logo
Starmer faces union backlash over benefits cuts

Starmer faces union backlash over benefits cuts

Telegraph12-03-2025

Sir Keir Starmer is facing a union backlash over plans to cut welfare.
Paul Nowak, the general secretary of the Trades Union Congress (TUC), warned the Prime Minister that cuts to benefit payments would 'only make the current challenges worse'.
The remarks from the senior union figure mark his first intervention on Labour's plans to crack down on welfare payments, expected in the Spring Statement later this month.
Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, is expected to make £5 billion in savings through tougher tests on a disability benefit called personal independence payments (PIP), designed to help with extra costs caused by the disability.
Mr Nowak said: 'A major lesson from the Tory years is that austerity damaged the nation's health. We must not make the same mistake again.
'Pushing disabled people into hardship with cuts to support will only make the current challenges worse – and will not win public support.'
He added: 'The Government's plan to Make Work Pay will ensure more better jobs. But cutting PIP is not the solution – not least because it enables many disabled people to access work so that they do not have to rely on out-of-work benefits.'
The union backlash to the proposals piles further pressure on the Prime Minister and Chancellor, who are also coming under fire from their own back benches.
Nadia Whittome, Labour MP for Nottingham East, said that Labour was 'getting it badly wrong on this'.
She told the BBC Radio 4 Today programme: 'It was wrong when David Cameron cut welfare, it would be wrong for us to do that now, because it's not disabled people who crashed the economy, or who were responsible for low wages or rising rents or falling living standards, and we must not scapegoat them for the failures and the political choices of Conservative government.'
Sir Keir faces the biggest rebellion of his premiership over the cuts, with about 80 Labour MPs said to oppose the proposals to rein in public spending through radical welfare reforms.
It is the latest in a string of controversial decisions on the two-child benefit cap, winter fuel payments, overseas aid and compensation for Waspi women which are causing anger among Labour MPs.
The TUC boss said that reforms to the system were needed as it had 'too much of a one-size-fits-all approach' and that assessors 'lack medical expertise'.
In a statement on Wednesday, Mr Nowak added: 'The Government should prioritise fixing these problems, with input from trade unions and organisations led by disabled people.'
PIPs can be worth up to £9,600 a year and are designed to cover extra costs for people with disabilities and other health issues.
Since they were introduced in 2013, the number of people using them has increased, especially for those citing mental health and anxiety issues.
The expected changes would also raise the basic rate for Universal Credit paid to those searching for work, or in work, while cutting the rate for those judged as unfit for work.
Some of the savings will be invested into employment support for those looking for a job.
It comes as Sir Keir is grappling with the twin challenges of funding a rise in defence spending and plugging a £9 billion fall in the Government's fiscal headroom.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Rayner faces Labour backbench call to ‘smash' existing housebuilding model
Rayner faces Labour backbench call to ‘smash' existing housebuilding model

South Wales Argus

time7 minutes ago

  • South Wales Argus

Rayner faces Labour backbench call to ‘smash' existing housebuilding model

Labour's Chris Hinchliff has proposed a suite of changes to the Government's flagship Planning and Infrastructure Bill, part of his party's drive to build 1.5 million homes in England by 2029. Mr Hinchliff has proposed arming town halls with the power to block developers' housebuilding plans, if they have failed to finish their previous projects. He has also suggested housebuilding objectors should be able to appeal against green-lit large developments, if they are not on sites which a council has set aside for building, and put forward a new duty for authorities to protect chalk streams from 'pollution, abstraction, encroachment and other forms of environmental damage'. Deputy Prime Minister and Housing Secretary Angela Rayner is fronting the Government's plans for 1.5 million new homes by 2029 (Jordan Pettitt/PA) Mr Hinchliff has told the PA news agency he does not 'want to rebel' but said he would be prepared to trigger a vote over his proposals. He added his ambition was for 'a progressive alternative to our planning system and the developer-led profit-motivated model that we have at the moment'. The North East Hertfordshire MP said: 'Frankly, to deliver the genuinely affordable housing that we need for communities like those I represent, we just have to smash that model. 'So, what I'm setting out is a set of proposals that would focus on delivering the genuinely affordable homes that we need, empowering local communities and councils to have a driving say over what happens in the local area, and also securing genuine protection for the environment going forwards.' Mr Hinchliff warned that the current system results in 'speculative' applications on land which falls outside of councils' local housebuilding strategies, 'putting significant pressure on inadequate local infrastructure'. In his constituency, which lies between London and Cambridge, 'the properties that are being built are not there to meet local need', Mr Hinchliff said, but were instead 'there to be sold for the maximum profit the developer can make'. Asked whether his proposals chimed with the first of Labour's five 'missions' at last year's general election – 'growth' – he replied: 'If we want to have the key workers that our communities need – the nurses, the social care workers, the bus drivers, the posties – they need to have genuinely affordable homes. 'You can't have that thriving economy without the workforce there, but at the moment, the housing that we are delivering is not likely to be affordable for those sorts of roles. 'It's effectively turning the towns into commuter dormitories rather than having thriving local economies, so for me, yes, it is about supporting the local economy.' Mr Hinchliff warned that the 'bottleneck' which slows housebuilding 'is not process, it's profit'. The developer-led housing model is broken. It has failed to deliver affordable homes. Torching environmental safeguards won't fix it—the bottleneck isn't just process, it's profit. We need a progressive alternative: mass council house building in sustainable communities. — Chris Hinchliff MP (@CHinchliffMP) June 6, 2025 Ms Rayner, the Deputy Prime Minister and Housing Secretary, is fronting the Government's plans for 1.5 million new homes by 2029. Among the proposed reforms is a power for ministers to decide which schemes should come before councillors, and which should be delegated to local authority staff, so that committees can 'focus their resources on complex or contentious development where local democratic oversight is required'. Natural England will also be able to draft 'environmental delivery plans (EDPs)' and acquire land compulsorily to bolster conservation efforts. Mr Hinchliff has suggested these EDPs must come with a timeline for their implementation, and that developers should improve the conservation status of any environmental features before causing 'damage' – a proposal which has support from at least 43 cross-party MP backers. MPs will spend two days debating the Bill on Monday and Tuesday. Chris Curtis, the Labour MP for Milton Keynes North, warned that some of Mr Hinchliff's proposals 'if enacted, would deepen our housing crisis and push more families into poverty'. He said: 'I won't stand by and watch more children in the country end up struggling in temporary accommodation to appease pressure groups. No Labour MP should. 'It's morally reprehensible to play games with this issue. 'These amendments should be withdrawn.'

Family SUVs face road tax hikes under new proposals pushed by Labour politicians
Family SUVs face road tax hikes under new proposals pushed by Labour politicians

Daily Mail​

time13 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Family SUVs face road tax hikes under new proposals pushed by Labour politicians

Family SUVs could be targeted with hikes in road tax and parking permits under proposals being pushed for by Labour politicians. The call for higher levies on large SUVs, often chosen by families for their space, came from Labour and Green party members of the London Assembly. The motion was passed this week amid concerns about 'car-spreading' – where more road space is taken up by larger vehicles – and calls on London mayor Sir Sadiq Khan to write to the Treasury and ask for vehicle excise duty (VED, or road tax) to incorporate a 'progressive' element that includes the vehicle's weight. If introduced, this would mean SUV-driving families in the UK face being hit with much larger road tax bills. Many SUV drivers already pay £600 for the first five years on new models under the premium car tax fee, which levies more against vehicles worth over £40,000. The standard road tax rate is £195 per year. The motion also asked London councils to look at hiking the cost of parking permits in the capital for SUVs, so as 'to account for pressure they put on road space and local parking spaces'. But critics accused Labour of declaring war on drivers, with AA president Edmund King, saying: 'It is up to Londoners to choose the type of vehicle that best fulfils their needs.'

Colombia will not paralyze economy to comply with fiscal rule, says minister
Colombia will not paralyze economy to comply with fiscal rule, says minister

Reuters

time14 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Colombia will not paralyze economy to comply with fiscal rule, says minister

BOGOTA, June 6 (Reuters) - Colombian Finance Minister German Avila said on Friday that "paralyzing" the economy to comply with the country's fiscal rule is not an option and that the government will take steps, including increased borrowing, if needed to ensure growth. His remarks follow news that Colombia may invoke an "escape clause" to suspend compliance with the fiscal rule governing government finances.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store