Pope Leo XIV appeals for ‘no more war' in first Sunday message
VATICAN CITY : Pope Leo XIV appealed to the world's major powers for 'no more war' in his first Sunday message to crowds in St Peter's Square since his election as pontiff.
The new pope, elected on May 8, called for an 'authentic and lasting peace' in Ukraine and a ceasefire in Gaza and release of all Israeli hostages.
Leo also welcomed the recent ceasefire between India and Pakistan, and said he was praying to God to grant the world the 'miracle of peace.'
'No more war!' the pope said, repeating a frequent call of the late Pope Francis and noting the recent 80th anniversary of the end of the Second World War, which killed some 60 million people.
Leo said today's world was living through 'the dramatic scenario of a Third World War being fought piecemeal,' again repeating a phrase coined by Francis.
The new pope said he carries in his heart the 'suffering of the beloved people of Ukraine.' He appealed for negotiations to reach an 'authentic, just and lasting peace.'
He also said he was 'profoundly saddened' by the war in Gaza, calling for an immediate ceasefire, humanitarian aid and release of the remaining hostages held by the militant group Hamas.
Leo said he was glad to hear of the recent India-Pakistan ceasefire and hoped negotiations would lead to a lasting accord between the nuclear armed neighbors.
He added: 'But there are so many other conflicts in the world!'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
35 minutes ago
- The Sun
Israel orders military to implement Gaza decisions amid strategy rift
JERUSALEM: Israel's defence minister has declared that the military must carry out any government decisions regarding Gaza, following reports of internal disagreements over a potential full occupation of the territory. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is expected to finalise a new strategy soon, with his security cabinet set to meet on Thursday. Netanyahu has repeatedly emphasised the need to 'complete' the defeat of Hamas to secure the release of hostages taken during the October 2023 attack. Israeli media suggests an escalation of military operations, including in densely populated areas like Gaza City and refugee camps where hostages may be held. The military has issued fresh evacuation warnings for parts of Gaza City and Khan Yunis, signalling an expansion of ground operations. Reports indicate tensions between Netanyahu and armed forces chief Lieutenant General Eyal Zamir over the feasibility of a full occupation. Zamir reportedly warned that such a move would be akin to 'walking into a trap' during a recent security meeting. Defence Minister Israel Katz affirmed that while military leaders can voice concerns, the army must follow government decisions. Opposition leader Yair Lapid has criticised the idea of occupying Gaza, calling it operationally, morally, and economically unwise. US President Donald Trump stated that any decision on Gaza's occupation is 'up to Israel,' distancing himself from the issue. Pressure is mounting on Israel to end the war, with growing concerns over Gaza's humanitarian crisis and the fate of remaining hostages. Only 49 of the 251 hostages taken in 2023 remain in Gaza, with 27 presumed dead by Israeli authorities. The UN has warned of famine in Gaza, with just 1.5% of farmland accessible and undamaged. FAO director-general Qu Dongyu stated that starvation is worsening due to blocked access and collapsed food systems. A recent incident involving an overturned aid truck killed at least 22 people in central Gaza, with accusations of Israeli obstruction. Israel denies involvement, though aid restrictions remain a contentious issue despite a partial easing in May. The war, triggered by Hamas's 2023 attack, has resulted in over 61,000 Palestinian deaths, mostly civilians, according to Gaza's health ministry. - AFP
Malay Mail
2 hours ago
- Malay Mail
The dialogical basis of Anwar Ibrahim's Nobel Prize nomination — Osman Bakar and Phar Kim Beng
AUGUST 7 — In the realm of international recognition for peace and justice, the Nobel Peace Prize stands as the world's most prestigious accolade. While the prize is often awarded for mediating ceasefires or ending wars, it is equally important to remember that peace is a process, not merely a momentary cessation of violence. It is in this broader, global civilisational sense that we offer our endorsement of Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim's nomination — not solely for his timely role in the Thailand–Cambodia ceasefire, but for something far more enduring: his lifelong contributions to the culture of dialogue. His role in the ceasefire, we believe, is not only born out of his sense of responsibility as ASEAN chairman and his 'love thy neighbour' philosophy but more importantly as a clear expression of his lifelong commitment to the pursuit of peace through dialogue. Indeed, even well before the recent escalation between Phnom Penh and Bangkok, there were sustained discussions among scholars, thinkers and civil society leaders about nominating Anwar Ibrahim for the Nobel Peace Prize. Our reasons were rooted not in the tactical diplomacy of a single event, but in the strategic and ethical ethos that Anwar has exemplified over decades: the empowerment of dialogical culture across civilisations, religions and political fault lines. Anwar Ibrahim's public life has consistently been defined by his belief in the power of words over weapons, and in the transformative potential of mutual understanding over mutual suspicion. From his early involvement with Islamic civil society movements in the 1970s, to his intellectual engagement with global thinkers like Ismail Al-Faruqi, John Esposito, even the works of Izutsu Toshiko, Anwar has consistently called for the harmonisation of faith, reason and governance through dialogue. He has embodied what we may call a 'civilisational mediator' — a leader who recognises that conflicts, even geopolitical ones, are rooted in deeper epistemological and cultural misunderstandings. The current ceasefire between Thailand and Cambodia, brokered in part through Malaysia's quiet but deliberate diplomacy under Anwar's chairmanship of ASEAN, is a case in point. While the dynamics of great power politics may shape regional developments in complex ways, this should not detract from the dialogical infrastructure that made the ceasefire possible. Moreover, it is continuing dialogue — the spirit of which flows in his blood veins — that will help sustain peace between the two nations and in the region beyond Anwar's chairmanship of ASEAN and even premiership of Malaysia. The success of any negotiation is built on years of trust, cultural literacy and principled leadership. This is precisely where Anwar's lifetime of work in fostering interfaith dialogue and regional understanding becomes invaluable. Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's civilisational positioning of Malaysia as a bridge nationhas become a model of peaceful coexistence in an increasingly fractured global order. — Picture by Sayuti Zainudin His leadership in convening the ASEAN–GCC Summit, coupled with China's active participation in the ASEAN–GCC–China Summit, represents a defining moment of dialogical diplomacy. These summits were not merely symbolic. They brought together diverse civilisational blocs — Southeast Asia, the Gulf and East Asia — into a single framework of cooperation grounded in mutual respect, shared values and an agenda for peace and development. That such a summit could take place under Malaysia's chairmanship, with Anwar at the helm, reflects his profound ability to orchestrate dialogue at a civilisational scale. It is worth recalling that Nobel Peace Laureates are not chosen merely for stopping a war. Many have been honoured for laying the groundwork for future peace — by building institutions, creating intellectual bridges or planting seeds of understanding in hostile terrains. In this regard, Anwar's lifelong commitment to the dialogical method — to resolving difference through deliberation rather than domination — resonates with the highest ideals of Alfred Nobel's vision. Anwar Ibrahim's political trials have also forged in him a moral authority that cannot be manufactured. His years in prison did not diminish his belief in reconciliation. Upon returning to power, he chose dialogue over vengeance, inclusion over exclusion. This is not just a political choice — it is a philosophical and a moral one, a commitment to the idea that democracy, like religion, must be grounded in a culture of ethical conversation and mutual respect. Moreover, his civilisational positioning of Malaysia as a bridge nation — between East and West, Islam and the modern world, between liberalism and tradition — has become a model of peaceful coexistence in an increasingly fractured global order. Whether through the ASEAN–GCC–China platform, Track II diplomacy, or his writings and speeches on the spiritual and ethical foundations of governance, Anwar's hand has always been visible, guiding the conversation toward common ground. Some may argue that the full impact of his dialogical contributions has yet to be measured on the global stage. We submit, however, that the Nobel Peace Prize has always been as much about moral signal as political signal. It is about honouring those who, through patience and principle, have shaped a new architecture of peace, even when global attention is elsewhere. In that spirit, we submit that Anwar Ibrahim's Nobel-worthiness lies not in a single ceasefire — though that alone is commendable — but in a life devoted to the ethics of dialogue. A prize bestowed upon him would be a recognition not only of his past, but a reinforcement of a model the world urgently needs: leadership rooted in humility, guided by wisdom, and committed to dialogue in the service of humanity. Let us not wait until history catches up. Let us recognise now what many already know: that Anwar Ibrahim represents the dialogical conscience of our time. * Emeritus Prof Dr Datuk Osman Bakar is the Al-Ghazali Chair of Epistemology and Civilisational Studies Rector at International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM). Prof Dr Phar Kim Beng is professor of Asean Studies, IIUM and director, Institute of Internationalization and Asean Studies (IINTAS). ** This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.
Malay Mail
2 hours ago
- Malay Mail
‘I watch the shows': How Trump's love for TV drives his major foreign policies, amid shift in Gaza concern
WASHINGTON, Aug 7 — Donald Trump's sudden concern about starving Palestinians was a major shift for the US president, who had previously ignored the endless cries for help from aid groups. So what changed? In his words, it was images of emaciated children in Gaza that Trump saw on television — his main window into the world that has long shaped his political and diplomatic decision-making. Trump made clear his affection for the small screen in late July when asked if he agreed with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, a major US ally, that there was no famine in Gaza. 'Based on television, I would say not particularly, because those children look very hungry,' said Trump, a former reality TV star. 'That's real starvation stuff. I see it, and you can't fake that.' Since then, the 79-year-old has repeated that aid must be brought to people living in the war-ravaged Palestinian territory, though he has stopped of any major diplomatic moves. 'Trump has a reputation for not reading anything, including the briefing papers that his aides prepare for him, and for always believing that he knows better than his staff or anyone else does,' said Dan Kennedy, a journalist professor at Northeastern University. 'So it's not surprising that he would be affected by images on television, especially since he is known to spend a lot of time watching TV.' 'I watch the shows' Trump has attended 22 intelligence briefings since taking office in January, according to an AFP tally, despite several reports having revealed that he lacks interest in written reports. However, his love for television is well-documented — even when it comes to major decisions. In 2015, before he first entered the White House, the billionaire told a journalist asking how he educates himself on military strategy: 'Well, I watch the shows.' And a New York Times report recounted how Trump spent several hours a day in his first term glued to the television, mainly watching Fox News — his favourite channel — but also CNN, NBC and ABC news channels. His second term has been little changed, despite Trump leading an election campaign that deployed social media and podcasts. 'Trump is a product of his generation,' Kennedy said. 'He's not sitting around looking at TikTok.' 'Great television' The Republican, who hosted 14 seasons of 'The Apprentice' television series, knows better than most how images can be weaponised for political point-scoring. He was gleeful after his shocking clash with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky at the White House in February, which saw the pair rowing in front of the world's press. 'This is going to be great television,' Trump said. And in May he gave a similar public dressing down to South African leader Cyril Ramaphosa when he sat in the Oval Office for what turned into a diplomatic ambush. Trump hijacked the meeting by playing a video montage — one littered with inaccuracies — that purported to prove claims of a 'genocide' against white farmers in South Africa. — AFP
