacks, strokes, and death. Study found that individuals with microplastics in their carotid plaque had a 4.5-fold higher risk of these events compared to those without.
Microplastic contains harmful chemicals like BPA, phthalates, and flame retardants.
They can cause:
Endocrine disruption (affecting hormones)
Carcinogenic effects (linked to cancer)
Neurotoxic effects (may harm the brain, especially in infants)
One natural way to flush out the toxins, is by drinking adequate water.
Recent studies to remove microparticles
A recent study by scientists at Guangzhou Medical University and Jinan University said that boiling tap water catalyzes mineral (calcium carbonate) deposition, which captures microplastics. It removes up to 90% of particles. After boiling it, you have to filter it using a coffee filter or kettle mesh, allowing water to be filtered further. It is considered a low-cost, effective method that can be used in daily routine.
One step to a healthier you—join Times Health+ Yoga and feel the change

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bharat Biotech signs pact with GSK to develop Shigella vaccine candidate
Bharat Biotech signs pact with GSK to develop Shigella vaccine candidate

Business Standard

time2 hours ago

  • Business Standard

Bharat Biotech signs pact with GSK to develop Shigella vaccine candidate

Bharat Biotech on Thursday announced its partnership with UK-based pharma company GSK for the development and potential use of the Shigella vaccine candidate altSonflex1-2-3. As part of the agreement, Bharat Biotech will lead the further development of altSonflex1-2-3, including Phase 3 clinical trials, regulatory advancement and large-scale manufacturing. GSK, on the other hand, will support the programme by assisting with clinical trial design, securing external funding and contributing to the access and delivery plans and commercialisation strategy. The company said that the agreement marks a significant step in advancing the vaccine, which targets shigellosis, a severe form of bacterial diarrhoea that disproportionately affects children under five years of age in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). 'The vaccine candidate has already demonstrated a strong safety and immunogenicity profile in both European and African trials, including in the primary target population of nine-month-old infants,' it added. Commenting on the development, Krishna Ella, Executive Chairman at Bharat Biotech, said that with no approved vaccine currently available and antimicrobial resistance on the rise, there is an urgent need for scalable, science-backed solutions focused on LMICs. 'This collaboration combines our strengths in innovation, manufacturing and global health commitment.' According to the World Health Organisation (WHO), Shigella was the second-leading cause of diarrhoeal mortality in 2016 (latest data) among all ages and the leading bacterial cause of diarrhoea, accounting for approximately 212,000 deaths and about 13 per cent of all diarrhoea-associated deaths. The disease is a major contributor to child morbidity and mortality, and the emergence of drug-resistant strains underscores the urgent need for a preventive vaccine. The standard of care for shigellosis primarily involves managing dehydration and using antibiotics. While mild cases often resolve with rest and fluid replacement, more severe cases or those with weakened immune systems may benefit from antibiotics like ciprofloxacin or azithromycin. Thomas Breuer, Chief Global Health Officer at GSK, said that by helping reduce illness and antibiotic use, this vaccine has the potential to play a critical role in combating antimicrobial resistance (AMR). The companies claimed that the vaccine candidate has broad serotype coverage, an innovative Generalised Modules for Membrane Antigens (GMMA)-based platform and robust early clinical results. 'GMMA technology is a platform that uses bacterial outer membranes to deliver the O antigen to the immune system, allowing for high-yield production, which creates affordable vaccines for underserved populations,' they added in a statement.

6 fruits that are safe for animals but harmful for humans
6 fruits that are safe for animals but harmful for humans

Time of India

time5 hours ago

  • Time of India

6 fruits that are safe for animals but harmful for humans

Nature is the most beautiful gift to us which is full of surprises especially when it comes to food. While some fruits may seem harmless or even appealing, they can be dangerous for humans but perfectly safe for certain animals. God has created every living organism differently and this is the main reason that makes the digestion, metabolism and eating habits of every living organism different from each other. Well, there are many fruits that can be consumed by animals but can be proved toxic for humans. But what makes these fruits to get easily consumed by animals and not humans is truly interesting to discover. Let's take a quick look at these food treats that can be proved dangerous for humans. 6 animal treats that are toxic for humans Manchineel Manchineel is famous by its name as "death apple" because it generates a small green fruit which may look appealing to the eyes but is very dangerous for human consumption. Even touching them or standing under these trees can cause severe burns and even blindness. It is true that these ingestions can be proved fatal for humans as well. But despite these factors, certain animals, reptiles and land crabs can eat this fruit without any side effects or harm because of their ability to tolerate these toxins which is the quality that humans lack. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Buy Brass Idols - Handmade Brass Statues for Home & Gifting Luxeartisanship Buy Now Undo Thus we can say that Manchineel is a perfect example that what is safe for eating habits in animals can be safe for human consumption too. Source: Wikipedia Yew berries Yew berries grow on a beautiful yet deadly plant named yew tree which is found in many parts of the world. While the fleshy red arils which are the berry-like part are technically non-toxic, the seed inside is highly poisonous to humans and can lead to rapid heart failure if chewed or swallowed. Surprisingly, many birds such as thrushes and waxwings can safely eat yew berries. They digest the fleshy part and pass the toxic seeds whole by being unharmed. However, for humans, yew is one of nature's deadliest plants which proves that a snack for wildlife can be a silent killer for us. Source: Wikipedia Strychnine fruit Strychnine fruit is incredibly toxic to humans but can be consumed by some animals without harm. They are found in parts of Asia and Australia and this small orange fruit contains strychnine and brucine that are potent alkaloids which affect the nervous system. In humans, even a small amount can cause muscle spasms, seizures and potentially death. However, certain birds and animals appear to tolerate the fruit likely due to differences in metabolism or selective feeding habits. While it may be part of their natural diet for humans, this fruit is strictly off-limits and highly dangerous. Source: Wikipedia European spindle berries European spindle berries come from the European spindle tree which is a striking shrub with bright pink fruits that are toxic to humans. These berries contain harmful compounds that can cause severe stomach pain, vomiting, diarrhea and even seizures if ingested. Despite their toxicity, various birds and small mammals eat the berries without harm by playing a key role in spreading the seeds. This contrast highlights how some animals have adapted to safely enjoy fruits that can be dangerous or even deadly to humans. European spindle berries serve as a vivid reminder that nature's treats do not always translate safely across species. Source: Wikipedia Buckthorn berries Buckthorn berries grow on shrubs and small trees that are found in many regions and are known for their glossy black or dark purple appearance. These berries are a valuable food source for various birds and wildlife but they are toxic to humans. Consuming buckthorn berries can cause nausea, vomiting, diarrhea and abdominal pain. The berries contain compounds that irritate the digestive system by making them unsafe for people to eat. Animals have developed a tolerance for these berries but for humans, buckthorn berries are a harmful reminder that not all wild fruits are safe to consume. Source: Wikipedia Holly berries Holly berries are bright red and often seen for decorating homes during the holiday season but they're highly toxic to humans if ingested. The berries contain compounds that can cause nausea, vomiting, diarrhea and stomach pain. While these berries can be dangerous to people, many birds safely eat holly berries that help them to spread the seeds throughout winter when other food is scarce. This difference in tolerance shows how some wildlife can enjoy fruits that pose serious health risks to humans. Holly berries are a striking example of nature's treats that are not meant for humans. Source: Wikipedia Also read: 15 human foods that are safe for dogs and 6 that can be dangerous them

AI takes over Gripen E fighter jet in dogfight trial against real pilot
AI takes over Gripen E fighter jet in dogfight trial against real pilot

Business Standard

time7 hours ago

  • Business Standard

AI takes over Gripen E fighter jet in dogfight trial against real pilot

Swedish defence contractor, Saab, on Wednesday announced that it has conducted successful testing of an artificial intelligence (AI) system piloting a Gripen E warplane in combat scenarios against a real fighter pilot, Reuters reported. The combat testing was done by Saab and a German defence startup, Helsing. It marks a step forward in Europe's effort to compete on autonomy in defence. The trial has also become the first- publicly known instance of AI being tested in a warplane beyond visual range (BVR) rather than in close-range dogfights or on a test aircraft. It was also the first time AI controlled a fully operational jet. The European trials, known as 'Projects Beyond', were carried out between May 28 and June 3 and included three flights, the last of which pitted Helsing's 'Centaur' AI agent piloting a Gripen E against a human-operated Gripen D fighter jet, the report added, citing a statement from the companies. Projects Beyond was funded by the Swedish government, and while the trial remained inconclusive in regards to who performed better, the AI pilot jet or the human top gun, it did indicate an increasing focus on integrating AI and autonomy into combat systems. Saab's Chief Innovation Officer Marcus Wandt, a Swedish astronaut and ex-fighter pilot, told journalists, 'I would say it is not a given who will win... you have to be on your game as a pilot.' Wandt further said, 'If you need to retrain for a new weapon system or new tactics, it will be difficult to stay on par. Right now, there are still pilots out there that will have a chance, but that will change fast.' The trial comes at a time when Saab is exploring new concepts for the next generation of combat jets, which is likely to feature a mix of crewed and uncrewed aircraft, under Sweden's KFS future air combat study.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store