Uzbek cleric goes on trial on charges of religious extremism, hatred against Israel
Alisher Tursunov, widely known as Mubashshir Ahmad, faces charges of inciting religious hatred, distribution of materials that threaten public order and illegal distribution of materials with religious content. In total, the charges carry a penalty of five-to-eight years in prison.
Tursunov, 51, ran a popular religious media project, Azon.uz, which had some 1.2 million subscribers on YouTube before he shut it down in 2023 under threat of legal punishment. He subsequently moved to Turkey, where he was arrested and extradited to Uzbekistan in May.
The charges stem from both his work on the Azon.uz project as well as posts the cleric made on social media, according to his lawyer. He has pleaded not guilty to the charges, local media reported.
In a post on his Telegram channel in April, Tursunov spoke out in favour of a fatwa issued by the International Union of Muslim Scholars, a Qatar-based group, advocating for jihad against Israel over "the bloodshed in Gaza."
"I would ask our government to listen to these calls," Tursunov said. "We are all Muslims, including leaders on top, and we should follow the fatwa issued to Muslims."
Uzbekistan, a landlocked, majority Muslim country in Central Asia home to some 38 million people, has had diplomatic relations with Israel since soon after the fall of the Soviet Union.
Islam Karimov, who ruled Uzbekistan as president from 1991 until his death in 2016, was widely criticised for cracking down on Muslims under the pretext of fighting religious fundamentalism and terrorism.
Karimov's successor, Shavkat Mirziyoyev, initially relaxed strict religious restrictions, but in recent years has instituted curbs on religious freedom, according to Human Rights Watch.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
an hour ago
- Times
SAS soldier ‘who shot farmer' faces Australia's first war crime trial
A former member of the SAS is due to become the first Australian soldier to face a war crime trial, 13 years after allegedly shooting an unarmed farmer in an Afghan wheat field. Oliver Schulz, 43, is accused of murdering Dad Mohammad, a young father of two, in May 2012 in Dehjawze, a village in the Uruzgan province of southern Afghanistan. After his arrest by police in the Southern Highlands of New South Wales in March 2023, the case was bogged down in the local courts. On Wednesday Greg Grogin, a magistrate in Sydney, finally committed it to trial, having expressed frustration that it had taken so long to get to that stage. The landmark case is now set to begin in the supreme court in October and Schulz, who denies the charge, faces life in jail if found guilty. Schulz was already the first Australian soldier to be charged with a war crime. Despite the gravity of the alleged offence, he was granted bail because of the risk that he could be targeted by Taliban sympathisers while in jail. The catalyst for his arrest was the decision by the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) in 2020 to air graphic video of the alleged murder of Mohammad, who was shot three times while lying on his back. It was taken from the helmet camera of a dog handler who joined Schulz on the fateful patrol in March 2012. Mohammad is believed to have been 25 or 26. The video prompted a public outcry and a three-year criminal investigation after the prime minister at the time, Scott Morrison, described the video as shocking. Under the Commonwealth Criminal Code, a killing constitutes a war crime of murder if the victim is not a combatant or is out of action due to injury or damage. Prosecutors must prove that the perpetrator knew, or was reckless regarding, the status of the victim. Schulz completed multiple tours of Afghanistan and was commended for gallantry before being stood down by the ADF after the video was broadcast in 2020. ABC revealed that the military had investigated the killing months after the alleged incident, having received complaints from Afghan villagers, but cleared the soldier of wrongdoing. An extended version of the helmet camera video, which is likely to feature prominently in the trial, was played at the committal hearing in April and May, when former SAS colleagues who witnessed the alleged murder were questioned. The video shows Schulz aboard a Black Hawk helicopter before it lands, and the soldiers running about 50 metres across a wheat field. The purpose of the mission was to kill or capture a Taliban insurgent called Mullah Payend, codename Objective Young Akira, the court was told. The dog handler and Schulz can be seen moving towards an open field and coming across Mohammad, who had been trying to fight off the dog. Schulz points his gun at Mohammad as the dog is called off. He looks around and asks three times whether he should 'drop this c***' before firing three shots at Mohammad, who had a condition that stunted growth in one leg. The initial ADF investigation, which cleared Schulz, painted a different picture. A military report claimed Mohammad had been seen 'tactically manoeuvring' on the ground as Schulz's helicopter approached. Smoke and flares were dropped from the helicopter but soldiers were forced to pursue him on foot as he could not be engaged from the air. He was then killed after being ordered to stop, according to the report. The police investigation was taken over by the Office of the Special Investigator, the body set up to prove alleged war crimes after an inquiry led by Paul Brereton, an army reserve major general and New South Wales supreme court judge. The Brereton inquiry concluded November 2020, recommending that 23 incidents and 19 individuals be referred for further investigation. It recommended that any alleged war crime should be tried in civilian court rather than in a military tribunal. Until now, Schulz's case had been overshadowed by that of another former SAS trooper, Ben Roberts-Smith, Australia's most decorated living soldier. The 46-year-old corporal started a defamation case against Australian newspapers after they reported he had murdered four unarmed civilians in Afghanistan. The legal action backfired when a federal court judge ruled against him in June 2023. Roberts-Smith, who was awarded the Victoria Cross in 2011 for his service in Afghanistan, lost his appeal in May but had vowed to fight on.
BBC News
3 hours ago
- BBC News
Tony Ferns murder trial told victim held 'grudge' against suspect
A man held a "grudge" against one of the suspects accused of murdering him, a court has Ferns, 33, died after he was repeatedly stabbed in Thornliebank, near Glasgow, in April Platt, 56, Craig Colquhoun, 39, Robert Park, 69, and Joseph McCulloch, 50, deny the charges against them at the High Court in the first day of the trial, the victim's mother Phyllis Ferns told the court how her son held a "grudge" against one of the men accused of killing him - Robert Park, who was known as Rab. The court heard about a number of incidents between the pair before an apparent "truce" was called. Ms Ferns said her son believed Mr Park was responsible for the injuries her older son, Mark, had suffered when he was knocked down by a car in 2012. She said the incident changed his life mentally and physically. Mark, who was registered blind, later died in 2017. She told the court how her son thought Mr Park had "made the phone call" that brought the car into the street and knocked down his brother. Mr Park has denied witness agreed there was "bad blood" between the Ferns said the two men met at a bookmakers in 2017 and her son asked for a truce because she had been "worried". She claimed her son said Mr Park had told him: "You were getting murdered - I'll make the phone call and call them off." The court also heard evidence from David Mitchell, who said he was Mr Ferns' best told the court about an incident where he and Mr Ferns were attacked in Mitchell said they were in a van when two men came at them with swords and witness claimed Mr Ferns believed one of the men was Mr Park and they were later told the other man was Joseph McCulloch, but this was not Park and Mr McCulloch deny attacking the two men. 'Put in the ground' He also told police about a separate occasion he had heard about between Mr Ferns and Mr Park. Mr Mitchell said: "He (Tony) jumped out of his car and had a few words with Rab and he ended up punching Rab a few times."He said Rab made some threats and told Tony 'he was getting put in the ground'."He said Mr Ferns was worried about the situation and had mentioned it a witness said that on the day before Mr Ferns died, he told Mr Mitchell that a car driven by Mr McCulloch went past the house he lived in with his mother. When asked about the speed, he said the car was "crawling".Mr Park's lawyer Tony Graham said it was apparent Mr Ferns blamed Mr Park for what happened to his brother, but this was "utterly irrational".Mr Mitchell replied: "Who am I to say? I do not know the ins and outs."The advocate stated Mr Ferns was "absolutely fixated" on Mr Park and spoke about him every the witness denied was claimed Mr Park had to move house due to the trial, before judge Lord Fairley, continues.
BBC News
4 hours ago
- BBC News
German controversy surrounds jail term for transgender far-right extremist
A controversy has broken out in Germany about whether a trans right-wing extremist should serve a prison sentence in a women's or a men's July 2023, Marla-Svenja Liebich was sentenced by the Halle District Court in Saxon-Anhalt to a total of one year and six months in prison without parole for extreme right incitement to hatred, defamation, and insult. Liebich appealed against her sentence and the time she was known as Sven Liebich. German media reports say Liebich used to be a member of a neo-Nazi group called Blood and Honour. At the end of 2024, Liebich had her gender entry in official records changed from male to female. She also changed her first name. The basis for this was Germany's Self-Determination Act, which had just come into force and strengthened the rights of transgender people. The Act allows people to change their gender marker and first name through a simple declaration at a registry office, instead of a judicial media have questioned whether Liebich's change was serious."Whether the change is serious is doubtful," wrote Der Spiegel. "Liebich has been known for years for her right-wing extremist views and has also made queerphobic statements in the past."Liebich has taken legal action against media outlets for what she considers to be false representations of her gender identity.A complaint against Spiegel to the Press Council was unanimously rejected by the Council as unfounded. Spiegel said the letter said it was likely that Liebich "made the change of civil status in an abusive manner in order to provoke and embarrass the state".Liebich will shortly begin her prison Chief Public Prosecutor in Halle, Dennis Cernota told German public broadcaster MDR in Saxony-Anhalt that Liebich would serve her prison sentence at the Chemnitz women's confirmed this in a post on X. "I will begin my prison sentence as scheduled," she said. "On August 29, 2025, at 10pm, I will arrive at the Chemnitz correctional facility with my suitcases."A decision on where to place Liebich will then be made at the start of incarceration. The chief public prosecutor said the prison administration would decide whether Liebich could pose a threat to security and order, which could lead to her transfer to another German media report that Liebich has recently lost another case, against journalist Julian Reichelt at Berlin Regional editor-in-chief of Nius, posted on X in July: "Anyone who follows the reporting on neo-Nazi Sven Liebich can only come to one conclusion: The traffic-light coalition government has managed, by law, to force almost the entire German media landscape to tell untruths and make grotesquely false claims. Sven Liebich is not a woman."Die Welt said the court's Second Civil Chamber decided to reject Liebich's application for a preliminary injunction, saying it was unfounded.
