
Iran says no nuclear talks if US insists it stop enrichment
Washington and Tehran had been engaged in several rounds of negotiations seeking to strike a deal on the Islamic Republic's nuclear program, but Israel derailed the talks when it launched a wave of surprise strikes on its regional nemesis, touching off 12 days of war.
Since the end of the hostilities, both Iran and the US have signalled willingness to return to the table, though Tehran has said it will not renounce its right to the peaceful use of nuclear power.
"If the negotiations must be conditioned on stopping enrichment, such negotiations will not take place," Ali Velayati, an adviser to supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, was quoted as saying by the state news agency IRNA.
The remarks came after Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baqaei said Iran had not set a date for any meeting with the US.
"For now, no specific date, time or location has been determined regarding this matter," Baqaei said of plans for a meeting between Iran's top diplomat Abbas Araghchi and US envoy Steve Witkoff.
Araghchi and Witkoff had previously failed to conclude a deal after five rounds of talks that began in April and were the highest-level contact between the two countries since Washington abandoned a landmark nuclear agreement in 2018.
The Omani-mediated negotiations were halted as Israel launched its surprise attack on Iranian nuclear and military facilities on June 13, with the US later joining its ally and carrying out limited strikes.
"We have been serious in diplomacy and the negotiation process, we entered with good faith, but as everyone witnessed, before the sixth round the Zionist regime, in coordination with the United States, committed military aggression against Iran," Baqaei said.
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said in a statement on Monday that Iran "supports diplomacy and constructive engagement."
"We continue to believe that the window for diplomacy remains open, and we will seriously pursue this peaceful path." Israel and Western nations accuse Iran of pursuing nuclear weapons, a charge Tehran has consistently denied.
While it is the only non-nuclear weapons power to enrich uranium to 60-percent purity -- close to the level needed for a warhead -- the UN's atomic energy watchdog has said it had no indication Iran was working to weaponise its stockpiles.
Israel's offensive, which it said was aimed at thwarting a nuclear threat from the Islamic republic, killed nuclear scientists and top-ranking military officers, but also hit residential areas.
The US launched its own set of strikes on June 22, hitting Iran's uranium enrichment facility at Fordo in Qom province south of Tehran, as well as nuclear sites in Isfahan and Natanz.
Iran responded with missile and drone attacks targeting Israeli cities, and attacked a US base in Qatar in retaliation for Washington's strikes.
The extent of the damage to the Islamic republic's nuclear program remains unknown, and Baqaei said it was "still under investigation."
Pezeshkian in his latest statement warned of an "even more crushing retaliation" to any "new aggression against Iranian territory."
Baqaei said on Monday that Iran remained in contact with Britain, France and Germany, the three European parties to the 2015 nuclear deal that the US later withdrew from.
The Europeans have threatened to trigger the deal's "snapback" mechanism, which allows the reimposition of UN sanctions in the event of non-compliance.
Baqaei said Tehran was "in continuous contact with these three countries," but added that he "cannot provide an exact date" for the next meeting with them.
There was "no legal, moral or political basis" for reimposing sanctions, according to Baqaei, as Iran was still committed to the 2015 agreement.
He added that such a move would be met with an "appropriate and proportionate" response, following Iranian threats to quit the global nuclear non-proliferation treaty.
After the US pulled out of the 2015 deal with Iran during Donald Trump's first term as president, Tehran began rolling back its commitments to the agreement, which restricted its atomic activities in return for sanctions relief.
"The Islamic Republic of Iran still considers itself a member of the JCPOA," Baqaei said, referring to the 2015 deal.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Korea Herald
14 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Trump says Ukraine should not target Moscow
WASHINGTON (AFP) -- US President Donald Trump said Tuesday that Ukraine should not target Moscow, after the Kremlin charged that a new US plan to supply weapons to Kyiv along with sanctions threats against Russia would delay peace efforts. Trump on Monday gave Russia 50 days to strike a peace deal with Ukraine, voicing exasperation with Moscow, and announcing that NATO members would supply Kyiv with new military aid. In what would be an even more extraordinary shift, the Financial Times reported that Trump spoke to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy about providing US missiles to hit Moscow. But asked by reporters at the White House if Zelenskyy should look at striking the Russian capital, Trump replied, "No, he shouldn't target Moscow." Trump had taken office vowing to end the conflict swiftly and to stop the flow of billions of dollars of US weapons to Ukraine. The Republican put heavy pressure on Zelenskyy and initially touted his relationship with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Under pressure from Trump, Moscow and Kyiv opened talks on the conflict, which has ground on for more than three years, but the only concrete result has been prisoner exchanges. Russia has rejected calls for a ceasefire and launched a record number of drones and missiles at Ukraine in recent months. Moscow said it needed more time to respond fully to Trump's Monday announcement, but suggested it was not conducive to diplomacy. "It seems that such a decision made in Washington and in NATO countries and directly in Brussels will be perceived by Kyiv not as a signal for peace but for the continuation of the war," Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov told reporters. "President Trump's statement is very serious. We certainly need time to analyze what was said in Washington," he told reporters in Moscow's first reaction to the comments. Trump warned that if no deal was concluded, he would slap severe tariffs on Russia's remaining trade partners in a bid to impede Moscow's ability to finance its military offensive. Pumped up by huge state spending on soldiers and weapons, as well as by redirecting vital energy exports to the likes of China and India, Russia's economy has so far defied US and EU attempts to push it into a deep recession through sanctions. Most European allies have cheered the return of a hard US line, although Slovakia, led by Moscow-friendly populist Robert Fico, has resisted new EU sanctions on Russia. But EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas also called for the United States to help fund the new weapons. "We welcome President Trump's announcement to send more weapons to Ukraine, although we would like to see US share the burden," Kallas said after a meeting of EU foreign ministers in Brussels. "If you promise to give the weapons, but say that it's somebody else who is going to pay for it, it is not really given by you." Trump has been pushing allies to step up defense spending -- and to buy from US manufacturers -- and has long said the US shoulders too much of NATO's burden. Denmark, the Netherlands and Sweden -- which joined NATO after Russia sent troops into Ukraine in 2022 -- all said they wanted to participate in Trump's plan. Sweden's Defense Minister Pal Jonson in a statement to Agence France-Presse said his country "would contribute" and said Ukraine was in "great need of more air defense," given Russia's "constant bombings and attacks." Tens of thousands have been killed since Russia launched its offensive, with millions forced to flee their homes in eastern and southern Ukraine, which has been decimated by aerial attacks and ground assaults. In Moscow, residents dismissed Trump's statement as little more than politics. "It's a game of chess," Svetlana, an aviation engineer said. Trump "gave 50 days, and then there will be more. ... We are waiting for the next move of our president," the 47-year-old said. Ukrainian soldiers fighting in the east were hopeful but cautious about Trump's position. "I don't believe him. There have been too many promises that haven't been kept," said one soldier with the call sign "Shah." Others were worried it might be too little, too late. "Of course it's good, but at the same time, time has been lost. Those Patriots could have been sent sooner and could have helped a lot," another fighter called "Master" told AFP. Ruslan, a 29-year-old soldier, said, "If there is even the slightest chance to improve the situation for us and worsen it for them, then that's already positive."


Korea Herald
15 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Trump unveils investments to power AI boom
PITTSBURGH (AFP) — US President Donald Trump went to Pennsylvania on Tuesday to announce $92 billion in energy and infrastructure deals intended to meet big tech's soaring demand for electricity to fuel the AI boom. Trump made the announcement at the inaugural Pennsylvania Energy and Innovation Summit at Carnegie Mellon University, with much of the talk about beating China in the global AI race. "Today's commitments are ensuring that the future is going to be designed, built and made right here in Pennsylvania and right here in Pittsburgh, and I have to say, right here in the United States of America," Trump said at the event. The tech world has fully embraced generative AI as the next wave of technology, but fears are growing that its massive electricity needs cannot be met by current infrastructure, particularly in the United States. Generative AI requires enormous computing power, mainly to run the energy-hungry processors from Nvidia, the California-based company that has become the world's most valuable company by market capitalization. Officials expect that by 2028, tech companies will need as much as five gigawatts of power for AI -- enough electricity to power roughly five million homes. Top executives from Palantir, Anthropic, Exxon and Chevron attended the event. The funding will cover new data centers, power generation, grid infrastructure, AI training, and apprenticeship programs. Among investments, Google committed $25 billion to build AI-ready data centers in Pennsylvania and surrounding regions. "We support President Trump's clear and urgent direction that our nation invest in AI ... so that America can continue to lead in AI," said Ruth Porat, Google's president and chief investment officer. The search engine giant also announced a partnership with Brookfield Asset Management to modernize two hydropower facilities in Pennsylvania, representing 670 MW of capacity on the regional grid. Investment group Blackstone pledged more than $25 billion to fund new data centers and energy infrastructure. US Senator David McCormick, from Pennsylvania, said the investments "are of enormous consequence to Pennsylvania, but they are also crucial to the future of the nation." His comments reflect the growing sentiment in Washington that the United States must not lose ground to China in the race to develop AI. "We are way ahead of China and the plants are starting up, the construction is starting up," Trump said. The US president launched the "Stargate" project in January, aimed at investing up to $500 billion in US AI infrastructure -- primarily in response to growing competition with China. Japanese tech investor SoftBank, ChatGPT-maker OpenAI, and Oracle are investing $100 billion in the initial phase. Trump has also reversed many policies adopted by the previous Biden administration that imposed checks on developing powerful AI algorithms and limits on exports of advanced technology to certain allied countries. He is expected to outline his own blueprint for AI advancement later this month.
![[Hal Brands] A new chapter in US foreign policy](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwimg.heraldcorp.com%2Fnews%2Fcms%2F2025%2F07%2F15%2Fnews-p.v1.20250715.970144cfcc5b4de9b23bdcce80cf1af3_T1.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
![[Hal Brands] A new chapter in US foreign policy](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fall-logos-bucket.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fkoreaherald.com.png&w=48&q=75)
Korea Herald
20 hours ago
- Korea Herald
[Hal Brands] A new chapter in US foreign policy
Nearly six months into Donald Trump's presidency, a Trump Doctrine is coming into view. Contrary to the fears of his critics, and the hopes of some admirers, Trump is no isolationist. And contrary to those who claim Trump is simply a marvel of ac hoc-ery and inconsistency, there is a distinctive pattern to the policies he has pursued. This Trump Doctrine emphasizes using American power aggressively — more aggressively than Trump's immediate predecessors — to reshape key relationships and accrue US advantage in a rivalrous world. The isolationist label has long followed Trump, but it's never accurately described an idiosyncratic man. Yes, Trump disdains core elements of US globalism, from the international trade system America established to its promotion of democratic values and its defense commitments around the world. Yet Trump has also argued that America should assert itself more forcefully in a cutthroat world. And today, as Trump pursues a capacious view of presidential power at home, he is offering an equally ambitious conception of American power abroad. Trump rails against long, costly nation-building efforts. But he has nonetheless waged two short, sharp Middle Eastern conflicts: one to deter Yemen's Houthis from attacking US forces and Red Sea shipping, the other to roll back the Iranian nuclear program. Several US presidents pledged to use force to keep Tehran from crossing the nuclear threshold; Trump really did it. Meanwhile, Trump started trade wars against dozens of countries, in hopes of reshaping the international economy. He deployed diplomatic leverage, and explicit threats of abandonment, to remake the transatlantic bargain by getting European allies to spend much more on defense. Trump also wielded America's innovation power — its role in designing high-end semiconductors — to bring Saudi Arabia and the UAE into Washington's tech bloc and make them partners in his push for 'AI dominance.' Closer to home, Trump used veiled threats to pry Panama out of China's Belt and Road Initiative. He has demanded territorial concessions from Panama, Denmark and Canada. At the same time, Trump touts his Golden Dome missile shield, meant to protect the homeland and give America greater freedom of action against its foes. This isn't standard-issue, post-1945 American internationalism: It's hard to imagine prior presidents telling allies to yield their land. But neither is it a retreat into Fortress America. And by applying American power in such energetic, omnidirectional fashion, Trump has revealed much about the true state of world affairs. Policy journals brim with articles about American decline and the advent of multipolarity. But Trump, in his inimitable way, has reminded so many countries where power really lies. For example: The strike on Iran demonstrated America's unique global military reach and its ability, together with Israel, to reshape the Middle East while relegating Russia and China — nominally Iran's allies — to the sidelines. Trump's key insight is that the world's sole superpower has more muscle than commonly understood. Yet the Trump Doctrine nonetheless suffers from three big problems. First, its exercise of power is weakened by its dearth of strategy. Trump's trade war got off to a farcical start because he failed to consider how sky-high tariffs might wreck the US economy — a real-time discovery that forced a rapid, humiliating climb-down. A president who privileges the art of the deal over intellectual consistency sometimes pursues contradictory policies: Trump's tariffs against Indo-Pacific allies erode their prosperity and make it harder for them to spend more on defense. Second, a president who sometimes struggles to distinguish friends from enemies sometimes fails to point US power in the right direction. Trump delights in taking aim at US allies. He has been more reluctant to confront Russia, even as Vladimir Putin makes a mockery of Trump's desire for peace in Ukraine — and even though Putin's war economy is increasingly vulnerable to the commercial and financial coercion that Trump so often threatens to employ. Third, the best presidents build US power for the future, but Trump risks depleting it instead. Maybe the One Big Beautiful Bill will juice the economy — or maybe it will lock in structural deficits that constrain defense spending and growth. Slashing foreign aid saves little money but squanders US global influence; the war on universities threatens the research ecosystem that underpins America's economic and military might. Moreover, a policy of tough love toward allies could turn into mutually destructive hostility, and a superpower that regularly coerces its friends could wreck the soft power that lubricates key relationships. Trump revels in using US power, but he doesn't quite understand where it comes from. That's the central irony, and fundamental weakness, of the doctrine guiding his administration today. Hal Brands Hal Brands is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist and the Henry Kissinger Distinguished Professor at Johns Hopkins University's School of Advanced International Studies. The views expressed here are the writer's own. — Ed.