Trump warns Israeli attack on Iran ‘could very well happen'
Donald Trump said he believed an Iran nuclear deal was within reach but cautioned that an Israeli strike could derail it. (AP pic)
WASHINGTON : President Donald Trump warned Thursday that Israel may soon strike Iran's nuclear sites, but urged the key US ally to hold off as he stressed his commitment to a diplomatic solution.
Tensions have soared in the region in the last two days with Trump warning of a 'massive conflict' and drawing down US staff.
Tehran meanwhile defiantly vowed to increase its output of enriched uranium – a key sticking point in talks with Washington – after being censured by the UN's atomic watchdog.
'I don't want to say imminent, but it looks like it's something that could very well happen,' Trump told reporters at the White House when asked if an Israeli attack loomed.
Trump said he believed a 'pretty good' deal on Iran's nuclear programme was 'fairly close,' but said that an Israeli attack on its arch-foe could wreck the chances of an agreement.
The US leader did not disclose the details of a conversation on Monday with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, but said: 'I don't want them going in, because I think it would blow it.'
Trump quickly added: 'Might help it actually, but it also could blow it.'
News outlet Axios reported that Trump had said the US would not participate in any strikes.
US troops in crosshairs
Trump later appeared to want tensions dialed down in a post on social media, while insisting that Iran must 'give up hopes' of developing a nuclear weapon.
'We remain committed to a Diplomatic Resolution to the Iran Nuclear Issue! My entire Administration has been directed to negotiate with Iran,' Trump said on his Truth Social network.
Tensions have rapidly escalated in the past few days amid growing speculation that Israel could push ahead with air strikes on Iran.
Trump's Middle East pointman Steve Witkoff is set to hold a sixth round of talks with Iran on Sunday in Oman, which has mediated efforts towards a nuclear deal so far.
But Iran has also ramped up rhetorical pressure before the talks, including with a threat to strike American bases in the region if the negotiations break down and conflict erupts.
'If the talks fail, the risk of military escalation becomes much more immediate,' said Hamidreza Azizi, a visiting fellow at the German Institute for International and Security Affairs.
The US on Wednesday said it was reducing embassy staff in Iraq – long a zone of proxy conflict with Iran.
Israel, which counts on US military and diplomatic support, sees the cleric-run state in Tehran as an existential threat and hit Iranian air defenses last year.
Netanyahu has vowed less restraint since the unprecedented Oct 7, 2023 attack on Israel by Tehran-backed Hamas, which triggered the massive Israeli offensive in Gaza.
'Non-compliance'
The US and other Western countries, along with Israel, have repeatedly accused Iran of seeking a nuclear weapon, which it has repeatedly denied.
Israel again called for global action after the UN's International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) accused Iran on Wednesday of non-compliance with its obligations.
The resolution could lay the groundwork for European countries to invoke a 'snapback' mechanism, which expires in October, that would reinstate UN sanctions eased under a 2015 nuclear deal negotiated by then US president Barack Obama.
Trump pulled out of the deal in his first term and slapped Iran with sweeping sanctions.
Iran's nuclear chief, Mohammad Eslami, slammed the resolution as 'extremist' and blamed Israeli influence.
In response to the resolution, Iran said it would launch a new enrichment centre in a secure location.
Iran would also replace 'all of these first-generation machines with sixth-generation advanced machines' at the Fordo uranium enrichment plant, said Behrouz Kamalvandi, spokesman of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran.
Iran currently enriches uranium to 60%, far above the 3.67% limit set in the 2015 deal and close, though still short, of the 90% needed for a nuclear warhead.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
2 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Anwar urges restraint after US attack on Iran's nuclear sites
Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim said the US's involvement in the Iran-Israel conflict is only worsening the situation. PETALING JAYA : Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim has raised concerns over the escalating conflict between Iran and Israel after US forces struck three of the republic's nuclear sites. Anwar stressed that for genuine resolution, pressure must be placed on Israel to stop its provocative and violent actions against other nations. 'When they launch attacks and kill the people of Iran, there will inevitably be retaliation. Our position is one of fairness. 'In Gaza, the killings continue and it includes women and children. Now Israel is attacking Iran, which has decided to fight back. The involvement of outside powers, including the US, is only worsening the situation,' he told reporters after an event in Kuching today. Anwar, who also serves as finance minister, warned that a closure of the Strait of Hormuz would have dire consequences on the global economy. 'To me, what matters most are human lives and justice. 'The question is, if Iran is not allowed to respond, why allow Israel to (continue) acting in such a manner?' he said. Earlier today, AFP reported US president Donald Trump as saying that 'Tehran's nuclear programme had been obliterated' after US forces struck three Iranian nuclear sites – Natanz, Isfahan and Fordow – in a 'very successful attack'. After days of deliberation and long before his self-imposed two-week deadline, Trump's decision to join Israel's military campaign against Iran represents a major escalation of the conflict. In a speech that lasted just over three minutes, Trump said Iran's future held 'either peace or tragedy', and that there were many other targets that could be hit by the US military. Yemen's Houthis had said they will target US vessels and battleships in the Red Sea if the Trump administration gets involved and continued to support the Israeli attack on Iran, according to a statement published on a Houthi spokesman's official Telegram account. Shell Plc CEO Wael Sawan and Petronas group CEO Tengku Muhammad Taufik Aziz have in the past week warned of rude shocks to global trade and oil prices following the escalating conflict around the Strait of Hormuz, a major transit route. In a separate statement, opposition leader Hamzah Zainudin said Perikatan Nasional strongly condemned the acts of aggression carried out by both Israel and the US against Iran. The Malaysian government, he said, must take a firmer and more resolute stance by calling for an emergency meeting of the United Nations Security Council to halt the actions of Israel and the US. 'Malaysia must also urgently engage with like-minded nations in a concerted and principled effort to address this crisis in a just, fair, and rules-based manner.'
The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
US bombing of Iranian nuclear sites sparks worldwide condemnation
This handout satellite picture provided by Maxar Technologies and taken on June 22, 2025, shows Iran's Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant (FFEP), northeast of the city of Qom, after US strikes on the site. President Donald Trump said US air strikes early on Sunday, June 22 "totally obliterated" Iran's main nuclear sites, as Washington joined Israel's war with Tehran in a flashpoint moment for the Middle East. -- Photo by Satellite image ©2025 Maxar Technologies / AFP KUALA LUMPUR, June 22 (Bernama) -- A wave of condemnation has followed the United States' recent airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, with global powers and regional states warning of a widening conflict and urging an immediate return to diplomacy. According to Anadolu Ajansi (AA), China strongly condemned the US for targeting Iranian nuclear sites safeguarded by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). In an official statement, the Foreign Ministry said the strikes "seriously violate the purposes and principles of the UN Charter' and have intensified tensions in the Middle East. Beijing called for dialogue and restraint from all parties. Saudi Arabia voiced deep concern, describing the attack as a violation of Iran's sovereignty. In a statement, the Foreign Ministry urged all parties to pursue de-escalation and called on the international community to intensify efforts toward a political resolution. Oman said the strikes constituted a "serious violation of international law and the UN Charter.' The Foreign Ministry stressed Iran's right to develop peaceful nuclear energy under international supervision and warned that continued escalation could widen the conflict. Lebanese President Joseph Aoun said the attacks risk expanding tensions that threaten stability across the region. He called for restraint and serious negotiations, stressing Lebanon's unwillingness to bear the cost of further conflict. Iraq condemned the US strikes, calling them an act of escalation that "goes beyond the borders of any country.' Government spokesman Basim al-Awadi warned that military solutions would only lead to destruction and instability. Qatar expressed deep concern, warning that further escalation could lead to "catastrophic consequences' for the region. It called for an immediate halt to hostilities and urged renewed diplomatic engagement. Egypt warned of grave consequences resulting from the escalation, with its Foreign Ministry calling for respect for international law and a peaceful resolution to the crisis. Latin American leaders from Chile, Cuba, Venezuela, Colombia, and Bolivia condemned the US airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, describing them as violations of international law and a threat to global stability. Pakistan condemned the strikes as a violation of international norms and reaffirmed Iran's right to defend itself under the UN Charter. Islamabad expressed concern over the deteriorating situation and called for restraint. France expressed concern over the US attacks, with Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot stating on X that Paris was not involved in the operation. He urged all parties to avoid widening the conflict and to prioritise diplomatic solutions. Bahrain shifted to online learning and remote work in response to rising tensions, advising citizens to avoid unnecessary travel. The Interior Ministry cited public safety concerns amid heightened regional risks. European Council President Antonio Costa urged restraint and compliance with international law, stating that diplomacy is the only viable path to peace. He warned against actions that could endanger nuclear safety. Switzerland called for an immediate return to negotiations and full respect for the UN Charter. The Swiss Foreign Ministry said the escalating conflict poses a serious threat to civilian lives and infrastructure. Ireland's Deputy Prime Minister Simon Harris warned that the risk of a wider Iran-Israel conflict is "more real than ever.' He stressed the need for de-escalation and highlighted the safety of Irish peacekeepers in Lebanon. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz called on Iran to begin immediate talks with the US and Israel to avoid further bloodshed. He urged a diplomatic solution to prevent broader conflict. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi spoke with Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian and urged "immediate' de-escalation. Modi reiterated that diplomacy remains the only path toward regional peace and stability. Turkiye said it is deeply concerned over the consequences of the US strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities. The Foreign Ministry emphasised that peace must be sought through dialogue, not armed confrontation. - Bernama
Malay Mail
4 hours ago
- Malay Mail
What now for Iran after US strikes? — Ng Chien Chern
JUNE 22 — Today marks the United States' entry into war against Iran after two weeks of fighting between Israel and the latter. Donald Trump has floated the idea of using the United States' proprietary bunker-busting bomb to destroy Iran's underground uranium-enrichment facilities at Fordow. Saturday's strike dispelled any remaining doubts about whether Trump, who had always portrayed himself as an anti-war president, would employ such a drastic move and risk dragging the US into another 'forever war'. With its back against the wall, Iran now faces only a handful of options in response to the latest development. For some time, Iran has warned against US involvement in its conflict with Israel or risked a regional conflagration. However, it has few cards to play following the assassination of many top brass military personnel on June 13 and the debilitating attack on its missile infrastructure by Israel. While Iran is believed to have massive stockpiles of ballistic missiles, a protracted war of attrition is unlikely to end in the regime's favour — especially when its proxies such as Hezbollah in Lebanon, the Houthis in Yemen, and Hamas in Gaza have been severely weakened, rendering it alone in the region. Nevertheless, Iran still wields some leverage against the United States; in particular, it sits in a strategic location to enact a blockade on the Strait of Hormuz, which would result in soaring oil prices. Roughly 20 per cent of the world's petroleum passes through this narrow strait. Countries like China, India and Japan, which are reliant on the oil flowing out of the Persian Gulf, are particularly sensitive to such a price shock. Similarly, the US is not immune to the spike in oil prices, as it can stoke domestic inflation. A protester with a US dollar note taped over her mouth participates in a demonstration in support of Iran and Palestinians in Gaza, and against the actions of Israel and the United States in Sydney on June 22, 2025. — AFP pic On the other hand, sealing off the strait would almost certainly alienate Iran from whatever diplomatic goodwill remains. This would bolster not only the United States' but Israel's justification that Iran indeed poses a threat to the region and should be pressured into full surrender. However, when push comes to shove, Iran may still do the unthinkable to put the United States under international pressure to scale back its attack. Iran may also opt for a more calibrated retaliation against the United States by attacking its military installations in the region. A limited attack may demonstrate to international audiences that Iran does not yield to foreign aggression, which in turn signals to Israel that it retains sufficient capability and capacity to continue the fight. But every act of retaliation risks provoking further escalation with severe casualties, as Trump warned, 'any retaliation will be met with force far greater than what was witnessed tonight'. That brings us to Iran's final, starkest option: capitulation and de-escalation to preserve the survival of its current regime. Faced with the very real prospect of regime collapse, the Ayatollah regime could forswear its nuclear enrichment programme in exchange for a ceasefire. While this would leave hardliners furious and undermine Iran's narrative of resistance, it might be the only way to preserve the Islamic Republic. If the bunker-busting bomb dropped by the US has indeed obliterated the facilities and set back the development of its nuclear weapons for years, further defiance would serve no purpose in the interest of regime survival. Iran is at a crossroads now. Its Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, is allegedly sheltering in a bunker and has picked his successor in the event of his assassination. Its proxies are weakened. Although the current Israeli attack has also riled up deep-seated patriotism among Iranians, the regime remains deeply unpopular at home. Tehran may yet attempt a Hail Mary to slay the Goliath that is the US — but the odds are stacked against it. Its next move will no doubt shape the future of Iran. * This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.
