Councilmembers debate bill preventing undocumented immigrants from using taxpayer-funded services
City Council members today debated a bill that would prevent undocumented immigrants from using taxpayer-funded services in Jacksonville.
The bill would also require the Mayor to report to the council about the number of undocumented immigrants in public housing and the city's compliance with federal immigration laws.
Essentially, the bill sponsored bans the city and anyone who gets city funding from providing services to or supporting people who are unlawfully in the United States.
>>> STREAM ACTION NEWS JAX LIVE <<<
One big question that came up was whether hospitals would face penalties for providing care to an undocumented patient.
'If you are accepting essentially services paid for by taxpayer dollars here in Jacksonville, and you're not in the country legally, you shouldn't be able to get it,' said Councilman Rory Diamond, the sponsor of the bill.
This discussion surrounding the city bill led to a lot of debate on Monday.
Council member Rory Diamond wants to make sure taxpayer money does not go to undocumented immigrants in Jacksonville. But two amendments carved out some big exceptions today.
[DOWNLOAD: Free Action News Jax app for alerts as news breaks]
Under the first amendment, if a group knowingly gives money to undocumented immigrants, it will be punished.
The second says UF Health, Kids Hope Alliances, and groups helping sex trafficking victims would be exempt.
In addition, some council members who were unsure of the bill said it would put too much of a burden on local organizations and hospitals, who would have to worry that their good work would somehow get them in trouble.
[SIGN UP: Action News Jax Daily Headlines Newsletter]
'It concerns me that if a child, if the parent of a child, a family, needed some assistance, and not documented they're still human beings that live and coexist with us,' said Councilman Matt Carlucci.
Councilman Diamond shared a different perspective.
'What's not humanitarian is saying, 'Hey, come to America. We'll give you everything for free.' And that's essentially what that policy would lead to. Just a welcome to Jacksonville, we'll give you everything for free. I don't want that. We want to say no, you need to be here legally,' said Councilman Diamond.
Both of the amendments presented today passed. The bill moves to the finance committee on Tuesday, June 3, and then to the full city council next Tuesday, June 9.
Click here to download the free Action News Jax news and weather apps, click here to download the Action News Jax Now app for your smart TV and click here to stream Action News Jax live.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
FDOT says raising of Main Street Bridge was not intended to stop Pride March
We're getting new answers from the Florida Department of Transportation on why the Main Street Bridge was raised ahead of a planned Pride March on Sunday. The bridge lighting battle has been going on for at least two years, after Gov. Ron DeSantis ordered all state-run bridges be lit red, white and blue last year for the so-called Freedom Summer. The move prevented cities like Jacksonville from lighting some bridges in rainbow colors for Pride month. In response, protestors in 2024 held their own lighting of the Main Street Bridge using flashlights. This year, after FDOT announced all state run bridges would again be lit red, white, and blue for the county's 250th birthday, Pride activists wanted to repeat last year's Main Street Bridge lighting. But an hour before they'd been told they would need to clear off the bridge ahead of scheduled maintenance, the bridge was raised. [DOWNLOAD: Free Action News Jax app for alerts as news breaks] Hampton Ray with FDOT told Action News Jax the bridge was briefly lifted to get workers into position, and was lowered after marchers had already moved on. He claimed work still began at 9 p.m. as scheduled. 'We did have to have our crews in place. And this was performed every single night from Thursday night till actually Monday evening. Crews were performing this same high lift from between 7:30 and 8:30 in order to access the point,' Ray said. [SIGN UP: Action News Jax Daily Headlines Newsletter] In response to the explanation given by FDOT, March Organizer Matt McAllister sent Action News Jax this statement: 'I thank Mr. Ray for his detailed and professional explanation. Given our intention to fully comply with 9:00 pm scheduled closure, the 20 minute delay would have made it impossible to place 146 people in precise locations to shine for 20 minutes and then safely and completely evacuate the bridge. When we asked city officials if our 8:00 pm entrance would, for any reason, be impeded, we were assured it would not be,' McAllister said. 'In the end, the bureaucratic lemons served to us made a particularly sweet lemonade. It was important to return Pride lighting, however briefly, to its rightful place on the Acosta Bridge.' The FDOT spokesperson also said generally, it's helpful for groups to have permits to ensure situations like this can be avoided. McAllister noted permits are not required for gatherings in public spaces with fewer than 500 participants. Click here to download the free Action News Jax news and weather apps, click here to download the Action News Jax Now app for your smart TV and click here to stream Action News Jax live.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
City Council OKs budget, puts project of resident on hold
The approval of a new budget, a rundown of the 2013 bond projects, and a balcony over a city right-of-way were discussed by the Tahlequah City Council during a meeting earlier this week. The Council approved the FY2025-2026 budget at the June 3 meeting, and in the absence of Mayor Suzanne Myers, Treasurer Marty Hainzinger commented on the final numbers. "This budget prioritizes all of the essential services such as public safety, infrastructure, community development, while holding all the operational spending in line with revenues," Hainzinger said. A balance of $2,241,550 carried over from FY 2024-2025; projected revenue is $14,271,113, bringing the total available to appropriate to $16,512,663, states the budget summary. Projected expenses are $12,886,330 and total projected carryover is $3,626,333. A 10% carryover of reserves is $362,633; and a projected general fund total to appropriate for FY 2025-2026 is $16,190,758. Before the budget was voted on, Ordinance No. 1389-2025 was considered and approved because of how the proposed ordinance could affect the budget, said City Administrator Taylor Tannehill. "This is the second shot of this version of this ordinance; it is drastically different than what was proposed at the last meeting," Tannehill said. "The gist of it is in May of each year the finance director will certify projected revenues for next year and during budget time we would only appropriate 95% of those revenues into the next year's budget." The remaining 5% would go to a stabilization fund and as that grows to 15% of any given year's projected revenues, the city would budget more than the 95%, Tannehill said. City Attorney John Hammons clarified what the ordinance would do. "We would build into the revenue stabilization fund until such time as the revenue stabilization fund reaches 15%; thereafter, that 5% would be allocated to a special cash fund and that could be allocated for whatever purpose the City Council found to be appropriate," Hammons said. Dr. John Uzzo compiled a list of projects proposed for completion with the 2013 bond and asked the city to comment on their progress. Tannehill said all have been completed, are funded or are in the works. "There were 20 projects listed on the ballot to be completed, and of those 20, it's safe to say that 17 have been completed," Tannehill said. "One of the three remaining is South Muskogee, so we anticipate that wrapping up later this year." Two other projects not completed from that bond issue are the North Grand Road project and the East Allen Road project, Tannehill said. "Each one of the 20 items there [has had money spent on them]," Tannehill said. "The money spent on East Allen Road and North Grand has been engineering, and we are currently doing right-of-way acquisitions for East Allen Road and will continue to see those expenditures rise in those columns as we proceed." Ward 1 City Councilor Danny Perry asked if there was a timeline for completion of the construction on South Muskogee. "When we had the bridge change order that [timeline] was about eight weeks from that time, and it's been two or three weeks since then," Tannehill said. On May 30, the manhole relocation and construction of a sewer line under the bridge next to Lowry's Discount Furniture was almost complete. The crew was finishing up the project and the cones and traffic barriers were being pulled back. James Murray and Kenna Beckett, owners of property at 334 N. Muskogee Ave., presented a request to the Council to build a balcony over city right-of-way over a sidewalk along Morgan Street, across from Norris Park. Tannehill said Murray approached the city to do this project but no decision was made. A few weeks later, Tannehill sent an email to Murray that there was interest in the project, and Murray took it to the Board of Adjustment for a variance, which was not authorized. "The city does allow for the construction in the city of right-of-way with the Council's blessing; that's why this is before you today," Hammons said. "I've had numerous conversations with the applicant and we have a draft version of the agreement, which largely meets with my approval." Hammons said a policy provision in the agreement, on which he had no position, is the nature of termination of the agreement if it was approved by the council. Ward 3 City Councilor Stephen Highers said the council was not voting on whether the balcony could be built or not, but whether the mayor is allowed to negotiate an agreement with the property owners. Murray had submitted a packet explaining the project, with examples of other businesses in that same area that had balconies and bollards to stop traffic from crashing into the buildings. Murray said they have spent $50,000 on improvements that didn't need approval and plan to put another $50,000 into it if the city approved their request. "We are trying to make this consistent with the rest of the area, and from my property, I can throw a rock and hit three of them that have posts in the sidewalk," Murray said. "And I'm just asking to let me do that as well." Hammons said the only thing left for him was the policy question that the Council needed to address – that it not remove the structure within five years. Highers said this project is what Tahlequah is looking for, which is bringing investment and housing downtown. The item was approved, but with a caveat initiated by Ward 2 City Councilor Keith Baker – that the couple return to the next Council meeting with a revised agreement that reflects the time period the "license" with the city for these changes could be revoked, if needed. After the meeting, Murray and Beckett expressed their frustration at the numerous delays in the city's giving approval. Karen Murphy, communications and marketing director for the city of Tahlequah, said after the meeting that the administration wanted to make a statement for publication by TDP on the matter. "The city is excited to work with this couple and really pleased with the improvements that have been done," Murphy said. "We apologize for the frustration and understand it, but we want to make sure we are doing our due diligence and going through the right steps." Murphy said Myers is ready to start the negotiations as soon as possible. "It is frustrating, but the city has to do what's right," Murphy said. "If there is concern about safety, we just want to make sure we are protecting our citizens and their property." What's next The next Tahlequah City Council meeting is July 7, 5:30 p.m. in Council Chambers at the City Administration Building.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Pusha T Addresses Drake's UMG Lawsuit Over Kendrick Lamar's 'Not Like Us'
Pusha T is, once again, making his stance clear when it comes to his longtime rival, Drake—this time in light of the rapper's recent lawsuit against Universal Music Group. The legal action, sparked by Kendrick Lamar's scathing 'Not Like Us' diss track, has prompted reactions across the Hip-Hop community, but Pusha isn't holding back. In a new profile with GQ, the Virginia Beach native shared his blunt reaction to Drake's decision to take legal action, questioning what it means for his place in rap culture. 'I don't rate him no more,' Pusha said of Drake. 'The suing thing is bigger than some rap sh*t. I just don't rate you. Damn, it's like it just kind of cheapens the art of it once we gotta have real questions about suing and litigation. Like, what? For this?' Though critical of the lawsuit, Pusha did acknowledge that Drake may have a legitimate case, subtly referencing how his own 2018 diss, 'The Story of Adidon,' was allegedly suppressed by UMG. Still, as for reigniting their lyrical feud, Pusha appears unmoved. 'I think after everything that had been done, I don't think there was ever anything subliminal to be said ever again in life. Not only just musically, like bro, I actually was in Canada. I actually had a show and made it home,' he said, before adding: 'So, I can't pay attention to none of that. I did the dance for real, not to come back and tip-toe around anything.' Elsewhere in the article, Pusha touched on his fallout with Ye West, as well as he and his brother No Malice's forthcoming Clipse album, set to drop this summer. Speaking of Drake, the rapper recently made music history, becoming the artist with the most Diamond-certified singles ever, according to the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA). With the recent elevation of 'Hold On, We're Going Home' and 'Best I Ever Had' to Diamond status—each representing 10 million units sold or streamed—Drake now holds an unprecedented 10 Diamond singles. The hitmaker surpassed both Post Malone and Garth Brooks, who previously shared the top spot with nine a piece. More from Pusha T On Current Relationship With Ye: "I Don't Think He's A Man" DJ Akademiks Clowns Ab-Soul For Being Legally Blind In Response To Diss Track Drake Breaks Record For Most Diamond-Certified Singles In RIAA History
