Military aids evacuations as Canada wildfires expand eastward
An airlift of Sandy Lake First Nation members started over the weekend as a 156,346-hectare blaze overwhelmed firefighting efforts and brushed up against the remote Indigenous community.
Wildfires in recent weeks have swept across densely wooded parts of the vast Prairies forcing more than 30,000 people in Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba to flee their homes.
The latter two provinces have declared states of emergency.
The evacuation of Sandy Lake, an isolated community about 600 kilometers (370 miles) north of Thunder Bay with no road access, is the largest mobilization so far in Ontario.
Currently the fires are raging in the province's sparsely populated northwest corner and have so far not threatened the densely inhabited south, which includes Toronto and its suburbs -- home to some seven million people.
As of midday Monday, military Hercules aircraft had evacuated one third of the town's 3,000 residents, Sandy Lake First Nation Chief Delores Kakegamic told AFP by telephone.
It has been slow-going, she said, as these bulky but nimble aircraft were only able take off half-full with passengers because of the community's short airstrip.
- 'Rapidly deteriorated' conditions -
"We're prepared to mobilize every resource needed to keep Canadians safe," Prime Minister Mark Carney posted on X.
He announced the military deployment late Sunday after meeting with senior officials in Ottawa.
The military said in an email to AFP, "wildfire conditions in northern Ontario have rapidly deteriorated."
"Over the last 24 hours, (the Sandy Lake) wildfire has advanced from 40 kilometres to just two kilometres from the community, placing the population at immediate risk," it added.
On Saturday, 19 construction workers took refuge for several hours in a shipping container in the community as the skies turned orange and the air filled with smoke.
"A helicopter tried to go pick them up but the smoke was so bad they couldn't land," Kakegamic said.
Moments before the shipping container itself caught on fire, they made a run for it. "It was a narrow escape," Kakegamic said. "They've been traumatized, for sure."
There were 227 active wildfires across Canada as of Sunday, including about 20 in Ontario. Some 3.1 million hectares of forests have been scorched this year and hundreds of buildings destroyed in several small towns.
Images shared by wildfire agencies showed blackened and devastated landscapes left behind fast-moving walls of fire and big plumes of smoke.
The fires have downgraded air quality in parts of Canada and the United States. Smoke, which can be hazardous to health, has also reached as far away as Europe.
Climate change has increased the impact of extreme weather events in Canada, which is still recovering from the summer of 2023 when 15 million hectares of forests burned.
Most of the ongoing fires this year have been triggered by human activity -- often accidental -- such as poorly extinguished campfires or the passing of vehicles in extremely dry areas.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
17 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
The one thing America could learn from us
A few weeks ago I watched as protesters braved the rain to cross the Sydney Harbour Bridge in a March for Humanity, calling for aid to Gaza. Among the Palestinian flags, one image stood out: the Indigenous flag, symbolising a shared history of dispossession. This week Prime Minister Anthony Albanese announced that Australia will next month recognise a Palestinian state at the UN. These developments remind us that identity cannot be separated from politics. At a time when democracies elsewhere are fracturing under the weight of polarisation, Australia's institutional resilience should embolden us to embrace our differences more openly in political discourse – not frighten us. As an Australian studying in the US during both of Trump's presidential victories I saw first hand how identities can be politicised to fracture a society. After the October 7 Hamas attacks I witnessed, as a graduate student, how Harvard students retreated into ideological silos, avoiding dialogue with those whose identities they perceived to be at odds with their own. Australia feels different – partly because of how our political system is structured. Identity weighs less heavily on our social conscience, but perhaps that's why it's so often ignored. Identity politics refers to the idea that our race, gender, religion or class shapes our political views. Over time it has often been framed as divisive. Peter Dutton, after the 2023 Voice referendum defeat, said the result was a rejection of 'the madness of identity politics'. But his own loss in the 2025 election might suggest otherwise. A wave of post-election commentary emphasised the Liberal Party's need to better reflect 'modern Australia', with female representation highlighted as one of the most glaring absences in the party room. Loading Australia's electoral system structurally limits the worst elements of polarisation caused by identity politics. Unlike the US, where turnout hovers around 60 per cent, Australia's compulsory voting system ensures broad participation and fosters a more centrist politics. Our Westminster system means Australian voters elect a party to govern, not a singular leader. Our ballots are cast for local MPs, and the party with the majority elects our prime minister. In contrast, the US system centres on the direct election of a president, making national politics more personalised by design. Preferential voting also encourages engagement with more than one party and rewards coalition-building over extremism. This institutional design helps insulate us from the deep political tribalism seen in the US and gives us the space to explore identity in a less adversarial way. A few months ago, during the 2025 Australian federal election, the main topics on the campaign trail were the cost of living, Medicare, affordable housing and Australia's future energy mix – a far cry from the US presidential election, which focused on a 'war on woke' and employed rhetoric that divided American voters along lines of race, gender and sexuality. This contrast is driven in part by the need of American candidates to use emotionally charged narratives to boost voter turnout.
The Age
17 hours ago
- The Age
The one thing America could learn from us
A few weeks ago I watched as protesters braved the rain to cross the Sydney Harbour Bridge in a March for Humanity, calling for aid to Gaza. Among the Palestinian flags, one image stood out: the Indigenous flag, symbolising a shared history of dispossession. This week Prime Minister Anthony Albanese announced that Australia will next month recognise a Palestinian state at the UN. These developments remind us that identity cannot be separated from politics. At a time when democracies elsewhere are fracturing under the weight of polarisation, Australia's institutional resilience should embolden us to embrace our differences more openly in political discourse – not frighten us. As an Australian studying in the US during both of Trump's presidential victories I saw first hand how identities can be politicised to fracture a society. After the October 7 Hamas attacks I witnessed, as a graduate student, how Harvard students retreated into ideological silos, avoiding dialogue with those whose identities they perceived to be at odds with their own. Australia feels different – partly because of how our political system is structured. Identity weighs less heavily on our social conscience, but perhaps that's why it's so often ignored. Identity politics refers to the idea that our race, gender, religion or class shapes our political views. Over time it has often been framed as divisive. Peter Dutton, after the 2023 Voice referendum defeat, said the result was a rejection of 'the madness of identity politics'. But his own loss in the 2025 election might suggest otherwise. A wave of post-election commentary emphasised the Liberal Party's need to better reflect 'modern Australia', with female representation highlighted as one of the most glaring absences in the party room. Loading Australia's electoral system structurally limits the worst elements of polarisation caused by identity politics. Unlike the US, where turnout hovers around 60 per cent, Australia's compulsory voting system ensures broad participation and fosters a more centrist politics. Our Westminster system means Australian voters elect a party to govern, not a singular leader. Our ballots are cast for local MPs, and the party with the majority elects our prime minister. In contrast, the US system centres on the direct election of a president, making national politics more personalised by design. Preferential voting also encourages engagement with more than one party and rewards coalition-building over extremism. This institutional design helps insulate us from the deep political tribalism seen in the US and gives us the space to explore identity in a less adversarial way. A few months ago, during the 2025 Australian federal election, the main topics on the campaign trail were the cost of living, Medicare, affordable housing and Australia's future energy mix – a far cry from the US presidential election, which focused on a 'war on woke' and employed rhetoric that divided American voters along lines of race, gender and sexuality. This contrast is driven in part by the need of American candidates to use emotionally charged narratives to boost voter turnout.
Sky News AU
2 days ago
- Sky News AU
‘Not surprising': Millions of dollars unreported by Indigenous corporations called out by Warren Mundine
Indigenous leader Warren Mundine has called out the around 1,000 Indigenous corporations failing proper reporting of their activities, claiming auditing "has to change today". Indigenous leader Warren Mundine has claimed Indigenous corporations auditing "has to change today", with around 1,000 of the corporations with a collective turnover of millions of dollars coming up short in reporting their activities. The Herald Sun reported on Thursday that a third of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander corporations had not filed reports they are required to lodge, based off of data from the Independent Office of the Registrar of Indigenous Corporations (ORIC). The figures show that 1,254 reports had failed to be filed in 2023-24 financial year. There are more than 3,000 registered Indigenous corporations in Australia. Of those corporations yet to lodge reports, 26 are deemed as 'large' as they have an annual turnover of over $5 million, and 10 large corporations also failed to report their operations for previous financial year. In the wake of the revelations, Mr Mundine told the one in three corporations failing to report figures "did not surprise" him, and he reiterated his support for audits and government reform. "This has been a problem for a long time. Plus, where have the millions/billions of dollars gone to? Why haven't we met the majority of Closing the Gap targets?" Mr Mundine said. "I have advocated for years for audits and governance reform. This has to change today. Because the losers are the Indigenous people who so need these services functioning and delivering." One Nation leader Pauline Hanson is similarly urging for a "comprehensive" audit of what she has labelled a 'corrupt, nepotistic aboriginal industry'. 'Some of these organisations have eight or nine-figure budgets and millions of dollars' worth of assets, with CEOs earning wages well over $250,000,' Ms Hanson said in a statement on Thursday. 'One Nation renews our call for a comprehensive audit of this corrupt, nepotistic aboriginal industry that is preying on Australian taxpayers, denying meaningful assistance to indigenous Australians in genuine need, and which has failed for decades to make any meaningful progress in closing the gaps. 'The Australian people have every right to know exactly how every cent of their money is being spent, but the people running this gravy train clearly do not want to be held accountable. There will never be meaningful progress in closing the gaps until those charged with closing them are held accountable.' The Queensland Senator also took aim at Indigenous Australians minister Malarndirri McCarthy - who criticised One Nation last month following the party's protest against an Acknowledgment of Country in the upper house. "(Ms McCarthy) appears more interested in enforcing welcomes to country than enforcing the law," Ms Hanson said. According to the Herald Sun, Coalition Indigenous Affairs spokeswoman Kerrynne Liddle has blasted the failings of reports to be lodged as 'unacceptable'. 'Where organisations receive taxpayer money to deliver these critical services, they must meet all regulatory, governance and legislative standards,' Ms Liddle said. 'Where they do not, it is fair to question whether they are delivering services as intended.' The reports Indigenous corporations are required to lodge include a General Report, Financial Report, Auditor's Report and Directors' Report. Indigenous corporations can be either for profit or not-for-profit, and can be registered as a charity if they meet criteria, according to the Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission (ACNC) website. The corporations' income can come from a variety of sources including government grants, land use agreements like mining royalties or compensation through Native Title and businesses activities like retail or tourism operations.
